.Cuevas, J. (2015). Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles. Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 308-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515606621Fauziah, H. & Cahyono, B. Y. (2022). Prevalent beliefs in learning styles myths: Indonesian research trends on learning styles. Issues in Educational Research, 32(4), 1384-1402. http://www.iier.org.au/iier32/fauziah.pdfFelder, Richard & JE, Spurlin. (2005). Applications, reliability, and validity of the Index of Learning Styles. International Journal of Engineering Education. 21. 103-112.Felder, Richard & L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engr
1Preparing Engineering Graduate Students to Engage in Scholarly Communications Dianna E. B. Morganti Angie Dunn ASEE Annual Conference 2 Abstract The typical engineering degree plan has several important gaps when reviewed againstthe research lifecycle. These gaps are often filled in by students learning ad hoc, by overworkedfaculty over numerous mentoring sessions, or often by the engineering research librarians inworkshops and consultations. Purposeful incorporation of a curriculum that fills those gaps,though, can
-530.[6] Cuellar, M. G., Segundo, V., & Muñoz, Y. (2017). Assessing Empowerment at HSIs: AnAdapted Inputs-Environments-Outcomes Model. AMAE Journal, 11(3).[7] Strayhorn, T.L., College students' sense of belonging: A key to educational success for allstudents. 2018: Routledge.[8] Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successfulwomen of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching:The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.[9] Godwin, A. (2016, January). The development of a measure of engineering identity. In ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition.[10] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and
laboratories for cybersecurity. Sensors, 2020. 20(11): p. 3011.8. Vigna, G., Teaching hands-on network security: Testbeds and live exercises. Journal of information warfare, 2003. 2(3): p. 8-24.9. Li, C., et al. BAC: Bandwidth-aware compression for efficient live migration of virtual machines. in IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 2017. IEEE.10. Helali, L. and M.N. Omri, A survey of data center consolidation in cloud computing systems. Computer Science Review, 2021. 39: p. 100366.11. Li, B., B. Li, and F. Liu, Cloud and data center performance [Guest Editorial]. IEEE Network, 2013. 27(4): p. 6-7.12. Topham, L., et al., Cyber security teaching and learning laboratories
enhance cognitive learning.Learning and Teaching ActivitiesTo enhance students' learning experience, infographics are significant learning tools of teachingthat are adaptable to any set of learning. [12]Learning ActivitiesSome of the benefits of learning using the infographic tool include: a) The improvable comprehension of concepts, ideas, and information [13] b) The enhancement in the ability of critical thinking and development in the organization of ideas [14] c) The improvement in the recall of information and retention [15]The content is typically presented in a concise manner using infographics. To improve the students'engagement with the material and increase the chance of interaction, the educators can also designvarious
] B. Altay, “User-centered design through learner-centered instruction,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–155, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827646.[10] J. H. L. Koh, C. S. Chai, B. Wong, and H.-Y. Hong, “Design Thinking and Education,” in Design Thinking for Education: Conceptions and Applications in Teaching and Learning, J. H. L. Koh, C. S. Chai, B. Wong, and H.-Y. Hong, Eds., Singapore: Springer, 2015, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1.[11] T. Berg, “Teaching Your Students to Bounce Back from Failure,” Harvard Business Publishing. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/teaching-your-students-to-bounce-back-from- failure[12] S. A. Kidd
, projects), and instructors assigned to eachsection. Sections No. of Homework In-class activities Team Instructor students (HW) (ICA) Project Bloom’s 100 Modified Problems at five Not A Taxonomy- problems at Bloom’s Assigned based Learning five Bloom’s Taxonomy levels (BTL) Taxonomy levels Project-based 100 Textbook Problems at two Assigned B Learning problems at Bloom’s (PBL) two Bloom’s Taxonomy levels
of Competency in Generic Skills," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 2-20, 2017.[3] L. J. McKenzie, M. S. Trevisan, D. C. Davis and S. W. Beyerlin, "Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study," in In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.[4] M. D. Kirschenman and B. Brenner, "Civil Engineering Design as the Central Theme in Civil Engineering Education Curriculum," Leadership and Management in Engineering, pp. 69-71, 2011.[5] M. C. Paretti, D. A. Kotys-Schwartz, S. Howe, J. D. Ford, B. D. Lutz, K. Kochersberger, C. Gewirtz, L. M. Rosenbauer and S. Arunkumar, "From School to Work: Understanding the Transition from Capstone
