Coordinator, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK 14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference: University of Tennessee in Knoxville, Tennessee Jul 30 WIP: Engineering Education after ChatGPTBackgroundIt is fair to say that artificial intelligence (AI) only became a reality to many people in the springof 2023, when ChatGPT burst into the news. Previously, AI had been a niche interest amongcomputer scientists, data scientists, and the like, or it had been a recurring (usually hostile)feature of science fiction. Suddenly, ChatGPT was able to make pertinent responses to questionsand even to write computer programs. ChatGPT was soon passing medical and bar exams
2023 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings Exploring the Potential Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Engineering Education Sinan Onal Department of Industrial Engineering Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville sonal@siue.eduAbstractThis paper examines the potential benefits and risks of using ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot developedby OpenAI, in engineering education by generating sample questions and answers and solving samplemathematical problems related to course subjects in the industrial engineering curriculum. The
Paper ID #40646Full Paper: Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT on a First-Year EngineeringDesign CourseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor, Principal Lecturer, and Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland.Catherine Marie Hamel, University of Maryland, College Park Catherine ”Cara” Hamel is a Keystone Instructor and Senior Lecturer with the Keystone Program at the University of Maryland’s Clark School of Engineering.Mr. Joshua Cocker, University of Maryland - Keystone Program Joshua Cocker is a lecturer with the Keystone Program at the
Boulder. Scott’s research relates to accessible and inexpensive engineering equipment for laboratory education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Digital DesignAbstractAccessible artificial intelligence platforms, especially ChatGPT, are now available to solveengineering questions. Here we evaluate this tool for finite state machine construction in Python.With well-guided queries, ChatGPT built sensible code that implements a microwave ovencontroller for hardware integration. However, to leverage ChatGPT user knowledge of theprogramming task was necessary, which included schematics, input, and output delineation, anddebug expertise.Special Note
, chaired nine conferences including 2009 ASEE/PSW and 2015 ASEE/PSW and three USPatents. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student Use of Artificial Intelligence to Write Technical Engineering Papers – Cheating or a Tool to Augment LearningAbstractConsiderable concern has emerged over the potential use of AI tools by students for completingassignments in their classes. Reactions in academia have been mixed, with some describing suchuse of AI tools as “cheating” while others compare it to the use of calculators and see it as theimpetus for enabling deeper learning by students. To analyze some of these issues, the recentlyreleased AI tool ChatGPT was used to respond to actual Discussion
an AI-powered tool known as ChatGPT (short for Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer) chatbot.Basically, a chatbot is a computer program that simulates and processes human conversation (eitherwritten or spoken), allowing humans to interact with digital devices as if they were communicating with areal person. Even though the launch of ChatGPT was not felt by the common public, the technical circleknew about its inauguration, and the media space was flooded with shocked reactions.Anyone can open the ChatGPT program and type in the word or phrase about something he/she wants toknow, then the ChatGPT is going to spit out a short or long essay or summary of what is being asked.Suppose a student is asked to submit a report or an essay on a
generative artificialintelligence systems more widely available. One such system is ChatGPT, created by OpenAI,which has the ability to handle a variety of tasks, including answering complex questions,analyzing data, and engaging in contextual conversation. This paper assesses the impact ofChatGPT on programming assignments by examining its strengths and limitations in solvingchallenging problems presented in the IEEEXtreme programming contest problem set, whichincludes problems that were not included in ChatGPT's training data. ChatGPT's performancevaries depending on the type of problem, performing well in identifying underlying concepts andgenerating basic solutions for easier to medium-level problems, but facing difficulties with edgecases and
theme of the third proposed question group is intended to examine student, faculty,and stakeholder views on ChatGPT and artificial intelligence text or image generators. ChatGPThas caused disruption already for educational practice. Faculty across the country haveconsidered the question of how they might restructure their courses to reduce ChatGPT’s impacton educational quality (Huang, 2023). Recently, Kung et al. (2022) examined the use ofChatGPT to take medical licensing exams – and ChatGPT did surprisingly well on the exams.Whether ChatGPT can be considered a paper author for scientific work has even become adebatable proposition (Stokel-Walker, 2023). If one carefully considers the reference list for theinstant paper, they will discover
brings undeniable benefits to the educational landscape, instructorsexpress significant concerns. They worry not only about the potential suppression of students'critical thinking skills but also about the risk that students might rush through the foundationalcoding concepts crucial for becoming effective professionals in the field.This literature review seeks to provide insight into the landscape of critical Thinking in thecontext of ChatGPT, highlighting the unique opportunities and challenges this partnershippresents in the context of computer science classes. This paper employs the SWOT analysisstrategy to deconstruct the various aspects of Chat GPT's interaction with computer students,with a particular focus on its impact on their critical
students learn better and fasterwhen paired with high-quality learning materials and instruction. But due to the array ofavailable specializations in industry categories, selecting the best fit for their interests is a bigchallenge for engineering students. This paper focuses on using AI to help students choose theirengineering program.Using ChatGPTChatGPT is a chatbot launched by OpenAI in November 2022. It is built on top of OpenAI'sGPT-3 family of large language models and is fine-tuned with both supervised andreinforcement learning techniques. We tried to use ChatGPT as a trained AI system to answerthis question, “How ChatGPT helps students to select their program.”ChatGPT answer was:“ChatGPT is a large language generation model developed by
., vertical versus lateral reading), but also toevaluate and incorporate sources written by non-subject-matter experts (e.g., how one mayutilize research journalism and news reporting versus scientific and technical publications).Natural language processing (NLP) models such as ChatGPT are also included in the sourceevaluation exercises, reflecting emerging concerns about how they will affect research andwriting.This paper argues that source evaluation is a skill that must be taught in all STEM classrooms;the stakes for society of producing STEM graduates with a poor research foundation are simplytoo high. Just as STEM students learn to flex their critical-thinking skills to make reason-basedprofessional judgments, they can apply those same critical
attention inthe business and public sphere with the release of models like ChatGPT [4] and DALL-E [5],robust applications within the field of engineering education remain are still emerging [6]. Aspart of the recent popularity of large language models (LLM) there have been increasingconcerns about the ethical ramifications in educational and industry settings. In their analysis ofthe practical ethical dangers of ChatGPT Zhuo et al. [7] outline areas of concern for LLMs as agroup; the risk inherent in small models propagating with increased scale, potential biases withinmodel training data, and the ballooning size of LLMs computational requirements. Theseconcerns limit the number of practitioners that are willing to adopt ML, NN, or LLM tools
be better. Everyone is used to that now and this ChatBox technology seems a bit outdated (e.g. people are using Google and this is Yahoo). Incorporating AI into it might make it a lot better.” “Ask follow-up questions after asking ChatGPT, and somewhat integrate the chatbot answers with the response acquired from ChatGPT (record it in database or something so that when the same or a similar question is asked again the bot is able to provide answers relevant to the course)” 9Overall, the preliminary finding based on the initial prototype of the chatbot was promising. Thechatbot made accessing information much easier for students and other users
: structural, construction management, environmental, andtransportation. This questionnaire is imperative to understand the current perceptions andexperiences of students in this field and how it has impacted them in their academic studies.The purpose of this survey was to gather valuable insights regarding the integration of AI inengineering education from the perspective of students. By understanding their attitudes,preferences, and challenges. The students’ feedback from the survey can help educators andpolicymakers make informed decisions about the implementation and improvement of AItechnologies in the classroom.The survey addressed the following 10 questions: 1. Have you used AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT, for learning in your engineering
[of the students] and holding it’ [3]. He goes on to contend that our task as professorsis not unlike that of a commercial for a soft drink or other product- what differs, is what professorsdo with the attention once they have it.Stories are not just a means to record historical events but can be a powerful way to teach lessons.Jesus Christ, arguably one of the most influential individuals in history relied heavily upon the useof stories (parables) and metaphor to teach His disciples, who in turn have passed these storiesdown for over 2000 years.Not into religion? If your faith lies instead on the future of Artificial Intelligence, then considerthat ChatGPT lists “storytelling” as its number 2 strategy when asked how to make engineeringvideos
