develop grade level appropriate lesson plans based ontheir experiences. The five-week program consisted of teachers conducting team-based research,weekly meetings with graduate student mentors, reviewing journal articles, attendingprofessional development meetings, and building scientific written and verbal communicationskills. The weekly themes were 1) Orientation, Literature Review and Introduction to Python, 2)Introduction to OpenCV and Basics of Computer Vision, 3) Introduction to Machine Learning,4) Implement the Monitoring, and 5) Analyzing Data, Developing Lessons and ResearchPresentations (see Table 2 for detailed program agenda).Table 2. PATHS-UP Virtual RET Program Monday Tuesday Wednesday
University of Minnesota. Her research explores issues of professional development for K-12 science teachers, with a focus on beginning teachers and implementation of integrated STEM learning environments. She has received over $30 million in federal and state grants and published over 80 peer-reviewed journal articles and book chapters. She is a former board member of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching and past president of the Association for Science Teacher Education.Dr. Christopher Barr, Rice University Rice University Office of Assessment and Evaluation of STEM Programs led by Dr. Barr is the Direc- tor of Assessment and Evaluation of STEM Programs at Rice University. He has been an evaluator and
student learning, three assessments have been implemented at the endof the project: (1) self-assessment, (2) peer-assessment, and (3) industrial review panelassessment. From the assessment results, the new teaching efforts have fulfilled the ABET’srequirements and been highly evaluated by both the students and the industrial reviewers.In the self-assessment, all the senior students are required to complete a self-assessment of theirability to attain the educational outcomes of the Chemical Engineering Program. A short answerwith a score would be given for each ABET student outcomes as below: a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and
students to write a summary of what has been covered in the lectureto asking them to collaboratively work on real-world problems and projects. The effectiveness of activelearning strategies compared to the traditional lecture approach, when implemented well, has beenempirically validated and documented in engineering education literature. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore engineering faculty’s use of active learning strategies in their teaching in aMidwestern university’s college of engineering context. Data sources included a survey about the facultyknowledge and use of active learning strategies and follow-up semi-structured interviews that aimed togather an in-depth understanding of their implementation of active learning
longevity of the project and the persistence andmotivation of participating students. In this paper, we use a reflexive lens to explore the evolutionarystages of the AREND project since 2014. We connect the project leader’s lived experience throughoutthis evolution to the theoretical underpinnings of co-curricular initiatives in higher education.Reflecting on the lessons learned during each stage, we provide an implementation framework forsimilar projects and offer long-term recurriculation guidelines for large cohorts.Keywords: Project/Problem based learning, Vertically Integrated Projects, Co-curricular,Professional skills, Experiential learning1. IntroductionThe Engineering School at University of Pretoria follows the Conceive, Design, Implement
(PjBL), engineering, and culturally relevant curriculum that fit the specific needs of the studentsthey serve.To ensure the alignment of the independent RET program's goals and the NSF's objectives, variousuniversity RET programs have utilized evaluation methods that capture short-term data such as theprogram's impact on the teacher or lesson plan implementation with diverse populations. This paperinvestigates the connection between our RET program and long-term female and minority studentachievement in the forms of high school graduation rates and undergraduate STEM major selectionrates using a state agency K-12 and higher education database. As a comparison, state agency datafrom students of nonRET teachers within the same schools and grade
Paper ID #34977Work in Progress: A Conceptual Design Project for Civil EngineeringFreshmen to Enhance Their Entrepreneurial MindsetDr. J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University Dr. Carroll is an Associate Professor and the Civil Engineering Program Coordinator in Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll is also the chair of the American Concrete Institute’s
values. This can be facilitated by the course unbundling optionscreated by online teaching/learning repositories, as various learning tracks can be designed.Universities can employ competency-based programs on a large scale (e.g., four courses inmachine learning, six courses in creative writing) for students who require the necessary skills.The hybrid model has the potential to make education affordable to a large group of students.Note, however, that teaching hybrid courses requires hardware/technology not found in allclassrooms and creates considerable burden and overhead for instructors.Path 3: Full Online ModelMany high school students directly go to work at minimum wage and never get the opportunityto attain a residential college as they
- tributed neuromorphic computing. Dr. Arafin’s work has been published in several top-tier peer-reviewed journals and conferences, such as IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration Systems (TVLSI), ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), and Asia and South Pacific De- sign Automation Conference (ASP-DAC). He won the IEEE Asian Hardware Oriented Security and Trust Symposium (AsianHOST) best paper award in 2018. He was a recipient of the prestigious A. James Clerk School of Engineering fellowship (2012).Prof. Kevin Kornegay, Morgan State University Kevin T. Kornegay received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY, in 1985 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
chemical and biofluids. Moreover, fluidic handling is the bottleneck for productionthrough-put in large scale DNA sequencing and IVD systems. The research question: “Is it possible toprovide a valuable learning experience through a faculty-initiated, authentic-industry productdevelopment effort in an undergraduate research program in a community college?” Two-yearcommunity colleges have very limited co-op / internship opportunities compared to 4-year schools. Figure 1. Example of an 8-channel dispenser using high precision nozzlesSuccess of any authentic industry experience requires careful planning before and during execution of thecycle and perceived authenticity. We chose judiciously narrowing the traditional development cycle
