Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevion Henderson, University of Michigan

, teaching, and learning are described.MethodScholars have outlined several approaches to instrument development and validation, each onepointing researchers’ attention to various, often ideologically informed issues in the instrumentdevelopment process. For example, Hinkin [8] outlined a six-step scale development process thatfocusses the research heavily on an iterative process of statistical analysis, item reduction, andreplication. Hinkin’s six-step process includes (a) Item generation, (b) questionnaireadministration, (c) initial item reduction using techniques like exploratory factor analysis, (d)confirmatory factor analysis, (e) convergent/discriminant validity, and (f) replication.Similarly, Kalkbrenner [9] described the seven-step MEASURE

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyeonghun Jwa, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University

, 2019, p. 12.[8] I. M. Hasbun, H. M. Matusovich, and S. G. Adams, “The dissertation Institute: Motivating doctoral engineering students toward degree completion,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2016, vol. 2016-Novem, p. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757508.[9] R. L. Kajfez and H. M. Matusovich, “Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness as Motivators of Graduate Teaching Assistants,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 245–272, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20167.[10] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Tally, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, “Aligning engineering education with disciplinary expectations: A strategic blueprint for doctoral competency assessment,” Int. J

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Interdisciplinary Capstone Projects, Pandemic Adapted Mechatronics Lab, Call for Change

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bart Johnson, Itasca Community College; Ronald Ulseth; Michael Raich, Itasca Community College

Paper ID #36758A Multi-Decade Response to the Call for ChangeBart M Johnson (Vice President Academic and Student Affairs) Dr. Bart Johnson is currently the Provost and Senior Academic Officer for Itasca Community College (ICC) and the Vice- President of Academic and Student Affairs for the Northeast Higher Education District. On a regional level, he is involved with educational opportunities, economic development, and youth opportunities and activities. Prior to his administrative roles, Dr. Johnson was a faculty member in engineering at Itasca, involved with the development of the Iron Range Engineering and

Conference Session

Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Daniell DiFrancesca, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Matthew Swinarski, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Chetan Nikhare, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Mohammad Rasouli, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Qi Dunsworth, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College

are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.References1. Wang, B., “The future of manufacturing: A new perspective,” Engineering, 2018, vol. 4, pp. 722–728.2. Spak, G.T., “US advanced manufacturing skills gap: Innovation education solutions,” In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Elsevier, 2013.3. Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, “The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing: 2015 and beyond,” 2015.4. Kimmel, H., and Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., and Rockland, R., “Bringing engineering into K-12 schools: A problem looking for solutions,” In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.5. Kevin J. B

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Dorribo Camba; Kristin Bartlett, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis

rule three, “we interpret lines collinear in an image ascollinear in 3D” [20]. Figure 2 shows an example of a shape from the PSVT:R with propertiesrelated to these rules. Figure 2A shows answer choice option 8c from the PSVT:R. The redhighlighted line in 2B shows lines that are depicted as collinear in the image, meaning theywould be interpreted as colinear in 3D, but these lines are not actually collinear in the 3D shape.Figure 2C shows a red circle around a vertex where the tips of multiple lines coincide in the 2Ddrawing, meaning they would be interpreted as coinciding in 3D, but these lines do not allcoincide in 3D. FIGURE 2. VISUAL PROBLEMS WITH ANSWER CHOICE OPTION 8C FROM THE PSVT:R (FIGURE A FROM YOON [11], B AND C CREATED BY THE

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sreyoshi Bhaduri, Amazon; Lilianny Virguez, University of Florida; Michelle Soledad, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Debarati Basu

reviewed papers will be provided in a futurepublication.References[1] D. J. Nelson and D. C. Rogers, A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Citeseer, 2003.[2] L. Blaney, R. Kandiah, J. J. Ducoste, J. A. Perlinger, and S. L. Bartelt-Hunt, “Trends in Population and Demographics of U.S. Environmental Engineering Students and Faculty from 2005 to 2013,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 578–590, 2016, doi: 10.1089/ees.2016.0063.[3] M. B. Bailey et al., “Establishing the Foundation for Future Organizational Reform and Transformation at a large private university to expand the representation of women faculty,” 2011.[4] M. Heyvaert, K. Hannes, B. Maes, and P. Onghena

