GC 2012-5649: A STUDY ON ASSESSMENT METHOD AND RUBRICSOF PROGRAM OUTCOMES RELATED TO SOFTSKILLSProf. Minhee Shin, Seoul National University of Technology Page 17.3.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012A study on Assessment Method and Rubrics of Program Outcomes related toSoftskills▪ Presenter: Minhee Shin (minhees@seoultech.ac.kr)▪ Organization: Seoul National University of Technology, 139-743 Page 17.3.2
has been developed that the programs based on engineering and technologyfor middle and high school students. Therefore the programs were instructedthrough team teaching by engineering professors and technology teachers.Second, the programs were consisted with lecture, field trip, problem solving,project and so on.Third, the programs were utilized in various institutes such as engineering andtechnology related colleges, universities, governments, research institutes, andindustries.Fourth, we applied the programs three times in December 2011, February 2012 andMay 2012. Approximately, 100 students participate in all the programs, respectively.It was high that the satisfaction of the participants, their parents, engineeringprofessors and
GC 2012-5616: A MULTINATIONAL MASTER’S DEGREE PROGRAMIN ELECTRONIC PRODUCT ENGINEERINGProf. Helmuth Gesch, University of Applied Sciences Landshut, Germany Education: 1975 Master of Engineering from Technical University of Munich 1978 Doctorate in Physics from Technical University of Munich Academic positions and administrative responsibilities: Professor (since 1985), University of Applied Sciences Landshut, Germany Vice President (since 2005), responsible for technology transfer and indus- try related collaborations Coordinator of the Microelectronic study program Coordinator of the Industrial Engineering and Management study program (temporarily) Coordinator of different international cooper- ation programs
coal gasification in Korea, providing leadership in gasification slag rheology and refractory corrosion. The other area that Dr. Oh devotes her effort is to develop women in engineering program and educational contents. With her colleagues, she introduced the concept of engineering education for women (EEW). For last seven years, she organized and chaired the EEW session in the annual conference of Korean Society of Engineering Education (KSEE).. Dr. Oh now serves as a vice president of Korea Federation of Women’s Science and Technology Associations, a vice president of Korean KSEE, and a director of the Regional center for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology in Seoul. She also served several government
learning outcomes, (ii) adopting active andcooperative learning methods and (iii) implementing formative plus summative assessmentstrategies are analyzed to understand how they implemented these thrusts through pedagogicalapproaches appropriate to the IIT-M ethos, which is characterized by a large student populationof diverse socio-economic-cultural backgrounds. Also, issues related to varying set ofinstructions to a diverse group of students are identified and possible solutions are discussed forfurther action to sustain the TLC activities for the benefit of the teaching-learning process in IIT-M.Key words: faculty development program, teaching learning center, course delivery cycle,engineering and science educationIntroductionToday, amidst
empowerment, closer towards the NAE21st Century Engineering Grand Challenges, and then to the local education ontological beliefsabout high school teaching and learning needs. The curriculum and instruction facilitate designexperiences that directly relate to the NAE Grand Challenges by integrating inexpensive yeteffective household materials, movies, novels, and museums (to name a few) as points of accessinto student learning through the design-based learning cycle (Fig. 2) based on the award-winning Design, Technology, & Engineering for All Children (DTEACh) program and method(Fig. 3). Figure 1. Framework of Curriculum Design for Design Curriculum Figure 2. Design-based Learning Cycle
. outreach officer. In a recent qualitative survey of students, faculty/deans, and The Australian respondent has also facilitated multipleindustry, students provided a characterization of their “ideal” workshops with SPEED and affiliate organizations and isprofessor.12 The top characteristic of professors that students currently enrolled in a doctoral program in Australia. Hisreported they were looking for was “inspiring/motivating”. research focus is related to engineering education. He isBeyond this, students sought an educator who was prepared SPEED’s current president.knowledgeable, including with practical real-world knowledge,as well as someone committed to teaching and helping, The
