Paper ID #35606Retaining a diverse group of undergraduate students in EngineeringTechnology MajorsProf. Melanie Villatoro, New York City College of Technology Melanie Villatoro, Chair of the Department of Construction Management and Civil Engineering Technol- ogy at NYC College of Technology, is a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of New York. Prof. Villatoro is passionate about student retention and performance, as well as STEM Outreach in K-12. She has served as Project Director for the National Transportation Summer Institute sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration multiple years. Prof. Villatoro leads a
priorities to advance diversity, equity and inclusion in the College. Fatima earned her Ph.D. and M.S. degrees in materials science and engineering from UC Berkeley and a B.A. in chemistry from City Uni- versity of New York, Hunter College.Mr. Ricky Vides, University of California, Berkeley Ricky Vides is the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion advisor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He is also the staff director for the Combining Forces: Putting Equity to Work project. Ricky Vides is an alumnus of the University of California. He also received advanced degrees in Higher Education Student Development and Marriage and Family Therapy from Saint Mary’s College of
Programs Girl Day at UT Austin and high school summer camps are designed to increase awareness and interest in STEM fields, strengthen STEM identity and increase self-efficacy for pre-college students. WiSTEM also serves as the administrative home for the Texas Girls Collaborative Project (TXGCP), connecting nonprofits, K-12 schools,higher education institutions, companies, organizations and individuals across the state of Texas committed to informing and motivating girls to pursue careers in STEM. Undergraduate ProgramsFocus on strengthening STEM identity, creating a sense of belonging and increasing self-efficacy for all undergraduate women in STEM. WiSTEM creates opportunities for mentoring
Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. April studied at Winthrop University, earning a BS degree in Chemistry and BA degree in Psychology in 2000. She then completed her PhD in 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh, studying oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and developed new methods for imaging and tracking mitochondria from living zebrafish neurons. In her work for the EERC and Pitt-CIRTL, April Dukes collaborates on educational research projects and facilitates professional development (PD) on instructional and mentoring
comprise 47% of the workforce, they are overrepresented in education and healthservices, and underrepresented in industries such as manufacturing, information,transportation, utilities, and construction [4]. Those with STEM degrees are most likely towork in these industries. STEM United States Department of Labor US Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupations Last Modified Date: April 9, 2021 Table 1.11 Employment in STEM occupations, 2019 and projected 2029(Numbers in thousands
projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. She has been author or co-author on papers receiving ASEE-ERM’s best paper award, the AAEE Best Paper Award, the Benjamin Dasher award, and co-authored the paper nominated by the ASEE Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for ASEE Best PIC Paper for 2018. More recently, she received her school’s Award for Excellence in
Institution STEM Articulation grant ($4.4 million) from the USDepartment of Education. This ongoing project which serves as a STEM pipeline is incollaboration with two local state/community colleges. Collaborating with BrowardCollege and Palm Beach State College, the three institutions are promoting therecruitment of Hispanic and low-income students who matriculate from the statecolleges where they complete their AA degree and then enter FAU to complete a BSdegree in computer science and related fields. This project assists students at everylevel as they transition from state college to FAU so as to ensure a more diversifiedand successful technological workforce
Paper ID #35545Sharing Exemplary Admissions Practices that Promote Diversity inEngineering Panel DiscussionDr. Elizabeth Cady, National Academy of Engineering Dr. Elizabeth T. Cady is a Senior Program Officer at the National Academy of Engineering (NAE). She has worked on a variety of projects that examine and enhance systems for the formal, informal, and life- long education of engineers and improving diversity and inclusion in engineering. She is leading a project that will recognize and share innovative practices that improve diversity in undergraduate engineering education and also staffs a consensus study examining
diversity in Engineering beforebeing guided through an exercise to identify inclusive practices they could establish to promotediversity.In 2019, The DEI instructor did not teach this course but instead guest-lectured in the twosections that were offered. The course instructor for each of those sections was asked to assignthe Wolf article as a reading exercise for homework. The next day, the DEI instructor gave ashort lesson on the need for diversity in engineering. Students were guided through an exercise tofirst identify engineering projects that would benefit from a diverse perspective, then to identifythe unique perspectives they bring to the table, and finally to identify inclusive practices theycould start now that would promote diversity
the number of international,experiential learning opportunities for students. While these two topics are in constant fluxand contention with one another, online learning could provide a valuable exploratoryoption for those seeking to improve their numbers both financially and domestically toachieve access to quality education for all students. Global learning was born to helpstudents become more globally aware [7]. It also grew out of a need to help strategicallysolve complex problems that affect humanity. The lens of global learning is often directlylinked to exchanges and travel. Those two concepts will always be valuable. However,project collaboration, community building, and connection online could help bridgeexperiences and student
Science and Engineering group, existing within the university. We alsoimplement virtual COVID19 pandemic programming, and then assessed the results and best practices for our mentoring program. 9The Lean Six Sigma DMAIC methodology was applied with many tools that helped tocollect the voice of the customer, or potential mentors and mentees, women in scienceand engineering.In the Define phase, the project charter is developed to understand the problem, thegoals and scope of the project. A stakeholder analysis is performed to understand whohas a stake in the project. The project plan is developed and the working team isformed.In the Measure phase, the
macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, tends to leverage large-scale institutional, state, or national data sets, and considers the intersection between policy and organizational contexts. He has B.S., M.S., and M.U.E.P. degrees from the University of Virginia and a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Dustin Michael Grote, Weber State University Dustin M. Grote holds a PhD from Virginia Tech in Higher Education Research and Policy and currently serves as a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is currently involved in several NSF-funded projects spanning
towards goal attainment.Dr. Saundra Johnson Austin, University of South Florida Dr. Saundra Johnson Austin is the lead project coordinator at the University of South Florida for Florida Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (FL-AGEP) Transformation Alliance: Improving Pathways in the Professoriate for Minority Women in STEM. She is the project coordinator at the Univer- sity of South Florida for Project Racism In School Exclusionary Suspensions (RISES), a mixed methods study that addresses the long-standing phenomenon of out-of-school suspensions for African American middle and high school adolescents. Dr. Johnson Austin also teaches math and pre-algebra to 7th grade girls and boys at Academy Prep
Munich. He holds a Ph.D. in English (University of Wisconsin) and is a certified Project Management Professional.Dr. Kim Lester, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Lester serves as the Director of Pre-College Programs at Virginia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity focusing on outreach and recruiting underserved students into STEM fields. She also worked as a global engagement specialist in the Office of Global Engineering Engagement and Research at Virginia Tech, providing assistance with the development, implementation and administrative support of international initiatives at the College of Engineering. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Animal Science and a Doctor of
name is Rachelle Pedersen and I am a Ph.D. student in Curriculum & Instruction atTexas A&M University. With me is Nyima Sanneh, an undergraduate researcher whohas been working on this project with us alongside Dr. Paul Hernandez. Our project istitled “Implicit and Explicit Balanced Identity Scores Vary as a Function of Gender andSTEM Major.”Here is a brief outline of what we will be going over during our presentation today.Regardless of pre-collegiate academic abilities, women are underrepresented in many fields ofscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics. According to NGC 2020, “Women make uphalf of the total U.S. college-educated workforce, but only 28% of the science and engineeringworkforce.” Upon further analysis, we find
Engineering Exchange for Social Justice (ExSJ) framework,which situates community-based engineering projects as exchanges rather than services andholds community partnerships as a key component to this work. The shift in language is criticalbecause it works to dismantle the imperialist, white-centered, patriarchal notions of what itmeans for engineers to engage with “the community” [38]. The authors note, “The term serviceconnotes a one-directional flow of ideas, resources, and expertise from engineers to communityrecipients” [38, p. 2], while “exchange connotes equal partnership, and a bidirectional flow ofideas, resources, ways of knowing and being, and expertise” [38, p.2]. Also, ExSJ pushes againstthe dominant mindset that engineering is a
how others haveapproached empathy in curricula, projects, and practice. We applied Zaki’s model of empathy —which triangulates “sharing,” “thinking about” and “caring about,” as the theoretical frameworkguiding the inquiry — and performed a systematic literature review. We sought answers to thefollowing research questions: 1) How have educators integrated empathy development intolearning activities in STEM?; 2) What pedagogical approaches have been shown to promoteempathy of students in STEM?; and 3) How have scholars approached the development ofdifferent kinds of empathy in classrooms? After querying Google Scholar, analyzing more than10,000 publications, and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, we identified 63 articles thatcentered
the past 12 years. She has a BS and MS in Civil Engineering at the University of Cincinnati and is a registered Professional Engineer.Dr. Dustin Michael Grote, Virginia Tech Dustin M. Grote holds a PhD from Virginia Tech in Higher Education Research and Policy and currently serves as a Postdoctoral Research Associate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is currently involved in several NSF-funded projects spanning undergraduate and graduate STEM education. His interdisciplinary research agenda includes graduate funding in STEM, transdisciplinary, experiential and adaptive lifelong learning, undergraduate education policies, systems thinking, organizational change, broadening participation in
this role, she served as Director of the Program in Technical Communication since 2012. She has taught classes in technical communications to undergraduate and graduate students at the College of Engineering since 1997. She has also co-authored the book A Practical Guide to Technical Reports and Presentations for Scientists, Engineers and Students. Prior to her teaching career, Dr. Khan worked as an engineering and project manager to design man- ufacturing systems in the information technology field, to manufacture and test engine blocks for the automotive industry, and to research coatings for high-speed and high-temperature machining applica- tions. Dr. Khan has a Bachelors of Science degree in Mechanical
education research. He is currently developing projects on Black family mathematics socialization, mathematics and citizenship, STEM-mentoring experiences, and the question of equity in mathematics education. His scholarship has been published in several journals and edited volumes; find and download his work here. Dr. Larnell develops and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in the College of Education across curricular and degree programs (including in the general education program): Introduction to Urban Ed- ucation; STEM, Education, and Society; Teaching and Learning Elementary Mathematics in the Urban Classroom; Research on the Learning of Mathematics; Research on the Mathematics Teachers and Teach- ing
