Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Dean Palmer, Northern Arizona University; Joseph Flieger, Northern Arizona University; Eddie Hillenbrand

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

, Kölling M. Objects first with Java: a practical introduction using BlueJ.Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.11. Kölling M. Using BlueJ to Introduce Programming. In: Bennedsen J, Caspersen M, KöllingM, eds. Reflections on the Teaching of Programming.Vol 4821. Lecture Notes in ComputerScience. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg; 2008:98-115.12. Kouznetsova S. Using BlueJ and Blackjack to teach object-oriented design concepts in CS1.J. Comput. Small Coll. 2007;22:49–55.13. Patterson A, Kölling M, Rosenberg J. Introducing unit testing with BlueJ. In: ACM SIGCSEBulletin.Vol 35. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2003:11–15. Page 22.985.1414. Henriksen P, Kölling M. greenfoot

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Hossein Hosseini, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Ethan V Munson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Leah Rineck

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

Expansion Program (STEP) under Award No. 0757055.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theauthors would also like to thank Todd Johnson, Tina Current, Sharon Kaempfer, and JenniferKlumpp (all at UWM) for their assistance with this project.Bibliography1. National Science Board. 2003. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing America’s Potential.Publication NSB 03-69. (www.nsf.gov/nsb/documents/2003/nsb0369/nsb0369.pdf)2. Augustine, N. “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a BrighterEconomic Future”, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darrin S. Muggli, Benedictine College; Brian Tande, University of North Dakota

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

widespread use of remote labs, experience has shown that they should not fullyreplace traditional hands-on laboratories…it is difficult, if not impossible, to address all of theeducational objectives for laboratory based courses in a Web-only environment. (Remote Page 22.64.11laboratories) target only 4 of 14 educational objectives recognized by ABET”. Their statement isechoed by another study2 which notes the following: “The vital importance of a comprehensivelaboratory experience in the engineering curricula is widely acknowledged by all constituentsand reflected prominently in the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000”.During Phase I, students travel to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Warren, Kansas State University; Xiongjie Dong, Kansas State University; Tim J. Sobering, Kansas State University; Jason Yao, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

(TUES) Program) under Type I grant DUE–0942425. Opinions,findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. Page 22.91.21References[1] Martinez, Angel. "Acquisition of Heart Rate and Core Body Temperature in Cattle Using Ingestible Sensors," Electrical & Computer Engineering. Manhattan, KS, Kansas State University, 2007, 77 pages.[2] Warren, Steve and Jianchu Yao, "Portable Cyber-Laboratories for Electrical Engineering Education," 2010 Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville, KY

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn E. Kelly, Arizona State University; Dale R. Baker, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

of the different bonding types to the real-world components of a motorcycle. It ties bonding to properties as well as processing methods. Page 22.140.8Figure 3. Concept-in-Context Team Activity on Materials Selection that Connects Bonding-Property-Processing Relationships to Motorcycle Components for Different Materials FamiliesStudents found the processing-bonding relationships quite interesting. In fact, about one third ofthe students found the materials processing aspect of bonding to be the most interesting part ofthe class, as elicited by the class-end Most Interesting Point reflection. While students found theprocessing techniques

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janice M. Margle, Pennsylvania State University, Abington; Catherine L. Cohan, Pennsylvania State University; Yu-Chang Hsu, Boise State University; Jill L. Lane, Clayton State University; Amy Freeman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Javier Gomez-Calderon, Penn State University; Dhushy Sathianathan, California State University, Long Beach; Renata S. Engel, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

campus is directly driven byenrollments and state allocation. Hence, administratively, there are varying degrees of resourcesavailable to each of the 15 regional coalition campuses to address challenges associated withstudent retention. To reduce this disparity and examine the effect of intervention strategiesrelative to the project scope and goals, the retention and academic pathways of STEM degreestudents at these campuses are being tracked as part of the Toys’n MORE project.7. Preliminary Results after Two Semesters of Implementation A. Demographic CharacteristicsBased on the first two semesters of implementation, demographic characteristics for theparticipants reflect the overall enrollment patterns in STEM disciplines across institutions

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan W. Klingbeil, Wright State University; Scott Molitor, University of Toledo; Brian W. Randolph, University of Toledo; Shane A. Brown, Washington State University; Robert G. Olsen, Washington State University; C. Richard Cassady, University of Arkansas

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

under grant numbers DUE-0618571 (CCLI Phase 2), DUE-0622466(STEP Type 1) and DUE-0817332 (CCLI Phase 3), and by a Teaching Enhancement Fund grantat Wright State University. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation or Wright State University.Program InformationMore information on the Wright State model for engineering mathematics education (includingall course materials for EGR 101) can be found on the program website:http://www.engineering.wright.edu/cecs/engmath/Bibliography1. Kerr, A.D., and Pipes, R.B., 1987. “Why We Need Hands-On Engineering Education.” The Journal of Technology Review, Vol. 90

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher W. Swan, Tufts University; Kurt Paterson, Michigan Technological University; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Bradley A. Striebig, James Madison University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

, and advocates.5.0 AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantsNos. 1025207 and 1025220. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.6.0 References 1. ABET (2008). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Evaluations During the 2009- 2010 Accreditation Cycle, 21 pp., ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. www.abet.org 2. Aidoo, J., J. Hanson, K. Sutterer, R. Joughtalen, and S. Ahiamadi (2007). International senior design projects – more lessons learned, National Capstone Design Course Conference

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Jones, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Carmen R. Zafft, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; John Sutton, RMC Research Corporation; Lance C. Pérez, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees

commented on how they felt misinformed on what courses transferred, that thecurriculum transfer Web site at UNL didn’t appear to reflect current courses, and whetherspecific courses would transfer was not clearly stated. The STEP students indicated thataddressing this issue would improve the program. Other suggestions for improvement weresetting up a scholarship for STEP participants and also providing assistance for STEP students toline up an internship.Program Challenges Recruitment The CCs have an unresolved challenge in that it is difficult to recruit students to enter theSTEP project. It should not be surprising that the CCs have a different challenge than UNL-COE, although it manifests itself a bit differently. Neither UNL-STEP