endeavor.References[1] Institute of International Education. Open Doors Report on International EducationalExchange, (2023). IIE Open Doors / U.S. Study Abroad (opendoorsdata.org)[2] National Academy of Engineering. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in theNew Century”, 35 (2004).[3] Grandin, John M., and E. Dan Hirleman. "Educating engineers as global citizens: A call foraction/A report of the national summit meeting on the globalization of engineering education."Online Journal for Global Engineering Education 4.1 (2009): 1.[4] Urbina, J., Oliden, J., Tunno, P., Lakhtakia, A., Rodrigues, J., Estrada, M., Obonyo, E.,Zappe, S., “Experience-Based Learning: Global Engineering Culture and Society” in theProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
gender choice of “Other”was excluded due to the limited number of degrees awarded, reported only for 2019. Our“Native” category reflects combining the racial reporting options of “American Indian/AlaskaNative” and “Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander.” Similarly, our “Multi” category reflectscombining “Foreign,” “Multiracial,” and “Unknown.” Other racial categories are used asreported by ASEE (e.g., “Asian,” “Black,” “Hispanic,” and “White”). Procedurally, the data was first downloaded into a CSV file. A self-generated Jupyter filewas created to clean the data and create the tidy format [21] XLSX files needed by Tableau forcreating the infographics [11]. Once the charts were styled with shapes, colors, and categorieschosen for visual
approaches and engineering leadership concepts within theengineering curriculum, both internally at our own institutions, and more broadly as members ofnational engineering education communities of practice such as the Canadian EngineeringEducation Association (CEEA), the CEEA Sustainable Engineering Leadership and Management(SELM) special interest group, the National Initiative on Capacity Building and KnowledgeCreation for Engineering Leadership (NICKEL), Graduate Attribute Continuous ImprovementProcess (GACIP), Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering (CSChE), the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) and the ASEE Engineering Leadership DevelopmentDivision (LEAD). We are instructors with both industry and academic experience who
with an asterisk* indicate study is included in the review and table.[1] *A. K. T. Howard, “Gamification design for engineering statics.” Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, Jul. 2021.[2] *A. Mehdiabadi, R. A. Atadero, D. W. Baker, & A. M. A. Casper, “The effects of infusing diversity and inclusion into a design problem in engineering mechanics: Statics.” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[3] A. S. Donker, H. De Boer, D. Kostons, C. D. Van Ewijk, & M. P. van der Werf, “Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta- analysis.” Educational Research Review, 11
Paper ID #41983Gauging Scholarly Engagement: An Investigation into Topic Popularity withinthe ASEE CIT DivisionDr. Barry M. Lunt, Brigham Young University Dr. Barry Lunt has taught electronics engineering technology, information technology, and cybersecurity at Brigham Young University since 1993 where he now serves as a full professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. He has also taught electronics at Utah State University and Snow College. Before academia, he was a design engineer with IBM in Tucson, AZ.Dr. Mudasser Fraz Wyne, National University I hold a Ph.D. in Computer Science, an M.Sc. in
were applied to in-person classrooms.Trends in the Types of Intervention Categories and Sub-CategoriesThe trend for "Learning Strategy Interventions" was consistently the most utilized method ofintervention from 2014 to 2019. However, after this period, due to the increase in "TechnologyEnhanced Learning" interventions, the trend for "PBRBIS" began to rise. Additionally, followingthe COVID-19 pandemic and the resumption of in-person classes, LSI interventions once againbegan to show an upward trend. Also, over the past 10 years, the majority of interventionspublished in the ASEE conference proceedings focused on improving and changing the learningstrategies of students in circuits rather than improving the motivation of students to learn
Paper ID #41523Learning Goals in Middle School Engineering: A Systematic Review andComparison with NGSS and ASEE Frameworks (Fundamental)Natasha Lagoudas Wilkerson, Texas A&M University Natasha Wilkerson is a Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum & Instruction with an emphasis in engineering education at Texas A&M University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering and her M.S. in Curriculum & Instruction from Texas A&M University. She is the President of the Cosmic Leap Foundation and Co-Founder of Vivify, LLC.Joanne K Olson, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, Texas A&M University
