students: oneundergoing a traditional cumulative assessment (Group A) and the other experiencingthe modified ‘chunking’ assessment structure (Group B). Paired t-tests were employed tocompare the results between the two groups. The results reveal that Group Boutperformed Group A with a 24% increase in final assessment scores. Additionally,Group B exhibited higher levels of engagement with the material during the assessmentweek. These findings suggest that modifying the assessment structure by dividing thefinal assessment into multiple portions may reduce cognitive and testing fatigue, leadingto improved student performance and increased engagement. Further research coulddelve into the underlying mechanisms driving these effects to inform the design
Paper ID #43318High-Temperature Materials Testing using a Hybrid Rocket TestbedDr. Dustin Scott Birch, Weber State University Dustin Birch is a professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Weber State University. Dr. Birch earned his PhD in Systems Engineering from Colorado State University. He also earned a BS and MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Utah. In addition to his academic experience, Dr. Birch has worked for several decades as an engineer and manager for various companies. His experience includes thermal and structural analysis of aerospace propulsion systems, mechanical
different expectations, and with the flipped classroom approach, there aremore nuances due to different student personalities and how that affects the learning process.Furthermore, how does one determine which students put forth the work and effort worthy of anA letter grade compared to students doing B or C quality work? This has evolved a lot throughoutthe M2I program and will continue to evolve to improve the methodology and hopefully find theoptimal way to assess this style of class.In recent semesters, we have been using a combination of having students submit their time spenton the project, with a minimum number of hours required per credit hour, and submitting a shortpresentation, often referred to as a quad chart. An example of this quad
students. We decided to implement the panel project, but in a safe manner.Thus, the project was reframed to comply with safety regulations. The main considerations toaccomplish this were to include safe distancing requirements and minimize student stress andanxiety. This wasaccomplished by (a) limitingthe number of teams thatcould occupy the laboratoryspace (Fig. 1) at any giventime and (b) allowing alonger period of time tocomplete the many steps inthe project. Since thenecessary course materialhad not been covered toenable students to designtheir panels, the panelgeometry (stringer shape,size, quantity, spacing andform of attachment) wasgiven to each team two Figure 1. Students fabricating their panels (fall 2020).weeks after classes
. Theme Module Description Category Interaction Nickname Type Aircraft Module A Explore a Jet Plane Learning Individual Week Module B Fly a Jet Plane Experience Individual Module C Explore Mars with a Remote- Learning Individual Spacecraft Controlled Vehicle Week Module D Explore Mars with an Au- Experience Individual tonomous Vehicle Astronaut Module E Human-Machine Interactions Both
-person lecture and discussion format with textbookssuch as Airport Planning & Management by Seth B. Young and Alexander T. Wells [3] and theFAA advisory circulars and articles in news and journals. It was taught remotely online in 2020and 2021 fall semesters due to the pandemic and was redeveloped in 2022 fall semester when theuniversity moved back to in-person classes. One significant change was adding the ACRPUniversity Design Competition to the course structure as a student team project to enhancestudents' engagement and hands-on experience. This competition, which evolved from theformer FAA Design Competition for Universities, aims to foster college students’ engagement inaddressing pertinent challenges within the aviation domain. The
–584, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0042085911431472.[16] D. Carter-Andrews, “Preparing teachers to be culturally multidimensional: Designing andimplementing teacher preparation programs for pedagogical relevance, responsiveness, andsustenance,” Educ. Forum, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 416–428, 2021, doi:10.1080/00131725.2021.1957638.[17] A. Ishimaru, “New rules of engagement: From conventional partnerships to equitablecollaborations,” in Just Schools: Building Equitable Collaborations with Families andCommunities, J. A. Banks, Ed. New York: Teachers College Press, 2020.[18] L. A. Mooney and B. Edwards, “Experiential learning in sociology: Service learning andother community-based learning initiatives,” Teaching Sociology, vol. 29, no. 2, p. 181, 2001,doi
Paper ID #43722Aerospace Lunar Lander System Design - A High School Student’s IndependentDesign ProjectDr. Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University Adeel Khalid, Ph.D. Professor Industrial and Systems Engineering Office: 470-578-7241 ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Aerospace Lunar Lander System Design - A High School Student’s Independent Design ProjectAbstract:In this study, a high school student is involved in research in an engineering laboratory at a publicuniversity. The student started with limited research skills but was able to quickly learn some ofthe tools and
Paper ID #43730Student Rocketry: Out-of-Class Learning Experiences from a Year-Long CapstoneProject at UniversityMr. Tim Drake, Saint Louis University Tim Drake is a senior undergraduate aerospace student at Saint Louis University. He is the president of the Rocket Propulsion Lab at SLU and is leading his senior design capstone project.Dr. Srikanth Gururajan, Saint Louis University Dr. Srikanth Gururajan is an Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering at the Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology at Saint Louis University. Dr. Gururajan’s teaching interests are in the areas of Flight Dynamics and
. exist Document B Code value exists A (# of code values B (# of code values identical in both that exist only in documents) document B) Code value does not exist C (# of code values D (# of code values that exist only in that do not exist in document A) both documents)Results and DiscussionThis section presents the results from the scoring of the concept maps as well as the trends foundby the cluster analysis
