Light, and Jonathan Goldstein, “What High-Tech Managers Need to KnowAbout Brands.” (HBSP download)Case: Mountain Man Brewing Company: Bringing the Brand to Light (HBSP download)Globalization Page 15.253.8Isenberg, Daniel J. “The Global Entrepreneur.” (HBSP download)Case: Samsung Electronics Company: Global Marketing Operations (HBSP download)Article: McDougall, P., B. Oviatt, and R. Shrader, “A Comparison of International and DomesticNew Ventures.” Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1, 59-82, 2003.http://wf2dnvr13.webfeat.org/APC3N174/url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/r71676m6250841u7/fulltext.pdfAccounting & FinanceGuest SpeakerTracy
world had guided a process of iterativevisioning and re-envisioning, ultimately leading to a high-level strategic planning document.Through this earlier process, a vision, mission, core values, goals, and key strategies wereestablished. To begin the process described in this paper, “team co-captains” were selected tolead teams that would take each strategy and move it from a “big idea” to a set of actionableactivities. An example of a strategy from the plan is “Educate Renaissance Engineers for the21st Century World.” Actionable activities under this strategy include “(a) developing andimplementing the Purdue Engineer of 2020 curriculum, (b) defining the role of engineering inpre-university education,” and so on. A total of 33 teams, which
Leadership Self-Perception Assessment. In itsoriginal form, it consisted of 30 statements (see Appendix A), but after a focus group study, itwas revised to contain 31 statements (one deleted and two added, see Appendix B). In addition,the students answer seven demographics questions. The instrument asks students to respond tothe statements on a 5-point Likert Scale in which they examine how they perceive themselves inthinking and behavior pertaining to the leadership/entrepreneurial skills that are introduced andpracticed in the leadership curriculum. For that reason, the statements are worded in first-personso that students respond in regards to their perceptions of themselves as leaders rather than theirunderstanding what leadership “is” or “is
. ABET Criteria Project Components a. apply math, science & engineering product design; process design b. design & conduct experiments prototype evaluation c. design systems, components or product design, process design, processes production system design, enterprise design d. function in multi-disciplinary teams project operation e. identify, formulate & solve product design, production system engineering problems design, prototype fabrication f. understand professional
AC 2010-745: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF FACULTY BELIEFSRELATED TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONKirsten Hochstedt, Pennsylvania State University Kirsten Hochstedt is a Graduate Assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education. She has received her Masters degree in Educational Psychology, with an emphasis in educational and psychological measurement, at Penn State and is a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Sarah E. Zappe, is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional
AC 2010-920: STUDENTS AS CONSULTANTS: A PROJECT COURSECOMBINING ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND GREEN TECHNOLOGYWilliam Hornfeck, Lafayette College Professor Hornfeck earned MS and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University. He earned the BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Penn State University. Hornfeck has taught at Lafayette College for twenty-two years, and has combined his interest in energy studies with international engineering education. He has led study abroad programs in Belgium and Germany. Page 15.1129.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010
AC 2010-1906: FIRST-YEAR STUDENT EXPERIENCES, ATTITUDES ANDOUTCOMES IN A SEMINAR ON INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIPPhil Schlosser, Ohio State University Dr. Schlosser teaches First-Year Engineering courses and Freshman Seminars at The Ohio State University. He graduated from Ohio State University with B.Sc. degrees in Physics and Electrical Engineering and M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering. Early in his career, he was Professor of Nuclear and Mechanical Engineering at OSU where he taught courses and conducted research in nuclear medical imaging systems. Over the past two decades, he has started several successful companies in the central Ohio area. He holds 22 U.S. and foreign
White Paper assignment fills all the pedagogical goals of the literature review assignment,with the additional benefit that successful white papers can be readily used as a basis for elevatorpitches for SEC II, and/or entrepreneurial Junior/Senior Clinic projects (Table 2).B. Sophomore Engineering Clinic IIFor each of the last 11 years, Sophomore Engineering Clinic II has offered two differentsemester-long design projects. Both projects are presented on the first day of class and studentschoose one. A new project was introduced in the spring of 2007 [7] as one of the two options:the “Create your own entrepreneurial project.” Every student proposes to their classmates anidea for a semester-long entrepreneurial project. Based on student interest
toVenture” (I2V), and more recently the “Advanced Invention to Venture” (AI2V). The proposedworkshop is based on a need for an additional type of workshop modeled in part after the I2Vand AI2V: an innovation-focused workshop. The new workshop can be offered independently,or as an add-on to (or part of) I2V or AI2V workshops. The program consists of two parts: 1. Traits of Innovative Individuals Participants will learn about: (a) Traits of innovative individuals, and (b) enhancing individuals’ innovative skills. Innovators share some common traits, many of which can be learned and enhanced. Inparticular, this part of the workshop will present traits such as observing, thinking,experimenting, teaming, dreaming, persisting
proposition, its commercial feasibility, the various risk factors, and the resourcesrequired. The class was divided into five separate groups, but all groups worked on the sameoverall problem. Additionally, excerpts from the writings of thought leaders on innovation, suchas Carlson, Christensen, and Porter, were included. To give us more time for extendeddiscussions, the class met twice a week, for two lecture hours each time. The syllabus for the fallof 2009 is shown in figure 1.Our institution operates on a somewhat unusual academic calendar where each semester is splitinto two seven-week terms. Terms A and B are taught in the fall (September to December) andterms C and D are taught in the spring (January to April). During each academic term
outcome of the commercialization plan development being a Page 15.1386.8primary driver. Of critical importance is the ability to engage students in businessactivities beyond the traditional professional service role (i.e. entrepreneurialactivities).AcknowledgementsThe work presented herein is funded in part through a grant from the KentuckyScience and Engineering Foundation, project number KSTC-144-401-07-016,COMMFUND-713-RFP-006.Bibliography 1. Ernest, A. N. S., N-B. Chang, R. Fowler, J. R. Fattic, K. Andrew, and J. Ballweber, "Water Resource Management Capacity Development: A Small Systems Technology Transfer Model", 2009 ASEE Annual
AC 2010-2012: CROSS-DISCIPLINARY TRAINING OF RESEARCHERS INENTREPRENEURIAL DISCOVERYRobert Keynton, University of LouisvilleJames Fiet, University of LouisvillePankaj Patel, Ball State University Page 15.336.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Cross-Disciplinary Training of Researchers in Entrepreneurial DiscoveryIntroductionThe work presented in this paper are the outcomes from an NSF-sponsored Partnership forInnovations program which involved the development of a new training paradigm in an attemptto:(1) stimulate the transformation of knowledge created by the nationally-renowned researchand education enterprise at the University into innovations to
described in this paper and the National Science Foundation for the two grantsthat support this research (EEC-0835992 & DUE 0817394)References: 1. Weilerstein, P., & Shartrand, A. (2008). Proceedings from the American Society for Engineering Education annual meeting. A decade of technological innovation: A retrospective view of the first decade of the NCIIA. Pittsburgh, PA. 2. BankBoston. (1997). MIT: The impact of innovation. Boston, MA: Author. 3. Vesper, K. H., & Gartner, W. B. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 403-421 4. Levie, J. (1999). Entrepreneurship education in higher education in England: A survey. London: London Business
included the creation of anEntrepreneurial Application Center.Relationship of Course to Program Outcomes - meets the intent of ABET a-k OutcomesOutcome Support Rating Rationale for Rating a 3 Student will use knowledge, techniques, skills, and Page 15.252.8 modern tools learned in their previous courses. b 3 Students will apply current knowledge and applications of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology for their projects. c 2
iv nc i lit c ge r sh R igu t ai at ab Ex ra itm de o tr u b er lia t ou m a re re
State University remote location? 2. What are the available resources to support development of a regional learning center for engineering? 3. What curricular offerings in engineering should be delivered? 4. What are the marketing strategies and tools that may be effective in student recruitment? 5. How should the success of the regional learning center be assessed?Theoretical Basis This study is framed by Tyler’s9 seminal work on curriculum development. In his work Tylerposes four questions which are: (a) “What educational purposes should the school seek toattain?”11; (b) “How can learning experiences be selected which are likely to be useful inattaining these objectives?”12 (c) “How can learning experiences be organized
Page 15.5.3continuum, and it is believed that by providing a continuum of resources to entrepreneurs andstartup companies, the probability of success is significantly increased. Details of each of theprograms listed in the figure will be discussed below. Students Companies Re sea rch • H inm an CEOs • On- campus I ncubat or Base • Tech St ar tup Boot Cam p • B- Plan Competition • 2 n d stage I ncubator I nnovat ive Concepts • H illm an Entr epr en eur s
electronic commerce and electronic data interchange; and a Vice President at the First National Bank of Chicago, where he founded and managed the bank’s market leading professional Cash Management Consulting Group and initiated the bank’s non credit service product management organization and profit center profitability programs.Michele Govekar, Ohio Northern University Michele A. Govekar, Ph.D. Michele is a Professor of Management at Ohio Northern University. Her academic research and publications focus on the management and history of US firms’ international operations, corporate- nonprofit interactions, nonprofit organizations, and the process, outcomes and assessment
AC 2010-589: ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS:PLANNING, OPERATING AND GROWINGDonald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Associate Director of the Lear Entrepreneurial Program at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Don is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organization. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Don also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
AC 2010-1253: MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN TECHNICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIPAND MANAGEMENT (TEAM)Duncan Moore, University of Rochester Page 15.856.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Masters of Science in Technical Entrepreneurship And Management (TEAM)AbstractThe Master of Science in Technical Entrepreneurship and Management, or TEAM, degreeprogram at the University of Rochester offers students the opportunity to immerse themselves ina technical concentration of their choice while receiving a strong foundation in entrepreneurialmanagement. TEAM is designed for students with an undergraduate degree in engineering,science, or
; Computer Science, Baylor UniversityBrian Thomas, Baylor University Senior Lecturer of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering & Computer Science, Baylor University Page 15.241.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Bringing Innovation and the Entrepreneurial Mindset (Back) Into Engineering: the KEEN Innovators ProgramAbstractThe U.S. economy has gone from being a predominantly innovation-based economy to being apredominantly service-based economy. Historically, this is not a trend that can sustain a nation,and this is especially apparent in the face of the economic
AC 2010-413: DESIGNING AND LAUNCHING THE ENTREPRENEURSHIP ANDINNOVATION LIVING-LEARNING PROGRAM FOR FRESHMEN ANDSOPHOMORESJames Green, University of Maryland Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech as the Director of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Director with Mtech, Dr. Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. He is Co-Director of the Certificate in Innovation Management Program for executives, and Co-Director of the Graduate Certificate in