students so that it makesthem feel more at ease and comfortable because of this shared connection.The commitment to teach abroad require faculty to make personal sacrifices, leaving theirfamilies for weeks at a time, usually during the holidays. In Dr. Schattler ’s case, having madethe decision to travel abroad far in advance, she was not anticipating that this trip would occur inthe midst of moving to a new house with her new husband and other family medical emergenciesthat arose back in the US. Dealing with such personal issues long distance, coupled with theintensity of the program, balancing students’ needs inside and outside the classroom, classroomresponsibilities, and acquiring advanced time management skills, while immersed in
, “Robot Projects as Education Design Experiments”, Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education, 2005, vol. 2, p. 524-529.9. A. Friesel, “Learning Robotics By Combining The Theory With Practical Design And Competition In Undergraduate Engineering Education”, AutoSoft Journal, International Journal on Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing; Special Issue on Robotics Education.10. Norman S. Nise, “Control Systems Engineering”, Ed. Jonh Wiley & Sons, Inc, ISBN 978-0470-54756-411. L.W. Anderson, D.R. Krathwohl, and B.S. Bloom, “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives”. New York: Longman, 2001.12. P. Race, “The lecturer's toolkit
Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Throughout his undergraduate degree, Francisco was the President of the NMT Society of Automotive Engineers Student Chapter. During his time as president, the chapter grew to become one of the largest chapters in the world. He also volunteered at the NM State Science and Engineering Fair and NM State Science Olympiad. Francisco was awarded the NMT Student Appreciation Award (2013), the DOE Summer Visiting Faculty-Student Fellowship at Sandia National Laboratories (2013), and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Outstanding Scholarship Award (2012).Ms. Tennille Charisse Bernard, The University of New Mexico Ms. Bernard is a graduate student of The University of New
notarized. Upon receipt of the application, MoE forms a reviewcommittee consisting of members from government, academia, research institutes, and otherorganizations. The committee may meet multiple times until all the issues raised by thecommittee are addressed by the applying institute. The review committee visits the campus inSongdo and has a Q&A meeting with the faculty and staff. At the final stage of the review, thecommittee has a site visit to the overseas main campus. Every time new programs are added tothe already approved branch campus, MoE requires a new submission of the application,although some sections of the application may remain unchanged.The Global Campus can contribute to the higher education in South Korea by providing
, social, cultural, and economic issues thatare intimately connected to engineering issues and people affected by these engineeringchallenges. One of the most effective ways of providing our students these learning experiencesis through education abroad opportunities. Yet less than 4% of US engineering students studyabroad and there has been little growth in the past two years1. It is also well established that experiential, project/problem-based learning with an emphasison acquiring new knowledge and applying and integrating previous knowledge can be veryeffective structures for enhancing student learning2. These structures engage students in open-ended, ambiguous, authentic activities; and usually involve teams. It is learning that goes
learned that stay with the participantsThe second open-ended question asked participants to report what was most enjoyable for themduring the visit. 88% of the participants responded. One of the most common threads wasexperiencing a different culture that was new, interesting and exciting. Many commented on thevalue of the tours of industrial and historic sites and the insights they learned that have stayedwith them as they look back. They reported that experiences of the industrial visits helped themdeal with issues in their jobs that deal with national and international companies andmanagement teams. Page 20.21.6Several participants commented on
1995, two CEC faculty went abroad; one to Denmark and one to England. Their purpose wasto plan for a study abroad, inspect potential venues for the students, and to arrange for coursetransfer credits for engineering courses. After a survey of CEC students concerning the countryand course they would prefer, an environmental engineering course was selected to be taught inLondon England during the January interim of 1996. CEC appealed to industrial partners forfinancial contributions to help support students taking this first study abroad. CEC has beenblessed with many industrial partners who have supported the department, but only one at thetime decided that international study abroad was a worthwhile cause.A group of ten students studied in
). The purpose of the competition isboth educative – educational experience for the participating students, for the general public, forthe building industry and the policy makers – and research oriented – encouraging multi-disciplinary collaboration towards development of new technologies and methods.The paper discusses the educational experience of the students participating in this internationalcompetition, focusing on the engineering undergraduate students. It describes the planimplemented for integrating the Solar Decathlon into the required curricula within theengineering, architecture, and business departments. A project as large and diverse as this onerequired accommodating curricular development at various levels and within various modes
a method that suits a constructivist view of learning in that it gives the students an opportunity to contemplate issues from new perspectives. This is augmented by scaffolding the students regarding how to reflect beyond the mere descriptive form. Reflection assignments have also been used to highlight crucial aspects in the course, e.g. to consider how to act in order to avoid difficulties with cultural differences in the international collaboration on an individual basis.Reflections are also important as a means to help the students cope with unusual educational settings, such as open-ended group projects, and learning goals different from
students participating in international education experiences remains small,there is a particular concern for the preparation of career researchers.In response, U.S. universities are experimenting with new curricular methods, including thedevelopment of international programs designed for STEM students, to foster the development ofskill sets necessary for successful international research collaboration. However, sparse researchexists that comprehensively assesses globally focused outcomes associated with such efforts, andthe simple question remains: Are international programs for STEM students effective in meetingthese goals?In this paper, we compare the experiences of students participating in two Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU