landing mechanism for the Mars Science Laboratory Rover Mission AKA Curiosity. Mechanism design work for Hubble Robotics and on Global Precipitation Measurement Instrument Missions. Additionally, Professor Brown has worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology designing test equipment to measure stress-strain relationships to superconductor perfor- mance. His past work on the tethering landing mechanism used to lower the Mars rover Curiosity to the Red Planet’s surface is part of a $2.5 billion program NASA says will assess whether the Gale Crater area of Mars has ever had the potential to support a habitable environment. Professor Brown runs the NASA Space Grant program at MSU Denver. His current
31% to a B+ (89%). In the mid-semester evaluations for the Spring 2014course, 98% of students noted that working in a group has contributed to their understanding ofthe course material. Engineers in the workforce are constantly working with others on variousprojects. Another student explains that working in a group motivates students to stay on top oftheir work load as well as encourages them to produce higher quality work. This student states,“Working in a group allows me to work harder to guarantee that I do not let my partners down.”This accountability not only improves the students’ work ethic but also improves the way theyinteract with their peers. By exposing teamwork early in student engineering development theygain a sense of
Paper ID #11027Enabling Extensive Numerical Problem Solving on Smartphones and TabletsDr. Michael B. Cutlip, University of Connecticut Michael B. Cutlip is an Emeritus Professor within the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Depart- ment at the University of Connecticut and has served as department head and director of the university’s Honors Program. He has B. Ch. E. and M. S. degrees from Ohio State and a Ph. D. from the University of Colorado. He has been the Chair and National Program Chair for the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division plus he co-chaired the ASEE Summer School for Chemical Engineering faculty in 2002
. Keech, B. Mariani, J. Klingler and M.V. Moncada, “Challenges and Successes in Making Health Care More Accessible To Rural Communities In Waslala, Nicaragua Using Low- Cost Telecommunications”, IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (San Jose, CA) October 20-23, 2013[3] http://erasmusprogramme.com/ accessed 3/14/14[4] J. Mesaric, and B. Dukic, “Implementing international IS curricula in the Croatian universities”, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (IEEE Cat. No.05EX1001), p 313-18, 2005[5] A. Alkhairy,L. Blank, D. Boning, D. Cardwell, W. Carter, N. Collings, A. Hayhurst, W. Milne, P. Robinson, W. Seering, S. Sheppard, K. Smith, and B. Stronge, “Comparison of
Phase.The above courses will be described in more detail in the following subsections (B.2-B.4),based on the phase of the project they refer to. Furthermore, an existing co-taught civilengineering/architecture design studio course was modified to focus on the Solar Decathlon. Adescription of this course is presented in subsection B.1.In addition to the above mentioned courses, a select group of the engineering students wereinvolved in the Solar Decathlon as part of their senior design projects. Specifically, the seniordesign project teams focused on: 1. designing and building the energy-management, controlsand monitoring systems, and 2. designing and putting together the mechanical and electricalaspects of the solar panels and the design of the
standard. The Standard that weare concerned with for this discussion is Standard 2 that addresses student learning anddevelopment. There are four sub-statements to this Standard dealing with a) interculturalunderstanding, b) language and communication, c) academic growth and d) student development.It is important to note here that the second sub-statement that deals with language is notapplicable to the WPI program being discussed. With the remaining 3, there are 24corresponding queries. Space does not permit a detailed presentation of each of the 24 queries and how the WPIprogram does or does not satisfy them. We present only a summary here. Copies of the completeset of standards and queries will be distributed at the presentation. Standard
. d c a b Figure 3. Various learning resources can be called up from within the VE including but not limited to: (a) – prerecorded lecture, (b) animated video instruction for one of the experiment tasks, and (c) online lesson. The screenshot (d) presents the assessment page of the edX MIT course “Introduction to Solid State Chemistry” in that the virtual experiment has been Page 20.39.5 integrated.The v-Diffractometer and associated programs can
