downward in a slight arc. Page 14.214.6 A Single Input & Output (Group A) Mechanism A1 Mechanism A2 Mechanism A3 B Single Input, Multiple Outputs (Group B) C Circular Link (Group C) Mechanism B1 Mechanism B2 Mechanism C D Constraining Motion in Different Ways (Group D) Key Floating Pivot Figurine used
60 42.6 4.25 11.955 75 50.7 4.45 10.976 90 47.3 4.2 9.767 105 41.6 4.18 9.858 120 44 4.2 11.379 135 45.3 4.15 10.9410 150 51.6 4.25 10.8Figure 5. Data recording and graphical analysis for 50 W, 12 V incandescent light bulb run by a bicycle generator with pedal power. Page 14.889.7 (a) (b) (c)Figure 6. (a) Graphical analysis for 15 W, 12 V, CFL bulb run in (b) by a
variation of design “story telling” in engineering design teams, International Conference on Engineering Design ICED’03, August 19-21, Stockholm, 2003.12. Sim, S. K., and Duffy, A. H. B., Evolving a model of learning in design, Research in Engineering Design, 15, pp. 40–61, 2004.13. Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R., Problem-based learning: an approach to medical education, NY: Springer, 1980.14. Torp, L., and Sage, S., Problems as Possibilities: Problem-Based Learning for K–12 Education, 2nd edn., ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 2002.15. Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M., Intentional learning as a goal of instruction, in Resnick, L.B. (Eds.): Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 361–392
. Asdescribed on the nanoHUB.org website, key characteristics of the nanoHUB.org simulation toolsthat make them good resources for incorporation into classroom environments are: a) they wereproduced by researchers in the NCN focus areas, b) they are easily accessed online from a webbrowser powered by a highly sophisticated architecture that taps into national grid resources, andc) they provide a consistent interactive graphical user interface—i.e. Rappture, which makeseven the most esoteric computational model approachable to experts and non-experts. Rapptureis a toolkit that allows the incorporation of a friendly graphical user interface with the simulationtools in the nanoHUB.org (McLennan, 2005) 2 . For example, Figure 1 illustrates a typical
. (a) (b) Figure 4. (a) Before and (b) after adjusting the O2 and draft in a process heater. Page 14.1062.6 Figure 5. Example screen from heater simulator.Heater SimulatorFigure 5 shows an example screen from an electronic heater simulator that was developedprimarily as a teaching tool. The simulator has numerous inputs that can be varied todemonstrate the effects of a variety of parameters related to fluid flow, heat transfer, thermalefficiency, pollution emissions, and operating conditions. The simulator is semi-analytical asmost of the calculations are based on well
-respondents.The SRC removed any connection to personal identifiers before distributing a copy of the dataset of questionnaire respondents for each institution. Members of the research team developed a student and faculty questionnaire from partsof The Student Persisting in Engineering Survey developed as part of the Assessing Women andMen and Engineering Project (AWE). The Engineering Student Survey contains 114 questions.After a set of demographic items, the questionnaire is organized in seven sections: (a) ImportantFactors in Career Choice, (b) Self-Assessment of Abilities, (c) Classroom Experiences, (d)Support Networks, (e) In- and Out-of-Class Engagement, (f) Opinions about University andDepartmental Climate, and (g) Family and Educational
answers into a coherent big picture. It is important that the questions posed to the expert designer be related to his/her specific experience and perspectives, and not general information that could be found from internet, books, or other source of information. 3) The project’s scope of work that shows the project’s codes analysis. 4) Building selection: the building can be single use (group A, B, E, F, H, I M, R, S, U), mixed use, or even can be a structure with special requirements, such as covered mall, high-rise building, atrium, underground building, motor vehicle related occupancy, private garage, enclosed parking garage, and so on (Chapters 3 & 4, IBC 2006 edition
Page 14.165.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 AFRICOM and the Corps of Engineers Helmets .vs. HardhatsAbstractService learning projects in developing communities, offer an opportunity for students togain a full appreciation for the cultural and political limitations that engineers face whenproviding technical support to developing nations. To satisfy the project requirement forthe Civil and Infrastructure Engineering MS program at George Mason University, onestudent took on the daunting task of developing a framework for the US Army Corps ofEngineers to provide civil works expertise to desperately needy areas of rural Africa.Africa is a vast continent with over 900 million people
