Paper ID #45139Using Strategic Planning Processes to Promote Success for UndergraduateCS Students at a Systemic LevelDr. Jamie Huber Ward, NCWIT Jamie Huber Ward is a social scientist and Associate Director of Higher Ed for NCWIT at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on organizational change in higher education; collaborative pedagogy; curriculum reform; post-secondary student experiences; and the experiences of faculty and staff in academic computing workplaces. Jamie’s work includes implementing and analyzing research projects designed to enhance all students’ success and sense of belonging post
-environmental factors shaping STEM persistence and post-secondary plans Pulled in or pushed out? Underrepresented minority high school students describe socio- environmental factors shaping STEM persistence and post-secondary plans AbstractIntroductionThis research applies the Phenomenological Variant of Ecological Systems Theory to understandthe persistence of racially underrepresented minority (URM) youth in STEM pathways. URMyouth aspire to STEM careers at the same rate as White peers [1], but Black and Latinx studentsleave STEM disciplines at nearly twice the rate of White students [2]. As a result, the STEMworkforce does not reflect the country’s diversity. Literature reveals key
-related professions through interactive mini-sessions and displays.This paper focuses on one specific mini-session, which introduced best management practices(BMPs) for stormwater design. The session was collaboratively designed and delivered bypracticing engineers and educators. In this mini-session, student teams developed cost-effectivesite solutions that adhered to county area specifications. After a brief introduction to the topic,teams were provided with a site plan, sheets representing BMP options, a worksheet, and othersupplies. The activity was structured into the following steps:1. Calculate the Impervious Area2. Calculate the BMP Area3. Design a Minimum of Two Alternative BMP Solutions4. Estimate the Cost of the Selected BMP
: CRITICAL THINKING, TIME MANAGEMENT, EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION.Skill-Building Workshops: A CloserLook• Icebreaker: Introductions and goal sharing to build community.• Critical Thinking: Activities on questioning assumptions and evaluating evidence.• Time Management: Strategies for prioritization, goal setting, and scheduling.• Effective Communication: Role-playing exercises for clear messaging and active listening.• Reflection: Sharing takeaways and planning for skill application.Fostering a Sense of Belonging• Sharing experiences and challenges in a supportive environment.• "Cultural Exchange" activity
ethical considerations, and its potential impact on society. Networking Opportunities Students had the opportunity to network with other students, mentors, and industry professionals.The feedback from the camp was overwhelmingly positive as the students andparents relished the opportunity to learn about topics driving their world andtheir community. The camp also brought awareness of how technology isshaping the world around the students. 8 Future Plans and Next Steps The Gaskins Foundation plans to continue offering the Ethical AI Camp
● Eight hours of office hours were provided. Prospective applicants could bring questions, come to just listen, or bring draft proposals for feedback ● The majority of awarded projects were to those who attended office hours (some of them came several times) ● Office hours were both on-campus or on Zoom, with one evening option ● For those who could not attend office hours, 1:1 meetings were offeredProposal Template1. Project Lead: Name, role (undergraduate student, graduate student, postdoc, staff), department2. Project Personnel: Name, role (undergraduate student, graduate student, postdoc, staff, faculty), department for each person3. Brief Description and Implementation Plan: Include
mechanical engineering students andthree business students. Early project work (year one and two) has been documented in previouspublications [1 – 3]. Reference [2] presents a detailed summary of work completed for years oneand two. This work included design and prototyping of various column guards, the design andfabrication of an impact tester, stiffness testing and benchmark testing. The current paperpresents the final phase of the project which involved a group of four mechanical engineeringstudents collaborating with a group of three business students. The engineering students wereresponsible for the final design and test validation while the business students focused on themarketing and business plan as well as customer interaction. The groups
lectures & those learnt from previous courses, especially from math courses. 3. Visualize solutions, Discuss the solution steps, alternative approaches, expected results, results & evaluation plan and evaluation plan. Using flow diagram, sketches, etc. are strongly encouraged. Reflect on the plan before proceed (break point #1). 4. Solve the problem Follow the planned solution steps. Do not skip steps! 5. Evaluate the results Follow the evaluation plan. Discuss the results with others (breakpoint #2). Re-visit the goal and constraints if necessary 6. Report methods & Write down detailed step-by-step solution following the
Wheelock, Great Hearts Academy, Irving, TX Raziye Aghapour, Soulmaz Rahman Mohammadpour, Jaivardhan Sood, Victoria C. P. Chen, Ph.D., Erick C. Jones Jr., Ph.D. Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering Department University of Texas at Arlington AbstractWe present K-12 educational lesson plans towards conducting college level research in engineering.These experiences are an extension of a National Science Foundation Research Experiences forTeachers project (EEC-2055705), where math and science K-12 teachers are trained to conductresearch on sustainable and resilient engineering systems in various disciplines. For
Telecommuting Expectation Models (TeEMs) for predicting the post pandemic Telecommuting Choice and Frequencies using Machine Learning Models. These ➢ Frequency Model models could aid Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) nationwide to forecast • Frequency model data was highly imbalanced, telecommuting, so that it can be incorporated into Travel Demand Models (TDM) to predict