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siddhant Joshi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kirsten Davis, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Lori Czerwionka, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Elisa Camps Troncoso, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Francisco Montalvo

advantages of using scenario-based assessments over self-reporting,observational, simulation-based, and other assessment methods are: (a) Ability to identify salienttechnical and contextual dimensions (b) Help evaluate the potential behaviors of participants inrealistic situations (c) Less time consuming than some other approaches (d) Can be administeredto a large number of students simultaneously (e) Include both open-ended and closed-endedquestions (f) Easier to score due to a well-defined scoring rubric [2]. Moreover, scenario-basedassessments can indicate growth in dimensions of systems thinking over a short period [16].Multiple scenario-based assessments are available that claim to assess similar skills, making itchallenging to identify which

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brayan Díaz, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Cesar Delgado, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC; Kevin Han, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

, H., & Meek, S. (2021). Enhancing graduates’ enterprise capabilities through work- integrated learning in co-working spaces. Higher Education, , 1-20. https://10.1007/s10734-021-00756-xJones, F. R., Mardis, M. A., McClure, C. R., Ma, J., Ambavarapu, C., & Spears, L. I. (2017). Work-integrated learning (WIL) in information technology. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 7(4), 394-407. https://10.1108/HESWBL-08-2017-0046Kolmos, A., & de Graaff, E. (2014). Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering education: Merging models. In A. Johri, & B. M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (pp. 141-160). Cambridge University Press. https://10.1017

Conference Session

Utilizing Technology to Train Chemical Engineering Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University; Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Daniel Burkey, University of Connecticut; Daniel Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Paper ID #36541Exploring Engineering Students’ Decision Making Prioritiesin a Digital Plant EnvironmentJeffrey Stransky Jeffrey Stransky is a PhD candidate in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) Department at Rowan University. His research interests involve studying engineering ethics and decision making and using digital games as safe teaching environments. He has published in the overlap of these topics by integrating digital games into chemical engineering curriculum to help students build an awareness of the ethical and practical implications of their decisions. Jeffrey obtained his BS and MSc

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vignesh Subbian, The University of Arizona; Linda Shaw; colleen halpin, University of Arizona

wasthe control group, which received the standard instruction, including lectures and exercises thatdid not include case studies. Group B received the same instruction as Group A, with an addedelement of nine case examples to review and were discussed for 15-20 minutes per case. GroupC received the instruction that Group B received, and also received a copy of the Babson Collegeethical decision-making framework, which they were quizzed on. When tested on moralreasoning, Group B and C, the intervention groups, did not outperform Group A. The researcherscited motivation as a major reason of why this particular method may not have shown improvedmoral reasoning results in the intervention groups, as the added intervention element did notimpact the

Conference Session

Computers in Education 3 - Modulus I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Deorio, University of Michigan; Christina Keefer, University of Michigan

times of a class before and after a newautograder feedback style, we use a two-sided, independent sample t-test.5 ResultsWe now examine the relationship between automated feedback style and office hours wait time.We first compare our data set to previous work. Then, we rule out course enrollment and staff sizeas possible confounding variables. Using an ANOVA test, we analyze the association betweenoffice hours wait times and different autograder feedback styles.5.1 Comparison with Prior WorkOur web-based queue for peer teaching office hours is similar to Smith et. al. [9]. The context issimilar, with both being deployed in computer sciences courses at larger universities. (a) Total service time per student (b

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Essig, Purdue University Fort Wayne

, pp. 515-529, 2008.[8] B. Gunnick and K. L. S. Bernhardt, "Writing, Critical Thinking, and Engineering Curricula," in 22nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Boston, MA, USA, 2002.[9] J. Wolfe, B. Olson and L. Wilder, "Knowing what we know about writing in the disciplines: A new approach to teaching for transfer in FYC," The WAC Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 42-77, 2014.[10] L. Wilson, T. T. J. A. Cook and J. Everly, "Developing A Writing In The Disciplines Program In An Engineering Technology College," in American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2008.[11] M. C. Paretti, A. Eriksson and M. Gustafsson, "Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Impacts of Communication in the

