Paper ID #7529Theme-based Teaching /Learning: A New Approach in Teaching Manufac-turing ProcessesDr. Masud Salimian, Morgan State University Faculty at the department of industrial engineering, Morgan State UniversityMr. Yaseen Mahmud, Morgan State UniversityMs. Avis L. Ransom, Morgan State University School of Engineering Early career engagement as a systems and logistics engineer by Department of Defense contractors, Avis Ransom, applied a bachelor’s degree in chemistry and an M.B.A. in the management and development of technology and in the application of engineering to address DoD requirements. Following fifteen years
Paper ID #5878Reform the Intro to Engineering course For Retaining Minority EngineeringFreshmenDr. Singli Garcia-Otero, Virginia State UniversityDr. Nasser Ghariban, Virginia State UniversityDr. Fedra Adnani Page 23.11.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Reforming the Introduction to Engineering Course to Retain Minority Engineering FreshmenAbstractIt is always a challenge to retain engineering students, especially in Historically Black Collegesand Universities (HBCUs) like ours
recruittalented students often from urban and inner city areas. The College of Engineering is a highlyselective and nationally recognized program. The acceptance rate for class of 2016 for theCollege of Engineering was 23% and the average SAT score for the class of 2016 in QuantitativeReasoning was a 720. The University has experienced some challenges in meeting the needs ofstudents entering the University from under-resourced high schools. Many of these high schoolshave not prepared their students thoroughly for the intense rigor of the curriculum in the fields ofscience, engineering and mathematics. While the students who are accepted into the College ofEngineering possess the intellectual ability and character to succeed at the University, they canbe
Paper ID #5746Introduction of New Technologies in the Engineering Technology CurriculumDr. Alireza Rahrooh, Daytona State College Dr. Alireza Rahrooh received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Akron in Ohio in 1979, 1986, and 1990, respectively. He worked as an electronic engineer in Kurdistan from 1979 to 1984. He was involved in conducting sponsored research for the Electrical Power Institute and NASA Lewis Research Center from 1984 to1998. He was appointed to a faculty position in electrical engineering at Penn State University in 1988. In 1994, he joined the faculty of
Paper ID #5828The Perpetual Challenge: Finding a Complementary Balance of Depth andBreadth in an Engineering Curriculum – Approach of the Electrical Engi-neering FacultyDr. Robert J. Albright P.E., University of Portland Robert J. Albright received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from Oregon State Uni- versity, Corvallis, in 1963 and 1965, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington, Seattle, in 1971. He is a Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of Portland, Portland, OR. A member of the faculty of the University of Portland
Paper ID #7100A new approach in Mechatronics Education through Project Based Learningby International CollaborationDr. Devdas Shetty, University of District of Columbia, DC Dr. Shetty is the Dean of the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of DC. Previously he held academic and administrative positions at the University of Hartford, CT, Lawrence Technological University, MI and the Cooper Union New York. He is the author of 3 text books and more than 200 publications. Dr. Arunkumar Giriyapur is a Professor at the BVB College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, Karnataka Stae, India. He is also the
Paper ID #7330An Inexpensive Approach for Teaching Adaptive Filters Using Real-TimeDSP on a New Hardware PlatformMr. Michael G. Morrow, University of Wisconsin-Madison Michael G. Morrow, M.Eng.E.E., P.E., is a faculty associate in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He previously taught at Boise State University and the U.S. Naval Academy. He is the founder and president of Educational DSP (eDSP), LLC, developing affordable DSP education solutions. He is a senior member of the IEEE and a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Cameron H. G
biofuel education in engineering. To help bridge this gap, we have been creatingeducational materials that systematically integrate biofuels technology into undergraduatechemical engineering curriculum. The modular approach we proposed aims to address some ofthe major obstacles of introducing biofuel education into chemical engineering curricula.1 IntroductionIt has been argued that advanced biofuel industry will have significant impact on U.S. economicrecovery and its transition to a sustainable green economy. The U.S. National Academies haveidentified renewable energy as a national scientific strategy aimed at replacing the oil-basedrefinery and transitioning to a green economy. 1 In addition, as shown in a 2009 BiotechnologyIndustry
