Asee peer logo

Unveiling Demographic Influences and Differential Career Preferences among Engineering Graduate Students: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineers

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

July 12, 2024

Conference Session

Engineering a Just Future: Cultivating Equity, Voice, and Community in Technical Education

Tagged Divisions

Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)

Tagged Topic

Diversity

Permanent URL

https://strategy.asee.org/48212

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Ebony Omotola McGee The Johns Hopkins University

visit author page

Dr. Ebony McGee is a Professor of Innovation and inclusion in the STEM Ecosystem in the School of Education and the Department of Mental Health in the School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. Dr. McGee is an electrical engineer by training and an 11-time NSF investigator awardee. She is the leading expert on both race and structural racism in STEM, with all its toxic consequences, and on the growing resistance to the traditional STEM ecosystem. She also investigates the limits of resiliency, wellness, and job embeddedness in STEM fields. She founded Racial Revolutionary and Inclusive Guidance for Health Throughout STEM (R-RIGHTS) and co-founded the Explorations in Diversifying Engineering Faculty Initiative (EDEFI), as well as the Institute in Critical Quantitative and Mixed Methodologies Training for Underrepresented Scholars (ICQCM), with support from the National Science Foundation, the Spencer Foundation, and the WT Grant Foundation.

visit author page

biography

Thema Monroe-White Berry College

visit author page

Dr. Thema Monroe-White is Assistant Professor of Management Information Systems at Berry College. She has 10 years of combined evaluation, research and data analytics expertise from her years as a consultant, nonprofit leader and instructor. Dr. White ha

visit author page

biography

Shelly Engelman Custom EduEval LLC

visit author page

Shelly Engelman, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Evaluation at Custom EduEval LLC in Austin, TX. She earned her PhD in Social Psychology and has over 15 years of research and evaluation experience. Dr. Engelman has been a lead evaluator, data analyst and social science methodologist on over 40 federal and state funded grants and programs.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

In the last decade, engineering education has undergone significant transformation, with mechanical, electrical, and computer engineering emerging as the most popular and fastest-growing engineering disciplines. However, there is a significant gap in the literature on how engineers from these disciplines differ in career trajectories and attitudes, especially regarding race and gender diversity. Existing research emphasizes the unique social dynamics within specific engineering fields and their potential to attract diverse students and support varied career paths (Brawner et al., 2012). To probe these distinctions, our study, grounded in Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994) and Critical Race Theory (CRT; Crenshaw et al., 1995), investigates the career pathways and attitudes of engineering graduate students. Leveraging a dataset of 847 engineering graduate students, we examine differences across these three engineering disciplines and the impact of demographic factors like race and gender on career decisions and attitudes. Findings suggest that clear demographic distinctions emerged at the intersection of race and gender: female students across all disciplines displayed a greater preference for nonprofit careers compared to their male counterparts, while underrepresented racially minoritized (URM, that is Blacks or African Americans, Hispanics or Latinx, and American Indians or Alaska Natives) students exhibited a stronger inclination toward entrepreneurial endeavors than their non-URM, that is White and Asian, peers. Even after accounting for these demographic variables, it is noteworthy that computer engineering students exhibited a higher level of interest in nonprofit positions and careers in K-12 education compared to their counterparts in mechanical and electrical engineering. Disparities in attitudes were also observed; URMs were more concerned with racial justice issues and experienced greater race-related stress. Similarly, computer engineering students were more involved in racial justice activities. These findings underscore the complex interaction of demographic and disciplinary differences and the unique position of computer engineering in promoting social justice interests. This study contributes to the broader discourse on engineering education, providing valuable insights into its evolving landscape while also highlighting the necessity for further research to explore the specific factors within computer engineering that might encourage greater diversity and social justice initiatives.

McGee, E. O., & Monroe-White, T., & Engelman, S. (2024, June), Unveiling Demographic Influences and Differential Career Preferences among Engineering Graduate Students: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineers Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://strategy.asee.org/48212

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015