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division ASCE Liaison Committee - Supporting the Development of the Next Civil Engineers

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Clayton, Wake Forest University; Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Monica Palomo, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Carolyn Rodak, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute; Stacey Kulesza, Kansas State University; Pinar Omur-Ozbek, Colorado State University

78 2020 semester: Vicki May, improvement for new Lessons learned Jennifer techniques implemented; what from the term Retherford, Kelly techniques to continue “post- Salyards (Patricia pandemic” Clayton) (a) (b) (c) Figure 1: Example photos from ECX 2020: (a) home set-up viewing ECX welcome slide andgallery view of participants; (b) ECX presenter (given with permission) conducting at-home live demonstrations during August 3, 2020 session; (b) slide showing strategies for students to

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Becker, United States Air Force Academy; Timothy Frank, United States Air Force Academy; Joel Sloan, United States Air Force Academy

stereotypes). 7. I am able to write using the appropriate point of view consistently. 8. I am able to integrate visuals (e.g. charts, maps, graphs, tables, images) with informative labels into a technical document. 9. I am able to write descriptions within a technical document that accurately interpret the visuals. 10. I am able to appropriately format (e.g. use of a specific style/convention for headings, lists, bullets, pagination) my technical writing. Response Options: a) I have no proficiency in this task at this time. b) I have very limited proficiency in this task at this time

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Fluids, Heat Transfer

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Drenth, US Air Force Academy; George Sidebotham, The Cooper Union; Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ioan Feier, US Air Force Academy

simplifies the analysis because the change in pressure is determined bythe initial condition. That is, the initial height defines the magnitude of the hydrostatic vacuumproduced. This behavior will be apparent when conducting the lab, during which the change inthe water level is not large. Model B will relax that assumption, resulting in a more complicatedanalysis (yet still analytical), but obscuring the controlling physics.The volume of water added is simply related the height by: 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 = 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏 + ℎ1 𝐴𝐴The change in pressure, is: 𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 − 𝑉𝑉𝑏𝑏

Conference Session

Transfer Programs at Two-Year Colleges in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agniprava Banerjee, University of Texas at El Paso; Sara Rodriguez, University of Texas at El Paso; Benjamin Flores, University of Texas at El Paso

meaningful one-on-one mentoring relationship and explore the possibilityof a teaching career at a 2-year higher education institution. Highlights of the program are: a) Participation Stipend - Selected fellows are provided with a stipend for their participation in the program. However due to the federal nature of funding (NSF) only US citizens and permanent residents. The fellowship opportunity has also been extended to international applicants who are provided a complete experience and referred to as “ Associate Fellows.”b) Mentoring by a qualified Community College Mentor - The West Tx RC team, is built on existing relationships fostered by the UT LSAMP program. This allows for mentors with extensive experience and multiple

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Claudia Calle Müller, Florida International University

is sustainability? 1.Basic information 3. How to measure it a. Design and construct about sustainability 4. Role of the engineer, b. Operate and maintain 2.Basic information ethics, and professional c. Decommission and recycle about rating systems responsibility 3. How to measure it (optional) 5. Apply rating system(s) to 3.Use one or more

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Melissa Caserto, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

, 2007.[12] H. J. Heo and B. A. Chun, “A Study on the Effects of Mobile-based LMS on Flipped Learning: Focused on the Affective Pathway in Pre-service Teacher Education,” Int. J. Softw. Eng. Its Appl., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 473–484, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.14257/ijseia.2016.10.12.39.[13] D. H. Jonassen, “Engineers as Problem Solvers,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 103–118. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.009.[14] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x

Conference Session

Investigations Using Calculus Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emre Tokgoz, Quinnipiac University; Elif Tekalp; Berrak Tekalp; Hasan Tekalp; Samantha Scarpinella, Quinnipiac University; Michael Giannone, Quinnipiac University

