President? a. How would you explain the divulging of proprietary information? b. Would you recommend pursuing the job under these circumstances? c. Would you recommend any procedures to prevent such situations? 2. Would you communicate any concerns to the Pastor? 3. Would you communicate any concerns to the Architect? 4. Would you communicate any concerns to the other Contractors?This list of questions can be extended depending on the level of response from the audience. It isessential to underline that the project is still not awarded to any party at the time of the report tothe President. There is a motivation to secure the job regardless of the circumstances.Our experience suggests that the instructor should initially
and Cases,Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2013.[8] B.K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, A. E. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global EngineeringCompetency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” Online Journal for Global EngineeringEducation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2014.[9] B. Barry and J. Herkert, “Engineering Ethics” in Cambridge Handbook of EngineeringEducation Research. Eds. A. Johri and B.M. Olds. Cambridge Press, 2014, pp. 673-692.[10] J. R. Herkert, “Ethical challenges of emerging technologies,” in The Growing Gap BetweenEmerging Technologies and Legal-Ethical Oversight, G. E. Marchant, B. R. Allenby, and J. R.Herkert, Eds., Dordecht, Germany: Springer, 2011, pp. 35-44.[11] J. R. Herkert, “Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education
Aviation A served as an expert witness on similar committees to ATIC; is Consultant always keen on expressing the viewpoint of pilots. A is concerned that authority for decisions during flights has shifted from pilots to technology and that decisions about pilot training have been determined by business interests rather than pilots' needs. B Professor of B is an expert on aeroelasticity, specifically nonlinear Aerospace aeroelasticity flight dynamics of highly flexible wings. B provides Engineering insight regarding the change to the wing placement to incorporate
Paper ID #33770A Graduate-level Engineering Ethics Course: An Initial Attempt toProvoke Moral ImaginationMr. Yousef Jalali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Yousef Jalali is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He re- ceived a B.S. and M.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.Eng. in Energy Systems Engineering. His research interests include interaction between critical thinking, imagination, and ethical reasoning, interpersonal and interinstitutional collaboration, diversity, equity, and inclusion, systems thinking, and chemical en- gineering learning systems. Yousef
] W. Huang and J.C. Ho, “Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-basedlearning approach,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 6, no.5, pp. 583-596, 2018.Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1374979.[8] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[9] J. Borenstein, M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, J. L. Swann, “The Engineering and Science Issues Test(ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 16(2),pp.387-407, Jun. 2010.[10] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for
incident, many poor ethical choices were madewhich exacerbated the loss of life, money, and reputation.The biomedical device case (Scenario B) was an expanded version of one written by Lewis et al.involving a diode failure in a brain stimulator used to prevent epileptic seizures [8]. This scenariois based on the real-world case involving Medtronic’s MarquisTM and Guidant’s VentakTMimplantable defibrillator device recalls in 2005. These two recalls were interesting because theyinvolved two manufacturers with similar device failures in similar products and with the samecustomer base. But the two manufacturers chose very different courses of actions. On February10, 2005, Medtronic provided notice that certain cardiac defibrillators manufactured
engineeringeducation during COVID-19 pandemic.” ORMS Today Informs Membership Magazine, 2020.Available: https://pubsonline.informs.org/do/10.1287/orms.2020.06.10/full/[3] Y. Lambrinidou & M. Edwards, “Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach toEngineering Ethics Education,” ASEE, 2013, Paper ID# 8224.[4] E. A. Cech, “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?,” Science, Technology, &Human Values, 39(1) , pp. 42-72, 2014.[5] M. F. Young, S. Slota, A. B. Cutter, G. Jalette, G. Mullin, B. Lai, & M. Yukhymenko, “Ourprincess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education”. Review ofEducational Research, 82(1), pp. 61-89, 2012.[6] D. G. Johnson, “Can engineering ethics be taught?” Yale University Press Blog, June 4
bycolleagues (Amber Diaz Pearson, Stacy Tantum) at Duke University as a part of a larger effort tomeasure ethical awareness. This instrument asked more practical questions around safety, designdecisions, regulations, etc. Thirty questions were sourced from this survey and are found inAppendix B. Students selected a level of agreement using a six-point Likert scale, which rangedfrom strongly disagree to strongly agree. In all, the instrument consisted of 47 multiple choicequestions and took ~10 min to complete. The survey was conducted under the Duke Universityapproved IRB Protocol 2021-0134.We recognize that other changes may be occurring during a student’s first year on campus,although these are factors that cannot be controlled. The Fall 2020
ofCivil Engineering Education, vol. 146, no. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000021[10] B. A. Burt, D. D. Carpenter, M. A. Holsapple, C. J. Finelli, R. M. Bielby, J. A. Sutkus, andT. S. Harding, “Out-of-classroom experiences: Bridging the disconnect between the classroom,the engineering workforce, and ethical development,” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 714-725, 2013.[11] M. C. Loui, “Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 383-390, 2005.[12] G. Rulifson, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Influence of internships on engineering students’attitudes about socially responsible engineering,” Proceedings of the 2018
engineers work with different types of resources, which exist on a spectrum ofessential/non-essential resources as well as a spectrum of scarcity. Ethical distribution ofresources was also addressed. The discussion prompts and questions for this topic were asfollows: 1. Come up with an example of each of these: a. An essential resource- very important or perhaps even necessary to common ideas about a flourishing life in contemporary society- that engineers might use. b. An inessential resource- perhaps useful or pleasant but unimportant to common ideas about a flourishing life in contemporary society- that engineers might use. c. A resource that engineers might use, that is somewhere in
, 2020.[3] Y. Lambrinidou and M. Edwards, "Learning to Listen: An Ethnographic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education," ASEE, p. Paper ID#8224, 2013.[4] J. R. Herkert, "Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 7, p. 403–414, 2001.[5] N. Gabiam, The Politics of Suffering: Syria's Palestinian Refugee Camps, Indiana University Press, 2016.[6] C. Baillie and M. Levine, "Engineering Ethics from a Justice Perspective: A Critical Repositioning of What It Means to Be an Engineer," International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-20, 2013.[7] H. L. Brown-Liburd and B. M. Porco, "It's
Analysis, 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2010.[18] Qualtrics, “Qualtrics.” Provo, UT, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.qualtrics.com.[19] QSR International Pty Ltd, “NVivo.” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.qsrinternational.com/ nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home.[20] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Second. SAGE Publications, 2013.[21] R. A. Singleton, B. C. Straits, and M. M. Straits, Approaches to Social Research, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 1993.[22] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, N. Canney, C. Swan, and D. Knight, “Ethics Education of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Environmental Engineering and Related Disciplines,” Environmental
Do We Know What Works ? A Review and Critique of Current Practices in Ethics Training Evaluation,” Account. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 319–350, 2016, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1186547.[8] I. Van de Poel, H. Zandvoort, and M. Brumsen, “Ethics and Engineering Courses at Delft University of Technology: Contents, Educational Setup and Experiences,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 267–282, 2001, doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0048-0.[9] H. Zandvoort, G. J. van Hasselt, and J. A. B. A. F. Bonnet, “A joint venture model for teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03043790801980003.[10] G. L. Downey, J. C
, 2011.[7] J. Haidt, The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York,NY: Vintage Books, 2012.[8] J. Graham, J. Haidt, & B. A. Nosek, “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moralfoundations,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1029-1046, 2009.[9] O. P. John, E. M. Donahue, & R. L. Kentle, The Big Five Inventory – Versions 4a and 54.Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research,1991.[10] D. P. McAdams, M. Albaugh, E. Farber, J. Daniels, R. L. Logan, & B. Olson, “Familymetaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives,” J. Pers. Soc.Psychol., vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 987-990, 2008.[11] J. Haidt, J
Google forms (S20) or Moodle (F20) based on his QM and RISEtraining. These digital records gave the instructor insight into whether the ethical content of aparticular lecture needed to be tweaked and it also provided the quantifiable data that is analyzedhere. The students were told that there were no right or wrong answers to these ethical dilemmas.Two pre-/ post- vignette viewpoints were a) not as much subject to prior exposure to the topicand b) might cause a significant swing in an expressed ethical viewpoint. These were the coch-lear implant debate re children who were deaf and Quality of Life issues of individuals with asevere non-verbal form of cerebral palsy.With cursory thought and after the engineering and neuroscience behind cochlear
behavioral adaptations to harsh environments in youth who have experienced adversity, so we can design educational interventions that work with, instead of against, these adaptations.Dr. Brian J. O’Leary, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dr. Brian J. O’Leary is Department Head and Associate Professor of Industrial-Organizational (I-O) Psychology at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC), where he has worked since 2001. He completed his PhD in Organizational Behavior at the A. B. Freeman School of Business at Tulane University, focusing on justice in the workplace. He also holds a BA from the General Program of Liberal Studies at the University of Notre Dame, a BS in Accounting from Guilford College, and an
://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.06.057.[21] R. W. Chen, D. Navin-Chandra, and F. B. Print, “A cost-benefit analysis model of product design for recyclability and its application,” IEEE Trans. on Compon., Packag., and Manuf. Technol.: Part A, vol. 17, no. 4, Dec. 1994.[22] Z. Boz, V. Korhonen, and C. K. Sand, “Consumer considerations for the Implementation of sustainable packaging: A review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, pp.2192, March 2020. Appendix 1: Grading ChecklistTo students: Please check and see if your final letter report meets the following gradingchecklist. Please bring this assignment sheet to class on peer review day.Letter Report Content____ Identifies a contemporary sustainability
., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 04021002, May 2021, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000889.[7] Y. Yang and D. W. Carroll, “Gendered Microaggressions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,” p. 18.[8] M. J. Lee, J. D. Collins, S. A. Harwood, R. Mendenhall, and M. B. Huntt, “‘If you aren’t White, Asian or Indian, you aren’t an engineer’: racial microaggressions in STEM education,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 48, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s40594-020- 00241-4.[9] C. Poleacovschi, S. Feinstein, S. Luster-Teasley, and M. Berger, “An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions in Engineering Programs,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc., Jun. 2019, Accessed: Mar. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https
. [4] Ingram, J.C. “Establishing Relationships and Partnerships to Engage Native American Students in Research”, in Broadening Participation in Undergraduate Research: Fostering Excellence and Enhancing the Impact, eds. M. Boyd and J. Wesemann, publishers Council on Undergraduate Research, 2009, pg. 269-280. [5] Lopez, J. D. Factors influencing American Indian and Alaskan Native persistence model: AI/AN Millennium Falcon Persistence Model, Res. Higher Educ., 59 (6), 2017, 792-811. [6] Brayboy, B., Fann, A., Castagno, A., Solyom, J. Postsecondary education for American Indian and Alaska Natives: Higher education for nation building and self-determination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [7] Roy, J. Engineering by the Numbers, ASEE website, https
Paper ID #32657Engineering Alumni Rate the Impact of Co-curricular Activities on theirEthical DevelopmentDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning
. Educ., vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 169–186, 2013, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00047.x.[7] B. A. Burt et al., “Out-of-Classroom Experiences: Bridging the Disconnect between the Classroom, the Engineering Workforce, and Ethical Development,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 714–725, 2013.[8] F. Falcone, E. Glynn, M. Graham, and M. Doorley, “Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool Engineering Ethics Survey for Faculty : An Assessment Tool,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., 2013.[9] R. E. McGinn, “‘Mind the Gaps’: An Empirical Approach to Engineering Ethics, 1997- 2001,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 517–542, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0048- 3.[10] D. D. Carpenter, T. S
Paper ID #35003Examining Faculty Barriers and Challenges in Adopting Ethical Pedagogiesin Online EnvironmentsMr. Samuel Aaron Snyder, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Sam Snyder is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received his Bachelors of Science in Materials Science and Engineering in 2017 from Virginia Tech. His current research interests are in engineering ethics education and exploring the relationship between empathy and ethical decision-making.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an
, with Adam Briggle), and Steps toward a Philosophy of Engineering: Historico-Philosophical and Critical Essays (2020). Additionally he served as a member of the Com- mittee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (1994-2000) and on expert study groups for the European Commission (2009 and 2012). Awards include the International World Technology Network (WTN) award for Ethics (2006) and a Doctorate Honoris Causa from the Universitat Internacional Valenciana, Spain (2010). He holds the BA and MA in Philosophy from the University of Colorado and the PhD in Philosophy from Fordham University. American c
Paper ID #32744High School STEM Teacher Perspectives on the Importance and Obstacles toIntegrating Engineering Ethical Issues in Their CoursesJake Walker Lewis, Graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder with a bachelor’s degree in environmental engineering and a master’s degree in civil engineering. Was involved with undergraduate research regarding ethics in engineering education, presented work in the form of a poster at the 2018 Zone IV ASEE Conference. Defended and published master’s thesis examining if/how ethics are being introducted in K12 STEM education in November 2019. Co-authored paper entitled ”Educating
Paper ID #33737Partnerships and Pedagogies for Introducing Neuroethics to SecondarySTEM Classrooms [Poster]Dr. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is a learning scientist, STEM program manager, and curriculum designer. She is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Neurotechnology at the University of Washington and the Curriculum Design Project Lead at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Dr. Bergsman owns Laughing Crow Curriculum, a consulting firm offering support in STEM curriculum design and publication. Previously, she was a graduate researcher at the
Paper ID #33011Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Exposure to, and Valuation of,Ethics Through the Lens of SocializationDr. Madeline Polmear, University of Florida Madeline Polmear is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering at the University of Florida. She completed her B.S. in environmental engineering, M.S. in civil engineering, and Ph.D. in civil engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on bridging technical and nontechnical competencies to support the professional preparation and ethical responsibility of engineering students.Dr. Angela R