implementation, use, andrequired maintenance of the projects. Community members will also be asked to work alongsidethe students in implementing the project to gain a deeper understanding of the structure orsystem that is being put in place and as a means of providing their own equity to the project.Where possible, community members may also be asked to supply a portion of the financialresources or materials necessary to complete the project.During the trip, students will assimilate their new experiences through several academicactivities. Students will be required to keep a journal documenting their experiences. Beyond asimple account of each day’s activities, the journals will be used to encourage critical thinking asstudents provide analysis of their
. M., and Johri, A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Forthcoming.28 Lucena, J. What is Engineering for? A Search for Engineering beyond Militarism and Free- markets. In Downey, G. L. & Beddoes, K. (Eds.), What is Global Engineering Education For?: The Making of International Educators (361-383). Morgan and Claypool, San Rafael, CA. 2010.29 Walther, J., Kellam, N., Sochacka, N., and Radcliffe, D. Engineering Competence? An Interpretive Investigation of Engineering Students’ Professional Formation. Journal of Engineering Education, 2011. 100(4): 703-740.30 Flanagan, J. The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin
leading a global network of Boeing executives for implement- ing Higher Education engagements for the company, and • Working across Boeing organizations to align higher education engagements and funding to the various Boeing Presidents’ country Strategies Annually, Boeing provides over $8 million dollars of charitable and business contributes for international and domestic higher education engagements through Higher Education and STEM. Prior to this assignment, Lynn managed the Educational Partnerships group in Boeing’s training orga- nization. She was responsible for conducting integrated and sustained partnerships and internships with schools, colleges, and universities to communicate skills required by the
New Century9, Re-engineering Engineering Education in Europe10, Rethinking EngineeringEducation: The CDIO Approach11, The 21st Century Engineer: A Proposal for EngineeringEducation Reform12, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field13, and HolisticEngineering: Beyond Technology14. In the United Arab Emirates, the aim of on-going educationsector reform is “…to ensure that graduates have the skills and qualifications to drive economicgrowth.” 15, p. 96 As the K-12 education sector, industry and engineering practice continue to Page 21.32.3evolve, engineering education should, it can be argued, also be transforming. However
effectiveness of the program, the agenda for the upcoming 2013experience has been adjusted to focus less time in the formal classroom environment, and moretime in the field. However, rather than exclusively focusing the field time on construction, theconcepts presented at the beginning of the class (1) history and economics of development andunderdevelopment in Latin America, 2) social capital, 3) the ethical foundation of internationalassistance, and 4) the role of technology in development will be revisited through groupdiscussion and reflection activities.Works Cited[1] A. Strage, College Student Journal 38 (2004) 257-261.[2] R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, The Journal of Higher Education 67 (1996) 221-239.[3] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W
programs have set in stone the needfor graduates to think well beyond the technical domains of engineering5. The culturaldifferences students are likely to encounter when working overseas or liaising withcolleagues offshore has placed an emphasis on global competency and international aspectsof intercultural competency. There is now a substantial body of work exploring this area1-3.Many of the considerations relating to working across national boundaries involve clearlyidentifiable, though not necessarily known, differences in cultural norms and work practices.This discussion paper looks at cross cultural interactions from a different perspective. Itexplores the question:How can subtle cultural differences be managed in engineering education and
many existing programs, which often began as experimental initiatives based on aparticular existing relationship to a particular university abroad. This often makes suchinitiatives both difficult to scale beyond the natural capacity of the initial partnership and, moreimportantly, difficult to expand to other departments, colleges, or institutions. What is needed isa robust, broadly-applicable model for pursuing internationalization of STEM education on acollege-wide basis.In this paper, we provide a starting point for this conversation by discussing our development ofthe Global Science and Engineering Program (GSEP), an ambitious internationalization initiativeuniformly spanning all science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) degree
could apply mathematics himself did not implythat he knew how to use his knowledge in his teaching. It often happened that mathematiciansignored aspects of reality when doing mathematics.In recent research of 2007, Lesh & Zawojewski2 posed the same problem and asserted thatamong mathematics educators there was a common recognition, that a serious mismatch existedand was growing between the skills obtained at schools and the kind of understanding andabilities that were needed for success beyond school. Almost at the same time Ilyenkov3 wroteabout a current problem of ‘the practical application of knowledge to life’. Like Freudenthal in1968, Ilyenkov in 2009 saw the problem in how the subject was taught. He asserted that theattempts of some
Hydrometallurgy, Materials Processing, and Environmental Systems, Academic Press/Elsevier, an undergraduate-level textbook, in preparation – draft chapters used at Dept. of Chemical Eng., University of Toronto, Dept. of Materials Sci. and Eng., MIT (http://www.allbookstores.com/author/Kwadwo Osseo-Asare.html); K. Osseo-Asare, Chemical Principles in Aqueous Processing of Materials. Hydrometallurgy, Materials Processing, and Environmental Systems, a graduate-level textbook, in preparation - draft chapters used at UC Berke- ley. From 1998- 2010 he served as Editor-in-Chief, Hydrometallurgy, International Journal of Aqueous Processing. He has served as a member, Visiting Committee, Division of Materials Science and En
Association for Engineering Education, Sydney, Australia, pp. 222 - 229.13. Svinicki M. (2004), Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom: Anker Publishing.14. Irons A. (2008) , Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment andFeedback: Routledge, 2008.15. Willey K., "SPARKPLUS," http://spark.uts.edu.au/, 2008.16. Runesson, U. (1999), Teaching as constituting a space of variation, in 8th European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Conference, N. Mercer, Ed. Goteborg, Sweden.17. Willey K. & Gardner A.,(2011) Change Learning Culture with Collaboration, in Proceedings of the 2011 SEFI Annual Conference:Global Engineering Recognition, Sustainability, Mobility, Lisbon, Portugal., pp. 93 - 98.18
concern is evident 7.Engineering programs have recognized that they must produce globally competent graduateswho, by working cross culturally, and beyond national boundaries can effectively identifyopportunities, understand market forces, and successfully commercialize new technologies. Thiscall has come from professional organizations including the National Academy of Engineering(NAE) and its widely quoted The Engineer of 2020, the American Society of EngineeringEducation and the American Society for Mechanical Engineers 8, 9. As a result, a small, butgrowing number of engineering programs now imbed international experiences in their curricula.There is a second concern: Can these graduates become world citizens? Engineers mustunderstand that in
and Alignment of Electrical and Information Engineering in European Higher Education InstitutionsIntroductionMobility, recognition, Lifelong Learning (LLL), and accreditation are very important keywordsfor Europe, and also beyond Europe. Global educational policy is to encourage mobility ofpeople, workers and citizens, during their studies and during their professional lives. The generalobjective of the Lifelong Learning Programme in Europe is to contribute through lifelonglearning to the development of the European countries inside European Union (EU) as anadvanced knowledge-based society, with sustainable economic development, more and betterjobs and greater social cohesion, while ensuring good protection of the environment for