, providing users with acomprehensive view of the sentiment analysis results. The user interface allowed for real-timeinteraction, enabling users to input different project group IDs and observe the correspondingchanges in the displayed results. (a) Chatbot design (b) User Interface Figure 4. Proposed Chatbot Interface CHATME.Framework for Virtual AssistantAs we built the chatbot, we began to question if a chatbot would provide the easiest and mostintuitive user experience. A chatbot would require users to type the project ids and/or first andlast names of students whose status they wanted to check. Users would also need to know whatfunctions our web app offers and specify the type of information that they were interested in, beit
Paper ID #42376Work in Progress: Hardware-in-the-Loop Process Control Simulation LabsMr. Bradley Lane Kicklighter P.E., University of Southern Indiana Brad holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1989) and an MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair Pre-Engineering. Since 2015, he
autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. J. Autism. Dev. Disord. 41 (5), 566–574. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1070-312. Kouo, J. L., Hogan, A. E., Morton, S., & Gregorio, J. (2021). Supporting students with an autism spectrum disorder in engineering: K-12 and beyond. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities. 24(11).13. Ehsan, H., & Cardella, M. E. (2019). Investigating Children with Autism’s Engagement in Engineering Practices: Problem Scoping (Fundamental). Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 15027–15043.14. Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M
: 5Adham, T. K. I. (2023). Conflict Resolution in Team: Analyzing the of Conflicts and Best Skills for Resolution.Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(08), 152-162.https://doi.org/10.36347/sjet.2023.v11i08.001Aranzabal, A., E.;, E., & M., A. (2022). Team formation on the basis of Belbin’s roles to enhance students’performance in project based learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 22-37.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.09.001Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s Team Role Model: Development, Validity and Applicationsfor Team Building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96-118.Bayram, H. B., & Bütün, E. (2020). Role of teamwork
Canadian EngineeringEducation Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15886[3] Mueller-Alexander, J. M., & Soto, A., & Leonardi, B. M. (2023, June), Research in Progress:Engineering Research for Indigenous Engineering Techniques Paper presented at 2023 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2—44115[4] Ketchum, Q.J. 2023. Walking Between Two Worlds: Indigenous Student Stories of Navigating theStructures & Policies of Engineering at Public, Non-Native Institutions. Dissertation. Virginia Tech,Blacksburg, VA, USA[5] Risling Baldy, Cutcha, Kaitlin Reed, and Kayla Begay. 2023. "Polytech to PolyTEK: TraditionalEcological Knowledge, Indigenous Science, and the Future Forward Polytechnic
(s) where students present to their peers to allow the class tocollectively explore and critique their work-in-progress, and a formal review where groups uploadtheir work for a final critique. All three phases occur during a single, three-hour studio period.Observational Tool. Building on the formative feedback guidelines developed by Kluger andDeNisi [10, 11], Hattie and Timperley [2], and Shute [12], an observational tool was developedand used to characterize feedback exchanges in BME 4010 studios (Appendix B). Divided intotwo components, the framework focuses on the feedback itself and the immediate ECR to thatfeedback by student teams. Data presented in the manuscript was recorded from one team of fivestudents during studio three of the
educator participants from classrooms and libraries alike. Starting thesummer of the pandemic, the project pivoted to an entirely virtual format, and over three summers en-gaged cohorts of doubling size (y1=20, y2=40, y3=80). Ultimately WySLICE reached over 150 K-12 teachersand state librarians from all disciplinary areas to integrate computer science into their teaching.The project’s support of participants occurred in several distinct phases: A)preliminary assessment andscaffolding, B)week-long professional development focused on “effective integration of CS in X”, andC)year-long implementation and support. Phase A and Phase B professional developments enabled edu-cators to gain enough foundational content knowledge in Computing Systems
by the sponsors early in the semester, and students submitproject and team member preferences to the course directors. Course directors assign projectteams by reviewing student preferences for projects and team members and attempt to bestaccommodate all students.Table 1. Project descriptions for the 2023-2024 academic year. Faculty perspective represents what workshop(s)course faculty would have predicted would be most relevant to each project. Project descriptions simplified toprotect sponsor intellectual property. Team Project Description Faculty Perspective A Drug delivery patch CAD, Silicone B Back phantom CAD
