senior engineer in Combustion Research at Cummins Inc., where in addition to his primary role in developing future engine systems, he leads a planning team of Cummins engineers in organizing an after-school STEM Outreach Program at Girls Inc. to encourage girls to pursue STEM Careers.Archana K. KulkarniMr. Dinesh Balaji Ramaraj,Jennifer M. ThomassonAlexa Davis Alexa Davis graduated with her Bachelors of Science in Psychology from the University of Indianapolis in 2020. She has served at Girls Inc. of Johnson County for 4 years, and has begun her role as Program Director within this affiliate as of August 2021. Along with her experience at Girls Inc. of Johnson County, Alexa has worked with children and teenagers on
institutions to implement similar plans to return to normalrecruitment and outreach activities. Perhaps the greatest argument for returning to recruitingactivities, including in person events is the fact Engineering Technology (ETEC) is hands-on, andit is important for potential students to come experience things like the state-of-the-art lab facilitiesat ETEC. Fall of 2021, The Department of Engineering Technology organized Saturdays@SAMand ExCEL@SAM events in conjunction with campus Visitor Services. Three hundred plusstudents had the opportunity to visit the university campus. Among the visitors, 80+ students wereinterested and visited the department to learn about Engineering Technology programs. SkillsUSA2021 Annual Fall Symposium was one of the
subtractive manufacturing while simultaneously developing the process flow, the process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and the production process control plan. Artifacts: Balloon Drawing Process Flow Diagram (SMM) Process FMEA Production Process Control Plan6. SMM sends the prototype part(s) to OEM for validation a. Validation of SMM capability regarding subtractive manufacturing and overall quality of the part. This includes i. Part geometry, dimension and tolerance inspection ii. Functional capability of the part in the intended product system iii. Cost information supporting commercial
development plan creating a control dashboard. It can then be accessed through an Androidapplication, and the controls are synchronized with an Arduino Nano 33 IoT modelmicrocontroller via WIFI. The circuit and IoT components add constraints to the enclosure © American Society for Engineering Education, 20222022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36099design, while user preferences impact what connections are to be available and connected backto the circuit. The details of each element are explored in the following sections.Printed Circuit Board (PCB) DesignStudents began the project focused on the core power supply PCB design. The
’, and1 being ‘Strongly Disagree’. The statements assessed were: 1. I found my peer mentor to be a useful resource for completing my design project 2. I had an easier time adjusting to college life thanks to my peer mentor (RQ1) 3. My peer mentor helped me better connect with the engineering program community (RQ1) 4. I plan to continue studying engineering at this institution next semester (RQ2)To directly measure the impact of the peer mentorship program on RQ2, retention data wereused. For this work-in-progress study, the short term retention rate (persisting to semester 2) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference Proceedings | Paper ID 36054was
multiple concepts. Students were also asked to identify necessary modifications to theanalysis if a physical change was made to the system to demonstrate understanding without re-solving problems.As an instructor in a flipped classroom, it was necessary to accept uncertainty. Immediate studentfeedback was used to influence the use of class time rather than a carefully planned lecture. Itwas helpful to consider common questions or challenges from students from prior semesters,conceptual questions to probe understanding, content summaries to link knowledge, and multipleexample problems or variations to problem statements to provide additional guidance andpractice where students struggled the most. This meant preparing material that may never beused
Proceedings | Paper ID 35749Our camp had some limitations too. Although we planned to involve parents in the camp byhaving a STEM career session we were unable to execute this piece because our camp was heldMon to Friday (i.e., on working days). We consider that for future implementations, onlineresources about STEM careers can be provided to parents to address the limitation of meeting inperson. Our sponsor required 6th to 8th-grade girls only hence we had to turn down girls fromother grades. Thus, although we targeted 150 girls we were only able to have a total of 116 girlsspread over the 6 weeks. This was in spite of inviting all girls who met the criteria and whocompleted the application process. Some of the free responses from the girls
for success as a graduate student. Thus far,80% of our participants are currently enrolled in or have accepted admission to a graduateprogram. Thus far, all of the participants have been URM’s. Our outcomes indicate that wehave been successful at helping to prepare students for success in graduate school and increasediversity of BMMB at the graduate level.Future WorkWe plan to continue tracking participant progress through their degrees and into the careers theypursue in comparison to their original intent as reported during the program.This research is supported by the National Science Foundation grant number 1852298. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference
30 years of industrial experience, most of the students simply did not graspthe concepts sufficiently to do well in the course. The final grade distribution was bifurcated with five of14 students getting an overall average of 88% or better while five got an average of 75% or less, and onewithdrew before the mid-term exam.After the experience of teaching ENGR 207, the author concluded that the majority of today’s generationof students do not respond well to the methods that were used in Engineering classrooms in the 1980swhen he was a student. However, with little time to make modifications in his planned approach for the5 Ibid.6 Ibid.7 Ibid.8 Jones, D.R.H., and M. F. Ashby, Engineering Materials 1, 5th edition, Butterworth-Heinemann
not aware of the specificregulations at airports, and aviation management or airport planning students were able to identifythose problems. The graduate students experienced that teams with diverse educationalbackground attacked the problem from diverse perspectives. This facilitated in achieving anoptimal solution to the problem.By working with team members with diverse educational background and experiences, thegraduate students learned different work styles, approaches, attitudes, and ethics. For example, thegraduate students experienced that team members with engineering backgrounds strived for bestresults and settled for most optimal work possible, whereas members with managementbackgrounds were focused on effective task completion and
youngwomen? Did a higher percentage of young women from the cohort pursue an Engineering or Technologydegree in their undergraduate program?Other instruments will be evaluated that could be used with the STEM semantics survey to improve theaccuracy of the measurements. For example, the researchers plan to track the enrollment of the cohort inProject Lead the Way program at school that could be a short term predictor of STEM interest.References[1] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). 2019 . Women, minorities, andpersons with disabilities in science and engineering. Tables 1-1, 5-2, Alexandria, VA: National ScienceFoundation. Available at [https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/data-tables#].[2] Women in Science, Technology
available, the background of the students, and theacademic accomplishments to date. These assignments mirror industry wheremanagers will place employees into teams in an attempt maximize the output of theteam. The projects range from local industry sponsored projects to faculty definedprojects related to research interests. Teams typically range from 4 to 6 students.Learning outcomes for the first semester course are: 1. Apply the engineering designprocess to engineering technology problems. 2. Evaluate customer needs whendefining a solution. 3. Determine a preferred solution. 4. Define and develop a plan forimplementing a technical solution. The learning outcomes for the second semestercourse are: 1. Participate effectively in teams. 2. Use
that enhances meaning 4.22 4.82 -2.606 .009 Reject Make clear the interdependence of language and meaning, thought, and expression 4.31 4.85 -2.706 .007 RejectReflection and Self-Assessment Envision a future self 4.35 5.13 -3.879 .000 Reject Make plans that build on past experiences that have occurred across multiple and diverse contexts. 4.43 5.18 -4.126 .000 RejectNote. 5-point Likert scale: 1-Strongly Disagree to 5-Strongly Agree © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022
also connects the consideration of impacts and concerns to ethics: Ethical considerations can and should be embedded in projects from the outset, from the planning and design stages, right through the development life cycle, to implementation and evaluation. Key actors, users and stakeholders can, and should, be involved in the design of systems and devices from the earliest stages [18, p. 45].Considering key actors, stakeholders, and their perspectives is not restricted to computer systemcreation. Although Jones does not mention other disciplines, I will describe how this frameworkcould be used inside other moral/ethical contexts in the Discussion.Reflexive Principlism within the SIRA FrameworkOne approach already