AC 2008-545: A COMPARISON OF IMPLEMENTING A SINGLE PROBLEM INRELATIONAL, OBJECT-RELATIONAL AND OBJECT-ORIENTED DATABASESYSTEMSFloyd Wilkes, Utah Valley State CollegeReza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley State College Page 13.20.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Comparison of Implementing a Single Problem in Relational, Object-Relational and Object-Oriented Database SystemsABSTRACTSeveral database textbooks were studied to determine how extensively the three database models Relational, Object-Relational and Object-Oriented were been covered [1]. From this study it was determined that some database textbooks either do not
AC 2008-1478: UNDERSTANDING AND RELATING TO YOUR INTERNATIONALSTUDENTSEdward Gehringer, North Carolina State University Page 13.1309.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Understanding and Relating to Your International Students Edward F. Gehringer North Carolina State University efg@ncsu.eduAbstractIn most engineering programs, international students constitute the majority of the graduatepopulation, and a rising percentage of the undergraduate population. It is important forengineering faculty to understand these students’ expectations of
entrepreneurship, so that at the end of their formalstudies, the students will become “Innovation Ambassadors” who think and lead innovatively. Several different related courses, workshops, approaches and programs have been developed,implemented and assessed over the past years at FAU. Among these are: Page 13.750.3 1. “Eight-Dimensional (8D) Methodology for Innovative Problem Solving.” (Raviv 2002a) It is asystematic and unified approach that stimulates innovation by effectively using “both sides” of thebrain. It builds on comprehensive problem solving knowledge gathered from industry, business,marketing, math, science, engineering, technology
knowledge and skills required for its graduates to function effectively in a technical environment and to accept increasing responsibility in technical leadership positions. (Emphasis added.) The program permits specialization in an area of modern technology applicable to each student’s working environment or area of interest. Emphasis is placed on preparing students for technical leadership positions in business and industry, faculty positions in technology and engineering technology at community college and university levels, or to continue for a PhD in technology or a closely related field at Purdue or another university. The program outcomes for the graduates, consistent with the existing
AC 2008-2741: RELATING CONTINUOUS-TIME AND DISCRETE-TIME IN THECLASSROOMMark Hopkins, Rochester Institute of Technology Mark A. Hopkins is an Associate Professor in the Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Rochester, NY. He obtained his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech in 1988. His main research interests are in the areas of modeling and controlling large flexible structures, and engineering education. Page 13.1030.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Relating Continuous-Time and Discrete-Time in the ClassroomAbstractIt never ceases to
are taken into account in our inferential analyses through the selection of the non-STEM focused exam school as the referent by which to compare the other four schools.Survey measures: control variables School Site. Although each high school was selected because of its particular emphasis onSTEM or STEM-related programming, the sites vary by neighborhood characteristics, studentcomposition, and educational ranking (as described above and in Table 1). A series of dummyvariables was created to test for differences by site. The non-STEM exam school is the referencein our logistic regression models. Student Demographic Characteristics. The under representation of Black and Latinocollege engineering students relative to Asian and
AC 2008-2026: AN INTERVENTION USING CONCEPT SKETCHING FORADDRESSING DISLOCATION-RELATED MISCONCEPTIONS ININTRODUCTORY MATERIALS CLASSESStephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K-12 engineering outreach. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing fundamental knowledge
inspecific courses are compared against their performance in related topics in thecomprehensive examination. Results show that the overall student GPA inmechanics courses correlates with comprehensive examination performance.However, there is poor correlation between student performance in specificsubjects and corresponding student grades. The FE pass rates of SeattleUniversity civil engineering students have been higher than the national pass ratessince the implementation of the comprehensive examination. However, moreyears of data is necessary to support the latter conclusion.IntroductionABET 2000 Criterion 3 requires that all engineering graduates demonstrate elevenprogram outcomes referred to as the “a-k program outcomes”. In late 2005
