change. Since we currently have a small sample size,we may need to examine a larger sample before drawing broad conclusions.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to acknowledge the American Association for Engineering Education (ASEE)Archival Publication Authors Workshop for Engineering Educators (APA-ENG) program, whichis based on Engineering Unleashed faculty development and supported by the Kern FamilyFoundation.References[1] J. Lee, H. J. Jeong, and S. Kim, “Stress, Anxiety, and Depression Among Undergraduate Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic and their Use of Mental Health Services,” Innov High Educ, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 519–538, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10755-021-09552-y.[2] K. M. Soria and B. Horgos, “Factors Associated With College
? Were all ideas heard and valued? 7. What was your contribution to the team process and final product? How do you feel you did performing your role? 8. How was the communication with your clients? Was there anything that surprised you or that you learned in the process of client briefing, PDR, and CDR? (Preliminary design review, critical design review.) 9. How did you/your team determine the needs of the client and determine if you met those needs with the final product? 10. What skills do you think you developed over the semester? a. Your surveys noted that you did/did not grow in ______ (creativity/critical thinking/collaboration/communication). b. Describe any experiences in this
Paper ID #41150Board 313: Industry 4.0 Engineering Technology Skill Integration into Florida’sTechnical Workforce EnvironmentDr. Marilyn Barger P.E., FLATE (Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence) Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Senior Educational Advisor of FLATE, the Florida Advanced Technological Education Center, part of FloridaMakes, the NIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Center in Florida. Previously FLATE was founded by Dr. Barger and funded by the National Science Foundations Advanced Technological Education (NSF-ATE) as a Regional Center of Excellence. FLATE’s mission is to support
. E. Study, “Assessing and improving the below average visualization abilities of a group of minority engineering and technology students,” J Women Minor Sci Eng, vol. 12, pp. 367–380, 2006.[13] B. M. Casey, E. Dearing, M. Vasilyeva, C. M. Ganley, and M. Tine, “Spatial and Numerical Predictors of Measurement Performance: The Moderating Effects of Community Income and Gender,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 296–311, May 2011, doi: 10.1037/a0022516.[14] T. Johnson, A. P. Burgoyne, K. S. Mix, C. J. Young, and S. C. Levine, “Spatial and mathematics skills: Similarities and differences related to age, SES, and gender,” Cognition, vol. 218, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104918.[15] Y
in engineering problem-solving. Some efforts havebeen made to understand how students judge their learning; prominent findings indicate that a)students are often not very accurate in their monitoring, b) higher-achieving students tend to beunderconfident, while lower-achieving students tend to be overconfident, and c) learners maydraw on myriad sources when judging their confidence [14, 20]. Yet, the nature of these sourcesand the explanations learners provide for their metacognitive judgments are still largely notunderstood. More broadly, efforts to promote students’ metacognition during problem-solving -particularly through prompts to support accurate monitoring - are nascent in engineeringeducation.This work in progress paper summarizes
). Walking on gender tightrope withmultiple marginalities: Asian international female students in STEM graduate programs.Journal of International Students, 11(3), 647-665.[13] Field, K. (2023, December 20). Largest source of private funding for women in STEM isunder attack. The Chronicle of Higher Education.[14] Clark, S. L., Dyar, C., Inman, E. M., Maung, N., & London, B. (2021). Women’s careerconfidence in a fixed, sexist STEM environment. International Journal of STEM Education,8(1), 1-10.[15] Jennifer L. Glass, Sharon Sassler, Yael Levitte, Katherine M. Michelmore, What's SoSpecial about STEM? A Comparison of Women's Retention in STEM and ProfessionalOccupations, Social Forces (92)2, December 2013, Pages 723–756.https://doi.org/10.1093/sf
Midwest. Two research questions will be examined: a. What are the factors that enable faculty mentors of undergraduate engineering students to feel effective in their role? b. How can engineering faculty be supported to enhance their mentoring interactions?The primary focus of this study will be to fill a critical gap in the understanding of facultymentoring of undergraduate students by investigating the factors that enable faculty mentors tofeel effective and proposing strategies for their support.IntroductionTo fully understand the feelings and needs of faculty mentors, it is first critical to understand theroles they play in their students’ lives. Faculty mentors are professors who voluntarily meet withand mentor students, usually