Energy and Sustainability Center (RESC) at Farmingdale StateCollege (FSC) and staff. The equipment and supplies purchased for these workshops werefunded by the “Department of Energy’s Smart Grid Demonstration Grant”.References: 1. Houchens, B. C., 2010, “Service and Design as Mechanisms to Impression the Study of Engineering, from K-12 to Higher Education”, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Vol.5, No.1, pp:25-46, Spring 2010 2. Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., and Rockland, R., 2007, Bringing Engineering into K-12 Schools: A Problem Looking for Solutions? International Conference on Engineering Education – ICEE . Coimbra, Portugal. 3. IEEE Spectrum Forecasters STEM Survey
Paper ID #11034International Experiential Learning in Engineering: a Case Study of JuniorEnterprise in the United StatesMiss Morgan M. Bakies, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Morgan Bakies is an undergraduate student in chemical engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and former British Exchange student at Swansea University in Swansea, Wales. During her studies as an undergraduate, she conducted research through a National Science Foundation-funded Re- search Experience for Undergraduates program at the University of Alabama and also interned at Lyon- dellBasell’s Houston Refinery.Karen
Paper ID #11020A Focused Curriculum Improving the Written English from Russian Speak-ing EngineersJulia Ziyatdinova,Dr. Phillip Albert Sanger, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Artem Bezrukov, Kazan National Research Technologcal University, Russia Artem Bezrukov graduated from Kazan State Technological University in 2007 and received his PhD in 2010 at the Department of Physical Chemistry at the same university. His major study area was chemical engineering. He also obtained a degree in professional translation and linguistics. Artem was given the lecturer position at the Department of Physical Chemistry in 2010. He took
9 field experience destination for US students because it requires no visa for US students, has English as its main language, is relatively safe, easy to get to and affordable. Figure 2: (a) Final Skype session where the secondary school students talked to each mini-‐team of biosystems undergraduate students (11/28/12). (b) Final land excavation of biodiversity pond at Edward P. Yorke with Belizean students and team of undergraduate students from University of Mount Union (05/20
Paper ID #11076Using Social Media to Create a Global Community of Sustainability-EngagedStudentsMatthew E Verbyla, University of South Florida Matthew Verbyla is a Ph.D. student of Environmental Engineering and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at the University of South Florida. Matthew worked for several years in the water and sanitation sector in Honduras, including one year with a Fulbright Fellowship. He currently studies pathogen removal in wastewater treatment ponds and microbial risk in wastewater irrigation systems in Bolivia.Ms. Colleen Claire Naughton Colleen Naughton is a doctoral student at the University of
Paper ID #11001Utilization of Eclipse-based Software Tools in Teaching a New Software De-velopment Methodology to EngineersDr. Nannan He, Minnesota State University, Mankato Nannan He received the Ph.D. in computer engineering from Virginia Tech. She did Post-doc at Oxford University in UK and participated two EU projects. From 2012 to present she is an Assistant Professor at the ECET department in Minnesota State University at Mankato. Her teaching and research interests are in safety-critical embedded software, real-time embedded systems, and software verification. She is an IEEE member and reviewers for many conferences
Paper ID #11015Challenges in Establishing an American Global Campus in KoreaProf. Hongshik Ahn, Stony Brook University Prof. Hongshik Ahn, Stony Brook University (SUNY) Dr. Ahn is a Professor of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics at Stony Brook University. From 2011 to 2013, he served as the first Vice President of SUNY Korea. Prior to joining Stony Brook University in 1996, he was Mathematical Statistician at National Center for Toxicological Research, US FDA. He has been an Associate Editor of Communications in Statistics since 2000. Dr. Ahn is included in Marquis Who’s Who in America. He
of instruction that will better match the cohort of students’ learning style to initiate ouradaptive teaching process.Cohort Cognitive ProfileThe different conglomeration of the Felder-Silverman learning scales for the students in a cohortforms a specific cognitive profile. We propose to use the Felder-Soloman index of learning styles(ILS) survey to determine the dominant learning styles within a cohort of students. The Felder-Soloman index of learning styles survey consists of 44 multiple choice questions. The survey has11 forced-choice questions that address each scale. Each item has only two possible choices (a)and (b) that corresponds to either one of the two categories in a specific scale. The (b) responsesare subtracted from the (a
