Conference Session

Track 6: Technical Session 6: WIP: Factors Influencing Faculty Pedagogical Decisions around Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Justice (DEIJ) in Engineering: A Comparative Case Study

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Avis Carrero, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

. Rice and D. Mays, “Opinion: Building Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Into anEngineering Course,” vol. 10, no. 4, 2022.[17] C. Haynes, “Restrictive and Expansive Views Of Equality: A Grounded theory Study ThatExplores The Influence Of Racial Consciousness On The Behaviors Of White Faculty In TheClassroom,” 2013.[18] M. Besterfield‐Sacre, M. F. Cox, M. Borrego, K. Beddoes, and J. Zhu, “ChangingEngineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no.2, pp. 193–219, 2014, doi: 10.1002/jee.20043.[19] M. Soledad, J. Grohs, H. Murzi, and D. Knight, “Instructors’ Beliefs on the Importance ofInter-Departmental Curriculum Planning for Engineering Student Learning,” Stud. Eng. Educ.,vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 122–143, 2023

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 5: Motivations for Engineering Faculty Engagement in an Inclusive Pedagogy Program

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Renee M. Desing, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Karen Thomas-Brown, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity