Paper ID #38034K-8 Computational Thinking through Engineering (Fundamental)Dr. Christine M. Cunningham, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Christine M. Cunningham is a Professor of Practice in Education and Engineering at the Pennsyl- vania State University. She aims make engineering, science, and computational thinking education more equitable, especially for populations that are underserved and underrepresented in STEM. Christine is the founding director of Youth Engineering Solutions (YES), which develops equity-oriented, research-based, and field-tested curricula and professional learning resources for preK-8 youth and
University (Mechanical En- gineering), and The University of Utah (in both Materials Science and Engineering, and Metallurgical Engineering). Nonacademic pursuits include tending his orchards (he’s a fruit philanthropist) and playing the piano.Dr. David G. Rethwisch, The University of Iowa Dr. Rethwisch is a professor of chemical and biochemical engineering at the University of Iowa. His current research interest is assessing the impact of secondary curricula (particularly problem/project based learning curricula) on student interest and pe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A New Paradigm for Learning the Fundamentals of Materials
Paper ID #38089Barriers to including engineering education into elementary classrooms(Fundamental)Lajja Mehta, Tufts University Lajja Mehta is a Lead User Researcher in a Financial Technology company and holds a master’s degree in Human Factors from Tufts University. In her 15 years of professional career, she has dabbled in Education and Finance domains with the lens of user-centered research and design. She is passionate about learning how people interact with interfaces and making end-user experiences more intuitive and satisfying. She is particularly interested in leveraging technology for infusing STEM into early
engineering judgment to draw conclusions” [1] is a fundamental outcome of all engineeringprograms. Students conduct laboratory experiments in all areas of engineering and report on theirfindings. New faculty, however, have little experience or training in how to develop effective labreport assignments and instruct students on how to write laboratory reports. In an effort toimprove both the teaching and learning of laboratory report writing, engineering educators fromthree distinct universities (one large public research university, one small public polytechnicuniversity, and one private undergraduate university) developed a series of online laboratoryreport writing instructional modules. These modules were presented to laboratory instructors,half
Paper ID #38621Effectiveness of Transfer Focused Writing Pedagogy on Undergraduates’Lab Report Writing in Entry-Level Engineering Laboratory Courses atThree UniversitiesDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is Professor and Mechanical Engineering Program Coordinator in the School of Engineer- ing and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. His teaching and research have been in the areas of engineering materials, fracture mechanics, and manufacturing processes. In par- ticular, he has been very active in pedagogical research in the area of writing pedagogy in engineering
Paper ID #37942The influence of notebooks on elementary teachers engaging inengineering practices (Fundamental)Dr. Matthew Johnson, Pennsylvania State University Matt is an Associate Professor of Science Education and Associate Director of the Center for Science and the Schools in the College of Education at Penn State University. His research interests focus on how teachers learn about epistemic practices of engineers through in-service teacher professional development and how that learning manifests itself as they teach engineering projects to their students.Minyoung Gil, Pennsylvania State University Minyoung Gil is a
Paper ID #38513Challenging the Notion of Role Models in Engineering Outreach Programsfor Youth (Fundamental)Dr. Kelli Paul, Indiana University-Bloomington Dr. Kelli Paul is an Assistant Research Scientist at the Center for Research on Learning and Technology at Indiana University where her research focuses on the development of STEM interests, identity, and career aspirations in children and adolescents.Dr. Karen Miel, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Karen Miel’s research focuses on PK-16 students’ reasoning and decision-making in collaborative engi- neering design and the ways educators facilitate
Paper ID #38410Illuminating Contexts that Influence Test Usage Beliefs and Behaviorsamong Instructors of Fundamental Engineering CoursesKai Jun Chew, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won
? For example, KEEN cards, printable pdfs, modifiable documents, or Canvas Commons modules?Figure 1. Prompt to CoP participants requesting evaluation of existing lab writing resourcesduring the Outside Source Benchmarking exercise.OBJECTIVES: Provide feedback for modules and supplemental materialsParticipant tasks:Each individual reviews the first module assigned to the group.After each participant has reviewed the module, consider the following prompts for discussion: Is the purpose of module clear or not? Is the module content clear and well organized? Is the scaffold level appropriately identified (fundamental, intermediate, advanced)? Is it appropriately linked to higher/lower scaffolds to help students
Labs and Air Force Research Labs). Dr. Vijlee has been at the University of Portland since 2014.Molly Hiro, University of Portland ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Improving Writing Instruction, Practice, and Feedback in an Introduction to Engineering CourseIntroductionThis Work in Progress (WIP) project’s motivation was to create stronger engineering writers inthe Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland (UP) and to infuse thecurriculum with a healthy understanding of and respect for good writing as an aspect of asuccessful engineering graduate. UP is fundamentally a liberal arts university with a robust Corecurriculum. Still
