fully by means of examining all the courses offered. The process becametedious because University A, for example, had five courses to consider, University B had threecourses to consider, and so on with the others. Therefore, to establish the amount of coverage foreach topic in each category for all the courses, composite ratings were used as set out in Table 1. Horizontal View Table 1. Composite ratings + N JM TB TM TD Vertical View N N JM TB TM TD JM JM JM TB TM TD
AC 2009-1603: AN ASSESSMENT STRATEGY FOR A CAPSTONE COURSE INSOFTWARE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERINGRichard Stansbury, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityMassood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Page 14.181.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 AN ASSESSMENT STRATEGY FOR A CAPSTONE COURSE IN SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Richard Stansbury and Massood Towhidnejad Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, FL 32114 {stansbur, towhid}@erau.eduAbstract:The assessment of individual student work on team
AC 2009-2001: A SOFTWARE PROCESS ENGINEERING COURSEJ. Scott Hawker, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Hawker graduated with a B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Texas Tech University in Lubbock, Texas, in 1981 and 1982, respectively. He graduated with a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, in 1990. He has over 15 years of industry experience developing large-scale, multi-agent information and control systems for diverse applications including manufacturing, combat pilot decision support and mission management, robotics, and surveillance. In these areas, he developed and applied technologies including distributed
learning process, a basic series of laboratory experiments to be performed bythe students has been created. The sequence addresses the issues of timing, multi-tasking, sharedresources and locking, communication, signals and interrupts, and scheduling. As the operatingsystem plays an important role in developing real-time software, the experiments focus on usingthe kernel primitives by the application programs. The experiments were designed to becompleted by a student during a single semester, or during a course of independent study, whilelearning the appropriate theory component in the classroom. Each lab experiment contains the following sections: a) introduction, b) objectives, c)description, d) example program, e) procedures, f) follow-on
propositions 4 Figure 2. Scopes in SPS [19]for L, R, P, and Q. For example, the property “Request (E) always triggers Acknowledgment(A), between Beginning of execution (B) and System shutdown (N)”, can be described by theS Responds to P pattern within the Between Q and R scope. The LTL formula for the patternand scope combination as provided by the SPS website is:✷((Q ∧ (¬R) ∧ R) → (P → ((¬R)U (S ∧ ¬R)))U R).Using the user’s propositions E, N, A, and B, the resulting LTL specification is:✷((B ∧ (¬N ) ∧ N ) → (E → ((¬N )U (A ∧ ¬N )))U N ). Tools such as the Property Elicitation (Propel) [17] and the Property Specification (Prospec)[12, 13] build on SPS by completely
Stucki, D. J. 2000. Design early considered harmful: Graduated exposure to complexity and structure based on levels of cognitive development. SIGCSE Bulletin 32, 1, 75-79. 5. Budd, T. 2009. A course in open source development. Integrating FOSS into the Undergraduate Computing Curriculum, Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Symposium (Chattanooga, TN, Mar 4, 2009). 6. Cooper, R. G. 2001. Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. Perseus Books. 7. Fincher, S., Petre, M., and Clark, M. 2001. Computer Science Project Work: Principles and Pragmatics. Springer. 8. Gannod, B., Koehnemann, H., and Gary, K. 2006. The Software Enterprise: Facilitating the industry
.. Page 14.778.12Appendix - CPD Training Roadmap for Engineering and Science ClassificationsDB - 02Assignment to sponsor/mentorSEC briefing by Director or Deputy DirectorYour Place on the Army Team – 4 HoursTutorial on the CE-LCMC New Employee AssetSEC Introduction to CMMI – OL – 3 hoursFundamentals of Systems Acquisition (ACQ 101) - OL – DAU*Action Officer Development Course – OL – AIPDBusiness Writing Essentials – OL – 30-hours – Army E-LearningDelivering Successful Presentations – OL – 11-hours – Army E-LearningGreening Course – 5-days – CERDECPlanning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution – 9-days – USAFSIntermediate Systems Acquisition (ACQ 201 A&B) A-OL B-5-days*DB – 03Systems Planning, Research, Development and Engineering (SYS 101