-1302.Hess, J., & Fore, G. (2018). CCE STEM institutional transformation: Integrated community-engaged learning and ethical reflection. Retrieved February 7, 2024, from https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/past-events/cce-workshop-2018/Langlais, P. J. (2012). Ethical decision making in the conduct of research: Role of individual, contextual and organizational factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 551-555.Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). A multi-level review of engineering ethics education: Towards a socio-technical orientation of engineering education for ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, Article no. 60.McLeskey, C., Berling, E., O'Rourke, M., & Pennock, R. T. (2020). The
Paper ID #41103Understanding Ecosystems of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education throughan Ecological Systems ApproachMargaret Webb, Virginia Tech Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master’s and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engineering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems
].[11] M. Y. Ahn and H. H. Davis, “Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university,” Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp, 622-634, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1564902[12] M. M. D. Suan and C. I. Magallanes. “Sense of belonging and self-esteem of high school students in a Catholic college” Philippine Social Science Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 87-88, Sept/Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v3i2.174[13] S. N. Wosu, “Framing cultural bridges for relational mentorship,” in Proceedings of the 2023 Collaborative Network for Computing and Engineering Diversity (CoNECD), New Orleans, Louisiana, Feb. 2023, https://peer.asee.org/44797[14] B. D. McPheron, “Work-in-progress: Applying peer
. Lester, an IEEE and SPIE Fellow, received the B.S. in Engineering Physics in 1984 and the Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering in 1992, both from Cornell University. He joined Virginia Tech in 2013 as the Head of the Bradley Department of Electrical a ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #41151Dr. Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis Kenneth Reid is the Associate Dean and Director of Engineering at the R. B. Annis School of Engineering at the University of Indianapolis. He and his coauthors were awarded the Wickenden award (Journal of Engineering Education, 2014) and Best Paper
2008.[7] G. E. Okudan, M. Murphy, and B. Bowe, “An international comparison of engineeringprograms in their emphases and professional skills development,” in Proc. of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC,June 2011.[8] A. M. Gansemer-Topf, Q. Li, S. Jianh, G. E. Okudan-Kremer, and N. F. Reuel,“Implementing professional skills training in STEM: a review of the literature,” in Proc. of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education North Midwest Section Annual Conference,Brookings, SD, October 2020.[9] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzekski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility in a circuitscourse,” in Proc. of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,Tampa, FL
(Virtual), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.[5] Gattis, C., Delgado Solorzano, X., Nix, D., Popp, J., Cleary, M., Lo, W., Hill, B., & Adams, P. (2019, June). Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural STEM Students Succeed. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33585
., New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2023, pp. 156–182.[10] H. B. Carlone and A. Johnson, “Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1187–1218, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1002/tea.20237.[11] A. Godwin, G. Potvin, Z. Hazari, and R. Lock, “Identity, Critical Agency, and Engineering: An Affective Model for Predicting Engineering as a Career Choice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 312–340, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20118.[12] E. Treadway, J. E. S. Swenson, and M. Caserto, “Development of a Survey Instrument for Measuring Affective Pathways,” in American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis: ASEE
Paper ID #42480Data Acquisition Using the Raspberry Pi Pico WProf. David R. Loker, Pennsylvania State University David R. Loker received the M.S.E.E. degree from Syracuse University in 1986. In 1984, he joined General Electric (GE) Company, AESD, as a design engineer. In 1988, he joined the faculty at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. In 2007, he became the Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Program. His research interests include wireless sensor networks, data acquisition systems, and communications systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
