participating in teaching, scholarship and service to the department. Dr. Stiner-Jones recently won funding for the College’s first National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experience for Undergraduates SITE program. She and her co-investigators aim to pro- vide students from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds with a 10-week research immersion and prepare them for graduate school. She is the recipient of the 2018 College of Engineering Faculty Diver- sity Excellence Award for achievements that support the College’s goal of excellence through diversity and inclusion. She and her co-author are the recipients of the 2019 Best Paper and Best Diversity Paper Awards from the American Society for Engineering Education for
beginning of Day 1, the girls were administered a pre-camp survey. Then during each day,in the beginning, the students were encouraged to do an internet search to find the answer to akey question related to the contents for the day. Specifically, on the animation day, the onlinesearch focused on what an animation engineer does and how animations are made; on therobotics day the focus was on what robotics engineers do and robotic applications, on the gamesday the online search was related to gaming engineering and how games were created; and on thewebpage design day, girls researched about webpage designers and how webpages are made.Then as the day progressed, the students learned about the basics of the programmingenvironment followed by
: Engineering Inspired by Nature, Teachers’ Manual[15]: SAE A World in Motion: Pinball Challenge, Teachers’ Manual[16]: SAE A World in Motion: Jet Toy Challenge, Teachers’ Manual[17]: SAE A World in Motion: Fuel Cell Challenge, Teachers’ Manual[18]: Friedman, A.E., Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education, 2008,Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education: Washington, DC.[19]: Wiebe, E. N., Faber, M., Corn, J., Collins, T. L., Unfried, A., & Townsend, L. (2013, June).A large-scale survey of K-12 students about STEM: Implications for engineering curriculumdevelopment and outreach efforts (research to practice). In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition (pp. 23-59).[20]: Faber, M., Unfried, A., Wiebe, E. N., Corn, J
issue and arrived at a balanced conclusion by considering different argumentsand perspectives.” Jones makes it clear that taking up other perspectives is critical to the design,deployment, and use of computer systems and that a conclusion that does not consider thoseaspects cannot be balanced. For example, there are various environmental impacts andsustainability concerns associated with information and communication technologies that Jonesmentions. These include finite raw materials, energy consumption coming from nonrenewableresources, toxic substance waste, and an “obsolete” mentality associated with older technologicaldevices. The multi-dimensional analytical framework presents steps that can help remedy theseimpacts and concerns. Jones
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36054number of ‘best practices’ have been suggested, which were used in designing a peermentorship program at Anderson University.In 2017, Coller, et. al. used peer mentors for teams in a first-year engineeringdesign-build-test-communicate course at the University of Michigan, and the authors provide aframework for assessment of their mentorship program [5]. They were able to report severalbest practices from their experience. Suggestions for successful peer mentorship programsinclude recruiting excellent former students, assigning mentors at a laboratory (TA) level,gathering regular updates from mentors, and providing
] G. Conole and B. Warburton, “A review of computer-assisted assessment”, Research in Learning Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/0968776042000339772[2] S. N. Ikwumelu, Ogene A. Oyibe, and E. C. Oketa, “Adaptive teaching: an invaluable pedagogic practice in social studies education”, Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 6, no.33, 2015.[3] B. Balakrishnan, “Motivating engineering students learning via monitoring in personalized learning environment with tagging system”, COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 700–710, Feb. 2018, doi: /10.1002/cae.21924.[4] K. Soria, I. Chirikov, and D. Jones-White, “The obstacles to remote learning for undergraduate