Effect of Assessment Structure on Perceived Efficacy of a Rocketry Course
- Conference
- Location
-
Portland, Oregon
- Publication Date
-
June 23, 2024
- Start Date
-
June 23, 2024
- End Date
-
June 26, 2024
- Conference Session
- Tagged Division
-
Aerospace Division (AERO)
- Page Count
-
35
- DOI
-
10.18260/1-2--47216
- Permanent URL
-
https://peer.asee.org/47216
- Download Count
-
96
Paper Authors
Scott Nguyen
Joshua Rovey University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Heather Ruth Arnett University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Heather Arnett is the Coordinator of STEM Engagement Activities in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She received her Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS) from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2018 with an emphasis on experiential STEAM learning and outreach programs. Her work focuses on recognizing resource assets and needs in diverse learning spaces and developing methods for accessible learning.
Abstract
In recent years, the growing popularity of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can be attributed to their exceptional accessibility. While MOOCs offer valuable educational opportunities, they also present challenges with regard to instructional effectiveness. A notable challenge concerns the design of final assessments. Conventional final assessments include cumulative content from the entire course, a practice known to induce testing fatigue and potentially misrepresent students' true performance. Research findings indicate that dividing the final assessment into smaller assessments, each focused on a specific topic, may offer a more accurate evaluation of student performance.
This study centers on evaluating the effectiveness of modifying the assessment structure for an introductory rocketry course to accurately assess student knowledge. Past investigations have explored the impact of hands-on content on students' technical knowledge, self-confidence, and overall interest in space. Findings demonstrated an increase in students' self-confidence following engagement with online materials and hands-on activities. Yet there were indications of a decrease in technical knowledge possibly due to assessment fatigue. In contrast to previous research, which assessed participants through a single comprehensive evaluation, this study breaks down the final assessment into discrete components that students complete within the concluding week of the course. Each assessment centers on a distinct rocketry-related topic, with the intent of mitigating assessment fatigue and enabling students to concentrate on one subject at a time.
In this study, a survey was conducted with early-college students majoring in STEM fields, with the exception of aerospace engineering. Participants first complete an online component, which includes: 1) gaining knowledge about model rocket components and hardware; 2) making predictions about rocket dynamics with applied design elements; and 3) taking a series of quizzes, exams, and surveys. Once the online component is complete, participants are provided with a model rocket kit that they are instructed to assemble and launch. Data from the launch is then analyzed and compared. In addition to weekly unit quizzes to test their technical knowledge, participants also complete self-efficacy and interest assessments prior to and after the course.
The results of this study confirm previous findings, which indicate that the self-efficacy questionnaires reveal an increase in participant confidence and their ability to perform technical tasks. Survey results consistently indicate an increase in interest and attraction towards space-related careers. The results continue to show that hands-on kits are both beneficial in enhancing and enriching the online learning experience. The adjusted assessment structure indicates a positive trend in participants' technical knowledge.
Nguyen, S., & Rovey, J., & Arnett, H. R. (2024, June), Effect of Assessment Structure on Perceived Efficacy of a Rocketry Course Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--47216
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015