further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022In this session we will think about engineering and computer doctoral students’ movement through the education system over time‐‐disaggregating by race/ethnicity as well as doctoral students’ first generation status. We would like the session to be interactive, so we’ve built in places to generate some group conversation.The project is a
Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes, and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab group and her research interests include broadening participation in engineer- ing, engineering leadership, and experiential learning experiences in engineering. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her M.S. in Human Systems Engineering from Arizona State University.Dr. Meseret F. Hailu, Arizona State University Dr. Meseret F. Hailu is an Assistant Professor of Higher and Postsecondary Education at Arizona State University. Her research focuses on the retention of minoritized women in STEM higher education path- ways. Recently, her work has focused on 1) how Black immigrant women in the U.S. persist
conducted through Zoom, taking approximately an hour.Interviews were recorded and transcribed using Zoom’s built-in recognitionsoftware, and we applied qualitative content analysis to identify somecommon themesWe covered age groups ranging from 18 to 65, with 4 in the range of 18-25, 2from 26-35, 2 from 36-45, 3 from 46-55, and 1 from 56-656 participants identified as female, 4 as male, one as two-spirited, and 1preferred not to say5 reported having a disability and 7 did notOf those 5, 4 of them reported having chronic illness, 3 of them reported amobility-related disability, 2 had a vision-related disability, and 1 hearing-relatedStudents seemed generally lonely. Most of them, even the ones who foundin-person classes difficult, were looking
activities, and in the development of DEI proposals to expand outreach 5efforts in K-12 schools, community colleges, and higher education institutions. CLICKThese are all funded using funds allocated to the Faculty Engagement Fund with theobjective to:(1) assist COE faculty with the administrative burden of accessing and spending funds on DEI activities while developing outreach ideas to maximize impact;(2) encourage faculty to partner with each other and existing programs;(3) track and measure the impact of COE efforts; and(4) help faculty strengthen their research proposals to external agencies.Since the program’s inception, the
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Improving engineering-student retention via the UC Davis LEADR program Ralph C. Aldredge, PhD, PE1 and Tanya D. Culliver-Whitlow, MA College of Engineering, University of California, DavisAbstract:The impact of the Leadership in Engineering Advancement, Diversity and Retention (LEADR) Program onthe retention of engineering undergraduates at UC Davis is evaluated. First-year retention rates for first-generation, female and URM program participants are found to be higher than those for their non-LEADRengineering undergraduate counterparts, while positive program impact on retention is found generallyto
codeblocks as preparation for actual coding. Recruitment Strategy Generalized over both semesters 1 2 3 4 5 Connect with Email graduate Hold instructor Behind-the- Finalize list of students who Bioengineering interest meeting scenes paperwork students who will have cleararances students about and gather names
Peterson from theUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs. 1 WARM UP • How do you define STEM identity? • Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity of undergraduate women? • Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEM identity among undergraduate women?To begin, how do you define STEM identity?Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity ofundergraduate women?Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEMidentity among
more motivated because they can recognize their ability touse technical skills to change people’s lives. In general, understanding how physics affects 3D objects has been necessary for me as I am working on a prosthetic project for one of my clubs right now and need to have the necessary tools to figure out how to make that work for the patient. I am excited, as in general this class has expanded my mindset on how things work and allow me to remember why I wanted to be an engineer in the first place. I was looking forward to being able to fight for social justice, and this is the first class that really takes into account the real world applications of the technical skills that we learn. I don't want
regarding their wellbeing. The findings on the lack of perceived support areorganized by departmental and university-level influences. The students also identify areasfor improvement that have posed barriers to their awareness and utilization of universitysupports and services and to their overall wellbeing. The method of soliciting studentperspectives has implications for institutions wanting to examine their own practices andpolicies in order to better support students’ whole selves.Keywords: wellbeing, student support, undergraduate, student experience, studentperception, thematic analysis1. BackgroundHigher education is dealing with a mental health crisis [1]. According to the 2019 ACHA-National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA II
Department at Virginia Tech and an M.S. student in the Virginia Tech – Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Engineering. She received her Bachelors of Science in Bioengineering from Clemson University. She was previously an undergraduate research assistant in Clemson University’s Engineering and Science Education Department. Her research interests include undergraduate research experiences, broadening participation in engineering, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a