) Advisors/Instructors Support, 2) Project Selection, 3) Structure of Class, 4)Feedback and Communication, 5) Lectures and Presentations, 6) Team Dynamics, 7) ProjectScope and Feasibility, 8) Peer Evaluation and Grading, 9) Industry Relevance, and 10)Effectiveness of Feedback. The faculty also requested examining research topics of A) FacultyAdvisor Technical Guidance, B) Industry Sponsor or Mentor Technical Guidance, C) IndustrySponsor Relationship, and D) Mentor Relationship. Figure 5 has a table that shows the numberof comments by academic year, and a bar graph that shows the probability of each of these topicsappearing in a given comment sorted by the old course and new course designs
: Synthesizing a human-centered engineering design framework,” in The 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Baltimore: American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/43626[5] S. Goldman, M. P. Carroll, Z. Kabayadondo, L. B. Cavagnaro, A. W. Royalty, B. Roth, S. H. Kwek, and J. Kim, “Assessing learning: Capturing the journey of becoming a design thinker,” in Design Thinking Research, H. Plattner, C. Meinel, and L. Leifer, Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp. 13–33, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_2.[6] R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What is design thinking and why is it important?” Review of Educational Research, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330–348, 2012.[7] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams
students. The interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom® platform and transcribed usingZoom® transcribe. The transcripts were stored in a safe folder per the IRB requirements andwere only accessible to the research team. Transcripts were then uploaded to NVIVO® softwarefor analysis. Two researchers read each transcript twice to verify accuracy. The first read helped theresearchers familiarize themselves with the participant responses. In the second read, theresearchers developed preliminary codes (Appendix B) based on the research questions. Thecodes were revised to develop the final themes. The following seven themes emerged from thecoding process.Theme 1. Motivation for pursuing aviation as a career Motivation for
Paper ID #42804Design of an Aerospace Industry-Informed Technical Writing and CommunicationCourseGlen Roderic Coates, Pennsylvania State University Glen R Coates received his B. S. degree in Environmental Engineering from Penn State University. He then went on to receive an M. S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Penn State and a second M. S. degree in Management of Technology from Rensselaer Polytechnical Institute. Working in the Aerospace industry as a Senior Analytical Engineer for the past 45 years, he also has taught undergraduate mathematics and physics at several institutions as an adjunct professor. These
nickel-cadmium (Ni-cd) batteries which have values in the range of 10-25 volts and 10-50 Ah values.However, lithium-ion (Li-ion) or lithium-polymer (LiPo) batteries can have values of 200V to600V or more. The ampere-hour (Ah) rating of these batteries can vary from a few tens toseveral hundred Ah. The values can vary from one aircraft to another depending on the aircraft'srequirements. These higher voltages require additional personal protection equipment to handlethe equipment. OSHA 1910 includes requirements for those working with high voltages [11].These requirements include the following: a. 1910.269: If the voltage is more than 600v there should be at least two employees present. b. 1910.269: The technician
FMEA,steps, and standards regarding PFMEA and have seen an example of using PFMEA to analyze anHAA accident, they will approach their capstone project by querying the CAROL database andselecting an accident. Then, the students would present a summary of the findings in the NTSBfinal accident investigation report, including: 1. Factual information 2. Probable causes a. History of flight 3. Findings b. Personnel information 4. Recommendations c. Weather information d. Organization informationAfter the presentation, the students and the instructor would discuss the probable causes of theHAA accidents as found in
o Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer/Aerospace Engineering o Program Director, Aerospace Engineering o Associate Director of Education, ACUASI • Dr Denise Thorsen, dlthorsen@alaska.edu o Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering o Chair, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering o Associate Dean of Academics, UAF o Director, ASGPAppendix A: Aerospace Engineering FlowsAppendix B: AcronymsA&D Aerospace & DefenseABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and TechnologyAC AircraftACUASI Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration (UAF)AIAA American Institute of Aeronautics & AstronauticsASEE
]. Efforts to better understand andreduce airport taxi times may potentially improve airport capacity and reduce fuel usage, costs,and emissions. Airport Surface Detection Equipment, Model X (ASDE-X) is a surveillancesystem that provides location and movement information of aircraft and vehicles on the airport toair traffic controllers [9]. ASDE-X was developed to reduce the Category A and B runwayincursions at airports by providing continuous information of aircraft and vehicle location onairport movement areas. This equipment was implemented at 35 major U.S. airports [9].The FAA defines U.S. airports as Large, Medium, Small, and Non hub airports. In National Planof Integrated Airport System (NPIAS), the Appendix A: List of NPIAS Airports provides
– to thermodynamics – to history and philosophy of engineering and the engineering worldview. Numerous conference presentations available on YouTube; personal website terrybristol.org; publications on Research Gate and Academia.edu. Book on Amazon: Give Space My Love – An Intellectual Odyssey with Dr. Stephen Hawking. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Grounding Aeronautical Engineering Education in Engineering Thermodynamics The aim of this paper is to present the case for a foundational course on The History ofthe Philosophy of Engineering Thermodynamics in Aeronautical Engineering Education. I amindebted to reviewers for encouraging a refocusing of the theme. The current
Paper ID #42978Leveraging Ontologies in Engineering Education: Top-Down and Bottom-UpApproachesWaterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University Dr. Waterloo Tsutsui is a Senior Research Associate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University, IN. Tsutsui received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University in 2017. Before Purdue, Tsutsui practiced engineering in the automotive industry for more than ten years, with the last position involving the research and development of lithium-ion battery cells for electric vehicles. Tsutsui’s research interests are systems engineering, structures and