lecture recordings as an adjustment during the pandemic to providestudents with all possible education resources.Table 1 displays the student enrollment information from the 2019-2020 to 2022-2023 academicyear according to majors and grade levels. The course is mainly open to lower-divisionengineering students with a few upper-division students enrolled with exceptional approval.Table 1. Student majors and grade levels from 2019-2020 to 2022-2023.Survey data was collected from students enrolled in the course ranging from the 2019-2020academic year to the 2022-2023 academic year. The survey was administered to obtain thestudent’s self-rated engineering skills and abilities as part of their learning outcomes, includingtheir ability to design and
solving, and 3) to provide students with a strongerbackground in dynamics for follow-on courses.Course CohortsAs part of a California State University graduation rate initiative, in the past we were able tooffer the special section of the course three different times. Because of the lower number ofstudents enrolled in these sections, it takes additional resources and we are considering if weshould offer it again. All offerings were presented in a flipped format, with numerous exampleproblems and lecture material offered in short videos for students to watch before class. The firstoffering was in Spring of 2019 – the winter quarter provides our largest number of students,typically 13-15 sections of approximately 32 students each. This first
., Campell, M., Wood, K., Jenson, D., Enhancing the Teaching of Machine Design by Creating a Basic Hands-On Environment with Mechanical Breadboards, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 1, January 2005.[7]. Shapiro, W. Building a better engineering technology, Proceedings of the 2019 conference for Industry and Education collaboration. 2019.[8]. Morales, J. C., Sizing the Components of Existing Machinery to Gradually Develop Machine Design Expertise, Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019.[9]. Shooter, S. B., A Systems Engineering Design Experience for the Machine Design Curriculum, Proceedings of the 1997 Frontiers in Education Conference
.[6] B. B. Smith, Y. S. Park, L. Ross, S. J. Krause, Y. Chen, J. A. Middleton, E. Judson, R. J. Culbertson, C. J. Ankeny, K. D. Hjelmstad, and C. Y. Yan, "Faculty characteristics that influence student performance in the first two years of engineering," in ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., New Orleans, LA, 2016.[7] S. J. Dooley, "Designing a reference training course and cultivating a community of practice: Utilizing the LMS for staff training and development," in ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, 2019.[8] C. Hodges, S. Moore, B. Lockee, T. Trust, and A. Bond, “The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning,” EDUCAUSE Review. Mar. 27, 2020. [Online]. Available: https
engineered, who isengineering, and how engineering is enacted from social and political considerations and context(Cech, & Sherick, 2015; Holly, Jr., 2021). Introducing students to engineering aligned with anideology that decontextualizes and separates the social from the technical makes studentsconceptualize the social as an afterthought or, worse, unnecessary (Erickson et al., 2020).Attempts at sociotechnical integration in engineering education are certainly not new. Neeley etal. (2019) used a text mining approach to chart the history of attempts at applying STS toengineering education, which often is enacted by adopting a sociotechnical approach toengineering education in the ASEE PEER repository. They found that while between 1996 -1999
in Higher Education, 50(2), 189-214, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7.[7] M.J. Chang, J. Sharkness, S. Hurtardo, and C.B. Newman, “What Matters in College for Retaining Aspiring Scientists and Engineers from Underrepresented Racial Groups,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555-580, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1002/tea.21146.[8] M.P. Morin, A. Dayerizadeh and K. Booth, “The Shift from the Two- to Four-Year Institute: How Research Experiences Impact Community College Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2-33424.[9] M. Danforth, C. Lam, R. Hughes, and S. Salomon, “Enhancing Research Pipelines for Underserved Students through a
