student, and then 1 studentin each of the following categories: SE Asian, E Asian, S Asian, and Middle Eastern orNorth African student. Pilot Results 33Furthermore, the sample was a little over half first generation college students (51%). Gender 34First we will walk through some of the scenario results by gender. Your first round of tests did not go well and your usual studying habits are not working Women’s top two choices: Men’s top two choices: 1. Spend more
enhancing engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Peru in State College: Providing Scholarswith a Global Perspective at HomeOur Story of Resilience 1 Lauren Griggs, PhD • Director, Clark Scholars Program • Director, Multicultural Engineering Program • Assistant Teaching Professor Julio Urbina, PhD • Faculty Advisor, Clark Scholars Program • Professor
post-COVID, the case likely represents a similar phenomenon at other large engineering programs. articipants and SamplingPSince the case involves several individuals situated in the same context[43], purposeful sampling was used to find participants for the study[44]. The participants in the study are first-year engineering students at a large R1 university enrolled in Calculus 1 during their second semester. After receiving approval from the IRB, we collaborated with the General Engineering Advising Coordinator at the university to contact all first-year engineering students enrolled in Calculus 1 during the spring semester. If students were interested in being interviewed, they were asked
CONCLUSIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS EXPRESSED IN THISMATERIAL ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NATIONAL PRIORITY INCREASE GRADUATES BROADEN PARTICIPATION President’s Council of Advisors on Underrepresented groups in engineering Science and Technology estimated that are also the fastest growing segment of the United States will need 1 million the general population, and so it is also additional STEM professionals. important that the field similarly reflect the population it serves.Among the national priorities are increasing graduates in STEM and
they want andcustomize the course offerings to match student interests.Ultimately, we found, to no surprise, that students are interested inthese topics. Still, if we only talk about them using examples of disastersor catastrophes, students will associate only the negatives with theseconversations. Suppose students are told of and can experience throughtheir discussions the benefits of being ethical engineers, scientists,students, and people in general by using ideas that affect them moreclosely. In that case, they are more interested in the conversation. 16 Related Publications 1. Using the Boeing Max Air Disaster
something in theenvironment rather than the student or their preparation is the root cause. Admissions statistics for students at participating institution. 8 We identified a first-year programming course with an equity gap in BLI students’ academic performance.Figure 1. Normalized GPA differences on a 4.0 scale for BLI students (left) and women(right) controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, first-generation college student status, HSGPA, and instructor. 9 Prior work on belonging interventions demonstrate significant impact
Undergraduate Education. Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs*S-STEM Active Awards “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further develop the infrastructure needed to generate and disseminate new knowledge, successful practices and effective design principles arising from NSF S-STEM projects nationwide.”Source: NSF NSF 23-536 3Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs* “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further
own experiences after acquiring disabilities during college, Jamie delved into research on the challenges faced by students with disabilities entering higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Slide 1 Cutting the Curb for Students with Disabilities Transitioning to Higher Education S eth Vuletich Br ianna Buljung Jam ie ReganBefore we begin, we want to acknowledge that accessibility is a broad and expansive field thatis constantly changing. Despite best efforts to learn about the field and support accessibleresources, we are not aware of all accessibility concerns but
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
, BakersfieldAisha Farra ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Examining how Graduate Advisors in STEM Support Mental Health among Black and Latinx Graduate Women Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Stephanie Marando-Blanck1, Angela Wang1, Aisha Farra1, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj2, and Aishwarya Shridhar1 1 University of Massachusetts Boston 2 California State University BakersfieldIntroduction It is well known that Women of Color (WOC) navigate an onslaught of
resourcesor knowledge to implement these concepts fully in their curriculum. In addition, Wang’s [27]exploration of the perceived divide between DEI pedagogy and technical rigor amongstengineering faculty points to a need for a better understanding of whether engineering facultyrecognize DEIJ concepts as components within the engineering curriculum and, if so, how theseconcepts connect with other engineering content.Research questionsThe purpose of this exploratory study was to compare the relevance faculty members fromRowan University’s College of Engineering and College of Education place on DEIJ concepts aspart of their curriculum by addressing the following research questions: 1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part