practices whilenavigating their graduate programs. I discuss the findings as they relate to concepts in literatureand my own auto-ethnographic experience. I also provide researchers, students, faculty, staff,and policy makers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) academiawith recommendations. Finally, I present the research community with areas for furtheracademic study.IntroductionProblemThere is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to graduate students with disabilities. Publicationsregarding the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of this population are scarce. Similarly,little is known about the retention and graduation rates of graduate students with disabilities [1],[2]. More generally, there is a gap in knowledge
culture of engineering.Action-Oriented Education and Organizing as Beyond ReformsBowen et al. [34] formed the Undergraduate Engineering Collaborative Growth Series (UECGS),seeking to “design a program for marginalized engineering students that reduced barriers to theexpression of their whole selves, including the value of their identities within the engineeringeducational space” [p. 1]. This was done through four two-hour workshops in addition to a seriesof one-on-one feedback and coaching sessions to provide participants reflective space to discussthe series itself and how it connected to other components of participants’ lives. The firstworkshop consisted of focus groups on naming barriers within and relating to engineering thatthey perceive
and Identity Development: A Case Study of an Asexual Woman Engineer Vivian X. Chou 1, Jerry A. Yang 2, Brandon Bakka 3, Patricia Clayton 4, Maura Borrego1,5 1 Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USA 2 Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA 3 Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USA 4 Department of Engineering, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101 USA 5 Center for Engineering Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USADEI programming in recent years has focused
-appropriate activities, marketing materials, graphics and arobot mascot, recruited 40 volunteers and 10 industry/partner school sponsors for this inauguralyear. All costs of the event were fully absorbed by the Saguaro Math & Science Academy parentBooster Board’s 501 (c) (3) general funds. ● Anticipating participation similar to that of theannual Girl Power event of 40 students, the launch year event fielded 130 young children and100 adult participants. ● From the connections made at the event, three long running ‘spinoff’outreach initiatives were launched: a student-led math tutoring program at a local Title 1 school;a student mentored young girls’ programming group; and full development and launch of theSisters in STEM website for connectivity
with organizing meaningfuland impactful events for other students as well as providing feedback from students to faculty and staffregarding college climate. Faculty mentors from the college’s DEI Committee helped to provide support,and guidance when needed, while still leaving the students with the autonomy to develop their own ideason how to work towards these goals. II. BACKGROUND The DEI Student Ambassadors program drew inspiration from similar initiatives in industry and academia.Most student ambassador programs exist in engineering departments or colleges to assist with recruitmentof new undergraduate students or with outreach to high schools [1], [2]. In [3], the authors describe an initiative
Ransom (he, him, his) is a Ph.D. student in the Clemson Engineering and Science Engineering department, and has a disciplinary background in Computer Science. His research interests include STEM identity and computing education.Mrs. Wysheka Austin, Clemson University Wysheka Austin is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University. She earned her B.S. in Electrical Engineering at Clemson University and M.S. in Supply Chain Management at Penn State Online World Campus. In addition to her Ph.D. studies, she also is a senior manufacturing leader at General Electric, where she is a 9+ year veteran. Her personal passion for creating a pipeline for young, African American women and
from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and a Master’s degree in higher education from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. She re- ceived a Bachelor’s degree in biology and psychology from Salem College.Dr. Marcel Brouwers, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Distinguished Lecturer Department of English American c Society for Engineering Education, 20221 1 Overview Pilot Study: Research Role of Women Motivation Follow-up
c Society for Engineering Education, 2022[SLIDE 1]Welcome to “Bridging internationalization and equity initiatives in Engineering Education!”[SLIDE 2]Like many public research universities, Virginia Tech hasrobust campus internationalization initiatives in engineeringalong with the leadership and mentorship of CEED to enhanceand retain a more diverse student body in engineering. Yet,like all but one public HE in Virginia, our institution continues to fallshort of representing racial and ethnic diversity across ourenrollment (see for example Scratching the Surface,http://edreformnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/VA-Issue-Brief-4.15.pdf). Enrollment of international students has grownover the last two decades. At times, “global” and
to be done to better provide and highlightengineering-specific resources to underrepresented groups in the program.Figure 1. Survey results for assessing DEI interventions in Grand Challenges and StaticsTable 2. Summary of DEI perceptions survey results from 2018-2020 1. Elon Engineering has always Students generally agreed the program has always promoted diversity and inclusion. promoted diversity and inclusion. 2. Discussions of diversity and inclusion Students generally agreed that DEI belongs in the do not belong in the classroom classroom. Students in 2018 and 2019 generally were unable to articulate the
a student encountering other students with diverse backgrounds, it does notguarantee a high-quality interaction. Gurin et al. [1] discuss two other forms of diversity:informal interaction diversity and classroom diversity. The former involves interaction withdiverse students outside of the classroom, and this is where most meaningful interaction happens,while the latter involves learning about diverse people and interacting with such peers in theclassroom. Informal interaction diversity and classroom diversity generate the impact oneducational outcomes, but structural diversity is required for the other two to exist.Piaget [3] states that encountering diverse students results in differing perspectives and equalityin relationships, and both
obstacles to URMs’ access and acculturation to graduate school23We developed a survey instrument with multiple aims, including to assess theinstitute, to identify opportunities to improve the program from the perspective of itsparticipants, and to better understand students’ goals for applying to graduate schoolin STEM fields. The survey also poses demographic questions related to knownobstacles to URMs’ access and acculturation to graduate school. 23Findings 24 2020 Participant Demographics ▪ 7 identified as Black or African-American ▪ 1 identified as Afro-Latino ▪ One participant was a first-generation
our phenomenological study whichexamined the ways in which engineering faculty conceptualize science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) identity and promote the STEM identity of undergraduate women in theclassroom.Our research team includes Sylvia Mendez, Emily Kulakowski, and Elizabeth Peterson from theUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs. 1 WARM UP • How do you define STEM identity? • Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity of undergraduate women? • Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEM
context andindividual student experience) [9]. The mediating relationship described by the college impactmodel is displayed schematically in Figure 1. Terenzini and Reason’s model is broadly used tostudy collegiate outcomes [14] (e.g., ethical development [15] and “personal and socialcompetence” [16, p. 271]).Figure 1Schematic of the mediating relationship between precollege characteristics and experiences, thecollege experience, and academic success (following [17]) in Terenzini and Reason’s collegeimpact model [9]We tailor this college impact model to our study of academic success by includingneurodiversity [18] in precollege characteristics and experiences and defining elements of themodel [19], as shown in Figure 2. We generally follow
pandemic.Autoethnography is a research methodology that analyzes a phenomenon through the use ofself-narratives, which would otherwise remain private or buried. This paper uses anautoethnographic approach to describe first-hand. the experiences and learnings of aneducator at a Western US Public University.This paper describes how first as an international student, then as a first generation PhD, andfinally as a professor facing immigration related challenges, the author has had to pivot toonline teaching multiple times before. Such virtual interactions with students was atypical atthat time. However, lessons learned from those online interactions helped the educator betterprepare and pivot to online during the pandemic.pg. 1This research paper will cover three
collaboratively to provideneeded support to close the home connectivity gap by providing needed digital access. To thatend, the University of Cincinnati Office of Inclusive Excellence and Community Engagementwill host a combination of virtual, in-person, and hybrid events to determine if offering multipleviewing options generates wider impact.References 1. R. B. Freeman and National Bureau of Economic Research, Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten U.S. Economic Leadership? 2005no. W11457Available: http://uc.summon.ssc.uc.idm.oclc.org/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwbZ1NTwJBDIYbkIsJBw0QFT X9Ayyb2Y-RkzGLxIM38UjITrcbPLgQZOPftx0-gsp1JplDk5k- 0_R9CxCZIBz8eRNyMqWAd5oatiPLUSJ5WTM3CS0UjtLf030g20tjago-is
;T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Bi- ological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) social competence in engineering education and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, Insti- tute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. American c
engineering in the workplace.Ms. Carin Queener, University of Michigan Carin Queener has a bachelor’s degree in Industrial and Operations Engineering, and is now working in industry.Dr. Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan Joi Mondisa is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering and an Engineering Education Faculty Member at the University of Michigan–Ann Arbor. Dr. Mondisa earned a PhD in Engineering Education, an MS in Industrial Engineering, an MBA, and a BS in General Engineering. She researches STEM mentoring experiences and mentoring intervention programs in higher education.Dr. Kinnis Gosha, Morehouse College Dr. Kinnis Gosha (Go-Shay) is an Assistant Professor in the
of 15 applicable papers which were added to the original candidates. In total, 63Figure 2: SLR paper selection processpublications were included in the systematic literature review.4.3 Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaThe search strings generated a lengthy list of sources, that often were not related to the researchquestions. To filter databases and publications from their title to abstract to content, we applied alist of additional criteria, illustrated in Table 1. We excluded articles if they did not meet thesecriteria or if the full text was unavailable. Inclusion Exclusion Publications that address the RQs Publications not in English
, NC:National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center, 2010.[11] R. L. Astramovich and K. R. Harris, "Promoting self-advocacy among minority students inschool counseling," Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 269-276, 2007.[12] R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsicmotivation, social development, and well-being," American psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, p. 68,2000.[13] M. E. Skinner, "Promoting self-advocacy among college students with learningdisabilities," Intervention in School and Clinic, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 278-283, 1998.[14] P. D. Rumrill Jr, "Effects of a social competence training program on accommodationrequest activity, situational self-efficacy