academic disciplines. This understanding is critical to ensuring that students from allbackgrounds are appropriately supported in pursuing their degrees and faculty are equipped todiscuss these topics with their students. In this pilot project, researchers from RowanUniversity’s College of Engineering and College of Education who were interested in exploringDEIJ implementation in the classroom in a cross-collaborative manner explored the followingresearch questions: (1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part oftheir degree program curriculum? and (2) How do faculty members’ conceptions of DEIJcompare across disciplines?There is scant literature on faculty members' conceptions of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, andJustice
projects (introducing both design and research thinking to understanding engineeringproblem solving, practice, thinking, and analysis), (b) one module “Engineering and Me”designed to connect historical, cultural, and personal values to the profession (and attempting tointegrate knowledge beyond engineering and beyond what we traditionally see in engineeringclassrooms), and (c) embedded professional development workshops. We knew that our visionfor the year one curriculum was to set a foundation for what would come over the next threeyears and to provide knowledge, skills, and attitudes so that our first-year students would havethe confidence to start pursuing internships and other relevant engineering work experience. Thesuccessful first year
engineeringprograms at UdeS and not systematically in other engineering programs in Canada (seesubsection PHASE 1: Analysis). In that sense, GBA+ remains an unfamiliar tool to engineeringeducators and has not yet been adapted for use in university engineering education in Canada.Currently, the material that will be included in the digital tool is at the development stage. A teamhas been successfully formed for the pilot phase of the project by engaging 4 out of 8 studyprograms (civil, building, mechanical, and robotics), as well as the coordination of majorcapstone design projects regrouping 4 of our study programs (robotics, electrical, computerscience, and mechanical) to participate. The major capstone design projects are a series ofmandatory
Northwestern University. She has also served as an Associate Dean for curriculum, instruction, and advising in the College of Science, Associate Department Head of Economics and Undergraduate Program Director for Economics. She is Associate Editor at Economic Modeling. As a woman in STEM Dr. Ball has presented work on active learning and research, as well as women in science and is actively involved with mentoring for Committee for the Status of Women in the Economics Profession.Walid Saad, Walid Saad received his Ph.D degree from the University of Oslo in 2010. Currently, he is an Assistant Professor and the Steven O. Lane Junior Faculty Fellow at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech
. 1, pp. 4–8, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.010.[10] M.-E. Baylor, J. R. Hoehn, and N. Finkelstein, “Infusing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Throughout Our Physics Curriculum: (Re)defining What It Means to Be a Physicist,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 172–175, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1119/5.0032998.[11] G. Potvin et al., “Gendered Interests in Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering: Intersections With Career Outcome Expectations,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 298–304, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TE.2018.2859825.[12] J. Rohde et al., “Design Experiences, Engineering Identity, and Belongingness in Early Career Electrical and Computer Engineering Students,” IEEE Transactions on
Paper ID #40715Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engi-neeringOlivia Ryan, Virginia Tech Engineering Education Olivia Ryan is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and a Master’s student in Engineering Mechanics at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. in engineering with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include understanding curriculum barriers in engineering related to mathematics.Dr. Susan Sajadi, Virginia Tech Susan Sajadi is an assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the department of engineering education. She has a BSE and MS
LOSSAlthough there is limited research quantifying credit loss, there is research on factors thataffect credit loss focused on three areas: Curriculum, Policy, Advising. LITERATURE REVIEW CURRICULUM CURRICULUM Heilman et al. (2019) compared the curricular complexity of electrical CREDIT engineering programs at 63 different US LOSS universities and found statistically significant variation across these programs. Grote et al. (2020) compared curricular
sociocultural contexts, the impact of critical consciousness in engineering practice, and the development and imple- mentation of culturally responsive pedagogies in engineering education.Dr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated En- gineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineer- ing is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
Brianna is the Teaching and Learning librarian at the Colorado School of Mines. She collaborates with faculty to design and implement information literacy throughout the curriculum. Prior to her work at the School of Mines, she was the Engineering and Computer Science Librarian at the US Naval Academy and a contract Reference Librarian assigned to the National Defense University. She earned her MLIS at the University of Denver in 2011.Ms. Jamie Marie Regan, Colorado School of Mines Jamie Regan is an undergraduate student in Electrical Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines. Her academic journey is intertwined with a personal and passionate dedication to advancing accessibility within STEM fields. Inspired by her
consistent with and limitedcompared to Indigenous practices. There may be ways to more formally draw on Enola’s insights so thatboth the classroom curriculum and Enola’s experiences are enhanced. Enola mentions other types ofassignments that have helped connect engineering concepts to different aspects of themselves and others;for example, she found a cross-cultural assignment particularly helpful to think about cultures other thanher own. She is also exploring more connections between her Indigenous identity and engineering byconnecting to more projects in the local Indigenous communities, and she is actively wondering abouthow she can leverage her learning to help her community and her people. If we think of a student on adevelopmental journey
establishing their own internal engineering goal [15],[39]. As an example, Micari & Pazos [42], in their study, discussed the importance of engagingstudents in relevant course work to students’ perception of curriculum and their success. Thiswas found again in Gasman et al’s. study [55], which also discusses the importance ofconnecting students with STEM capital, including STEM related opportunities and resources.Discovering that engineering faculty viewed their role in broadening participation as closelyconnected to how they support, encourage, and engage undergraduate students provides apotentially emerging engineering faculty perspective. Existing literature captures STEM facultyvoice in discussing their role in attracting more students into