participation in STEM graduate programs and research. Open to 3rd and 4th year undergraduates, masters, and 1st and 2nd year PhD students, this program: • Helps students frame their research • Prepares students to apply for external grants and fellowships • Provides support to workshop manuscripts for publications • Participants attend monthly sessions led by subject-matter experts and administrators during the spring semester. During the summer semester students receive 1:1 support for applications or manuscripts.The FSA is a new initiative which evolved out of several iterations of support forgraduate students designed to prepare students to secure external
other academicinstitutions to develop effective targeted programming.1. Introduction1.1 Existing demographics of STEMHistorically and currently, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fieldshave been characterized by a lack of diversity, with limited representation from variousdemographic groups [1-6]. Although the workforce has become more diverse in recent years,there are still significant disparities in the representation of women, racial minorities, and otherhistorically underrepresented demographics [2,7-9]. Within the US, the dominance of White menin STEM flourished due to legal barriers that prevented access for other groups until the 1960s[2,7-9]. This domination has been institutionalized through a range of laws and
Engineers (NSBE), As Chairman, he helped launch the Technical OutReach Community Help (TORCH) program and launched the NSBE 2025 initiative. He is the author of three books, Diary of a Mad Businessman: A Layman’s Guide to Starting a Business from the Ground Up, Instant Gratification: An Entrepreneur’s Guide to Satisfying Every Customer, Every Time and his memoir Taking My Soul to the Laundromat: From Prison Walls to Executive Halls Each book was written for the purpose of sharing his life lessons with others. He currently resides in Cincinnati, OH with his wife Dr. Whitney B. Gaskins. He is an Associate Minister at the New Friendship Baptist Church. He has previously been awarded the Spirit of Detroit Award and the
amplification of the voices of mi- noritized populations in STEM with the goal of informing disruption of the pervasive systemic inequities found in racialized organizations such as institutions of higher learning. Leveraging the outcomes of this work, Dr. Coley will continue to create exemplars of equity in action across realms of the academic enterprise—lived experience and restorative justice, scholarship generation and metrics, and rewards sys- tems and structures. Dr. Coley recently received the 2021 Diversity and Inclusion Award from the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering for her commitment to creating and fostering a diverse and inclusive en- vironment. Dr. Coley earned her Doctor of Philosophy degree in
theunprecedented challenges faced by this generation of students due to the pandemic, the ROPESprogram aimed to bridge the gap and provide a transformative educational experience for thoseleft behind.ObjectivesThe four major objectives of the ROPES initiative are provided below: 1. Promote opportunities for student success and enhanced workforce readiness in career fields such as teacher education, engineering, social services, computer science, and music business. This goal aligned with the institution's focus on preparing students for in-demand careers and equipping them with the necessary skills. 2. Engage students in experiential activities, fostered relationships with Rowan faculty and staff and connected them with student
workshops focused on issues related to power, privilege, social justice, and social identities such as race, ability, class, gender, and sexual orientation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Fostering Inclusive Learning Environments while Navigating DEI Backlash Date 1 Overview Current Landscape: Recent SCOTUS ruling & State Legislation National, state, institutional, and individual Key Areas Targeted and Examples levels Strategies You Can Control for broadening how we accomplish goals for inclusion
diverseand creative people are successful in the pursuit of engineering and computing degrees.Jean’s efforts have been recognized with numerous awards including the National ScienceFoundation Faculty Early Career Development award, the American Society for EngineeringEducation John A. Curtis Lecturer award, and the Bagley College of Engineering Serviceaward. Jean earned her B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering from Mississippi StateUniversity, and her Ph.D. in engineering education from Virginia Tech. 1 Overview of Engineering Summer Bridge Goal: Supporting student growth in academics, community, and life skills as they transition to University
thriving incomputing careers. 1 Positionality- Before diving into our presentation today, each of us will give a brief positionality statement to situate our perspectives in this work.- Hello, my name is Alia Carter. My pronouns are she/her. I am an able-bodied, cisgender Black woman living in the United States. I am a research scientist in the electrical and computer engineering department at Duke University. I have worked in informal and formal STEM education for the past 15 years including serving as the director of science engagement at a science center and teaching math and 2
environments 17as a result of being a part of the 3C Fellows program. Theyalso noted an increased ability to identify areas of neededgrowth or self-improvement through self-reflection on theirown experiences and practices. 17 Evaluation Recommendations • Refine prep packet/pre-work • Breakout session processes and composition • Offer more practical guidance on implementation • Feedback and accountability mechanisms on program deliverables • Facilitate community buildingHere is a sample of the recommendations provided by ourevaluators to improve the program.1. Refine prep packet/pre-work - Prioritize
) • “My parents/relatives/friends see me as a physics person; my teacher sees me as a physics person.” (Godwin et al., 2013) • “Do the following people see you as a mathematics person?:” Parents/relatives/friends/mathematics teacher. (Cribbs et al., 2015) • “Do the following see you as an engineering person: (1) yourself and (2) the engineering instructor” (Prybutok et al., 2016) • “My parents see me as an engineer. My instructors see me as an engineer. My peers see me as an engineer. I have had experiences in which I was recognized as an engineer.” (Godwin, 2016) • “I see myself as an engineer.” “My advisor sees me as an engineer.” “I have
construct validity of the surveyinstrument was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and subgroup comparisons wereconducted based on career stage, gender, generation-to-college status, community collegeexperience, and various combinations thereof.This paper provides an overview of the constructs utilized, the methodology employed for dataanalysis, and essential findings derived from the results. The study sheds light on importantinsights and implications for supporting Hispanic individuals in their STEM journeys.MethodologyIn this section, a detailed account of the methodology employed for SHPE's 2022 NeedsAssessment is provided. The primary objective of this study was to gain a profoundunderstanding of the multifaceted challenges, needs
Metricsnew modes of communicating scholarship that will reach a wider This pillar seeks to: 1) redefine what “counts” as scholarship; 2) re-audience and will be valued comparably to current, traditional envision current metrics of scholarship that perpetuate structuralmodes of scholarly dissemination. The modalities will be focused racism in higher education, and engineering, specifically; and 3)explicitly on racism at the structural level and designed to hold generate scholarship that addresses the sociotechnicalaccountable those with the power to create change. implications of structural racism.Outreach &
was on the board of governors for the Rocky Mountain chapter of ASHRAE. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree in architectural engineering and an MBA. He is a licensed professional engineer and a LEED-accredited professional in building design and construction.Rachel Levitt, Kansas State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Creating buy-in from key constituencies for supportingLGBTQIA+ engineering students Dr. Amy Betz (she/her)1 Craig Wanklyn, PE, MBA (he/him)1 Dr. Rachel Levitt (they/them)2 Mariya Vaughn (she/they)31-Col l ege of Engineering, 2-Social Transformation Studies, 3
showcased his skills for technical reading and writing and being able to bridge the gap between client and engineer. In his role as an Intern Engineering Inspector at CES Consulting LLC, Kevin demonstrated a strong commitment to quality assurance and control, ensuring that construction aligned with design plans and bringing errors to the attention of senior inspectors for correction. His involvement extends beyond his work and academic pursuits; His membership in the National ASME and AIAA organizations reflects his commitment to his field and his versatile interests. Additionally, he has taken on leadership responsibilities as the GMU ASME President, where he has organized informa- tional sessions and collaborated
, and was on the board of governors for the Rocky Mountain chapter of ASHRAE. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree in architectural engineering and an MBA. He is a licensed professional engineer and a LEED-accredited professional in building design and construction.Rachel Levitt, Kansas State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Real life experiences inrecruiting, retaining, and supporting LGBTQIA+ engineering students Dr. Amy Betz (she/her)1 Craig Wanklyn, PE, MBA (he/him)1 Dr. Rachel Levitt (they/them)2 Mariya Vaughn (she/they)3 1-Col l ege of Engineering, 2
featured two phenomenal guest speakers. Tracie Marcella Addy Associate Dean of Teaching and Learning Lafayette College Ebony Omotola McGee Professor of Diversity and STEM Education Vanderbilt University (Now at James Hopkins)Section 1:Summit Pre-Work• Teams were required to complete a document before they came to the Summit• Included: • Draft ABET Criteria (as of October, 2022) • Create an inventory of institutional DEI resources • Idea generation and reflection questionsActivity 1:Create
, and access to careers in STEM fields for students from historically underrepresented groups. Sharona is a founding organizer of ”The Grading Conference”, an annual two-day online confer- ence focused on reforming grading as we know it across STEM fields throughout higher education, now entering its fifth year. She coordinates a large general education Quantitative Reasoning with Statistics course for over 1,400 students per year as well as teaches a wide range of mathematics courses including Calculus and Linear Algebra.Mr. Robert Christopher Bosley, California State University, Los AngelesDr. Dina Verdin, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Dina Verd´ın, PhD is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Ira
. 1 1 INTRODUCTION 2 BROADER STUDY Agenda 3 METHODS 4 FINDINGS 5 DISCUSSIONIntroduce the flow of the presentation and what structure the audience can expect. 2 Introduction BASED ON A SURVEY BY THE HEALTHY MINDS NETWORK BETWEEN 2013 AND 2021 FROM 350,000 COLLEGE STUDENTS AT OVER 300 CAMPUSES 135% INCREASE IN 110% INCREASE IN
Paper ID #40707Siloed Efforts and Collaboration Among STEM Equity Initiatives: AnOrganizational Network AnalysisDaniel Mackin Freeman, University of Washington Daniel Mackin Freeman is a doctoral candidate in Portland State University’s Department of Sociology and a Research Scientist at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity. He received his BFA in General Fine Arts with a focus on social practice from the Pacific North- west College of Art and his MS in Sociology from Portland State University. With a background in the philosophy of art and education, Daniel’s current research