Zaurin, R., & Tirtha, S. D., & Eluru, N. (2020, June), A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--33985

\bibitem{asee_peer_33985}
  Zaurin, R., \& Tirtha, S. D., \& Eluru, N. (2020, June), \emph{A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.}
  Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line .
  10.18260/1-2--33985

Ricardo Zaurin PE, Sudipta Dey Tirtha, and Naveen Eluru.  "A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.".  2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June.  ASEE Conferences, 2020.  https://peer.asee.org/33985 Internet.  18 Apr, 2024

\bibitem{asee_peer_33985}
  Ricardo Zaurin PE, Sudipta Dey Tirtha, and Naveen Eluru.
  "A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.".
  \emph{2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line , 2020, June}.
  ASEE Conferences, 2020.
  https://peer.asee.org/33985 Internet.  18 Apr, 2024

@INPROCEEDINGS{asee_peer_33985
author = "Ricardo Zaurin PE, Sudipta Dey Tirtha, and Naveen Eluru"
title = "A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics."
booktitle = "2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access"
year = "2020"
month = "June"
address = "Virtual On line "
publisher = "ASEE Conferences"
note = {https://peer.asee.org/33985}
number = {10.18260/1-2--33985}
}

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - For the past years, the majority of engineering colleges and universities have been experiencing a vertiginous growth in the number of student applications and enrollment. Even though this tendency is very encouraging from the point of view of producing more engineers to satisfy the nation’s demand, it also comes with serious drawbacks. Such growing in the student population requires increasing the number and size of the courses, adding parking spaces, and other facilities.  Building new physical plant is costly and takes too much time. Some of these issues may be alleviated by offering Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC), however this approach is not feasible for some engineering courses.  Another explored alternative are the mixed-mode courses. This approach reduces the face-to-face time and use of physical plant by at least 50%.  Traditionally mixed-mode courses use a “flipped” modality, placing the majority of the teaching/learning responsibilities on the students and meeting with the instructor only for practicing problems.
This paper presents a mixed-mode approach, develop by the author, for a Statics course. The online portion (~50%), conveyed via Canvas Learning Management System (LMS), contains video lectures, study-sets, self-assessment, hands-on homework, e-homework, proctored quizzes, and exams. The face-to-face component (~50%) includes concepts clarification, pre-class assessments, learning activities, real-life applications, problem solving, group quizzes, and discussions. Quantitative analysis of the results regarding students learning and class success are presented and compared with other purely face-to-face Static courses taught by the same instructor. Students’ perception of instruction and opinions are analyzed and presented as well.

AU  - Ricardo Zaurin PE
AU  - Sudipta Dey Tirtha
AU  - Naveen Eluru
CY  - Virtual On line 
DA  - 2020/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - A Comparison between Mixed-Mode and Face-to-Face Instructional Delivery Approaches for Engineering Analysis: Statics.
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/33985
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--33985
ER  -