, and engineering,(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,(g) an ability to communicate effectively,(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global & societal context,(i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong
distributed in a society, (INV) indicateshow people view themselves within a society as individuals or part of a collective, MAS reflects thedegree to which a society values competition, UAI measures the comfort level with unknowns and aproclivity for risk-taking. M. Minkov (2007) using data from the World Values Survey developed the (5)Long Term versus Short Term Orientation, then Hofstede & Minkov (2010) added the (6) Indulgenceversus Restraint dimensions (Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context, 2011).Hofstede’s “national division” approach to cultural classification is criticized by some. B. McSweeney(2002) challenges underlying data assumptions, suggesting weaknesses with respect to Hofstede’sinterview data, suggesting that
., Löfström, A., McDermott, R., and Russell, L. Intercultural Competence in Global Collaboration Courses in Computer Engineering, Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, San Francisco, USA, 2012.[4] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., McDermott, R and von Konsky, B. “Assessing Professional Skills in Engineering Education”, Australian Computer Science Communications, vol 33, no 2, pp 145-154, 2011.[5] Cajander, Å. Daniels, M. and McDermott, R. On valuing peers: theories of learning and intercultural competence. Computer Science Education, 22(4):319–342, 2012. [6] Cajander, Å., Daniels, M., Peters, A., and McDermott, R. Critical Thinking, Peer-Writing, and the Importance
Engineering and Construction students to network with and learn fromprofessionals, scholars, and high level decision makers from around the world. Figure 2 showsexamples of a number of innovative construction projects from around the world that werepresented at the conference and that students got a chance to learn about first hand from thepeople who were involved in them. Page 20.29.7 (a) (b) (c) Figure 2. Sample of the construction projects highlighted at ICIC 2006. (a) Japan’s Kansai International Airport; (b) the new San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
are often very competitive. This scheme does not disrupt the standard fouryear undergraduate program. However, students are only available during a third of a year, whichis not typically desirable for host organizations.Model A: Summer Semester Co-op Option in a 4-Year BME Program Fall Spring Summer First Year Courses Courses Second Year Courses Courses Co-op Third Year Courses Courses Co-op Fourth Year Courses CoursesModel B is designed with two to three cooperative work module interspersed with the curriculum,as shown [13]. Industries prefer this model
and international undergraduate research experiencesThe National Council on Undergraduate Research defines undergraduate research as “An inquiry orinvestigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an original intellectual or creativecontribution to the discipline” and identifies six key benefits of these experiences: a) enhancingstudent learning through mentoring relationships with faculty, b) increasing retention, c) increasingenrollment in graduate education and providing effective career preparation, d) developing criticalthinking creativity, problem solving, and intellectual independence, e) developing an understandingof research methodology, and f) promoting an innovation-oriented culture.12 The NSF has fundedREU programs
writing this paper is many folds; to share our experience and approach withother engineering faculty and to attempt to bring and broaden the awareness among the highereducation management as well as engineering faculty members. We share variety of approachesthat we used to prepare and field graduate at a faster pace. It is also hoped that this paper willencourage engineering education researcher as well as other stake holders to take this to the nextlevel.References[1]. Natarajan, R., Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Indian Perspectives, In the proceedings of 16th Australian International Education Conference, 30 September – 4 October, Hobart, 2002.[2]. Raileanu, B., Lifelong Learning - Key Role for Education and Training