includegenerative AI models such as the text-to-text model, chatGPT [9], GPT-4 [9], and others. LLMsuse a transformer model architecture instead of a CNN and the transformer architectures arecurrently being explored for use in computer vision applications. Models such as chatGPT (andothers) have also proven useful for programming code generation and productivity enhancement.These LLMs are of growing importance but are outside the scope of this project and paper.2. Deep Learning Curriculum and ProjectsThe specific goal of this project is to design and implement an instructional 7-week coursemodule to introduce deep learning and computer vision with a project-based orientation. Asmentioned, the target course is a senior-level engineering design course in
integrated into ScribeAR butother integration projects are possible. For example, ESPnet [21] is also a common speech to textplatform that is an end-to-end speech processing toolkit. It includes various applications such asspeech recognition, text-to-speech, speech translation, and speech enhancement.Recent advances in Large Language Models will also provide new opportunities for inclusiveconversational approaches. For example, a student project might use the new ChatGPT API thatas of May 2023 is now available as part of Microsoft Azure cloud services, to providesummarization or other textual transformation of a transcript [24]t.8. AcknowledgmentsWe thank the VR@Illinois program and the Department of Physics Graduate Office at theUniversity of
stand-alone EC course.This trajectory is set to change rapidly with the rise of interdisciplinary, remote engineeringteams, increasingly visually-focused publication modes [25], and ChatGPT [26] and other AI-powered writing tools. It is beyond the scope of this paper to detail communication-supportingapproaches to integrating AI- and non-AI-powered tools in the EC course context [27]; however,selected emerging apps show clear promise for students for visual and presentation contexts(Tome.ai, Orai) [28-29] and written contexts (WordTune, ChatGPT) [30].The New EC CurriculumIdeally introduced in the second year of engineering curricula, an EC course is able to scaffoldand develop authentic communicative capacity grounded in students’ interests and
become whistleblowers be taken seriously, or not [7]; • Is the Amazon machine-learning algorithm used for recruiting discriminatory against women, or not [8]; • Should controversial public people be banned from Twitter and other social media platforms, or should the First Amendment protect them [9]; and • Should ChatGPT be embraced in school settings, or should it be banned [10], [11]. Acknowledging the relevance of ethics in CS education is not a novelty. In 1972, ACMreleased and adopted the first Code of Professional Conduct [12], with its last revision releasedin 2018 [13]. Discussions of professional and social responsibility in CS education have beenpart of professional forums for decades [14]. The 2017-2018
John Searle’s Chinese Room Problem [6]. [7]This remains true with ourinteractions with large scale natural language AI such as the ChatGPT that has generated somuch current buzz. In this case it is not a brute force lookup but a prior machine learning fromprior examples of natural language. That does not mean that these language AI can ‘understand’.It could be that aspects of language such as humor or lying or subtext generally are the frontierwhere Chatbots fail [7].Whether programming is sequential, parallel, object-oriented or any other variant, the branchingof decision-making is constrained by what the programmer envisioned. There is no adaptation toevents or the environment except by the conditionals that the human programmer had
, compellingly titled“ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?”, the authors discuss the threatof ChatGPT to academic professionals and provide recommendations to them in the face of the growing expansion ofpowerful natural language models. They conclude with the following: “… we believe that major changes to traditionalhigher education assessments such as essays and online exams are in order to address the existence of increasinglypowerful AI, unless universities want to be akin to driving schools that teach [horse riding]” [18]. This paper does not long consider language models that can be used to write student assignments; it is mentionedas an area of tangential concern to educators. The primary focus of
, andmusic, by learning patterns from existing data [14]. This differs from other AI approaches thatfocus on tasks like classification, prediction, and decision-making. Generative AI involvestraining a machine learning model on large amounts of data to learn the underlying patterns andthen using that learning to generate new content that has not been seen before.One example of generative AI is the ChatGPT language model developed by OpenAI, which hasbeen recognized for its ability to produce text that appears to be written by humans [15]. Recentadvancements in generative AI have shown significant potential in several fields, includinghealthcare, where generative models have been used to generate synthetic medical images [16],and robotics, where
, and novelty. First,artists are upset because the datasets include their unauthorized copyrighted material. The Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network-5B (LAION-5B) makes one of the larger datasetrepositories which holds 5.85 billion usable image and text pairings [9]. Then product vendorsaccess the dataset and deploy diffusion models to train the AI. The text-to-image generators donot attribute the original work [10]. Second, computers do too much of the work and not theartist. Using minimal effort, Ammar Reshi engages ChatGPT to write and AI art to illustrate thechildren’s book Alice and Sparkle [11]. Third, AI art is novel, and scholars have not vetted andresearched the curriculum for its impact on architecture education and
