Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
13
10.18260/1-2--40433
https://peer.asee.org/40433
426
Dr. Teichert received his bachelors and masters degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University in Provo Utah. After working in industry for a couple of years, Dr. Teichert attended the University of Michigan for his PhD in Mechanical Engineering. His research focused on testing and modeling various micro/nano scale systems. Since earning his PhD, Dr. Teichert has been teaching at Trine University in Angola Indiana where he teaches a variety of Mechanical Engineering courses. During his time at Trine, Dr. Teichert has been awarded a Mcketta-Smith Excellence in Teaching award and the Jannen Renaissance Scholar award. In addition to his academic involvement, Dr. Teichert is committed to his family and faith.
Engineering education focuses heavily on the analytical and design aspects of engineering. Recently, significant work has been presented showing the benefits of integrating the humanities and arts into science and engineering education. In prior work, the author and colleague reported an experience with a first-year engineering project themed around the classic novel Frankenstein (Spring 2018). Students were asked to read the novel and design a simple robot to represent a theme from the story. That prior work presented several challenges faced and insights gained. In subsequent years, adjustments have been made to address key shortcomings of the project. This work describes changes allowing students greater freedom in selecting source material, allowing various forms of sources to be explored, and adjusting the context of the project.
These adaptations were implemented to improve the engagement and the motivation of the students as they engaged with source material in the early stages of the design process. Results from these changes were promising in regard to student motivation, engagement, and perception. Based on a participant survey, the percentage of responding students that fully completed the assignment to engage with the source(s) rose from 11% in the original implementation to 45% in the current project implementation, and the percentage that engaged with 20% or less of the source(s) fell from 22% to 5%. Additionally, in the original project only 15% of students stated they at least “agreed” to enjoying the novel assigned, whereas in the current work 59% at least “agreed” to enjoying the source material chosen. Although a limited sample size, these and other findings capture the importance of selecting and adapting project frameworks to enhance student engagement when incorporating societal connections and humanities topics into engineering curriculum.
Teichert, K. (2022, August), Adapting a Literature-aided Design Project in Engineering Education for Improved Student Engagement Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40433
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015