related IT tasks, (ii) operational aspects, (iii) overall user reception of this approachand also about (iv) the cost vs value considerations of this approach.With minor operational modifications, this approach can be applied as a generic model for manyengineering courses that have compute-intensive lab components. It’s a modular cloud-basedsolution that can be rapidly deployed to address specific course needs. We begin with a briefdescription of the Digital VLSI course, as a running example.Running Example – Digital VLSI CourseThe Digital VLSI course constitutes an important component in upper division electrical andcomputer engineering curriculum in VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) and System-On-Chip(SoC) design. In addition to in-class
(albeit with considerable coordination of topics, as will bediscussed in section 6). For the second half of the semester, lectures transitioned into a series ofintegrated engineering case studies that engaged material from both disciplines as well as criticaltools from reflection. Lab activities were similarly organized with the first half-semesterhands-on applications of basic engineering principles and the second half an integrated,seven-week human-centered design project focused on issues of access and accessibility on theBC campus. Reflection utilized BC’s innovative small group Purposeful Ongoing Discussion(POD) model of near-peer mentors guiding students through various reflective practices tograpple with the ethical and moral dimensions of
one sability to contribute to the level of their talent is an ethical and professional responsibility to thefield.This paper shares some early results from our broader NSF-funded project, titled Identif ingMarginalization and Allying Tendencies to Transform Engineering Relationships, or I-MATTER. The project s research questions are: 1. What does marginalization look like within engineering classrooms where teamwork is a primary feature? 2. How is marginalization legible (or not) to instructors at the classroom level? 3. What are the different ways that instructors respond to incidents of peer-to-peer marginalization? 4. How might the lessons of this work be implemented to systematically alert instructors when
Programs in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of Research of the Academy for Global Engineering at Virginia Tech, and is affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering educa- tion can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to be data-driven by leveraging large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Tremayne O’Brian Waller
:00am EST slot for formalprogram engagement (see Table below for the schedule). As a large segment of the incominggraduate student cohort was from Asia, that slot translated into 10:00pm - 12:00midnight inBeijing. Virtual Happy Hours were scheduled each day @ 9:00pm EST / 10:00am GMT+8 and co-hosted by volunteer student ambassadors. The introductory meeting was a large-scale Zoom welcome, attended by faculty, staff,peers, and students from all CEAS departments, and focused on warm welcomes, wide smiles, abit of silliness, and as much excitement as could be transmitted in a virtual space. Immediatelyfollowing was exclusive peer-to-peer time, where new students and student ambassadors couldnetwork in multiple Zoom breakouts, curated with
Involving RET’sPrior to the inception of the NSF RET program, the first large scale evaluation of teacherresearch experience programs was initiated as The SWEPT Study [11]. Findings from this studyof eight SWEPT sites showed that participating teachers experienced a gain in science contentknowledge, positive attitudes towards science and interest in engaging in inquiry-basedinstructional practices. Following the SWEPT study, other significant evaluations indicated thatteachers engaged in literature searches and reading about concepts related to the research in theirlaboratory, performed a variety of procedures, experienced and overcame frustration, appliedlogic and creative insight to analyzing their data, presented their research to peers
-College and Pre-Professional Supports:CWIT’s Bookend Approach to Inclusive Excellence in Undergraduate Tech Education Presented by: Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, Ph.D. Cindy Greenwood, M.Ed. Erica D’Eramo, M.A. Kate O’Keefe, M.S.Ed. 2 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Pre-College Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 3. Pre-Professional Programs a. Impact b. Lessons Learned 4. Future Directions 5. Adapting the Model 6. Where to Start 7. Q&AThe Center for Women in Technology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore Countyhas a 21 year record of working to enable success
Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 607–624, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.[29] K. Buch, Y. Huet, A. Rorrer, and L. Roberson, “Removing the Barriers to Full Professor: A Mentoring Program for Associate Professors,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.618081.[30] C. Grant, J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith, “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits For Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty,” in 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Jun. 2010, p. 15.129.1-15.129.20, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https
widespread, large-scale change to improve equity and supportcultures of inclusion in engineering. This is a case study of a 5-year organizational change effortwithin a Hispanic Serving Institution. The computer science department emphasized the use ofcontinuous improvement as a strategy for engaging faculty in change processes and departmentalpolicy. We offer the theoretical framing of Kezar’s model for developing student supportstructures using four mechanisms for change, and provide recommendations based on theexperience of one University of Texas at El Paso.Theoretical FrameworkDrawing from the current state of the research on higher education organizational change inundergraduate STEM reform efforts, an underlying premise of the theory of change
of bias,increase a sense of agency, and ultimately empower students.1. IntroductionGiven clear evidence of disparities in educational attainment, much importance has been placedon increasing use of inclusive teaching to help close this so-called achievement gap [1]–[4]. Inscience, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines, deliberate inclusive practicemay reduce the “leaving” phenomenon where those underrepresented amongst STEM majorssuch as women and minoritized racial groups would otherwise fail to complete their STEMdegree program [5]–[7]. For example, active learning has been shown to improve learning gainsand reduce failure rates especially among underrepresented minority (URM) students [2].Similarly, current recommendations