] A. L. Miller, L. M. Williams, and S. M. Silberstein, “Found my place: the importance of faculty relationships for seniors’ sense of belonging,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 594–608, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1551333.[14] A. Driscoll and B. Holland, “An Assessment Model for Service-Learning: Comprehensive Case Studies of Impact on Faculty, Students, Community, and Institution,” Mich J Community Serv Learn, pp. 66–71, 1996.[15] M. Komarraju, S. Musulkin, and G. Bhattacharya, “Role of Student–Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement,” J Coll Stud Dev, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 332–342, May 2010, doi
School of Engineering Fall Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, Nov. 2023.[16] B. Bantawa, J. Briski, and April A. Dukes, “CIRTL INCLUDES Strategic Goal 1: A Guide to the Mentoring, Advising, and Pedagogy Frameworks,” CIRTL INCLUDES, p. 10, 2019.[17] W. C. Lee, H. M. Matusovich, and P. R. Brown, “Measuring underrepresented student perceptions of inclusion within engineering departments and universities,” The International journal of engineering education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 150–165, 2014, Accessed: Feb. 08, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7356151[18] A. P. Rovai, “Development of an instrument to measure classroom community,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 197–211
o Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer/Aerospace Engineering o Program Director, Aerospace Engineering o Associate Director of Education, ACUASI • Dr Denise Thorsen, dlthorsen@alaska.edu o Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering o Chair, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering o Associate Dean of Academics, UAF o Director, ASGPAppendix A: Aerospace Engineering FlowsAppendix B: AcronymsA&D Aerospace & DefenseABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and TechnologyAC AircraftACUASI Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration (UAF)AIAA American Institute of Aeronautics & AstronauticsASEE
. By the conclusion of the course, all students have experience with working in teams,utilizing the engineering design process, 3D modeling, and both written and oral communication.Their repeated assessments allow students to experience greater growth throughout the 18-dayblock period than previous iterations of the course.AppendixTeam Evaluation Questions for Weekly Assessment 1. My team met outside of class for at least _____ this week a. <1 Hour b. Less than 2 hours but more than 1 c. 2 hours or more 2. Rate your team on a scale of 1 to 5 in terms of its ability to cooperatively work (maximizing individual strengths and minimizing weaknesses) 3. Rate your team on a scale of 1 to 5 on its ability to
successful team science. These recent studies collectively highlight theevolving landscape of scientific collaboration, emphasizing the need for a transdisciplinaryapproach and effective team leadership.Part of the NSF project explores our research team’s journey in its pursuit of learning more aboutTeam Science and applying tools to optimize interdisciplinary collaboration. The core researchteam collaborated with the Institute for Research in the Social Sciences (IRISS) at ColoradoState University (CSU). The partnership with IRISS is intended to help the research team to a)build the capacity of our geographically dispersed Research Team by accelerating the team’sintegration to operate as a high-functioning team and b) explore whether Team Science
fuel resources: A review and techno-economic analysis," Int J Hydrogen Energy. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2022.08.202. 4. J.A. Okolie, E.I. Epelle, M.E. Tabat, U. Orivri, A.N. Amenaghawon, P.U. Okoye, B. Gunes, "Waste biomass valorization for the production of biofuels and value-added products: A comprehensive review of thermochemical, biological and integrated processes," Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 159 (2022) 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PSEP.2021.12.049. 5. H. He, Q. Li, J. Tang, P. Liu, H. Zheng, F. Zhao, W. Guan, E. Guo, C. Xi, "Study of hydrogen generation from heavy oil gasification based on ramped temperature oxidation experiments," Int J Hydrogen Energy. 48
Paper ID #43055Board 256: Encouraging Low-Income, High Achieving Undergraduate Studentsto Pursue Faculty Positions: Developing Socially Conscious Approaches toPedagogyJanna Jobel, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Dr. Janna Jobel received her PhD in Educational Leadership researching the ways in which social emotional competencies are taught in STEM high schools. She is now a postdoctoral research associate in the Biomedical Engineering department of UMass Lowell conducting interdisciplinary research to better understand what factors most influence the K-20 STEM pipeline.Dr. Hsien-Yuan Hsu, University of Massachusetts