. Page 13.227.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessing Progress: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Three Course Introduction to Aerospace Engineering and Related Curriculum ModificationsAbstractA three semester introductory sequence in Aerospace Engineering was implementedconcurrently with the 1999 ABET evaluation under ABET 2000 criteria, and was modifiedconsiderably to account for curriculum changes through the evaluation period of 2005. Asfurther program modifications have since been made to allow concentrations in aeronautics andastronautics with branching occurring during the last semester of the lower division, thisintroductory sequence has become a very important
Laurie K. Laird is the Director of Corporate and Alumni Relations and Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU. She received a masters degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. At ONU, she teaches primarily freshman engineering courses. In addition to freshman programs, one of her areas of interest includes outreach to K-12 students. Prior to teaching, she served as a design engineer for GE Aviation.John-David Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at ONU, and serves as Chair. His Doctorate is from the University of Notre Dame. Research interests include education, controls, robotics, and
(MATH 147) as aprerequisite for their first calculus course. In 2005, Engineering with Precalculus (ENGR 110)was developed as a companion course to MATH 147, with the goals of increasing studentsuccess in precalculus, and promoting interest in engineering. The primary activity in ENGR110 is based upon a supplementary math tutorial program (ALEKSTM)4, which the students usewhile progressing through their precalculus course. In Fall 2006, interactive simulation modulesin the Working Model2DTM environment were introduced to the students in ENGR 110 on an adhoc basis5. At that time, a formal assessment of the effectiveness of the simulation modules wasnot conducted; however, student comments encouraged us to implement simulation modules on
majors which are related to engineering as well asproviding information on career services programs designed to help students find appropriatemajors. This information has proven to be timely for the students in the class who decide not topursue engineering majors but do not know how to go about finding another major which isappropriate for them. Table 1 – Weekly Schedule of Class Topics and Assignments Date Topic Assignment Due Week 1 Course Introduction, Syllabus review, Preliminary questionnaire Week 2 Study Skills Week 3 Time Management Initial one- to two-page
more than 50 papers, book chapters and journals. She is a member of various national and international boards including the US National Science Foundation International Science and Engineering Advisory Committee, the Women in Engineering Programs Advocate Network Board, and the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies.Claudio Borri, Universita' di Firenze Claudio Borri, full professor of Computational Mechanics of Structures, University of Florence (Italy), is President of SEFI (2005-07), President of IFEES (2006-08) Vice-Dean for International Relations and Director of the Interuniversity Research Centre on Building & Environmental Aerodynamics; he is Author or
, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Dan Budny is the Director of the freshman program at the University of Pittsburgh.John Ventura, Christian Brothers University John Ventura is Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Christian Brothers University. His research interest includes formulating evaluation processes for engineering departments and developing online learning environments.Patricia Ralston, University of Louisville Dr. Ralston is Professor and Acting Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. In addition to her work with first and second year students, she is actively engaged in research related to process control and cyber
hands-on experience. While homeowners, businesses, farmers,schools and municipalities have benefited from the collective experience of the clean energyprogram, the participating students, including the lead author on this paper, are preparing for themodern practice of engineering. This paper will present the societal and pedagogical benefits ofthe project.IntroductionRowan University’s project-oriented curriculum allows students the opportunity to developabilities related to the ABET A-K criteria throughout their engineering studies. The hallmark ofthe curriculum is the Engineering Clinic sequence1,2, which allow students to apply technicalcontent they learn in class to real-world applications. The clean energy program (CEP),discussed herein
knowledge due to the existence of poor prior knowledge ormisconception, and (3) use of discussions or peer learning.Engineering Clinic at Rowan UniversityThe four engineering programs at Rowan University (RU) have common Engineering Clinicclasses throughout their programs of study. Students enroll in Clinics in each of their eightsemesters at RU. Each clinic class involves students in teamwork (often interdisciplinary),hands-on activities, and report writing and presentation. For a more detailed discussion, seeReference (16).The Freshman Clinic is focused on engineering measurements (Fall) and competitive assessment(Spring). The Sophomore Clinic is focused on engineering design. The course is team-taughtwith communications faculty17-18. Where