approach and assessments of the engineering programs at Hofstra University wereinformed by the literature in terms of improving mathematics placement, creating peer groups forwomen and a strong focus on team-building in the first-year program.Current Approach and Assessments in Light of the ASEE ARDP and ABET VisitThe three-year plan of action to promote diversity in the student and faculty populationssubmitted by the School of Engineering and Applied Science in November 2019 included thefollowing initiatives and their measures of success: 1. Increasing the proportion of women students from 21 % to 25% by Fall 2022. Initiative: A five-week paid summer program for women in computing and engineering named Women’s Summer Program in
[Online]. Available: http://irpe-reports.colostate.edu/pdf/ResearchBriefs/FA16_Obs_vs_Pred_Report.pdf[4] Innovation and Incubator Grants from the University System of Georgia, Kennesaw StateUniversity, (2015) Increasing Retention Rates of Mechanical Engineering Students Through anIntegrated, Collaborative First-Year Course [Online]. Available:https://completega.org/content/increasing-retention-rates-mechanical-engineering-students-through-integrated-collaborative[5] R. W. Freeman, R. S. Adrezin, A. Foley, “Bilge Pumps as Introductory MechanicalEngineering Design Projects.” the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 2019.[6] J. D. Smith, A.B. Johnson, A. B. “Revitalization of an Intro to ME Course Using an
2022,[17] Cohan, C.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Hassler, R.; Johnson, M.; Kagan, M.; Schmiedekamp, A.; Shull, P.; Butler, P.; Edson, H. Sustainable bridges from campus to campus: Outcomes for two cohorts of Jump Start second-year bridge participants (1525367). ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2019,[18] Espiritu, D.; Todorovic, R. Building Bridges into Engineering and Computer Science: Outcomes, Impacts and Lessons Learned. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2022,[19] Fogg, L.; Gros, A.; Evans, K.; Orr, M.; Belk, C.; Hilton, E.; Desselles, M. Fast-Forward Program: PSVT:R Test Results and Analysis. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings 2022,[20] Griggs, L
this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. M. Cruz, C. Hampton, S. G. Adams, and N. Hosseinichimeh, “A system approach to instructional change in academia,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Tampa, FL, USA, Jun 2019, doi:10.18260/1-2—32005.[2] National Academy of Engineering, “Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century,” The National Academies Press, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://nap.nationalacademies.org/11338[3] T. J. Siller and G. R. Johnson, “Constituent influences on engineering curricula,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Jun 2004, doi
FTC programs release annual game manuals focused on real-worldproblems, creating an ideal setting for PBL. Core PBL principles are presented as follows.1) Age-oriented PBL Implementation in FLL CompetitionsPBL Key Principle: Real-World ProblemsA research project was chosen based on the annual game manuals provided by the FLL program.These projects revolve around global challenges, such as water recycling (2017-2018) or spaceexploration (2018-2019). Examples of FLL projects are outlined in Table 1.Table 1: List of 4 project themes for PBL from 2015 - 2019 Encouraging students to think about modern waste2015-2016 Jr. FLL-TRASH TREK management solutions.2016-2017 FLL
”(IUSE – 2211320 and 1934707).References[1] S. Streiner, D. Burkey, M. Young, R. Cimino, & J. Pascal, “Engineering Ethics Through High-Impact Collaborative/Competitive Scenarios (E-ETHICCS)." ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Long Beach, CA, July 2021[2] P. Patel, “Engineers, Ethics, and the VW Scandal,” IEEE Spectrum, 25 Sept. 2015. [Online].Available: http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/at-work/education/vw-scandal-shocking-but-not-surprising-ethicists-say. [Accessed Apr. 11, 2019].[3] M. Hart, “The Ethical Lessons of Deepwater,” ASME.org, March 2011. [Online]. Available:https://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/engineering-ethics/the-ethical-lessons-of-deepwater. [Accessed Apr. 11, 2019].[4] R.P. Boisjoly, E.F. Curtis
, “Collaborative research: Supporting agency among early career engineering education faculty in diverse institutional contexts: Developing a framework for faculty agency,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2019, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10148508[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–597, Aug. 2019.[31] Consumer Reports, “Costs of ADHD Tests,” Jul-2010.