developing a more fundamental understanding of the early stages of the design process to improve design practice and pedagogy, and also improve the tools with which designers of complex sociotechnical systems work. She was previously a Stanton Nuclear Security Postdoctoral Fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Prior to her appointment at the Belfer Center, Aditi worked at the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, her work, endorsed and funded by policymakers from the NEA member countries, focused on bringing epistemologies from the humanities and social sciences to academic and practitioner nuclear engineering, thus broadening their epistemic core. At the NEA, Aditi also led the
Paper ID #42787Socio-technical and Culture-inspired Projects in Freshman Engineering DesignCourse Bring Context and Emotion to LearningDr. Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Raghu Pucha is a Principal Lecturer at the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, in the area of CAD/CAE and Manufacturing. He teaches computer graphics, design, mechanics and manufacturing courses at Georgia Tech., and conducts research in the area of developing upfront computational tools for the design, analysis and manufacturing of advanced materials and systems. His current research includes
Paper ID #43153Board 370: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation: Literature Reviewand Research Plan for an Engineering Specific Empathy ScaleDr. Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University Dr. Emmabeth Vaughn is an Assistant Professor in the Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy Department at Austin Peay State University. Before join faculty at Austin Peay, she worked in industry as a Product Development Engineer for a commercial roofing manufacturer. She holds a bachelors degree from the University of Tennessee in Materials Science and Engineering. She earned her PhD from the University of Pennsylvania
-4.[6] J. Watkins, K. Spencer, and D. Hammer, “Examining Young Students’ Problem Scoping in Engineering Design,” J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1082.[7] D. Crismond and R. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738–797, Oct. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb01127.x.[8] N. Crilly and C. Cardoso, “Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design?,” Des. Stud., vol. 50, pp. 1–38, May 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001.[9] B. Nicholl and R. McLellan, “‘Oh yeah, yeah you get a lot of love hearts. The Year 9s are notorious for
Educators.”549 Helvetica Chimica Acta 97 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.201300321.550 Meyer, Jan H. F., and Ray Land. 2005. “Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2):551 Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning.”552 Higher Education 49 (3): 373–88.553 Meyer, Michael D. 1990. Review of Review of Principles of Highway Engineering and Traffic554 Analysis, by Fred L. Mannering and Walter P. Kilareski. Transportation Science 24 (4):555 308–10.556 Nichols, Jason. 2003. “Methods in School Textbook Research.” History Education Research557 Journal 3 (2): 11–26. https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.03.2.02.558 Noland, Robert B., and Lewison L
., & Popp, J. (2020, June) Closing the STEM Labor Gap Through a Path to Graduation (PTG) for Low Income, Rural Students, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Educators Annual Conference (Virtual), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.[14] Gattis, C., Delgado Solorzano, X., Nix, D., Popp, J., Cleary, M., Lo, W., Hill, B., & Adams, P. (2019, June). Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income, Rural STEM Students Succeed. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33585
, in the Graduation outcome section, “DNG”refers to “Did Not Graduate”, and “G” represents “Graduated”. (a) Classification with All Predictors (b) Classification without Gender or Race Predictors Figure 1: Classification ResultsThe results were generated using different classifier selections for different neural networktraining and testing. Figure 1a shows the results of the network that uses all the classifiersavailable in Table 1. Figure 1b shows the results with the removal of the gender and ethnicityclassifiers. This provides a more general prediction without taking into account somedemographic data. We noticed that there were no major differences in the results obtained foreach combination.It is
tools into the curriculum.Computational methods and simulation-based problem-solving have been widely used byengineers to develop optimal designs. Most undergraduate engineering and technology coursesdo not use computational problem-solving methods. Use of this software requires knowledge ofthe physical phenomenon learned in courses such as fluid mechanics and mechanics ofmaterials. Due to a lack of understanding of the concepts, and unavailability of an introductorycourse in CFD or FEA, they are unable to develop the knowledge or skills with these analyticaltools. The engineering and technology program comprises a set of mandatory courses andoptional electives, leaving no space for extra courses. Therefore, these simulation-based