., Kavale, S. M., & Carberry, A. R. “Situating intuition in engineering practice,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 418–444, Mar., 2023, doi:10.1002/jee.20521 [4] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139-151, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x [5] I. D. L. Ríos, A. Cazorla, J. M. Díaz-Puente, and J. L. Yagüe, “Project–based learning in engineering higher education: two decades of teaching competences in real
Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45-76, 2014.[5] A. Henry and L. Stieglitz, "An Examination of Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature," in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[6] M. Phillips, J. B. Reed, D. Zwicky, and A. S. Van Epps, "A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews," Journal of Engineering Education, 2023.[7] K. Kolaski, L. R. Logan, and J. P. A. Ioannidis, "Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews," Systematic Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 96, 2023/06/08 2023, doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02255-9.[8] N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Grainger, and C. T. Gray, "Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation
Values, vol 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43671164[10] V. V. Bracho Perez, A. Nuñez Abreu, A. A. Khan, L. E. Guardia, I. M. Hasbún, and A. C. Strong, “Mechanical Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Design Skills Throughout a Senior Design Course Sequence,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, http://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36523[11] D. B. de Campos, L. M. M. de Resende, and A. B. Fagundes, “The Importance of Soft Skills for the Engineering.”, Creative Education, vol. 11, pp. 1504-1520, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.118109[12] J. Saldaña, The Coding Manual Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc., 2016
. Dyehouse, “The role of authenticity in design- based learning environments: The case of engineering education,” Comput. Educ., vol. 64, pp. 143–152, May 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.026.[4] K. Reid, D. Reeping, and E. Spingola, “A Taxonomy for Introduction to Engineering Courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, p. 18, 2018.[5] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, “An Analysis of Motivation Constructs with First-Year Engineering Students: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x.[6] J. B. Hylton, P. J. Herak, T. France, and S. Youssef, “Towards Development of an
]. Available: https://explore-education- statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/foundation-years-statistics[22] D. Chambers, “Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265,” Science Education, vol. 67, pp. 255–265, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670213.[23] M. Knight and C. Cunningham, “Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a Tool to Investigate Students’ Ideas about Engineers and Engineering”.[24] A. Young, L. Dawes, and B. Senadji, “Using journey maps as a holistic, reflective approach to capture student engineering identity experiences,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 22–44, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2268023.[25
] Van Veelen, R., Derks, B., & Endedijk, M. D. (2019). Double trouble: How beingoutnumbered and negatively stereotyped threatens career outcomes of women inSTEM. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 150.[6] Statistics Netherlands (2016). De Arbeidsmarkt in Cijfers 2016. Available at:https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2017/19/de-arbeidsmarkt-in-cijfers2016.pdf[7] Stoeger, H., Duan, X., Schirner, S., Greindl, T., & Ziegler, A. (2013). The effectivenessof a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Harvard Kennedy SchoolGender Action Portal.[8] Kupersmidt, J., Stelter, R., Garringer, M., & Bourgoin, J. (2018). STEM Mentoring.Supplement to the "Elements of Effective Practice for Mentoring". MENTOR: TheNational Mentoring Partnership
the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Chrysochoou, A. E. Zaghi, and C. M. Syharat, “Reframing neurodiversity in engineering education,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865.[2] J. Ahmad, N. M. Siew, N. M. Siew, and N. M. Siew, “CURIOSITY TOWARDS STEM EDUCATION: A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS,” J. Balt. Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, p. Continuous, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.289.[3] J. Egner, “#ActuallyAutistic: Using Twitter to Construct Individual and Collective Identity Narratives,” Stud. Soc. Justice, vol. 16, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.26522/ssj.v16i2.2675.[4] K. Eagan, E. B. Stolzenberg, H. B. Zimmerman, M. C. Aragon, H. W. Sayson, and C. Rios
3 sections of the course. The sameinstructor taught each section of the course. The lab groups were set by the course instructor whoarranged groups by spreading GPAs so that there was a mix of A, B and C students in each group.This study had no control group. It would have been preferable to have a section that did notparticipate in the I-in-Team method; however, the course instructor did not want to have differentprocedures in different sections of the course. We would also like to note that this is commonpractice in engineering education. The students enrolled in the course were given a pre-survey on the first day of class beforethe rubric and I-in-Team method were presented and explained. The purpose of this first pre-survey was
Multi-Dimensional Diversity.," in American Society for Engineering Education proceedings: ASEE, 2018.[7] G. Arastoopour, N. C. Chesler, and D. W. Shaffer, "Epistemic persistence: A simulation-based approach to increasing participation of women in engineering," Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 3, 2014.[8] J. Cullinane and L. Leegwater, "Diversifying the STEM Pipeline: The Model Replication Institutions Program," Institute for Higher Education Policy, Washington D.C., 2009.[9] M. J. Graham, J. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A.-B. Hunter, and J. Handelsman, "Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM," Science, vol. 341, no. 6153, pp. 1455-1456, 2013, doi
Performance: Comparing Paper-Based and Computer- Adaptive Versions of the Graduate Record Examinations (Gre©) General Test,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 249–273, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.2190/680W- 66CR-QRP7-CL1F.[20] J. A. Heissel, E. K. Adam, J. L. Doleac, D. N. Figlio, and J. Meer, “Testing, Stress, and Performance: How Students Respond Physiologically to High-Stakes Testing,” Education Finance and Policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 183–208, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1162/edfp_a_00306.[21] L. Moneta-Koehler, A. M. Brown, K. A. Petrie, B. J. Evans, and R. Chalkley, “The Limitations of the GRE in Predicting Success in Biomedical Graduate School,” PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e0166742, Jan. 2017
design). We provide detailsabout our prototype design process to add additional insights into how the project could beincorporated into a course.Figure 2. a) Demonstration of hydraulic actuation principle (fluid being pumped through tubing) by providing abending motion within the silicone tube. b) The original hand drawing of the final prototype. c) Mold and bodycomponents for the final design. 1) Instructors can demonstrate a simple actuation using a hydraulic system. A sample is shared in Figure 2a, showing the hydraulic actuation principle with a bending motion. Instructors must discuss how the chamber size and material structures can affect the capability of actuation and bending motion through the silicone mold. 2
. B. Park, “A Case Study of a Systematic Iterative Design Methodology and its Application in Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2010.[7] L. Belski, A. Hourani, A. Valentine, A. Belski, “Can Simple Ideation Techniques Enhance Idea Generation?”, The 25th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2014.[8] S. Antipolis, “From user participation to user seduction in the design of innovative user- centered systems, designing cooperative systems. Use of theories and models”. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP’2000), France, May 2000.[9] S. Bouwstra, W
Paper ID #43991Examining Students’ Beliefs on the Use of ChatGPT in EngineeringMohammad Faraz Sajawal, University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an Assistant Systems Engineer from 2011–2012 in
are unknown and have not been identifiedby any of the research. Future longitudinal research can investigate the information retentioninformation among the participants along with the impacts on the careers of the participatingstudents. References[1] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D. M. Mupinga, B. K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige, “Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges,” High. Educ. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 46, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.5539/hes.v7n1p46.[2] M. Hossain and M. G. Robinson, “How to Motivate US Students to Pursue STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Careers”.[3] R. Stansbury and F. Behi, “Inspiring Interest in STEM Through Summer Robotics
: a. Develop specific courses or modules dedicated to AI in construction management. Topics can include AI applications in project scheduling, risk assessment, supply chain optimization, and predictive analytics[8]. b. Cover fundamental AI concepts, including machine learning, neural networks, natural language processing, and computer vision, while also emphasizing their relevance to construction management [7].2. Guest Lecturers and Industry Experts: a. Invite professionals and researchers in the field of AI and construction management to give guest lectures. Their real-world insights can provide students with a practical perspective on AI's role in the
