Paper ID #6813Gritty students: The effect of perseverance on retention for traditional andnontraditional studentsDr. Anne-Marie A Lerner, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Anne-Marie Lerner is an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville collaborative program located at the University of Wisconsin - Rock County. In her capacity as assistant professor, she works extensively with place-bound, nontraditional students in face-to-face as well as streaming video capacity. Her professional interests include investigating effective teaching pedagogy for remote delivery as well as to nontraditional
Paper ID #6202CAREER: Cognitive Models of Conceptual Understanding in Practicing CivilEngineers and Development of Situated Curricular MaterialsDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Dr. Shane Brown conducts research on cognition and conceptual change in engineering. He received his bachelor’s and Ph.D. degrees from Oregon State University, both in Civil Engineering. His Ph.D. degree includes a minor in Science and Mathematics Education. His master’s degree is in Environmental Engineering from the University of California-Davis. Dr. Brown is a licensed professional civil engineer and has six years of
to promote community building as well as to buildcollaborations not only within the proposed LINCR collaborations, but to extend into the otherlabs attending this conference. A unique aspect of the LINCR program was that the LFs were also required to completebiweekly educational prompts throughout the program as pilot materials for an educational classin the proposed neurobiotechnology curriculum at Georgia Tech (Appendix B). A samplesolution created by the LINCR planning committee was provided for each educational prompt toguide the LFs through the educational prompt process. These prompts were intended to informLINCR fellows about possible ways to translate their LINCR research experience beyond just‘pure research’ into possible
Paper ID #7553The Impact of Inclusive Excellence Programs on the Development of Engi-neering Identity among First-Year Underrepresented StudentsDr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram and Laboratory. He holds a BA in psychology from Louisiana State University, and an MS degree in industrial/organizational psychology and PhD degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Prior to joining the University of Colorado at Boulder, he gained extensive experience in assessment and
Paper ID #7620Implementation and Assessment of a Blended Learning Environment as anApproach to Better Engage Students in a Large Systems Design ClassProf. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an associate professor in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. Previously, he has held faculty positions centered on engineering design at the University of Arizona and the University of Dayton. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech. in 1997 and 2000. He earned his B.S.E. in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University in 1995.Prof
Paper ID #6707Conceptual Understanding of the Electrical Concepts of Voltage and Cur-rent: A Pilot Study of a Method to Create Representations of Students’ Men-tal ModelsProf. Mark T Carnes PE, Purdue University, Electrical Engineering Technology Mark T. Carnes, Purdue University Mark Carnes is a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) and is currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Technology at Purdue University. He is also nearing completion of studies for a doctorate in Engineering Education, also at Purdue. Before coming to Purdue, he spent over 30 years as an electronics designer of control and power
Paper ID #6708Developing Best Practices for an Undergraduate STEM Summer ResearchProgram in a Government Institution through a Higher Education Partner-shipJessica Drennan MSW, Centers for Disease Control Jessica Drennan received a B.A. in Communication Arts from the College of Mount St. Joseph in Cincin- nati, OH and a M.S.W. from Washington University in St. Louis, MO. She is currently an ORISE Evalua- tion fellow at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga. From 2011 to 2012, she was the Internal Program Evaluator and Evaluation Committee chair with the LEADER Consortium, a National Science Foundation
Paper ID #6941A New Multidisciplinary Course in Sustainability using a Combination ofTraditional Lecture and Self-Directed Study ModulesDr. Jeffrey R Seay, University of Kentucky Dr. Jeffrey R. Seay is an Assistant Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky, Paducah Extended Campus. Dr. Seay joined the University of Kentucky in 2008 following a 12 year career in the chemical industry. Dr. Seay completed his BS and PhD from Auburn University and his MS from the University of South Alabama, all in Chemical Engineering. His primary research area is process systems engineering focused on
Paper ID #6295Barrier to Green Building Construction on Long Island, NY – A lesson LearnFrom A senior Project AssignmentDr. Amitabha Bandyopadhyay, State University of New York, Farmingdale Dr Bandyopadhyay is a SUNY Distinguished Service Professor and Chair of Architecture and Construc- tion Management Department at Farmingdale State College. He is also the Director of Green Building Institute at the college. He is currently (2012-13) the Chair of Engineering Technology Accreditation Commssion of ABET. Page 23.239.1
Paper ID #6085Preferential Learning of Students in a Post-Secondary Introductory Engi-neering Graphics Course: A Preliminary Study Focused on Students At-RiskDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremy V. Ernst is an assistant professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. Dr. Ernst specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development
Paper ID #6441The Four Pillars of Manufacturing as a Tool for Evaluating Course Contentin the Mechanical Concentration of a General Engineering CurriculumDr. Gayle E. Ermer, Calvin College Dr. Gayle Ermer is a professor of engineering at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, MI. She teaches in the mechanical engineering concentration in the areas of machine dynamics and manufacturing processes. Her master’s degree was obtained from the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in manufacturing systems engineering (1987), and her Ph.D. from Michigan State University (1994) in mechanical engineering. Her research interests include
Paper ID #7916Using the E in STEM as a Catalyst for Science and Mathematics CurriculumReform in a Large School DistrictDr. Susan A. Pruet, Mobile Area Education Foundation Dr. Pruet has been actively involved in STEM education – as a teacher, teacher educator and direc- tor of reform initiatives for over 30 years. She received her undergraduate degree in mathematics from Birmingham-Southern College, her master’s degree in secondary education from the University of Al- abama in Birmingham, and her Ph.D. from Auburn University in mathematics education. Since 1998 she has directed two STEM reform initiatives for the Mobile
Paper ID #7793Integrating Cyber Infrastructure with Physical LaboratoriesProf. Yongpeng Zhang, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Yongpeng Zhang received his Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Houston in 2003, then joined Prairie View A&M University as a post-doctoral researcher. Dr. Zhang was then appointed to work as a tenure-track assistant professor in Engineering Technology in 2004. He was pro- moted to associate professor with tenure in 2010. His research interests are control system, mechatronics, motor drive, and power electronics. His research has been widely recognized and funded by
. from the University of Illinois - Urbana/Champaign under the direction of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. Her areas of research include design of optoelectronic materials, devices, and systems; optical spectroscopy; high heat load packaging; and electrical engineering pedagogy.Dr. A. A. (Louis) Beex, Virginia Tech A. A. (Louis) Beex received the ”Ingenieur” degree from Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, in 1974, and the Ph.D. degree from Colorado State University, Fort Collins CO, in 1979; both in Electrical Engineering. His research interests lie in stochastic, digital, and adaptive signal pro- cessing, including algorithm analysis and design for applications involving acoustic, wireless, speech, and
Paper ID #8175Designing the Design Experience - Identifying Factors of Student Motivationin Project-Based Learning and Project-Based Service-LearningMs. Lauren A Cooper, University of Colorado Boulder Lauren is a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder and an Assistant Teaching Professor at the Colorado School of Mines. Her research in engineering education is focused on understanding the impacts of project-based learning and project-based service-learning on student motivation.Dr. Daria A Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado Boulder Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Design Center
Paper ID #6821Engineering Learning CommunitiesDr. Pamela Renee Lockwood, West Texas A&M UniversityDr. Emily M. Hunt, West Texas A&M University Dr. Hunt joined the College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering at West Texas A&M University in 2005. She received B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech. Univer- sity in 2001, 2002 and 2005, respectively. She is currently serving as the interim director of the School of Engineering and Computer Science at West Texas A&M University Dr. Hunt teaches primarily in the ther- mal fluid sciences including fluid mechanics and
Princeton and her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Tech. She spent two years working for Honeywell, Inc. as a controls engineer. She spent ten years working on hands-on education and has won several awards including the Harriet B. Rigas Award from the IEEE Education Society.Dr. Dianna Newman Mohamed Chouikha is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Howard University. He received his MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Colorado – Boulder. Dr. Chouikha’s research interests include, among other areas, machine learning, in- telligent control, and multimedia signal processing communications for secure networks. He also focuses on enhancing
softwarethat support effective implementations of our activities.2. A Taste of iMPaCT-MathA main strength of iMPaCT is that it provides an experiential-visual context for students to makeconnections across multiple representations: (a) statements in a program, (b) computationalprocess; (c) graphical output, and (d) underlying mathematical concepts.For example, to interpret plots of functions (a major learning outcome of Algebra I), studentsmust be proficient at reading graphs including accurately identifying and differentiating the Page 23.1332.5and axes and understanding that a point’s position is defined by a unique coordinate. Inan early
major, while Table 3-B summarizes the post-programsurvey results. Cumulative results for the four years (column labeled "Total") indicate that thelargest increase in the number of students' intended major is in Civil Engineering (+9), followedby Mechanical Engineering (+5), and Electrical Engineering (+3). The largest decrease is inEngineering (-11), followed by Undecided (-5), and Computer Engineering (-2). The largedecrease in the number of students who initially declared a "general" Engineering major showsthat after participating in SEI, these students have been able to identify a specific engineeringfield of interest to them. These results also indicate that after participating in the program andgaining an understanding of the different
Mr. B Embodiment of consciousness Needing others to understand reality Mr. C Able to see connections to larger contexts Diverse cultural links in constructing knowledge in connection to Mr. F the historic and cultural context Expresses that there is a need to understand how something really Ms. K works before being able to accurately improve or change it Awareness of resistance Mr. S A synthesizer/connector who recognizes the importance of team building to collaborate and negotiate in academia
) Type 2 project (DUE 1065486) founded on a precursor NSF Page 23.651.2Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Type 1 project, Inventory ofEvaluation Tools for Engineering Education Projects. The Inventory project (a) established theneed for a readily available repository of high quality evaluation tools to support evaluation ofengineering education projects, (b) identified some of the tools and characteristics that may bevaluable for an evaluation tools database, and (c) identified potential user groups who couldbenefit from an engineering education evaluation tools database. As part of the precursor project,a panel of national