beennewly developed and briefly discussed with each case example of the class projects.Keywords: design education, engineering education, mechanical engineering1. Introduction Nowadays global technology leaders in industrial field emphasize the importance of seamlessProduct Lifecycle Management (PLM), an integrated, parametric-based approach to all aspectsof a product‟s life–from its design inception, through its manufacture, marketing, distributionand maintenance, and finally into recycling, disposal and reuse/sustainability [Stark, 2006]. In1949, Duetsch reported that mutual cooperation between students, rather than the competitioninvoking negative effects on the relation, could bring a positive independency between them sothat they might be
GC 2012-5622: THE ATTRIBUTES OF A GLOBAL ENGINEER: INTER-NATIONAL FACULTY DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONSDr. Stephen Hundley, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Stephen Hundley is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Undergraduate Programs in the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI).Ms. Lynn G Brown, The Boeing Company Lynn G. Brown is the Corporate International Program Manager for Higher Education and STEM for The Boeing Company and the Chairperson of the ASEE Corporate Members Council Special Interest Group for International Engineering Education. Lynn was selected as Boeing’s Higher Education Pro- gram Manager in 2004 at which
impartation of quality knowledge and skills to the students,thereby lowering their overall development and employability. At times, the facultyalso lack in communication and pedagogical skills and industry academiccollaboration is also at nascent stage. Hence, the process of faculty developmentbecomes highly imperative. Improvements in instructional programs may involve subject integration, just-in-time instruction, writing across the curriculum, or any of a variety of other non-traditional approaches that have been found to improve learning. The quality of ateaching program is primarily related to the quality of the instruction that takes placein individual classrooms. For the new curricula and instructional methods to have thedesired impact, a
learning —continuous Oral, written, graphic education Ability to relate to practical aspects of Ability to muster knowledge from engineering neighboring disciplines Inter-personal skills Ability to work in a team Management skills Decision-making skills Exposure to commercial disciplines Design capabilities Creativity and Innovation ability to handle open-ended Integrative skills problems International outlook ability to handle poorly-defined Ability to employ IT problems
GC 2012-5651: DEVELOPING CAPABILITIES FOR TRAINING ENGI-NEERING FACULTY MEMBERS IN EFFECTIVE TEACHING AND LEARN-ING METHODSDr. Khairiyah Mohd Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Dr. Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering, Uni- versity Teknologi Malaysia (UTM). She is the Director of the UTM Regional Centre for Engineering Education (RCEE), which promotes meaningful research and scholarly practice in engineering education, and manages the PhD in Engineering Education program. Since 2011, she is the Secretary of the Society for Engineering Education Malaysia (SEEM). Prior to becoming the Director of RCEE, Dr. Khairiyah was the Deputy Director at the Centre for
? These are the questions addressed in thispaper within the topic of engineering problem solving.A central topic for educators and researchers in engineering education and related fields isproblem solving. A theoretically and practically rich collection of scholarly work surrounds thistopic, from the perspectives of the learning sciences and engineering education. Within thediscipline of cognitive psychology a theoretically-based distinction developed between “experts”and “novices” that was underpinned by hypotheses about learners’ mental representations andhow those mental representations changed both locally, during the solution of specific problems,and distally, as a natural developmental unfolding of skill due largely to extensive
fighter or bomber pilot over the course of 2 years of training. Theextensive training is provided to ensure AF pilots are capable of completing important missionswithout risk to life, limb, or aircraft. AF engineers also need adequate training to perform theirjobs. It is common for AF engineers to manage multi-million dollar programs where theirrequired post-baccalaureate training can be as short as a three week course on projectmanagement. The astronautical engineering programs at AFIT and USAFA work to enrich thattraining through undergraduate and graduate programs for AF engineers who complete theserespective programs. To maintain space dominance, it is critical that engineers understand whatthe people they are managing do.Engineering and
known as theGolden Rule.9 In an extensive analysis of national databases, Babcock and Marks2 found thatU.S. students were close to the mark in 1961, averaging about 24 hours of study time per week(the Golden Rule would require 15 * 2 = 30 hours, on average, based on a 15 credit course load).By 2003, average weekly study time had fallen to an alarmingly low 14 hours per week. Interms of the production of knowledge and skilled workers, Babcock and Marks regard thisdecline as a matter of grave concern. Time-on-Task in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsThe goal of this research was to assess differences across U.S. and Indian engineering programsin the allocation of time to academic activities and to relate time allocation to
GC 2012-5594: EXTERNALLY FUNDED POSTDOCS AND INTERNSHIPOPPORTUNITIES @ HP LABSMrs. Lueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard Corporation Lueny Morell, MS, PE, is Program Manager in the Strategy Team of Hewlett Packard Laboratories (HPL) in Palo Alto, California. She focuses on identifying Open Innovation opportunities for HP Labs, em- phasis on engineering/technology talent programs funded by external organizations. Since joining HP Labs in 2002 she has lead the development of various strategic partnerships with HP partners (govern- ments, customers and universities) to catalyze ideas, resources and develop talent for innovation. Lueny also has developed engineering/science curriculum innovation initiatives worldwide in support
/ Workshops Exchange Information Other Activities of Mutual Interest for Mutual benefit 12 Page 17.29.13 MINUTES OF THE INDO-CHINA DIALOGUE Lakeview Hotel, Beijing, October 20, 2011 Similarities in the Indian and Chinese Systems: Huge size, both in terms of number of institutions and admission capacity. Only a small proportion of the engineering programs have been accredited. Engineering students have limited industrial exposure and experience. Uneven geographic distribution of engineering institutions in the country. 13
points throughout a student’s learning pathway. The following points outline BentleySystem, Inc’s inclusive support of Engineering Education: Creation of the BeMentors Community, a central hub for STEM mentors to encourage, learn, prepare and share best practices for mentoring students Career readiness for exiting college graduates through the BeCareers Network “Educators Collaborative” program facilitating collegiate uptake of industry technology Support of student competitions both at National and Regional levels through contributions of direct manpower and operating funds Launched “Cloud Mentoring”, a corporate-corporate initiative to make impact Corporate leadership-embraced support of
University of Technology Coimbat- ore. He also played a vital role as the Member of Committee for making Tamil as medium of instruction in engineering institutions. He is actively involved in the Canada India Institution Cooperation project and made remarkable achievements in conducting various technical-knowledge and skill development pro- grammes for women, organizing ’Personality Development Programs’ for students and staff and summer schools as well. He has visited USA, Canada, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherland, Germany, Austria, Italy, Switzerland, Mauritius, France, Dubai, Tunisia, Egypt, China, South Korea and Australia. He has an inborn acumen towards research and has guided
The Boeing Company. Over his 26 year Boeing career he has worked on various defense programs in many different engineering groups; starting as an NC Programmer on the B-2 program to F-22 in structures, systems, tooling and many other manufacturing related groups. This is where his composites experience originated and then onto developing and teaching programming, relational design and composite modeling. In the last ten years, Barry’s focus has been on the ”supply pipeline” of our future technical workforce, where he and a colleague partnered to build several composite certificate programs with the University of Washington (UW) through their Aero and Astro department. Two of the largest programs are: Aircraft
all technical institutions in the country. Page 17.30.3At that time, mandate of AICTE basically covered only programs in Engineering andTechnology.The growth of industries in the Country, just after independence, also demandedthe need for qualified professionals in other fields, such as Business Management,Architecture, Hotel Management, Pharmacy etc. Although the diverse elements ofManagement such as Commerce, Economics, Finance, Psychology and IndustrialSociology were being taught for a long time, the need for Management Education ina formal way was felt in India only in the fifties. The Government of India decided in1954 to set up a Board of Management
. Sabah has over 25 years of experience in higher education including more than 15 years in education manage- ment across different parts of the world. Concentration in the last 15 years was on development of career, Art & Science, technology and engineering programs. Leading positions in educational institutions including chair of department, acting Dean, university board member, University assessment committee member, consultant and team leader. A unique experience in coordination between educational institution and industrial partners to build new paradigm in education through an NSF sponsored program. Many years of in-depth experience in curriculum development. Extensive knowledge in academic pro- grams