AC 2009-1227: DID IT WORK? - ANALYSIS OF WAYS TO MEASURE THEIMPACT OF AN AFTER SCHOOL ROBOTICS OUTREACH PROGRAM.Austin Talley, University of Texas, Austin AUSTIN TALLEY is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. His research focus is in design methodology and engineering education. He received his B.S. from Texas A&M University and M.S.E. from The University of Texas at Austin. Contact: Austin@talleyweb.com.Marilyn Fowler, Austin Children's Museum MARILYN L. FOWLER is a science educator with over 35 years experience with schoolchildren. Her years in education include classroom teaching at the elementary and college levels
ignited. To analyze the resulting process, launch the premixed closed-process IGcombustion daemon located in the Daemons> Systems> UnsteadyProcess> Specific>Combustion> Premixed> IG Model page. Configure the reaction in the Reaction Panel fortheoretical combustion of octane. Evaluate the reactants state with p1 = 1 atm, T1 = 298 K, andpartially evaluate the products state with Vol2 = Vol1 (for a constant-volume process). In theProcess Panel, load state-1 as the beginning state (b-state) and state-2 as the final state (f-state),and enter Q = W = 0. Click Calculateand then Super-Calculate to obtain thefinal state. The final pressure andtemperature are found in state-2 as1065 kPa and 2911 K, respectively. Inprocesses where a
) 2However, these textbooks do not provide an explanation regarding how the former formula isevolved into the latter formula. Lacking a good explanation for the latter formula in the text-books or by the instructors in classrooms, students are often made to simply take it on faith thatthese two formulas are somehow equivalent to each other. This paper is written to share witheducators of machine design and other readers two alternative paths that will arrive at the lattergeneral form of the von Mises stress: (a) by way of eigenvalues of the stress matrix, (b) by wayof stress invariants of the stress matrix. When used with the existing material presented in thetextbooks, either of these two paths will provide students with a much better understanding
year as shown in Figure 2 (b). Both of them are the fastestgrowing renewable energy sectors. However, electricity from sustainable energy resources(excluding hydropower) in 2007 still represents a small percentage of overall installed electricitycapacity (3%) and generation (2.5%) in the U.S. as shown in Figure 2 (b). Page 14.752.3 Figure 1 US Primary Energy Overview (Quadrillion Btu)2 (a) (b)Figure 2 sustainable energy overview (a) and the energy resources distribution in 2007 (b)3To reduce national consumption of energy and to
terminology in current MEB courses) the focusof the exercise was to test students’ ability to apply ChE principles in a bio vs. a non-bio context.Consequently, the biological problems did not include special biochemical terminology, or it wasclarified on the tests. The problems addressed the general learning objectives of a) Solve amaterial balance problem on a reactive process and b) Solve a material balance problem on anon-reactive process.The test and accompanying survey (on the back of page with bio problem) were administered ina 50 minute period. The first few minutes were used to explain briefly the research project andstudents were given the informed consent forms to review and sign. Students were allowed 20minutes to solve first the bio
% Sophom morebecause they t are two o of the largeer 20% Freshmmenengineeriing schools ono campus and a the 10%authors have h liaison responsibilit r ties for 0%them. Thhe survey waas delayed untilumiddle of Novemberr 2008 in ordder toobtain appproval from m the Institutiional Figure 1: Partticipants by yearr/degreeReview Board. B This resulted in fewer frespondeents than hop ped (216undergraaduate studen nts; 58
learner to Figure 6: OSHA e-tools uses 3D animations toexplore the environment on their own. illustrate concepts such as the operational timing of Type A vs. Type B gates.A variety of technologies exist that allowusers to navigate through 3-D environments. Most academic programs will certainly have accessto solid modeling software such as Inventor, Solidworks, or Pro/E. Most solid modelingpackages also include the ability to generate animations. In some cases, these models may evenbe exported to cross-platform web-friendly formats such as VRML (Virtual Reality MarkupLanguage).Though some of the desired capabilities for developing a virtual environment for
full-time faculty members in engineering and full-timestudents from two departments identified by the institutional liaison as being the mostsupportive of women. The survey center at the home institution administered the on-linedistribution of a faculty and student questionnaire and oversaw the follow-ups. The Centerremoved personal identifiers before sharing the data set of questionnaire responses for eachinstitution.The Engineering Faculty Survey was designed by the research team and contains 134 questions,organized in five sections: (a) Involvement with Recruiting Activities, (b) Departmental andUniversity Environment, (c) Professional Development, (d) Involvement with Undergraduates,and (e) Personal Information. The analysis used in this
Organization for Business Success. Addison Wesley, 1997. Page 14.351.11Appendix A Data entry forms with filled data Page 14.351.12Page 14.351.13Page 14.351.14Appendix B Sample Output Screens Initial Screen Display Administrator log-in. Page 14.351.15Data Entry Form Page 14.351.16
engineering students.Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education10. Ghone, M., Schubert, M., and Wagner, J., 2003, “Development of a Mechatronics Laboratory - EliminatingBarriers to Manufacturing,” IEEE Trans on Industrial Electronics, 394-397.11. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, J. Azuma & K. Hakuta (Eds.),Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Co.12. Klingbeil, N., Rattan, K., Raymer, M., Reynolds, D., Mercer, R., Kukreti, A. and Randolph, B., "A NationalModel for Engineering Mathematics Education," Proceedings 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Honolulu, HI, 2007.13. Krishnan, M., Das, S., and Yost, S. A., 1999, “Team
(11th) 1 1 1 25 School G High School Physics (11th) 1 2 3 90 Total 19 22 23 598Table 2. ______ Classroom Connection (XXX) School Partnership Overview: 16 of 18 ClassroomPartnerships were within public unified school districts (USD). Class subjects and grade levels are listednext to the classrooms with XXX Science-Teacher Partnerships, and K-12 Class Size.a Approximately 50 students from local area high schools participated in the XXX Hosted, ‘Opportunitiesfor You in Science and Engineering conference.’b Students also experienced a Faculty Presentationc 105
results ofthe study were somewhat limited by its pure quantitative methodology which couldn’t providein-depth responses regarding students’ experiences of the course.A question that arose in the present study was the appropriateness of an online learning formatfor teaching technical content, such as the use of a sophisticated 3D solid modeling package likeCATIA, in a corporate/university program. Additionally, what were students’ and instructors’opinions of offering a course on technical content in an online environment?Distance LearningThe evolution of distance education occurred through four generations: (a) printed instruction,(b) early technology in broadcasting systems, (c) online instruction, and (d) web-basedteleconferencing.7 Online
developing countries, the WorldBank notes that very little relevant data and research exists.[4] One tool used when considering Page 14.1342.4the cost of such technology deployments is the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) model. Muchfocus has been placed on the race to create a $100 laptop and other ultra-low cost computers fordeveloping countries but the costs of supporting these projects past the initial hardwareinvestment has been largely ignored. The TCO model divides costs into three separatecategories; a) initial costs, b) recurrent costs, and c) hidden costs. The initial costs of atechnology deployment are often the most highly visible and can
that had five possible answers. Question 8 asks: The thermal efficiency (effectiveness) of a fin is defined as the ratio of the actual heat transfer from the fin to the maximum possible heat transfer. Circle the letter of the statement that best describes the physical meaning of how the maximum possible heat transfer could be achieved. The possible answers for Question 8 are: A The fin has a uniform temperature equal to that of the surrounding air B The fin is infinitely long C The fin has zero thermal conductivity D The convection heat transfer coefficient is infinite E The fin has a uniform temperature equal to that of its baseThe increase in the
UCF, calledthe EXCEL Program, is a 5-year program funded in 2006. The specific goal of the EXCELprogram is to increase UCF’s retention rates in STEM disciplines, thereby increasing thenumber of students graduating with a STEM degree from the institution. In this process anincrease in the percentages of under-represented groups (women and minorities) graduating withSTEM degrees is expected, since UCF has high percentages of underrepresented minorities inSTEM disciplines (more than 25% of STEM admits at UCF are Hispanics or AfricanAmericans). To achieve EXCEL’s goal, two important objectives are identified: (a) recruitstudents in EXCEL, and (b) retain the EXCEL students in STEM disciplines. The result of thiseffort will be an institutionalized