, goals, and student needs. Some ofthe advising models documented in the literature include the following: (a) learning-centeredadvising approach (focused on connecting purpose of education with curriculum and degree),(b) engagement approach (focused on relationship building between student and advisor), (c)developmental advising approach (focused on student development and growth), (d)prescriptive academic advising approach (focused on checklists towards degree completion), (e)proactive advising approach (focused on students initiating advising meetings and advisorstacking those identified as at academic risk), (f) appreciative advising approach (focused oncreating positive interactions to support growth and academic planning), (g) flipped
University of NorthTexas. The University of North Texas College of Engineering supports admission of all studentsinto the degree of their choice. We explore the enrollment patterns from the pre-pandemic, post-pandemic, new HSI designation, a resulting NSF grant and planning for implementation of theTexas Senate Bill 17 in 2023. We employ an asset framework through creating a range of degreeplans, utilizing a focused experience with one community college and students of the Hispanicdemographic through the grant on the engineering student population and all transfer students. IntroductionThe demand for graduates in Engineering and Computer Science is undeniably high. 1 Nationally,STEM job growth is set to
educational experiences that meet the needs of all learners.Self-reflection is an often-cited yet underutilized reflective practice. This is due, in large part, tothe challenges inherent to making “reflection from within” a regular part of the teaching practice.For some, self-reflection is the first method to be abandoned when planning, instruction, andassessment tasks demand increasing time and effort to move the course forward. After all, thenext lesson, activity, exam cannot be delayed while an instructor stops to think about theiridentity, goals, and interactions with students. But then again, can any of these experiences befully realized as effective and impactful learning opportunities for all students in the absenceself-reflection?Another
torefine the planned activities and the SMART goals and planned measurement of theoutcomes of those activities.The project supports students pursuing careers in STEM, helps develop facultyskills/knowledge and supports some pre-college education activities. The new granthas an increased focus on broadening participation and has a new requirement forexternal evaluation. Historically, 50% of student funding is awarded to marginalizedstudents in STEM. Starting in 2024 the program began to increase the percentage ofmarginalized student recipients and alongside funding will incorporate cohortprograms that honor students’ cultural, racial, and ethnic identities. The presentationwill discuss the motivations for the changes as well as some of the outcomes
Retention How are you building community? Recruitment begins with your You retain through effective Prioritize mentor curriculum What’s your strategic plan? outreach. A strategic plan builds in cultivation of... according to your needs. that outreach for structured Mentorship Consider... intentional recruitment. Academic support
continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars, and workshops and has developed courses, videos, and software packages during his career. Najafi has more than 300 refereed articles. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, public works, and Renewable Energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Sustainable Cities Using Renewable Energy: A Case Study of a Renewable CityAbstractThe paper aims to examine the ability of countries to develop
development and training of CHE graduate students. • Customized Learning Paths • Individual Development Paths • Modular Coursework • Student-Centered Approach • Continuous Assessment and FeedbackOverall Research Goals• Goal 1: • Create a personalized learning model (PLM) for graduate STEM education that is inclusive and incorporates professional training• Goal 2: • Generate the knowledge and examine the potential to extend the PLM from one STEM context to anotherDiversity, Inclusivity, and our PLM• IDPs are a student-centered tool for academic and career development planning. (Instructional Goals)• Increased choice in courses and professional development stream activities respects diverse interests and career paths. (Task
towardinclusive teaching. Finally, this paper will discuss future plans and considerations for expandingand sustaining the program for STEM TAs at the university. MethodsContextThe pilot PD program for engineering graduate students was modeled off an existing facultycommunity of practice program at the university, that is part of a national, multi-institutionalprogram [14]. During 2023-2024, 52 faculty at the university participated in the program,including 12 engineering and science faculty. The faculty program yielded positiveundergraduate student outcomes within one semester of faculty’s participation, such as anaverage 3% decrease in drop-fail-withdrawal (DFW) rates across all faculty participants’courses
. in Educational Policy and Planning from UT Austin.Prof. Beth C McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh is a professor at Springfield Technical Community College, where she teaches courses in physics, engineering mechanics, and structures. A graduate of the engineering transfer program at STCC, McGinnis-Cavanaugh holds a B.S. and M.Sohn Paul Cook, Society of Women Engineers ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Title: Engaging Two-Year Students in STEM: A Professional STEM Society’s Efforts to SupportCommunity College StudentsKEYWORDS: 2 Year Institution, Engineering, Computer Science, TransferCommunity college is a popular pathway for
divided into three main components: quizzes(30%), labs (40%), and projects (30%). Quizzes included pre-lecture and post-lectureassessments to reinforce learning. Labs offered hands-on experience with sensors, requiringdetailed lab reports. Projects involved building two medical device prototypes, allowing studentsto apply theoretical knowledge to practical designs. Project evaluation focused on creativity,fabrication quality, device performance, user interface simulation, measurement accuracy, anddemonstration clarity.The course development process took 12 months, including one month of pre-planning, sixmonths to secure expert commitments, and five months for content finalization.Challenges and Future WorkThe development process faced several
Doctoral Female Middle Eastern Yes Mike ENG Doctoral Male Latin* Yes Summer ENG Doctoral Female Latin* Yes Mother Tricia ENG Undergraduate Female White Yes Autism 11/6/2024 | © Justin C. Major, Ph.D. | 6We were surprised to find that many of the students we interviewed were engineering orcomputing – not something we planned. A subset of 10 fit this category and are the focusof our presentation. As you can see, we have 10 participants, mostly in engineering
., the PI hasreceived money to oversee the conduct of a research project.Individual Development Plan (IDP): A career planning process to help graduate students explore theirinterests, values, and skills. An IDP helps graduate students decide how to invest their attention.Paper: A document that describes a research project in detail, including information about related prior work,the research methods used, the results obtained, and the interpretation of the results. When a paper is beingdeveloped it is often called a “manuscript.” Before a paper is published, it undergoes peer-review in whichother expert researchers provide critical feedback.PI: A principal investigator or PI is the lead researcher of a project. Graduate students often refer to
in 2024. This camp is a two-week camp. During the first week, a group of HSTAteachers come to campus to learn about the activities with faculty, meet the mentors, and explorethe campus. The goal of this week is 1) to help teachers prepare to help teach the lesson plans ofthe camp to students, 2) build a database of activities that they can use in the future in theirclassrooms, 3) further their confidence in STEM. The second week students attend the campwhich is broken into three components: STEM activities, a team-building project, andexploration of the regional area.ChallengesRunning these summer programs requires year-round duties of a faculty member to prepare forthe summer months. Responsibilities for the organization of these camps fall
(scores between 2.0 and 3.0), and notably, no negative These findings provide valuable insights for educational institutions metrics used in this study, including their components, calculation The study provides a framework for evaluating student readiness for AI, methods, and corresponding scales. These metrics include the AI responses were recorded. planning AI integration initiatives, suggesting thatoffering actionable insights for educational institutions planning AI Knowledge Index, Sentiment Score, Educational Impact, and
awarded a few months before the COVID-19 pandemic. The original plan for thisproject was to follow the middle school students in two out of the three counties from the firstproject into high school and examine how their interest in engineering was influenced by theseengineering activities. However, when the pandemic started, the outreach engineering activitiesneeded to be put on hold, and the project was put on pause. The initial approach was to wait itout and see what happened with the state of K-12 education with respect to the pandemic.However, during this time period, there were changes in school administrators, which meant thatany of the existing relationships and partnerships that had been previously established weredisrupted. Because of
(SWE), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of HispanicProfessional Engineers (SHPE). This paper explores the impact of EngineerFEST on studentengagement, describes the logistics of planning the event, and presents feedback fromparticipants to demonstrate its effectiveness in shaping a vibrant engineering community.1.0 Introduction and HistoryDr. Jack Byrd introduced the “Freshman Social,” an engineering-focused student organizationfair, to our college in the early 2000s to introduce new engineering students in the newly formedengineering first-year seminar course (ENGR 191) to the wealth of opportunities available tostudents through participation in career-relevant student organizations, many of which arestudent
Aggie War instrument projects alone printer plan Hymm Prefer in- Likes Static Hates in-person Wants to work Is a night-owl person problems meetings with teams meetings Checks emails First Excited to work Have a full-time Has built a and phone generation on cars job robot often
of the events they would like to compete in. Teams canorder a kit from the NMT outreach program containing all necessary parts and a variety ofinstructional materials to build their robot. Teams can also meet online with students from NMTto help build and design their robot throughout the semester.Robotics Lessons OfferedArduino BasicsArduino basics lessons are created by the NMT Mechanical Engineering outreach team to givestudents an introduction to Arduino. A team of students can order an Arduino basics kit, whichcontains an Arduino as well as many different sensors and devices. There are six cumulativelesson plans: Basic Concepts of Electronics and Electrical Circuits, Arduino Basic ConceptsApplied to LED Circuits, Reading Data From an
individuals with a fixed mindset all indicated that they disagree that the PWS programhas connected them to leaders in their fields, while all growth mindset individuals indicate thatthey strongly agree that they have been connected to leaders in their fields. Additionally, thosewith mixed or growth mindsets have indicated that they plan to go to graduate school or areunsure at this point; however all those with a fixed mindset indicated that were not planning togo to graduate school. Finally, those with fixed mindsets note that their biggest challenges aremaking connections or planning for their futures. For instance, one senior fixed mindset studentresponded to their biggest challenge by noting, “The biggest challenge I am facing in collegeright
]discusshowrecognitionfromimportantpeopleintheirentourage can enhancestudents'commitmenttotheirengineeringstudiesbyreinforcingtheirprofessional identity.Hence,havingaccesstoasupportiveenvironmentthatallowsstudentstoopenlydiscuss college plans with both family members and teachers may strengthen feelings of recognition. nderstandingthesecomponentsofengineeringidentityisessentialtoourresearchasitallowsUus to explore how engineering students’ access to resources influences their development of engineering identity [5]. We used these three elements of engineering identity asthreeoffour predictive primary factors based on resources in our work