videos in a more efficient way. The trend is similar to the findingsmentioned in [19], [20].Figure shows how many hours students spent on their weekly studies. The majority of studentsread and studied 3-5 hours each week out of class, which was consistent with the ideal workloadreflected by the majority from Figure . ChatGPT [21] was used to analyze students’ responses totwo open-ended questions, Q6 “What could you do to be more successful next week?” and Q7“What could your instructor do to help you be more successful next week?”.Figure 7 Shows the sentiment results of Q6, “What could you do to be more successful nextweek?”. After analyzing students’ comments, the most frequent topic is "time management",indicating that students feel they need
receive instant feedback about their score but do not have access to thequestion or their answer after they submit it. Students can re-attempt these exam topics infinitetimes; getting a (hopefully) different question each time.Students are free to access their notes and course materials while answering these questions andare encouraged to write and run test code as well. They are allowed to access the Internet ingeneral, however, they are forbidden from using Internet chat sites such as stackoverflow.com orquestion answering sites such as Chegg, CourseHero, or ChatGPT or from communicating withother people using any medium.Exam questions give the students 30 minutes to do problems that would typically take them 5-10minutes on a standard exam
classes. Implementing these methods to civilengineering problems in major requirements and electives can be mentioned to allow students torecall these concepts throughout their undergraduate career. High technology will only becomemore available, such as ChatGPT, and instructors and lecturers must prepare students for aworkforce that can use these methods for their own professional benefit. Section 2 provides moredetails on how universities can consider ABET accreditation when making high technologychanges in their curriculums.2. Accreditation and continuous improvementCivil engineering programs seek accreditation in order to ensure their program meets definedstandards of quality set by an accreditation organization. Accreditation also ensures
not a definitive and exhaustive list, it is a good starting point andcan be modified to suit the specific needs and context of the partnership. (Note that the rubricwas constructed with the assistance of ChatGPT. Putting a collection of related ideas into astandard format, like a rubric, is one of the tasks that AI seems to do well. We share thisinformation when we share the rubric as an incentive for potential collaborators to improve it.)Workshop PlanThe IEC has developed a broad and very challenging vision of enabling MSIs and their students,staff and faculty to more fully become part of and contribute to the ECE enterprise. To realizethis vision, this workshop brought together IEC Core MSI members with the heads of other ECEdepartments
lives. Thisis especially true now, since the world is in the midst of a number of controversies dealing withbiased data sets for training of neural networks, ChatGPT unfair uses, or the Elon Musk’s call fora moratorium on AI development. Results from this research will be used as preliminary findings while planning large-scale regionalresearch activities related to AI that could be supported by NSF, Amazon Machine LearningUniversity or the Department of Education. A collaborative network consisting of localschoolteachers interested in AI and AI-active university professors will be created to furtherpromote and implement AI in the K-12 curriculum. Partnership modalities with the AI4K12organization will be investigated to improve AI literacy
to the question “Was there anything that you would take away fromthis experience and apply to future projects or group work? If so what?” in the survey wasanalyzed and validated in two ways. Salient themes were identified by the authors and thefrequency of those themes were tabulated to count the number of occurrences specific featureswere identified from students. Responses were coded into the following 8 themes:Communication, assigned roles, motivation, lab skills/course content, collaboration/teamwork,leadership, enjoyment, and delegation/group organization. In addition, the responses were inputinto an artificial intelligence natural language processing tool (ChatGPT, OpenAI) to identifythemes from responses in an unbiased manner. This
learning community of the course? Ex. Engage students with personal knowledge that can enhance class activities like students from various origins or countries who can discuss how climate change is affecting their homes YES or NO Are students required to demonstrate self-reflective processes in evaluating engineering in society? Ex. Require students to express and defend opinions on engineering issues in the news on a regular basis, like the effects of ChatGPT on education YES or NO Are there opportunities for students to demonstrate their ability to integrate multiple values into evaluation and decision making in an engineering context? Ex