%, respectively (ASEE,2019). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019) projected higher job growth for computationalroles (12%) compared to mechanical, electrical, and computer hardware engineering (4-6%).Reflecting this demand, computer science and computer engineering faculty emerged with thehighest salaries in academia, surpassing their engineering counterparts (ASEE, 2022).These disciplinary distinctions permeate beyond academic and professional spheres, influencingsocialization, enrollment, and persistence, and carrying significant implications forunderrepresented groups. Hocker and colleagues (2019) pinpoint challenges in academiacontributing to a noteworthy doctoral dropout rate in engineering, particularly impacting womenand URMs. The prevalence
AbstractThe impact of multiple-attempt testing (MAT) on students’ overall success and retention infundamental engineering courses was studied when implemented in a blended mixed-mode (M-mode) class where students were given simple assignments before class. Two engineering courseswere delivered in M-mode in Spring 2023 (post-COVID): Dynamics and Thermodynamics, whoseresults were compared to the same courses given in the same semester, four years earlier, deliveredin M-mode in Spring 2019 (pre-COVID). All four courses were large classes of 167 students inDynamics to a maximum of 245 in Thermodynamics.All courses had three tests during the semester conducted in the Evaluation Proficiency Center(EPC). In Spring 2019, students were given a five-day window
Paper ID #43306A Model for Course-Based Undergraduate Research in First-Year EngineeringProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His current project involves developing and piloting an integrated multidisciplinary learning community for first-year engineering. More general teaching and research interests include designing, implementing and assessing activities for first-year engineering, engineering mechanics, and scientific computing. Eric has been an active member of ASEE since 2001
IDE thatruns on multiple operating systems. The touch screen enabled an intuitive user interface, whichmade working with the board much more convenient.References[1] J.O. Attia, L.D. Hobson, P.H. Obiomon, and M. Tembely, “Engaging Electrical and Computer Engineering Freshman Students with an Electrical Engineering Practicum,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017.[2] K.R. Hite, L.J. Slimak, D. Korakakis, and T.C. Ahern, “An Online Approach to the Analog Electronics Laboratory,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. June 2019.[3] M.E. Radu, C. Cole, M.A. Dabacan, J. Harris, and S.M. Sexton, “The Impact of Providing Unlimited Access to Programmable Boards in
]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/11/09/colleges-explore-new-three-year- bachelor%E2%80%99s-degree-program. [Accessed 20 January 2024].[6] B. J. Swenty and M. K. Swenty, "Is it Time for a Three-Year Accredited Civil Engineering Degree in the United States? A Critical Review," in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, 2019.[7] S. J. Ressler, L. Nolan, W. R. Bergstrom, "Preparing the Future Civil Engineer: Review and Update of the ABET Civil Engineering Program Criteria," in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, 2021.[8] L. Nolan, J. A. Puckett, D. A. Dzombak and W. R. Bergstrom, "Preparing the Future Civil Engineer: ASCE’s Proposed Revision of the ABET Civil
interests include Robotics, Autonomous Systems, and Control and Automation. Dr. Luo is an IEEE senior member, INFORMS, and ASEE member. Dr. Luo is active nationally and internationally in his research field. He was the Program Co-Chair in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (IEEE-ICIA’2018). He was the Plenary Session Co-Chair in the 2021 and 2019 International Conference on Swarm Intelligence, and he was the Invited Session Co-Chair in the 2017 International Conference on Swarm Intelligence. He was the General Co-Chair of the 1st IEEE International Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Smart Technologies (IEEE-CIST 2015), and Journal Special Issues Chair, IEEE 2016 International
., Harwell, M., & Peralta, Y. (2019). Life STEM: A Case Study of Life Science Learning Through Engineering Design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763- 017-9860-0[4] Chu, L., Sampson, V., Hutner, T. L., Rivale, S., Crawford, R. H., Baze, C. L., & Brooks, H. S. (2019). Argument-driven engineering in middle school science: An exploratory study of changes in engineering identity over an academic year. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), 6.[5] American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) & Advancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education (AE3). (2020). Framework for P-12 Engineering
-enrolled students from two year partners to 4 year Texas A&M University College of Engineering through coordination of institutions departments - Regularly evaluate the impact that co-enrollment with 2yr partners, curriculum/academic pathways, and non-traditional coursework have on the recruitment and retention of a diverse student population. - Membership – American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE); National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students (NISTS); League for Innovation Community Colleges; American Management Association (AMA); Texas Association for College Admission Counseling (TACAC) - Presentation - Bassett, E., De Sousa, D., ”Stay Local, Save Money: An Innovative Engineering Education
platform for programming, design and measurement in a freshman engineering course." 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2011.[4] Hamrick, Todd R., and Robin AM Hensel. "Putting the fun in programming fundamentals- robots make programs tangible." 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2013.[5] Daugherity, Michael. "Introducing programming and problem solving with arduino-based laboratories." 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2019.[6] Geddis, Demetris, Brian Aufderheide, and Herman Colquhoun. "Work in Progress: Project and Design-Based Introductory Engineering Course using Arduino Kits." ASEE Annual Conference. 2020.[7] Belfadel, Djedjiga, et al. "Use of the Arduino
. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[4] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, "Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[5] A. W. Johnson and J. E. Swenson, "Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[6] J. E. S. Swenson, A. W. Johnson, T. G. Chambers and L. Hirshfield, "Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] R.V. Vitali, N. Ramo, M. Bel, E. Treadway, A