].[5] M. H. Nicklas and G. B. Bailey, "Daylighting In Schools: Energy Costs Reduced. Student Performance Improved," Innovative Design, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1996.[6] K. B. Atici, G. Yasayacak, Y. Yildiz, A. Ulucan, "Green University and academic performance: An empirical study on UI GreenMetric and World University Rankings," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 291, pp. 125289, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125289.[7] H. C. McCombs,” Location and Transportation,” in LEED Green Associate™ Exam Preparation Guide, LEED® v4 Edition, , AMERICAN TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS, 2015, pp.72.[8] H. C. McCombs,” Sustainable Sites,” in LEED Green Associate™ Exam Preparation Guide, LEED® v4 Edition, , AMERICAN
-Bahill/publication/251201368_The_Zachman_Framework_Populated_with_Baseball_Models/links/5c718773299bf1268d1fd131/The-Zachman-Framework-Populated-with-Baseball-Models.pdf.[Accessed: 16-Jan-2024].[18] ABET, “Student Outcomes and Performance Indicators,” 2017. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Student-Outcomes-and-Performance-Indicators_revised.pdf. [Accessed: 25-Nov-2023].[19] G. K. Cunningham, “Educational and Psychological Measurement,” New York, MacMillianPublishing, 1986. [Accessed: 30-Jan-2024].[20] R. J. McBeath, “Instructing and Evaluating in Higher Education: A Guidebook for PlanningLearning Outcomes,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Educational Technology Publications, 1992.{Accessed: 30-Jan-2024}.[21] B. M. Olds
for the curriculum revision were identified to be:1. Content modernization to reflect changing needs and practices in software engineering2. Cohesive alignment of vertical progression that links each year of study3. Increased integration of course concepts and collaborative pedagogy4. Keep current with leading-edge technologies and approaches5. Student-focused to provide skills and knowledge needed to thrive in industry or graduate programs6. Raise department profile and increase competitiveness with other software engineering programsThe degree program objectives were identified as a) to graduate future software engineers aspractitioners, researchers, developers and collaborators, b) to integrate fundamental knowledgeand applied skills
section. Note that each of the bonuscategories had multiple questions. A greater percentage of students from each section receivedfull/partial credit on questions at the Understand level than the Evaluate level likely becauseEvaluate is a higher cognitive level. (A) (B)Figure 2: Student performance on Quiz 2. (A) Total quiz scores (with and without bonus), out of14 points. (B) The percentage of students who received partial or full credits on the quiz problemsat different cognitive levels. Error bars represent the standard deviations.The grades for students from the two class sections on questions from Chapter 2: Fluid Statics onMidterm 1 were compared using a Mann-Whitney
have made use of the “lightly-flexible” deadline policy, we observe that students who earn C, D, and F grades in these threecourses make use of the policy on average two to three times more often than those earning Aand B grades. Further, a higher proportion of students with A grades never make use of thepolicy at all. The data also reveals differences between class levels: in our junior-level course, anaverage of 0.5 slight extensions per student have been granted, versus on average 1.0 extensionsper student among the sophomores and 3.0 extensions per student among the first-years.BackgroundThe University of Delaware is a medium-sized public institution whose chemical engineeringprogram graduates on average 80 undergraduates per year. The
project #1, we will be writing separate functions for each number from zero to nine.This way when we want to display a number all we have to do in call the function for thatnumber. You will find good documentation on functions at:https://www.arduino.cc/en/Reference/FunctionDeclaration. G F Com A B A GND F B G 220 Com E C D H F A B E D C H G E D Com C H Figure 1: The
. Siddiqui, C. Allendoerfer, R. Adams, and B. Williams, “Integration of Scholarship: Interconnections among Three Studies on Becoming an Engineering Education Researcher*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, pp. 2352–2377, Dec. 2020.[6] S. Cutler and A. Coso Strong, “The Overlooked Impact of Faculty on Engineering Education,” in International Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Routledge, 2023.[7] L. Earle Reybold and J. J. Alamia, “Academic Transitions in Education: A Developmental Perspective of Women Faculty Experiences,” J. Career Dev., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–128, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0894845308325644.[8] D. Oyserman, “Identity-Based Motivation,” in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley &
. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat Biotechnol, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[2] J. Cornwall, E. C. Mayland, J. Van Der Meer, R. A. Spronken-Smith, C. Tustin, and P. Blyth, “Stressors in early-stage doctoral students,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 363–380, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1534821.[3] T. John and P. Denicolo, “Doctoral Education: A Review of the Literature Monitoring the Doctoral Student Experience in Selected OECD Countries (Mainly UK),” Springer Science Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 41–49, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s40362-013-0011-x.[4] F. A. Huppert, “Challenges
Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, pp.410-415, Feb 24 2015. [3] G. Haldeman, A. Tjang, M. Babeş-Vroman, S. Bartos, J. Shah, D. Yucht, and T.D. Nguyen, “Providing meaningful feedback for autograding of programming assignments,” in Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE, pp. 278-283, Feb 21 2018. [4] H. Keuning, J. Jeuring, and B. Heeren. “Towards a Systematic Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '16, pp. 41-46, Jul 2016. [5] Gordon, C. L., Lysecky, R
reconsider the role that spatial skills actuallyplay in training engineers. This paper argues that spatial skills testing and training interventionsare a misuse of the time and energy of people who want to help women and other historicallyexcluded students succeed in engineering. We must reframe our interventions withoutperpetuating deficit models about cognitive abilities like “spatial skills,” a construct which, inspite of its wide popularity in the STEM education community, has been very poorly formulated.References[1] S. G. Vandenberg and A. R. Kuse, “Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensionalspatial visualization,” Percept Mot Skills, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 599–604, Dec. 1978, doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.[2] M. Peters, B. Laeng
Collaborative Learning, pp. 556-567. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021.[23] B. Ozfidan, and M.A. de Miranda, "K12 teacher credentialing containing engineering content in the USA." Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3-13, 2017[24] M. Gharib, T. Katbeh, B. Cieslinski, and B. Creel B. “ A Novel Trilogy of E-STEM Programs”. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition (IMECE2021), November 15-18, Virtual, Paper No. IMECE2021-69012, 2021.[25] N. Alyafei, A. Shaikh, M. Gharib, and A. Retnanto “ The Role of Pre-College STEM Education in Student Enrollment in Petroleum Engineering”. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 21
Paper ID #43631Teaching Online Engineering: A Systematic Literature ReviewYoula Ali, University of Oklahoma Youla Ali, a Junior majoring in Computer Science at the University of Oklahoma, currently serves as a Research Assistant in the Engineering Pathways program under the mentorship of Dr. Javeed Kittur for the academic years 2023-2024. Her research focuses on online engineering education, driven by her desire to understand the challenges that instructors face when transitioning course components, such as experiments and labs, to remote formats. As an engineering student herself, Youla aims to offer valuable insights
Paper ID #42697Envisioning and Realizing a Statewide Data Science EcosystemDr. Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas Dr. Karl D. Schubert is a Professor of Practice and serves as the Associate Director for the Data Science Program at the University of Arkansas College of Engineering, the Sam M. Walton College of Business, and the Fulbright College of Arts & Sciences.Shantel Romer, University of ArkansasStephen R. Addison, IEEE Educational ActivitiesTina D MooreLaura J Berry, North Arkansas CollegeJennifer Marie Fowler, Arkansas State UniversityLee Shoultz, University of ArkansasChristine C Davis
] K.J. Chapman, M. Meuter, D. Toy, and L. Wright, "Can’t we pick our own groups? Theinfluence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes," Journal of ManagementEducation, vol. 30, pp. 557-569, 2006.[12] S.A. Myers, "Students’ perceptions of classroom group work as a function of group memberselection," Communication Teacher, vol. 26, pp. 50-64, 2012.[13] S.A. Rusticus and B.J. Justus, "Comparing student- and teacher-formed teams on groupdynamics, satisfaction, and performance," Small Group Research, vol. 50, pp. 443-457, 2019.[14] B. Rienties, P. Alcott, and D. Jindal-Snape, "To let students self-select or not: That is thequestion for teachers of culturally diverse groups," Journal of Studies in International Education,vol. 18, pp
Paper ID #42780Connecting Engineering Ethics with a Shared CurriculumDr. Markus D. Ong, Whitworth University Dr. Markus Ong is an associate professor within the Department of Engineering & Physics at Whitworth University, located in Spokane, WA. He earned his PhD in materials science and engineering from Stanford University in 2008 and was a staff researcher developing and characterizing nanomaterials at Sandia National Laboratories in Livermore, CA before starting at Whitworth in 2010. His current teaching responsibilities primarily include lower division physics classes, materials and mechanics classes in the
Paper ID #43469Storytelling in Engineering as a Justice-centered MethodologyRobyn Mae Paul, University of Calgary Robyn Paul is a Assistant Professor in the Sustainable Systems Engineering program at the University of Calgary. Her work looks at using best practices from ecofeminism to deconstruct the dominant normative culture of engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Storytelling in engineering as a justice-centered methodologyI recently completed my PhD in Engineering, where my work brings light to the normativecultures of engineering education. By applying
collaboration boundaries to understand how they can supportengineering students’ development of leadership competencies. This is work-in-progress, andpart of a larger project that aims at exploring students’ development of global competencies. Thecurrent paper advances our understanding of boundary crossing that occur within an engineeringdesign team, and it asks: a) what boundaries were encountered in globally situated engineeringdesign projects in a Canadian University and, b) how can these boundaries enable students tomake productive progress in their global leadership skills?Theoretical PerspectivesThe study was guided by three theoretical perspectives namely: 1) Vygotsky’s socialconstructivist perspective allowed for the study of students
as either full-time or part-time students [5],[6].Table 1. Awarded Scholarships by Program Year. Year Semester Cohort A Cohort B Cohort C Cohort D Total Fall 2023 - 4a 4a 7 Year 5 28 Spring 2024 - 3a 4a 6b Year 4 Fall 2022 1 5c 6 7 38 Spring 2023 1 6c 5c 7 Fall 2021 4a 6 8
]. b. Organic Evolution of the Two-Part FormatThe next planning committee was formed in January of 2022 when it was determined that theConference would be in person. The planning committee, led by co-chairs Lynn Albers (Multi),Micah Lande (ERM), and Bala Maheswaren (EPP), met regularly and decided to revisit the eighttopics previously prepared for 2020. The committee combined the eight topics into four andplanned a two-part ITH whereby the first half involved a roundtable discussion of the four topicsand the second half was led by a team conducting an NSF-funded study on ProfessionalDevelopment for Faculty. The two-part format worked well and the use of a two-minute video tointroduce the four topics for Part 1 was well received [4]. The same
. Stanley, A. Nath, J. Cherian, and T. Hammond, “Using the interactive software fossilsketch to teach micropaleontology to undergraduate students,” Journal of Geoscience Education, pp. 1–21, 2024.[2] A. Stepanova, C. Belanger, R. Lara-Garduno, T. Hammond, C. Stanley, and S. Raven, “Fossilsketch - an innovative way to teach micropaleontology in undergraduate geoscience classes, first results of classroom testing,” in 19th International Symposium on Ostracoda, Lyon, France, July 20 2022.[3] A. Stepanova, C. Belanger, T. Hammond, B. Williford, R. Lara-Garduno, C. Stanley, and S. Raven, “Fossilsketch - an innovative way to teach micropaleontology in undergraduate geoscience classes,” in AGU Fall 2021 meeting, New Orleans, LA, December
Engineering Education, 2024 10 2024 ASEE Annual ConferenceRiley, D., Slaton, A. & Pawley, A. (2014). Social justice and inclusion: Women and minorities in engineering. InCambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Jahiri and B. Olds (eds.), 335-356.Schuck, P.H. (2017). One National Undecided: Clear Thinking about Five Hard Issues That Divide Us. Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press.Schwarz-Plaschg, C. (2018). The power of analogies for imagining and governing emerging technologies.Nanoethics,12, 139-153.Sedlack, V. (n.d.). Fish don’t know they’re in the water. Almeda Education Foundation.https://AlamedaEducation.org.Slaton, A. (2022, July 7). Fast-track
1 2 Poorly Not Very Well Well Very Well Extremely Well Figure 3. Faculty's highest rated functions regarding Transcriptto's capabilities.(a) Breakdown of Lectures into Appropriate SegmentsThe responses indicate a generally positive reception towards Transcriptto's ability to segmentlectures appropriately. Most of the participants rated the tool as segmenting "Very Well" or"Extremely Well," suggesting effectiveness in its primary function of structuring contentconducive to online learning environments.(b) Quality of Polished Lecture SegmentsAfter polishing, the quality of the lecture segments was favorably received, with again a