collegestudents whose high-school SAT math scores were at least 650 and who started their collegecareers in natural science, mathematics or engineering. The interviewees were selectedrandomly by the participating colleges and universities. Approximately half of those interviewedhad switched majors out of science-math-engineering (SME) programs by their senior years. Theother half of those interviewed were still SME majors as seniors and planned to graduate with adegree in natural science, mathematics or engineering. They found that the greatest contributionto the loss of students in Science, Math and Engineering fields was due to problems associatedwith the structure of the educational experience and the culture of the disciplines. They alsofound that
13.182.3 Figure 2. Components of the retention program at COEThe Introduction to Engineering course exhibits radical departure from the COE’s tradition inwhich each engineering department in the College offered its own introductory course. Logisticalproblems related to scheduling, laboratory space, and equipment resources were resolvedthrough a very concerted effort across the college. The course has been implemented withexisting resources. This organization and development of Introduction to Engineering course ispresented below.Development of the Course:Until Fall 2007 Semester, each department in the COE offered their own introductory course.The content of these courses varied widely from teaching computer applications to
AC 2008-1319: DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FORASSESSING PROGRAM OUTCOMES IN ENGINEERING, ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY & COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAMSPaul Biney, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Paul O. Biney is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Prairie View A&M University, and the Director of the Future Aerospace Science & Technology (FAST) Center. He is a registered professional engineer in Texas. His areas of expertise include processing, fabrication and characterization of high temperature polymer matrix composites, multifunctional nanocomposites and energy systems design. He is also the chairman of the College of Engineering Assessment Committee and
sustainability of theethanol process by developing a facility to eliminate waste from the production process.This paper will describe the incorporation of the biomass-to-ethanol design project into our firstyear engineering program, the assessment methodology used and the expected educationaloutcomes of the project.IntroductionAll first year engineering students who enter our program Calculus-ready take a two semestercourse sequence: ENG1101 (Engineering Problem Solving and Analysis) and ENG1102(Engineering Modeling and Design). These courses are designed to introduce first yearengineering students to basic engineering topics: 3D visualization and modeling, ethics,engineering design and problem solving, software proficiency, and technical communications
. The ABET criterion 3 outcomes are a driving force inmaking sure the course outcomes are appropriate.Freshman Engineering courses have undergone significant evolution in the past few decades. Inrecent years great emphasis has been placed upon broadening the freshman engineeringexperience and improving retention in engineering programs. Several programs have madesignificant changes in recent years to address these issues. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 Many programs are lessskills-based instruction and more project-based instruction with an emphasis on problem solvingand engineering design. 1, 6,7,8 The United States Air Force Academy, as well as otherinstitutions, have taken a multidisciplinary approach in the first year by making the course opento or required
programs.The CEAB has two goals: - that engineering programs offered by Canadian universities will meet or exceed minimumeducational standards acceptable for professional engineering licensure in Canada;and - that the quality and relevance of engineering education will continuously improve.The CEAB strives to meet these goals by continuously reviewing and updating the policies andprocedures for evaluating university engineering programs.In addition to advising Engineers Canada on all matters related to engineering education, theCEAB works closely with Canadian universities to ensure that accredited engineering programsare able to impart to their graduates the skills and knowledge needed to become productivemembers of the profession. It also
reallocating faculty time, providing laboratory space, and a small amount ofoperating funds. The program is lead by the department heads from Computer Science, Electricaland Computer Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering as well as other faculty members fromthese departments. The courses are being designed and taught by an interdepartmental facultyteam from all three departments and we are currently searching for a faculty member explicitlyidentified as holding a joint appointment.In addition to resources committed by the Institute, we have sought and received external supportfor two related activities. One is a small pilot grant to work with FIRST to strengthen socialnetworking among teams in the competition. This is particularly important for