new knowledge about students’ understanding of what it means to practice engineeringand how that understanding changes with exposure to different types of contextualization. It will alsocontribute new knowledge about how undergraduate students associate engineering science andjudgement with engineering practice, particularly with respect to how these facets of engineering practiceare directly in service to design.References[1] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from," Interntational Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 914-925, 2013.[2] N. Honken and P. Ralston, "Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 29-37, 2013.[3] E. Seymour and N
persons with disabilities in science and engineering.Special report NSF 19-304,” 2019.[2] J. M. Love, “Wording matters: the impact of disability identification in post-secondaryeducation,” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2017.[3] “The Chancellor’s Senior Survey,” University of Illinois Urbana Champaign 2019.[4] D. A. Dewantoro, M. H. M. Yasin, and M. Irvan, “Measurement of e-learning readiness forstudents with and without disabilities,” pp. 152–159, 2020.[5] A. Schleicher and P. Zoido, “Global equality of educational opportunity: creating theconditions for all students to succeed,” Journal of Social Issues, 2016.[6] K. B. Roberts, “Outcome and process in pediatric education: Does the whole equal the sumof the parts
principles of the original rules of the game to create more layers that while unique still resonated with what was already established. The game then finished with a few of the participants creating their own layers to add to the exercise. b. Object selection and discussion: The artist and the workshop coordinators brought several objects and laid them on a table. The objects included a massage roller, a pocket watch, a useless box, a glass measuring cup, a piggy bank, and playing cards, among other things. Next, the workshop coordinators separated the students into groups. The groups were then given around ten minutes to choose an item, determine the item’s literal function and its societal and
at all certain – 5: Extremely Moderately certain certain) Very certain Extremely certain Pre, How important was each factor A) Personal interest Post below in choosing the engineering B) Abilities/talents (electrical/mechanical/civil/computer C) Job opportunities after graduation science) or non-engineering major D) Salary levels you are currently in (or will be in, if E) Opportunity to serve the society you are currently undeclared)? F) Desired work/life balance (1: Not at all important – 5
Statistics. Retrieved July 8, 2023, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d22/tables/dt22_311.15.asp 5. Heyman, E. (2010). Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs: A Delphi study. University of Phoenix. 6. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? Available at SSRN 2350964. 7. Bawa, P. (2016). Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—A literature review. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244015621777. 8. Brunhaver, S., Bekki, J., Lee, E., & Kittur, J. (2019, March). Understanding the factors contributing to persistence
Equipment used in Supporting CAD/CAM and CNC instruction (a) SNAP 200 Optical measurement Machine, (b) Brown and Sharpe CMM, (c) Assorted manual measurement instruments, (d) Profilometer To help students better understand the impact of their process planning and CAM decisions, measurements using different instruments are performed in almost every lab. In addition to manual instruments for dimensional measurements such as calipers, micrometers and gauge pins (see Figure 2), the students use an optical measurement machine (SNAP 200 from OGP) and a pair of coordinate measuring machines (Brown and Sharpe) to measure critical features on turned and milled components respectively. As will be described in a later section, some of these
ongoing problem in engineering education [22]. All studentswho started this course successfully completed it, with most students getting an A or B and 2students getting a C for the class.Although not a specific objective of this activity, it was observed that students often had to useproblem-solving skills to reassemble the more complicated devices. No assembly instructionswere provided with the devices since they came assembled and they were not specificallydesigned for users to take them apart and put them back together again. One particular incidenthighlighted this problem-solving. One of the groups disassembled the engine which has a pull-string mechanism to start it, similar to gas-powered lawnmowers. A team took that mechanismapart but was