., Tekalp S. B., Tekalp E. N., Tekalp H. A., Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of University Students’ Ability to Relate Calculus Knowledge to Function Graphs, 127th Annual ASEE Conference Proceedings, Mathematics Division, paper ID # 29726, Montreal, Canada, 2020.2. Tokgöz, E., Scarpinella, S. E., and Giannone, M., Analysis of STEM Students’ Ability to Respond to Algebra, Derivative, and Limit Questions for Graphing a Function, 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, https://peer.asee.org/366853. Tokgöz, E. & Gualpa, G. C. “STEM Majors’ Cognitive Calculus Ability to Sketch a Function Graph,” ASEE Annual Meeting Proceedings, Mathematics Division, Seattle, Washington, Paper I.D. #: 12661, 2015.4. Tokgöz, E. “Analysis of STEM Majors

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Ilbeigi; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Azita Morteza, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

upwardtrend in the number of publications in recent years (Figure 1a) shows the increasing attention thatthe research community is paying to this rapidly evolving topic. In terms of publication types,the identified 103 relevant documents consist of 41 peer-reviewed journal publications, 60conference proceedings, and two book chapters (Figure 1b). Figure 1: Distribution of the Documents Based on (a) Publication Year and (b) Publication TypeIn terms of content and scope, the relevant documents can be categorized into three groups: 1)studies that proposed a gamified solution for education or training, 2) studies that offeredgamified solutions for non-educational purposes, and 3) studies that contributed to this field butdid not develop a specific

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 10: Empathy and Human-centered Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ardeshir Raihanian Mashhadi, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico

for a multidimensional approach," Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, p. 113, 1983, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.[6] B. Wilkerson and L.-K. L. Trellevik, "Sustainability-oriented innovation: Improving problem definition through combined design thinking and systems mapping approaches," Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 42, p. 100932, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100932.[7] F. Ceschin and I. Gaziulusoy, "Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions," Design studies, vol. 47, pp. 118- 163, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.[8] T. Zhang and H. Dong, "Human-centred design: An emergent conceptual model

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Marszalek, University of Missouri - Kansas City; Michelle Maher, University of Missouri - Kansas City

, 2009.[12] B. Ozcan, H. Kontas, and A. Unisen, “Sources of mathematics self-efficacy of gifted and non-gifted students in high school,” Research in Pedagogy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2021, doi: 10.5937/istrped2101085o.[13] F. Pajares and M. D. Miller, “Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 193–203, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193.[14] Ö. S. Dinçol, “Chemistry self-efficacy beliefs as predictors of students’ metacognitive skills when solving chemistry problems,” International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, vol. 8, pp. 132–147, 2021, [Online]. Available: https

Conference Session

Assessment in Mechanics Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Brown, Abilene Christian University; Timothy Kennedy, Abilene Christian University

water towers in reducing pump requirements • Performed basic optimization of the pumped hydroelectric storage system • Developed a well thought out project separate from the three choices offered Figure 2 – Project RubricFinally, students are given a choice on how to improve their grade from a C to an A or B. Thereare four items beyond the C-level requirements for the course. One is to complete the projectwith a grade of “Exceeds Expectations” (as opposed to the C-level requirement of “MeetsExpectations”). The second is to complete a “mini-project” (essentially a glorified homeworkproblem) associated with the fourth module. This project will be discussed more in theDifferentiated Learning section. The

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Student Success

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University; Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University

. Geller, R. R. Faden, and D. M. Levine. “Tolerance for ambiguity among medicalstudents: Implications for their selection, training and practice,” Social Science and Medicine,31(5), 619-624, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90098-D[15] A. Weissenstein, S. Ligges, B. Brouwer, B. Marschall, and H. Friederichs. “Measuring theambiguity tolerance of medical students: a cross-sectional study from the first to sixth academicyears,” BMC Family Practice, 15:6, 2014. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/15/6[16] K. Kara and L. Kruteleva. “The relationship of ambiguity tolerance and personality traits ofyouth in a transitive society,” E3S Web of Conferences 210, 19007 (2020) ITSE-2020https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021019007https://www.e3s

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Alexander, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Michael Preuss; Breanna Bailey, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; David Hicks; Rajashekar Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Nitilaksha Hiremath, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Jingbo Liu, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Lihua Zuo, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Mahesh Hosur

engineering design process; importance of mathematics,chemistry and computers in engineering; engineering mechanics; data analysis; publicsafety; ethics; professional licensure; and career searches. Content varied from material thatwould be included in freshmen engineering courses to material that introduced advanced(upper-level) engineering courses. The portion of the SBP program involving industryprofessionals as guest speakers consisted of three panel discussions and three stand-alonepresentations. The three panel discussions invited guests from different career stages asfollows: (a) early career professionals, (b) a recent winning senior design team fromComputer Science in TAMUK’s COE, and (c) seasoned engineers. Each panel had four tofive

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Technical Session 3: Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Barlow, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Adrian Rodriguez, University of Texas at Austin; Oscar Rios, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; James Eakins, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand

about the graph, such as labels and ranges of the x and yaxes, descriptions of the different regions, and more specific descriptions of the locations ofPoint A and Point B, were added to the alt text so that students using AT can have a morecomplete understanding of what is happening in both graphs.Table 3. Figure from material science interactive textbook. Book Materials science Previous "Temperature versus composition percent graph shows solidus and liquidus lines increasing alt text from 1085 to 1455 degree Celsius, point A below solidus line and point B between solidus and liquidus lines." New "The copper-nickel phase diagram is shown in (a), and a zoomed in portion of the copper-nickel alt

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Integration of Engineering and/or Technical Rigor with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice (DEIJ)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Sanford, Lafayette College; Philip Parker, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University; Elizabeth Diacik, Lafayette College; Timothy Larsen, Lafayette College; Peter Canevari, Lafayette College

: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000275.[19] E. M. Spingola, “Literature Review on Disability Participation in the Engineering Field,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/literature-review-on-disability-participation-in-the-engineering-field[20] J. L. Hess, A. Whitehead, B. K. Jesiek, A. Katz, and D. Riley, “WIP: Intersections Between Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and Ethics in Engineering,” 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021 IEEE, pp. 1–5, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637059.[21] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd

Conference Session

WIED: Partnering with and Supporting the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kayla Kummerlen; Gretchen Dietz, University of Florida; Elliot Douglas, University of Florida

.[28] E. Cech, B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C. Seron, “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641–666, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0003122411420815.[29] B. M. Capobianco, B. F. French, and H. A. Diefes‐Du, “Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 698–716, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01125.x.[30] B. M. Capobianco, “UNDERGRADUATE WOMEN ENGINEERING THEIR PROFESSIONAL IDENTITIES,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 2–3, pp. 95–117, 2006, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2-3.10.[31] D. M. Hatmaker, “Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlyn Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Kelly Cross, University of Nevada, Reno

highlight theepistemologies that relate to learning rather than teaching. For this paper, we accumulated 200articles in an initial database search of the ASEE conference proceedings.Data AnalysisWe analyzed this data with secondary and tertiary rounds of exclusion based on the followingcriteria: 1. The paper was published between 2016 and 2021. 2. The paper was a peer-reviewed conference paper. 3. The paper focused on women engineering students as a population, either a. Exclusively b. Or along with other populations (e.g., male students, faculty, or administrators). 4. The paper addressed epistemologies or epistemic ideas in the main body of text (i.e., epistemology was not just acknowledged in references).The

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 6: Monitoring, Evaluating and Research

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Alves, Texas A&M University; Ahmarlay Myint, Texas A&M University; Zenon Medina-Cetina, Texas A&M University; Sonia Garcia, University of Georgia

Paper ID #37718Engineering Learning Community Introduction to ResearchAbroad A 5 year AssessmentMaria Claudia Alves (Senior Director, Halliburton Engineering GlobalPrograms) Dr. Maria Claudia B. Alves serves as Senior Director for Engineering Global Programs at the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. In this position since July 2012, she developed and implemented a multi-year strategic plan on global education programs that led to measurable outcomes such as increase in student participation and learning, as well as faculty engagement in global programs in the College of Engineering. Some of her most