. Figure 1: Common tasks comprising the lifecycle of a productPLM initiatives have applications in many different industries. An essential aspect of using PLMsoftware in the aviation industry is the optimization benefits for servicing and repairing aircraft toensure airline and passenger safety [2]. In the energy sector, Failla et al. [3] researched how oiland gas businesses use PLM solutions to manage manufacturing bills of materials forturbomachinery. In the production of electric vehicles, digital twins of lithium-ion battery packsare used to simulate extreme conditions and “improve the safety and service life of the batterypacks” [4]. Pollard et al. [5] describe how the electrical and electronic (E&E) sector was subjectedto research on how
their work into several key categories,including technical problem-solving, interdisciplinary applications, societal impacts, anddiversity and inclusion initiatives. This classification is informed by KEEN cards, whichhighlight innovative teaching methodologies such as problem-solving studios, project-basedlearning, and entrepreneurship in engineering. Our analysis reveals trends in topics, teachingmethods, and content of the KEEN cards, offering insights into how fellows from differentdisciplines (e.g., mechanical, civil, and chemical engineering) bring distinct approaches tointegrating entrepreneurial mindsets in their curricula. We also identify workshops, such asProblem-Solving Studios and Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset
, we recognized the importance of self-confidence in students'learning outcomes, as highlighted by Chiang, et al. [3]. Consequently, the camp's curriculum wasdesigned to build students' confidence in tackling coding tasks and solving complex problems,fostering a growth mindset in a supportive, collaborative environment.The iterative nature of the camp's development underscores the importance of flexibility andadaptability in educational design, especially in the face of unprecedented challenges like thepandemic. This paper focuses on the camp's 2023 and 2024 iterations, analyzing the impact ofthe program's structure and instructional strategies on student outcomes. By examining pre- andpost-survey data, we aim to contribute to the ongoing
. Plumb and C. Scott, “Outcomes Assessment of Engineering Writing at the University ofWashington,” J. Eng. Educ., 91, pp. 333–338, 2002.[8] R. Cockrum, D. Clark and Z. Mylona, “Motivating students to write technical papers,” Proc.of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference: Designing the Future of Science andEngineering, November 10-13, 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico: Institute of Electrical andElectronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. ISBN: 0-7803-5643-583.[9] D. Russ, “Developing technical writing skills to engineering students,” Procedia Technology,19, pp. 1109 – 1114, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.158[10] Y. Gao, "Teaching Technical Writing to Engineering Students: Design, Implementation, andAssessment for Project-based
completion of his Ph.D. he began working in the Aerospace Industry where he spent over 10 years as a Stress Analyst/Consultant. At present he enjoys working on Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) with his students, designing, analyzing, constructing and flying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Dr. Nader won a few awards in the past few years, among these are the College of Engineering Award of Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (2023), Excellence in Faculty Academic Advising for the College of Engineering and Computer Science (2020). In addition, he is also a Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact