July 26, 2021
July 26, 2021
July 19, 2022
Pre-College Engineering Education
The purpose of the study aimed at gaining a better understanding of how the intended Project Lead The Way (PLTW) curriculum differs from the enacted curricula. This understanding is important to make the professional development programs more meaningful to the immediate needs of the teacher in the classroom. By identifying, the factors that contribute to any merging differences between the curricula helped fill the gap in research on teacher knowledge and beliefs about the use of science and mathematics content in the PLTW classroom as they enact the curriculum. PLTW is an innovative hands-on pre-engineering curriculum designed for K-12 students based on project and problem-based learning. It tries to combine math and science principles to present engineering concepts to students in a way that tries to keep up with the rapid changes associated with technology in their everyday world. Multiple case sampling was used to select four teachers based on their years of teaching experience as well as background in science and math. They were interviewed about their knowledge and beliefs about project and problem-based learning. In addition, non-participant observations and teacher beliefs questionnaire were used to triangulate the data for more credible results. A fidelity of implementation rubric was also used to determine how well the teachers were implementing the curriculum. Findings of the study show that there were differences in the way teachers chose to enact the curriculum. It is recommended to address the professional development experiences of the teachers and make their beliefs a meaningful part of the training.
Nyaema, M. K., & Rethwisch, D. G., & McDermott , M. A. (2021, July), A Case Study on How Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs Influence Their Enactment of the Project Lead The Way Curriculum (Evaluation) Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2--36556
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2021 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015