which can be found in the references suggested byDym et al5. Substantial reformative progress on a broad scale has been made since EngineeringCriteria 2000 was first introduced as an ABET initiative designed to make step changes inengineering education6. It recommends assessment metrics designed to assist programs withcontinuous improvement. Commonly, Criterion 3 – Program Outcomes and Assessment, isdiscussed. According to ABET, engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduateshave: (a) ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering, (b) ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data, (c) ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, (d
multipliers (βi ) for the observed criterion variable values for each predictor at each step. OR: the odds ratio which is equal to exp(B), also written eB . This is the multiplicative amount by which the odds of non-persistence change per 1 point of change in the predictor, after the remaining predictors in the model at that step are held constant. For example, the 0.959 odds ratio for conscientiousness in step 1 indicates that the odds of non-persistence are multiplicatively lowered by 0.959 with each one point increase in a respondent’s conscientiousness score. -2LL and ∆-2LL: These values are relative badness-of-fit indicators, that is, large numbers mean poorer fit of the model to the
Grants #0836041 and #1226325.Bibliography 1. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall. 2. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Rev. of Educational Res., 66, 543-578. 3. Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future goal attainment: Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 60-80. 4. Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children's achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and
large-scale experimentation of reinforced concrete, FRP composite, and hybrid bridges.Prof. Catherine W. French, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Catherine French is College of Science and Engineering Distinguished Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota. She received her B. C.E. from the University of Min- nesota in 1979. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign in 1980 and 1984, respectively. She has been a member of the faculty of the University of Minnesota since 1984. Her research addresses the behavior of reinforced and prestressed concrete struc- tural systems, field monitoring of bridges, numerical and experimental
andrepresent individual pieces of students' knowledge or strategies of reasoning3. These facets wereclustered within particular domains of understanding, such as force and motion. For each cluster,facets were organized as: (a) appropriate or acceptable understanding for introductory physics,(b) arising from formal instruction, but either overgeneralized or undergeneralized in application,or (c) more problematic and needing instructional intervention to prevent student difficulty withthe cluster or ideas in related clusters3. This information was used in turn to develop items inwhich the answer choices were associated with specific facets of student thinking. In summary,Minstrell recommends the use of qualitative research strategies, such as open-ended
. Steyn-Ross and A. Riddell, “Standing waves in a microwave oven,” The Physics Teacher 28, 474 (1990).7. National Institute of Standards and Technology Atomic Spectra Database: http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm8. R. B. Kidd and S. L. Fogg, “A Simple Formula for the Large Angle Pendulum Period,” The Physics Teacher 40,81 (January 2002)9. D. S. Lemons, Perfect Form, Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press (1997)10. C. W. Wong and K. Yasui, “Falling Chain,” American Journal of Physics 74, 490-496 (2006).11. A. S. Green, P. R. Ohmann, N. E. Leininger, and J. A.Kavanaugh, “Polarization Imaging and Insect Vision,” ThePhysics Teacher 48, 17 (January 2010).12. K. J. Braun, C. R. Lytle, J. A.Kavanaugh, J. A.Thielen, andA. S. Green, “A Simple
dominatethe separation pattern, and hence alter the former separation of cells according to size.This effect can be observed in Fig. 4a where green bead settling velocity first equals, andthen surpasses turquois settling velocity. Fig. 4b depicts the change in settling pattern inthe intermediate regime. In this region the tiny and dense glass beads will settle thefastest and towards the bottom end of the elutriator, even below the largest beigeparticles. Note that the black and turquoise beads represent an azeotrope condition whereno separation between these two particles occurs. Page 23.1389.7 (a) (b)Figure 4
Newman fromthe Department of Chemistry at IUPUI for their contribution in teaching and supervisingresearch projects in nanotechnology for students pursuing this track. The development of thetrack was supported by National Science Foundation–Nanotechnology Undergraduate Education(NUE) grant 1042110.References:1. Zheng W., Shih H. R., Lozano K., Pei J. S., Kiefer K., and Ma X., “A Practical Approach to Integrating Nanotechnology Education and Research into Civil Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum,” J. Nano. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 22-33, 2009.2. Mehta B. R., “Nano Education at Indian Institutes of Technology: A Status Report,” J. Nano. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 106-108, 2009.3. Certificate in Nanotechnology and Nanoscience, George Mason
alloowed while doingthe experiment in thee virtual ph b the expeeriment in tthe end has to be perfoormed hysics lab, butindividuallly. Group discussions area encouraged because tthey stimulaate innovativve thinking. Aftercompletin ng the experriment, a po ost test is conducted c oon the samee topic. Thee time periood forconducting the post teest is 20 minutes. On an n average, sstudents havve 2 minutess for solvingg eachquestion. The levell of difficultty of the pre--test is comp parable to thhat of the posst-test. The qquestions aree almost id dentical but not