Asee peer logo

A Statistical Method, Using Labview Software, To Determine Missile Defense System Locations

Download Paper |

Conference

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Honolulu, Hawaii

Publication Date

June 24, 2007

Start Date

June 24, 2007

End Date

June 27, 2007

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Undergraduate Spacecraft Design II

Tagged Division

Aerospace

Page Count

20

Page Numbers

12.118.1 - 12.118.20

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/1517

Download Count

414

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Charles Bittle University of North Texas

visit author page

CHARLES C. BITTLE has been a Lecturer at the University of North Texas since 1997. He earned his B.S.E.E. at Lamar State School of Technology in 1960 and his M.S.E.T. at the University of North Texas in 2000. Mr. Bittle served in the U.S. Federal Service for 32 years as System Engineer, Program Manager and General Manager. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Texas.

visit author page

biography

Mitty Plummer University of North Texas

visit author page

MITTY C. PLUMMER is an associate professor at the University of North Texas since 1992. He earned his BSEE, MENE, and PhD from Texas A&M. He worked in a variety of industrial positions for 22 years before joining UNT.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract
NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract

A Statistical Method, Using LabVIEW Software, To Determine Missile Defense System Locations

Introduction Universities should offer an elective course covering missile defense technology. This course should cover subsystems needed for a ballistic missile defense engagement during powered, ballistic, and re-entry flights. A text book for the course should be written to include all the subsystems needed for these engagements. These subsystems are search, acquisition, track and target subsystems. In the early 1970’s, the first author was evolved with designing, building and installing successful ground based missile locating and tracking systems for the Department of Defense. Funds for additional ground based missile locating and tracking systems were not allocated because a decision was made to deploy satellite missile defense systems. The 1972 Antiballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty with the Soviet Union delayed development of missile defense systems by the United States (U.S.). Now, the U.S. has a National Missile Defense (NMD) program. The most pressing concern today is the feasibility of an attack by North Korean ballistic missiles bearing nuclear or biological weapons. Hypothesizing that a North Korean missile destroys a city like San Francisco or New York in the future, missile defense will become the highest priority program for the U.S. Universities should start teaching missile defense technology now to expose engineering students to missile defense.

A searching subsystem is needed to detect the launch of one or more ballistic missiles to provide early warning. The missile’s on-board tracking beacon is of primary interest to a missile defense system. A beacon tracking system is used at the launch site to track and keep the missile on the proper flight path during powered flight. During the 1970’s, beacon signals were in the 2-6 Giga Hertz (GHz) frequency range. A ground based 2-6 GHz signal will normally propagate straight off the earth. However, experience has shown the signal will bend over the horizon during the missile’s powered flight. The searching subsystem at the missile defense site will detect the beacon signal before the missile breaks the horizon to be acquired by radar.

A beacon tracking subsystem at the missile defense site could be already locked on to the missile’s tracking beacon and providing early warning of the missile launch prior to the missile’s horizon break point. The tracking radar subsystem could operate in synchronism with the bacon tracking system and take over tracking the missile at the horizon break point. Also, the targeting system could be calculating the antimissile intercept point before the missile breaks the horizon. In this scenario, the missile could be destroyed in powered flight or just when it enters ballistic flight. A search window around the point where the missile is predicted to break the horizon will allow the beacon tracking system to locate the beacon signal.

A suitable location (fixed land site or aboard ship site) for the missile defense is required to accomplish the scenario described above. This paper presents a statistical method and a LabVIEW modeling software program for choosing missile defense system locations to be included in the missile defense course. This statistical method and a LabVIEW modeling software program would be installed in the search subsystem described above.

Bittle, C., & Plummer, M. (2007, June), A Statistical Method, Using Labview Software, To Determine Missile Defense System Locations Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. https://peer.asee.org/1517

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2007 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015