Paper ID #7765Introducing a Business Acumen into an Engineering CurriculumDr. John J. Burke P.E., Western New England University John Burke received the B.S.E.E. degree from Northeastern University in 1984, and the M.S.E.E. de- gree from University of California at Los Angeles in 1986, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 1993. Dr. Burke joined the faculty of Western New England University (WNE) in 2000 and since 2004 he has been an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering. Dr. Burke’s primary teaching inter- ests are Electromagnetics, Physics of Semiconductor Devices
., Volk, T.L., Ramsey, J.M. (Eds.), Essential Readings in Environmental Education, 2nd Ed. (pp. 33-35). Champaign, Ill: Stipes Publishing L.L.C.4 Kucharski, G.A., J.O. Rust, T.R. Ring (2005). Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures, and Global (EFG) Curriculum: A Project-Based Approach. Education, 125(4), 652.5 DeWaters, J.E., S.E. Powers (2011). Energy Literacy of Secondary Students in New York State. Energy Policy. 39, 1699–1710. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.049.6 Bednarz, S.W. (2000). Connecting GIS and problem based learning. In: Audet, R. & Ludwig, G. (Eds.), GIS in Schools. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.7 Lambros, A. (2004). Problem-Based Learning in Middle and High School Classrooms: A Teacher's Guide to
Paper ID #6766Efficient and Effective Instruction in Process Simulation Across the ChemicalEngineering CurriculumDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Rebecca K. Toghiani is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at MSU. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. all in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. She re- ceived the 1996 Dow Outstanding New Faculty Award and the 2005 Outstanding Teaching Award from the ASEE Southeastern Section. A John Grisham Master Teacher at MSU, she is an inaugural member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers
Paper ID #6230A Hands-On, Active Learning Approach to Increasing Manufacturing Knowl-edge in Engineering StudentsDr. Jay R. Goldberg P.E., Marquette University Jay R. Goldberg, Ph.D, P. E. is a Clinical Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Marquette University, and Director of the Healthcare Technologies Management program at Marquette University and the Medical College of Wisconsin (Milwaukee). He teaches courses involving project management, new product development, and medical device design. His experience includes development of new prod- ucts in urology, orthopedics, GI, and dentistry. Dr. Goldberg
this newlydeveloped approach is an effective tool to assess student learning and can be adapted by otherUniversity Engineering programs. Recommendations and guidelines on incorporating thisapproach across the curriculum are provided.IntroductionFGCU is the newest public university in Florida. Established in 1997, FGCU attractsthousands of new freshmen each year because of its commitment to academic excellencecombined with a growing regional population. FGCU first admitted engineering students in2006 and debuted with three majors leading towards the Bachelor of Science degrees inBioengineering, Civil Engineering, and Environmental Engineering. In 2010, three (3)programs received full ABET accreditation for six (6) years. Rowan University offers
experiencing every aspect ofimplementing new material, they can provide a unique perspective to the design andimplementation process. Teachers are a valuable resource to curriculum developers.The CIC in partnership with Louisiana Tech University has developed a range of new curriculafor K-12. The educational programs from NICERC span three states. The demographic makeupof the schools implementing the curriculum is diverse including urban, rural, and suburbanregions. The development model used to design these courses is based on the engineering designprocess5, 6. NICERC Subject Matter Experts, which included engineering and science facultyfrom Louisiana Tech University, designed the two courses with the fundamental content in mind.The design teams for
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A new motivation and perspective on teaching simulation and design: The development of a dynamic process model in conjunction with an operator training simulator (OTS)IntroductionDuring the past five years, the author was involved, as part of a team of researchers anddevelopers, in building an Operator Training Simulator (OTS) for an Integrated GasificationCombined Cycle (IGCC) power plant. In a companion project, a 3-D fully Immersive TrainingSystem (ITS) was developed for the same IGCC power plant OTS. During this process, theeducational potential of both the OTS and ITS became evident and provides the motivation forthis paper.Traditional process/plant