Paper ID #38720Poetry writing to enhance conceptual understanding of mathematicalmodels and approaches for inventory managementProf. Elif Akcali, University of Florida Dr. Elif Akcali is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and an affiliate faculty member in the Engineering Innovation Institute at the University of Florida. She is an industrial engineer, a visual artist and an explorer of the interplay between engineering and the arts.Saron Getachew Belay Saron Belay is a Project Manager at Starbucks Technology and a recent graduate from the University of Florida with a
Paper ID #39150Client-Focused Technical Writing through Laboratory Report Preparationsin Geotechnical Engineering: A Case StudyDr. Nirmala Gnanapragasam, Seattle University Dr. Nirmala Gnanapragasam is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Seattle University. She also serves as the Design Coordinator for the department’s capstone design program. She is a licensed professional engineer in the State of Washington. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Client-Focused Technical Writing through Laboratory Report Preparations in
Paper ID #39546K-2 Grade-Age Children and Their Parents’ Experiences Engaging inEngineering and Computational Thinking Activities in Informal LearningSetting (Fundamental Research)Dr. Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Hoda Ehsan, The Hill School Hoda is Chair for Engineering and Computer Science Department and the Director of Quadrivium Design and Engineering at The Hill School. She holds a Ph.D in Engineering Education from Purdue University, M.S. in Childhood Education from City University of New York, and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Bahonar University in Iran.Dr. Monica E. Cardella, Florida
Paper ID #37667Board 178: Teacher Perspectives of Outcomes and Challenges Resultingfrom Students’ Interactions with MATLAB in e4usa (Fundamental)Mr. Nicolas L´eger, Florida International University Nicolas L´eger is currently an engineering and computing education Ph.D. student in the School of Univer- sal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. He earned a B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the University of Maryland at College Park in May 2021 and began his Ph.D. studies the following fall semester. His research interests center on numerical and
Paper ID #39458Board 15: Work in Progress: Cultivating Growth of Systems Thinking Habitof Mind over a Five Course Fundamental SequenceDr. Lisa Weeks, University of Maine Lisa Weeks is a lecturer of Biomedical Enginering in the Department of Chemical and Biomedical En- gineering at the University of Maine since 2017. She teaches several of the core fundamental courses including hands on laboratory courses.Prof. Karissa B Tilbury ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Cultivating Growth of Systems Thinking Habits of Mind over a Five Course Fundamental
difficult task but a foundational skill inengineering education. As the ABET outcome 3 stated, engineering graduates should be able tocommunicate effectively with a range of audiences [1]. Most US engineering laboratory coursesassign lab reports to improve students’ written communication skills and knowledge of writing inthe context of engineering. Indeed, engineering lab reports possess fundamental characteristics ofprofessional forms in engineering literacy. However, engineering undergraduates consistentlyface many challenges in producing satisfactory quality engineering lab reports [2-10].Writing is a complex task for students to combine multiple aspects of literacy at once. Often,undergraduates learn those aspects in their first-year
Paper ID #36941Board 205: A Web-Based Writing Exercise Employing Directed Line ofReasoning Feedback for a Course on Electric Circuit AnalysisProf. James P. Becker, Montana State University, BozemanDr. Douglas J. Hacker, University of Utah Dr. Hacker is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Educational Psychology and participated in both the Learning Sciences Program and the Reading and Literacy Program.Christine Johnson ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Web-Based Writing Exercises for a Course on Electric Circuit AnalysisAbstractThe use of writing-based exercises in a circuit analysis
the table, the main focus is to achieve intellectual pursuit, globalengagement and a bold vision. By developing these skills, the students can be equipped with theright tools needed to be successful for creating ideas and enhancing what they already know.Table 2. Objectives for student learning from course syllabusConclusionThis paper has shown a project where the students designed, built and tested a thermoformingapparatus and compared experiments with Ansys Polyflow simulations of the draping process.The project offered an opportunity for students to experience classroom learning together withreal-world applications of the thermoforming process.Bibliography[1] M. P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing Materials, Processes, and
section, students focus on finding, interpreting,and integrating scholarly research into a technical report. They learn about scholarlydocumentation in scientific fields as well as conventions of scientific writing, and learn how toassess the credibility of non-scholarly sources.Technology and MultimodalityThe CU Denver Composition program describes this outcome thus: “Students function inelectronic writing spaces, and use technology to compose, revise, and present their writing. Atthe intermediate level, students analyze and/or produce visual, audio, and online texts” [14]. Atits most fundamental level, this outcome is about producing, interpreting, and integrating imagesand other modes of communication. In Composition I students learn how to
-oriented pedagogy. Current research shows thatintegrating writing assignments into discipline-specific coursework is an effective strategy toaccomplish this objective. Thus, the USF has explored implementing oral and “process writing”assignments into creative thinking engineering undergraduate coursework to fulfill a statecommunication requirement and satisfy the NACE professional proficiency.In an attempt to teach students how to develop and communicate ideas within the engineering fieldto a wide range of audiences, USF integrated pre-writing, co-authoring, revising, and editingstrategies into a first-year engineering design course. In so doing, an aspect of the oral and writtencommunication needs between industry and academia should be mitigated
Paper ID #37233Capturing First-Year Engineering Students’ Situational and IndividualInterest via a Formal Makerspace CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persis- tence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens Science Hall
onmindsets that are discipline-specific, including maker mindset [8] and the entrepreneurialmindset [9]. The extant literature on mindsets is abundant and highlights the need for relevantmindsets toward specific task performance [9] – [11].The term ‘research mindset’ has been used by some researchers [10]–[12], but has yet to beexplicitly defined. A few studies call out the presence of research mindset and the relatedconstruct of researcher identity [13], [14]. Efforts in this space aim to better understand howmindset plays a role as researchers engage in various research tasks like defining researchproblems, conducting literature reviews, designing and conducting experiments, writing upresults, and working on a research team. Research is a task, or
Paper ID #37282Assessing Various Pedagogical Features of Remote Versus In-PersonIterations of a First-Year Engineering, Makerspace CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persis- tence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens
institutions for membership and writing a book on Circuit Theory with Applications. He has been the Graduate Semiconductor/VLSI Certificate Coordinator for the ECE Department since 1992. Dr. Prasad has developed and/or taught over 30+ Courses (List attached) at the University of Massachusetts of Lowell. He has Teaching and Industrial experience of 50+ years. He is the author of over 250 theses, dissertations and papers published and in refereed journals and/or presented in refereed conferences of national and international repute. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Design of Integrated 5G Chip-set with Microstrips Modules for Mobile Communications with its Integration in MMIC
higher education. More notably, they are focused on Programmable LogicControllers (PLCs). Companies need well-trained technicians with 2-year degrees to build andmaintain the equipment. 4-year schools are expected to provide engineers that can do designwork and higher-level systems integration.The ECET program has embraced the call for PLC skills and is deploying the content in thecurriculum. An introductory course ECET 290 - Computer Engineering Fundamentals waschosen as the entry-level PLC course. The current course description is provided below. In afuture semester, the course description will be updated, but for now it is adequately addressed bythe PLC content. ECET 290 - Computer Engineering Fundamentals - An introductory course in
Paper ID #40462Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the”Misinformation Age”Ms. Alexis P. Nordin, Mississippi State University Alexis is currently an instructor in the Shackouls Technical Communication Program in Mississippi State University’s James Worth Bagley College of Engineering. She has taught technical writing and various other writing- and communication-based courses at MSU since 2004. She holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in English from Mississippi State University and Louisiana State University and is certified as a Teacher of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL).Mr
the process of self-insight and the search formeaning as core principles of storytelling (Adams et al., 2007; Chandler, 2002; Gates et al.,2018; Hlalele & Brexa, 2015; Lengelle et al., 2013, 2014). Stories, as generated from our livedexperiences, provide us all the opportunity to make meaning and derive purpose from the thingsthat have happened to us—and, often, that meaning is focused on our understanding of the self. Hlalele and Brexa (2015) describe autobiographical writing as having the “potential forself-insight,” while Lengelle and colleagues (2013, 2014) similarly emphasize storytelling as amechanism for gaining self-insight. Moreover, both Gates and colleagues (2018) and Adams andcolleagues (2007) made the explicit
DesignAbstractOne approach to look at student learning is to identify “threshold concepts.” These are conceptsthat, once grasped, allow students to engage with the material in a fundamentally different way.First described by Meyer and Land [1], these concepts are transformative, irreversible,integrative, and troublesome. The process of mastering a threshold concept (TC) meanstraversing a liminal space during which the student is changed. Looking inward at our owncapstone program, we identified three candidate TCs: (1) Complex engineering problems arebest solved by teams working together. (2) A team can learn a lot from a prototype, even(especially?) when it doesn’t work. (3) The goal isn’t to find the right answer, but to learn aprocess by which a
Paper ID #39741Work in Progress: Studying Loss of Long-Term Knowledge Retention inChemical Engineering Undergraduate CoursesDr. Gaurav Giri, University of Virginia Prof. Giri has been a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Virginia since 2016, where his research group is focused on studying the fundamental processes behind organic molecule and metal-organic framework thin-film crystallization, and related applications. His current work focuses on the use of MOFs for air filters, separation membranes, and for drug delivery applications, and on the crystallization of pharmaceutical
? • Better storytelling - Learning to write clearly and concisely. • Better methodology - Appreciate the importance of developing a detailed proposal. Look for opportunities to discover the total process, not simply confirm the phenomenon. • Better data collection - Deciphering the critical data points for collection and presentation.This paper will attempt to detail the Foggy Mirror exercise so that the ideas can be adopted in othercurriculum, provide insights into successes and challenges, and how to meaningfully encourage students tobecome disciplined inquisitive engineers.Keywords: Experimentation, ABET, Problem Solving, Teamwork, Active LearningIntroduction Broadly, engineering is perceived as a practical profession