Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

) simulation sickness –through three symptoms nausea, oculomotor disturbance, and disorientation, 2) VR SystemsUsability – through comfort and ease of use, and 3) User Experience – through involvement,immersion, visual fidelity, interface quality, and sound. Simulation sickness analysis showed thatthe current VR teaching modules need some adjustments. The analysis of the systems usabilityand user experience of the module were found to be acceptable. In phase III of the research, wewill improve the VR module to make a full self-paced tutorial where the instructor’s role will bemore facilitator than an instructor.References[1] B. Dalgarno, A. G. Bishop, W. Adlong, & D. R. Bedgood, (2009). “Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

-to-face section offered in the same semester. For the Fall 2015 pilot implementation, Table 1 showsa comparison of the online section and the face-to-face section of the Engineering Graphicscourse. The online section was taught by the engineering instructor (Professor A) who developedthe online course. The face-to-face course was taught by an adjunct instructor (Professor B) whowas teaching the graphics class for the first time. The two instructors used the same PowerPointlectures to deliver content to students. For the online class, the PowerPoint slides were presentedin pre-recorded lecture videos, while the PowerPoint slides were presented by the instructorduring class time for the face-to-face section. The same laboratory exercises with

Conference Session

DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas P. James P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Board of Directors

Research in Higher Education 21.2 (1984): 150-58.Appendix A: Course Evaluation QuestionsPlease rate the questions from 1 to 5, 1 being the lowest, 5 being the highest:1. Rate the quality of your learning in this course.2. The laboratory assignments and course material reinforced one another.3. The workload for this course in relation to other courses of equal credit was4. Overall, how would you rate this course?5. Describe one or more strengths of this course.6. Describe one or more ways this course can be improved.7. The professor used teaching methods which helped me learn.8. The professor was well prepared for class.9. The professor was available for help outside the classroom.10. The professor seemed genuinely interested in teaching this