discussion amongst experts were split in the twosets a) Coding Related and b) Generic. The former set consists of the factors C2, C4 and C10 and thelatter consists of the rest. Page 20.22.3 TABLE 1: TEN COMMANDMENTS OF EGOLESS PROGRAMMING Ten Commandments of Egoless Programming C1 Understand and accept that you will make mistakes. C2 You are not your code. C3 No matter how much "karate" you know, someone else will always know more. C4 Don't rewrite code without consultation
Institute), 10 G Street NE Suite 800, Washington, DC 20002, USA / http://www.wri.org/our-work/project/eutrophication-and-hypoxia/interactive-map-eutrophication-hypoxia 3. UNEP, Sick Water? The Role of Wastewater Management in a Sustainable World, http://www.unep.org/pdf/SickWater_screen.pdf (last accessed March 7, 2014) 4. Mihelcic, James R., Zimmerman, Julie B., and Ramaswami, Anu, 2007. “Integrating Developed and Developing World Knowledge into Global Discussions and Strategies for sustainability. 1. Science and Technology,” Environmental Science & Technology, 41(10):3415-3421. 5. Al-Khafaji, Amir W. and Elhouar, Souhail, “Preparing Engineers for Global Challenges
to sharing our expertise withthem, we create a win-win situation for everyone.References1. Al-Khafaji, A.W. and Fuessle, R.W. (2014). Internationalization and Civil Engineering Program Innovation. Third Annual ASEE International Forum, Indianapolis, IN (in press). Page 20.20.9 8 2. Mintz K., Talesnick M., Amadei B., Tal T. (2014). Integrating sustainable development into a service-learning engineering course. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 140 (1).3. Asolekar, S.R., Kalbar, P.P., Chaturvedi, K. M., Maillacheruvu K.Y., (2013). Rejuvenation of
collaboration withcolleagues at our university and beyond.REFERENCES 1) Jesiek, Brent K., Yi Shen, and Yating Haller. (2012). "Cross-Cultural Competence: A Comparative Assessment of Engineering Students." International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1): 144-155. 2) Harris, Philip R., and Robert T. Moran, “Managing cultural differences, global leadership strategies for the 21st century”, sixth edition, Amsterdam: Elsevier/Butterworth- Heinemann, 2004. 3) Downey, G.L., Lucena, J.C., Moskal, B., Bigley, T., Hays, C., Jesiek, B.K., Kelly, L., Lehr, J.L., Miller, J., Nichols-Belo, A., Ruff, S., and Parkhurst, R. (2006). “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems
education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context1. The Royalacademy of engineering also has identified attributes required of graduate engineers, whichinclude team-work and multidisciplinary systems2. Male and Chapman3 have quoted EngineersAustralia accreditation board requiring its graduate engineers to have, among other attributes, (a)the ability to communicate effectively, not only with other engineers but also with the Page 20.32.2community at large, (b) the ability to function effectively as an individual contributor and inmulti-disciplinary and multi-cultural teams with the capacity to be
Paper ID #11023Embedded Systems - Shape The WorldDr. Jonathan W. Valvano, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Jonathan Valvano is a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and holds the Engineering Foundation Centennial Teaching Fellowship in Electrical Engineering. He received his S.B. and S.M. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from MIT in 1977 and his Ph.D. in 1981 from the joint Harvard-MIT program in Medical Engineering and Medical Physics. He joined the faculty at The University of Texas at Austin in 1981 and has 32 years of experience in teaching and
Spanish curriculum. She has developed specialized Spanish courses designed for engineers, as well as interdisciplinary courses that connect engineering to other fields of study. In her research she is equally versatile: her scholarship covers a wide range of topics relating to international education, languages across the curriculum, applied linguistics, materials development and literary and cultural studies.Dr. Sigrid – Berka, University of Rhode Island Dr. Sigrid Berka is the Executive Director of the International Engineering Program (IEP) at the Univer- sity of Rhode Island, and also the Director of the German and the Chinese IEP, responsible for building academic programs with exchange partners abroad, internship
Paper ID #11057Assessment of Remote Laboratory Practices in Engineering Technology Dis-tance EducationDr. Mert Bal, Miami University Mert Bal received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Eastern Mediterranean Univer- sity, North Cyprus in 2008. He was a Post-Doctoral Fellow in the University of Western Ontario, and a Visiting Researcher at the National Research Council Canada in London, Ontario, Canada between 2008 and 2010. He was involved in various research projects in the areas of collaborative intelligence, localiza- tion and collaborative information processing in wireless sensor networks, intelligent