between each operation like at the endof the shift. Operators then come back the next day to a primed process and start where theprocess was stopped. A primed process is often called a “wet” process and an unprimed processis called a “dry” process. Operation Operation Operation Start End A (15 mins) B (25 mins) C (50 mins) Figure 5. Simple Process With Three OperationsTo understand the concept of operator efficiency, let us assume a simple process as shown inFigure 5. The sum of operation times for the three operations is equal to 15 + 25 + 50 = 90minutes
robots. The controlalgorithm utilizes the quadrature encoders in order to determine position or speed error. Page 14.809.8Quadrature EncodersAs noted earlier, the Traxster II robot chassis incorporates motors with integratedquadrature encoders. As shown below in Figure 4, these encoders generate two signals‘A’ and ‘B’ in “quadrature” to each other (i.e., 90° out of phase). As the motor shaftrotates, the sequence of pulses are sensed and processed. As can be seen in the figure, theA and B pulses count out a grey-coded signal. When the motor is rotating in the forwarddirection, the sequence is of the form 00→01→11→10→00 etc. Conversely, when themotor is
students across the Commonwealth of VirginiaMath and Science Program (MSEIP) (Supported by T-STEM, DuPont, and Department ofEducation) – This was a four week residential program. This grant has expired.Enhancing Undergraduate Research Infrastructurea. Undergraduate Research CommitteeThis committee was established with the following purposes: 1. To enhance students' ability to make presentation in National Conferences a. Enhance students’ networking skills. b. Increase students' involvement in undergraduate research c. Increase VSU's visibility. d. Increase students' interests to pursue graduate education 2. To enhance the foundation of Undergraduate Research by establishing interdisciplinary
becomes available. CSTEP completed its first year in the summer of2008. CSTEP students took Programming Concepts at USF along with other USF students. Theevaluation is based on the students’ performance in class and their perceptions of CSTEP.Performance of CSTEP students was compared with USF students. As shown in Table I,although some CSTEP students were included in the group with the lowest grade in the class,half of them got the highest grade.Table I. Programming Concepts class performance. Grade All USF CSTEP A 18 58% 13 62% 5 50% B 8 26% 6 29% 2 20% C 5 16
-Summary-Handout.doc2. Schacter, J., “The Impact of Educational Technology on Student Achievement: What the Most Current ResearchHas to Say,” Milliken Exchange on Educational Technology, 1999,http://www.sbceo.k12.ca.us/~ims/techcen/EETT/ImpactofET.pdf3. Critical Issue: Using Technology to Improve Student Achievement, North Central Regional Educational Library, Page 14.1337.13http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy/te800.htm#reference4. Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Means, B., Korbak, C., Whaley, A., “E-DESK: A Review of Recent Evidence on theEffectiveness of Discrete Educational Software,” SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
applying disciplinary knowledge in the process of design. Specifically, ourresearch seeks to explore the role that computational and analytical abilities play in innovation inthe context of engineering design education. We apply the learning framework of adaptiveexpertise to focus our work and guide the research. Using the adaptive expertise framework,with a specific focus on computational/analytical knowledge, we document the type of evidencestudents do (or do not) use when selecting possible design alternatives, appropriate models ormethods of analysis, and when interpreting the results to justify their decisions.We analyzed student design project reports from different academic years, and from differentengineering disciplines. Specifically, our
reviewed those objectives originally assigned a Level two and three to determine ifany changes were merited based upon feedback from the second evaluator. Only a fewadjustments were made to the originally assigned levels based upon this second review.Appendix B contains a sample of the objectives showing the Depth of Knowledge Level towhich they were assigned. Page 14.216.10 9Before finalizing the objectives to include in the analysis regarding the science and mathematicscontent, a sample of objectives identified in each of the three categories (direct