the field of algorithm visualization, which explores technology and pedagogical approaches that enhance human understanding of computer algorithms. He is also one of the leaders of a national effort, funded by the National Science Foundation CPATH and CCLI programs, to adapt studio-based instructional methods for undergraduate computing education and chemical engineering education.Mr. Adam Scott Carter, Washington State University Page 23.1298.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Use of Studio-based Learning in a Material/Energy Balance ClassFor more than a century
Paper ID #5711Development of a New Power Electronics Curriculum Relevant to Tomor-row’s Power Engineering ChallengesMr. Nicholas David, Iowa State University Nicholas David received his B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin–Platteville in 2009. He has worked in the wind power industry and is currently a graduate student in electrical engi- neering at Iowa State University. He has interests in power electronics and machine drives for renewable energy applications.Mr. Suman Debnath, Purdue University Suman Debnath was born in Thiruvananthapuram, India in 1988. He received his bachelor’s and
Paper ID #6082Micromachining: A New Trend in ManufacturingProf. Farzin Heidari, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Heidari currently serves as Associate Professor of industrial management and technology at Texas A&M University, Kingsville. Dr. Heidari has 23 years of experience in manufacturing and CAD/CAM/CNC courses. He is currently serving as the Graduate Coordinator for the Industrial Management program. Page 23.907.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
antennas, microwaves, plasmas, teaching, and ethics.Dr. Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University Paul R. Leiffer, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology and Chairman of the Engineering Department at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 1979. He is the co-developer of LeTourneau’s program in Biomedical Engineering. He received his B.S.E.E. from the State University of New York at Buffalo, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Drexel University. His professional interests include biomedical signal processing, engineering design, and engineering ethics. Page
New Engineering FacultyAbstractThe participants populating our schools are becoming more diverse. They are coming from avariety of cultures and have different learning styles. They also have unique interests andvarious levels of maturity. As technical teachers, we frequently teach a blend of theoretical andapplied engineering topics. Our goal is to provide our students with the skills and knowledgethey require to safely and accurately accomplish their jobs to high standards of quality in a costeffective manner. Central to providing effective instruction is knowing something about howpeople learn. The more we know about the learning process the more effective we can be indesigning and delivering appropriate instruction. A one-size-fits-all
, especially those at the beginner’s level, typicallytend to associate literature with ‘textual information’ and huge volumes of books. While aseasoned faculty member or a researcher is quite used to reading voluminous literature,students and non-domain audience may find this challenging. Hence, this paper puts forth anovel approach wherein an interactive multidimensional dVR framework is used tomethodically organize and present engineering and technological literature. Technologicalliterature is represented as geometry objects embedded in a graphic interface that facilitatesviewing from multiple perspectives (literature-wise) and sort and re-structure the literature asrequired. Users can navigate within this 3D environment and interact with scene
NSF and CBRI. His research cur- rently involves the NS-3 project and real-time software simulations in the mm-wave domain.Mr. Paul T Phamduy, Polytechnic Institute of New York University Paul Phamduy received a B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering, from the University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML) in 2010. Upon graduation, he started research in the Nanometrology and Sensors Lab- oratory at UML. Paul completed his M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2012 focusing in the composite materials. He is currently serving as a teaching Fellow at the Pathways in Technology Early College HS under NYU-Poly’s GK-12 program funded by the NSF and CBRI. He is pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Polytechnic
taskanalysis, work modelling, use-case modelling and process map, used in other domains such assoftware engineering design and healthcare [13]. The PAC workflow model is in line with theRational-Linear approach, which represents one of the strongest traditions in the curriculumdevelopment. In addition, the PAC workflow model reflects research on instructionaldevelopment models. A summary of the actions initiated at the PAC project according to the proposedmodel is featured below.6.1 Reference Situation The content of the curriculum should be determined by the referent situation; that isthe work situation in which students who are enrolled in the curriculum will apply theirknowledge, skills, and attitudes after graduation. There can be
expanding role of chemical engineering in pharmaceutical productiondemands the inclusion of pharma-related concepts in chemical engineering courses throughoutthe curriculum. Successful curriculum improvement requires a new approach to integratingconcepts of batch processing, solid-liquid separation techniques, solid-solid particulateprocessing, drug formulation and delivery, and technology at the nano-scale. Students must havea solid grasp of chemical engineering fundamentals and the perspective necessary to worksuccessfully side-by-side with pharmacists, pharmacologists, medicinal chemists, and materialschemists in this highly multidisciplinary field.The field of pharmaceutical engineering is quite broad and involves the manufacture of the
Paper ID #7243Introducing Software Defined Radio into Undergraduate Wireless Engineer-ing Curriculum through a Hands-on ApproachProf. Shiwen Mao, Auburn University Dr. Shiwen Mao received a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York University in 2004. Currently, he is the McWane Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Auburn University in Auburn, AL. Dr. Mao’s research interests include performance analysis, optimization, and algorithms for wireless networks. He was awarded the McWane Endowed Professorship in the Samuel Ginn College of
Paper ID #5715Alternative Approaches to Incorporate Design for Safety into ConstructionEngineering CurriculaDr. Robert G. Batson P.E., University of Alabama Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor of construction engineering in the Department of Civil, Con- struction, and Environmental Engineering at The University of Alabama. He holds a Ph.D. in Applied Mathematics and an M.S. in Industrial Engineering, both received from The University of Alabama in 1979. He teaches required undergraduate courses in construction engineering, safety engineering, engi- neering management, and applied statistics, and graduate courses
Paper ID #7659Teaching Undergraduate Introductory Course to Mechatronics in the Me-chanical Engineering Curriculum Using ArduinoDr. Jose Antonio Riofrio, Western New England University Jos´e A Riofr´ıo received his B.S. in Engineering Physics from Elizabethtown College in 2003, and his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Vanderbilt University in 2005 and 2008, respectively. At Vanderbilt, Jos´e focused his research in controls, mechatronics and mechanical design. After obtaining his Ph.D., Jos´e worked in the Fluid Power industry designing servo-pneumatic control systems for various motion-control applications
active learning. We believe that engineering education needs fundamental modifications and new approaches to match the needs of the 21st Century. In previous papers and presentations, we have discussed classes and curricula that are based on the Deweyan pragmatic philosophy and argued that they have tremendous potential for creating critical thinkers and lifelong learners and therefore more adaptable problem solvers than the current crop of engineering-‐education graduates. Authors have also identified the studio model as the best course structure for accommodating Deweyan philosophy. However, a shift to that model requires a comprehensive review
components are unclear on thesyllabus and suggested that workshops or talks can help clarify them. They also suggested thatfew design components such as Background Survey & Patent Search, Statistical Analysis &Experiment, Economic Analysis & Mass Production and Reliability & Sustainability Analysiscould be combined. An additional comment was that the grading was confusing if a senior and ajunior work on the same paper. These comments will be implemented in the new improvedversion of syllabus for spring 2013.References 1. Wilczynski, V., Douglas, M., (1995) ” Integrating Design Across the Engineering Curriculum: A Report From the Trenches,” Journal of Engineering Education, v84 n3 p235-40 2. Nicolai, L.M., (1998
the development of these fields just as much as society is driven by them ii. As sciencecontinues to grow in our society, so does the need for science literacy among the population. Asmore science appears in the news, citizens need to be able to understand and participate in publicpolicy discussions and make informed decisions based on their understanding of the informationfrom the discourse iii. Therefore, the education and outreach programs at the laboratory are animportant part of its mission.The BOI of the laboratory is generally separate from that of its researchers. The generallaboratory goals of the outreach are: 1. To increase awareness of and esteem for the profession of engineering as whole, and specifically civil engineering