degrees with just one additional year, whereas a traditional MSE degreetakes usually two or more years to complete after the BSE. The combined degree program allowsacademically talented (high GPA) undergraduate students replace two of their three requiredundergraduate electives with graduate courses while also replacing their industry sponsoredsenior design project (capstone) with their Master’s thesis/project. With this, they are able toreplace up to 11 undergraduate credits with graduate credits thereby accelerating their graduatedegree while also reducing cost. The compressed timeline allows the scholars enter theworkforce a year earlier thereby maximizing their earning potential. This structure helps addressthe family pressure
. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Elmore Family School of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering and (by courtesy) School of Engineering Education, and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program within the College of Engineering at Purdue. Prior to her appointment in ECE, Dr. Zoltowski was Co-Director of the EPICS Program. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Her research interests include the pro- fessional formation of engineers, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, and leadership. American c Society for
introductory programming classes to an audience of computing andengineering students and therefore is well attuned to the challenges of first-year college studentslearning this material, although also at risk of projecting challenges her students face ontoparticipants.Dr. Meier grew up on a farm on a Native American reservation. He descends from WesternEuropean immigrants and nearby towns were mostly white European descendants. Native Siouxand Ponca Americans attended school, played sports, and socialized within the communities. Hegrew up appreciating Native American culture but saw inequities limiting education and careerpotential, and intersectionality resulting in cultural bias and discrimination. As a cisgender whitemale high school student, he
Science Foundation-sponsored projects focused on broadening participation in STEM academia. Her research centers on the creation of optimal higher education policies and practices that advance faculty careers and student success, as well as the schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century.Ms. Emily Kulakowski, University of Colorado Colorado SpringsMs. Elizabeth Peterson, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Elizabeth Peterson is a doctoral student in the Department of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. She earned her MS in Applied Mathematics and BS in Pure Mathematics, both from the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. Her
participation in higher education, and the educational attainment and schooling experiences of Mexican descent youth in the mid-20th century.Dr. Valerie Martin Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Valerie Martin Conley is dean of the College of Education and professor of Leadership, Research, and Foundations at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs. She previously served as director of the Center for Higher Education, professor, and department chair at Ohio University. She was the PI for the NSF funded research project: Academic Career Success in Science and Engineering-Related Fields for Female Faculty at Public Two-Year Institutions. She is co-author of The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American
Bias Busters groups created by industry and academia, especially the Bias Busters @ Carnegie Mellon University and the Bias Busters in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at University of California Berkeley. The student ambassadors were given broad objectives to improve the college community and educate the student population about diversity, equity, and inclusion. An initial planned project of the ambassadors was to organize a DEI Takeover Week during spring of 2020. This project had to be postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The student ambassadors took this as an opportunity to instead develop programs focused on equity and inclusion issues that arose due to the pandemic and the transition to
participants indicated that their advisors had helped them debug code; most of the othersdescribed their meetings as covering only big-picture topics. In fact, Glen reports that after the firstfew challenges, he realized that his advisor “really didn’t have time to actually get into weeds tohelp me out with something.” The relative independence advisors expect from their students seemsto have been a surprise to some of our participants. For example, Patricia says that she came inthinking that she would be assigned to work on an existing project, but instead found that “it wasmy job to figure out a research idea and then work on that.” Her advisor was willing to guide her,but was “pretty hands off” when it came to understanding what she needed to do on
engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben D. Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He is the leader of the Critical Research in Engineering and Technology Education (CREATE) group at Cal Poly. His research interests include critical pedagogies; efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering, engineering design theory and practice; conceptual change and understanding; and school- to-work transitions for new engineers
about each of the fields of engineering, as well as connect with students and staff members in those departments.Throughout her high school’s 3 course STEM program, she was able to get hands‐on experience with CAD and using power tools, as well as experience developing a concept project to propose to the community.Another influential factor in her decision to pursue STEM comes from her father’s work as an electrical engineer. These influences led her to conduct this study to ensure more women have access to outreach programs and chose to pursue STEM careers. 4 Research Question and Objectives Research question: What influences more women
, which is consistent with trends described in the literature. However, for URMparticipants, the career-forward experience results in a small/medium positive effect that isspecific to Engineering self-efficacy, an encouraging result.The decrease in commitment to an engineering career for URM students suggests that someaspect of the curriculum is likely causing issues. Considering the positive trend for EngineeringSelf Efficacy among this group, indicative of increased confidence for doing engineering, this isan especially intriguing and concerning result, which may be related to stereotype threat whereour focus on career practices causes URM students to project negative feelings or experiencesforward into their career. These findings merit