. Page 13.957.9 Table 5 - Summary of the Results of Direct and Indirect Measures Program Assessment Method & Performance Criteria Actions for Continuous Improvement Outcomes Indirect Direct Decision Include at least 3 hours for review of math required in each related courses. Encourage students to use math help center. Outcome 1 85% - 100% 67% Concern Explore developing an integrated math/science/engineering math course to improve the
Science program (which culminates withthe completion of a Master thesis) and a Master of Engineering degree program (which doesnot require the thesis). Both programs are titled “Sustainable Engineering”. The objectives ofthe programs are to equip engineers with the tools they will need to meet the challengesassociated with delivering goods, energy and services through sustainable means. Theseprograms will deliver education on sustainable design methods related to the design ofproducts, processes, and energy related systems as well as end of life management decisiontools and technologies.The structure of the M.Eng. program is shown in Figure 1, and that of the M.S. program inFigure 2
the students with an opportunity to meet engineers from variousdisciplines and to see them in assorted work environment.Goal 6: Instruction/Tutorial sessions in Engineering, Mathematics, English/reading, Science, andPSAT/SAT.Expected Student Outcome: Students will have the ability to apply mathematical, scientific andengineering principles to the identification, formulation, and solution of engineering problems.Students will also learn about reading comprehension. Students will be better prepared for theSAT.Assessment Process:The program coordinators established an assessment process and tools to ensure that the JETSparticipants achieved the expected program outcomes. The data related to each outcome wascollected from various resources such
AC 2008-2010: UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM INNANOMATERIALS, MACROMOLECULES AND INTERFACESAnnette Jacobson, Carnegie Mellon UniversityRosemary Frollini, Carnegie Mellon UniversitySusana Steppan, Carnegie Mellon University Page 13.1303.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Undergraduate Engineering Program in Nanoparticles, Macromolecules and InterfacesAbstractA coursework sequence for chemical engineering undergraduates is offered by the Colloids,Polymers and Surfaces (CPS) Program at Carnegie Mellon University to provide education abouttechnology applications in nanomaterials, macromolecules and interfaces. This program
sciences such as philosophy,psychology, and, especially, economics, and thus deals with theories concerning the basic lawsof humans and society. The goals of the Social Engineering Program are to educate advancedresearchers and administers who work in areas related to policy, design and planning in nationalterritory socio-economic systems and to develop the integrated theories and methods of theseareas. It has been designed in a way to satisfy the education law of the country. The design andimplementation of this program comes to add to the efforts of the different sectors of thecommunity to solve the social problems that are perpetuated by decades such as environmentalissues, overpopulation, and the urban problem.1. IntroductionThe Social
AC 2008-552: CHARACTERIZING THE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGISTS:IMPLICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ASSESSMENTRobert Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. Chin is a faculty member in the Department of Technology Systems, College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina University, where he’s taught since 1986. In addition, he is a full member of the East Carolina University and Indiana State University graduate faculties. Chin received his PhD from the University of Maryland, College Park; MAE from Ball State University; BA from the University of Northern Colorado, and AAS from the Community College of the Air Force. Before joining the ECU faculty, he was on the College of Education faculty at
writingcomponents are completed over the summer). There were four such programs (Brazil, China,Chile and Germany) offered in the summer of 2007 and the program is continuing in 2008. TheSchool of Engineering’s and the University’s Study Abroad Offices provide numerousalternatives and opportunities for international travel and some of these have an engineeringlearning component. We have also joined a consortium of schools in The InternationalAssociation for the Exchange of Students for Technical Experience (IAESTE) to provideadditional engineering related international opportunities for our students. Additional programsexist and are being developed. Until now however, an international experience has not been arequired part of a student’s degree completion