, zero points is awardedfor automated carts with the only power circuit being battery-based. Other “green” alternatives Page 23.246.11are evaluated on a case-by-case basis. B is the sum of bricks successfully transported from thestarting location to the end location 25 feet away. T is the number of trips required to transportthe bricks. The time, t, is calculated in seconds from 0 to 300 (five minutes). Time for all teamsis stopped at five minutes. Each time a cart goes off-track and has to be manually readjusted tenseconds is added to time score. Also, if the bricks are transported individually, ten seconds areadded for each unloading/loading
Engineering Education, 2001. 90(4): p. 477-489.7. Bell, A., et al., "Stereotype Threat and Women’s Performance in Engineering." Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(4): p. 307-312.8. Wolfe, J. and E. Powell, "Biases in Interpersonal Communication: How Engineering Students Perceive Gender Typical Speech Acts in Teamwork." Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 98(1): p. 5-16.9. Marra, R. and B. Bogue, "Self Efficacy in Women Engineering Students: Three Years of Data at U.S. Institutions," in American Society for Engineering Education. 2007: Honolulu, HI. p. 15 pp.10. Jones, B.D., et al., "An analysis of motivation constructs with first-year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies
had not otherwise been exposed to.Impact on future careers:Lastly, students in the Pavlis Institute expect to be better prepared for careers in increasingly globalizedfields of engineering and scientific research. Students are exposed to working in foreign cultures duringtheir international experience. This familiarity with working with members of other cultures preparesPavlis Institute students to work and live in a world that is becoming increasingly interconnected.References[1] A: Member of the 2012 Ghana travel group, B: Member of the 2012 India travel group[2] Pepitone, Julianne. "Tech stars plan City Slickers-style cattle drive." CNN Money. 31 Mar 2011: Web. 28 Nov. 2012. .[3] Dao, Francisco. "Without
-a.s.go, ASET(AccFditation Bo.rd for Enginoo.tng.nd Tgchnology),thg primary accroditationorganizatlonfor poat secondaryengineeringand tochnobgtac5demtc uniE in tho UnitedStat s, ruvlaedit3 r€quiEmentsfor undergraduatop.ogram6lead-iigto a bacheto/s of sciencedegrceln engim€ring. The n€w standaratt,known as EC200O, ,equire liat studenb receivingthe B.S,dogreenundorstand the tmpactof engii€eringsolutionl in a gtobal,economrc, envinonmental! andtocietalcontoxl.,, ThefollowingquertionnaiEIs dtvidodinto fivesho secuons: A. You. collegoor univeEity's a$pon3e to tfte ABETstandarde B. Youaacademicuoit,sexpedence with onlinecouEes C. Your aGademlcunifs interult in ofiering edd[ionrl onlin6 course3to mo€tthe ABET
experience." International Conference on Engineering Education. 2002. 18 Flores, B., and Piana, C.K.D. "Undergraduate student retention strategies for urban engineering colleges." Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000. FIE 2000. 30th Annual. Vol. 1. IEEE, 2000. 19 Martin, T. W., Brown, W.D. "A downsized, laboratory-‐intensive curriculum in electrical engineering." Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. 27th Annual Conference.'Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change'. Proceedings.. Vol. 2. IEEE, 1997. 20 Kiran, KPS, Engineering colleges to get another chance. Times of India, February 24, 2013. http://www. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city
. Feedbackprovided back to students is discussed briefly, but was tailored to each individual project, whichis difficult to describe in a manuscript such as this one. Lastly, qualitative student assessmentsare provided. Page 23.1061.3Course structure & Role of concept development projectsIt is widely touted that the use of research ideas can create excitement for learning in theclassroom8-12. The primary course goals were to a) enhance student familiar with small-scaletechnology with a focus on biomedical diagnostic applications, and b) to develop basicinformation synthesis skills essential for research within a single semester. The course coveredboth
(revised approach) consisted of 42 students (19 females and 23 males) from two more-recent Statics classes (fall 2010 and fall 2011). Both classes were taught by the first author usingthe revised approach.Because there is always the possibility that one cohort happens to be more academically adeptthan the other, the prior academic performance of each cohort was examined in terms of theirgrade point average (GPA) in prerequisite mathematics and science courses, specifically,Calculus I, Calculus II, Physics I, and Physics II. The GPA for these courses was calculatedusing the following four-point scale: A 4.000 B 3.000 C 2.000 D 1.000 A 3.667 B
, toachieve three things: (1) the students could appreciate better the physics and engineeringprinciples underlying the components. (2) The students could manipulate these components at ahigh level of abstraction, so they were not burdened with technological and software details. (3)They feel empowered to manipulate the robotic platform to achieve their specific goals.V. B. The Robots Constructed by Students: Figure 2 shows the two versions of robots thatour student teams built. The second version robots (to the right) were built and used by the highschool students. These robots had fewer wheels and used a lighter pen fixed in the center of theplatform, rather than at the back as with the first version of the robots (to the left) built and usedby
Research Association (AERA), 2010, Denver, CO.3. Streveler, R. A., Geist, M. R., Ammerman, R.F., Sulzbach, C. S., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., &Nelson, M. A. The development of a professional knowledge base: The persistence of substance-based schemas in engineering students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the AmericanEducational Research Association, 2006, Chicago, IL.4. Prince, M.J., Vigeant, M.A.S. & Nottis,K. A preliminary study on the effectiveness of Page 23.1231.6inquirybased activities for addressing misconceptions of undergraduate engineering students.Education for Chemical Engineers, 2009. 4(2), 29-41.5. The Pedagogical
d(k) + Input x(n) Adaptive Output y(n) Error e(n) Signal Filter Signal - Signal Adaptive Algorithm Figure 1. Block diagram of a typical adaptive noise cancellation systemThe signals shown in Figure 1 are described as follows:a. The vector ( ) represents the is the input vector of time delayed input values and ( ) is the input at time . ( ) [ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )] (1)b. The vector ( ) is used to represent the
of data collection, prospective study participants were sent an email messagefrom a top internal executive (a) asking for participation; (b) describing the common humansubjects research process; (c) elaborating regarding confidentiality assurances; (d) assuringparticipant anonymity as part of the aggregate data analysis; (e) reporting steps in researchprocess (f) reinforcing importance of filling out both Time 1 and Time 2 surveys, and (g)providing the open option for both employees and leaders to not participate in the study.Reminder invitations were emailed twice more during Time 1; and a re-invitation and two morereminders were deployed at Time 2.All respondents at Time 1, (followers/employees and leaders/managers) provided demographic
details of each e presenttation are athttp://ef.eengr.utk.edu u/RISER/pre-calculus/maath-130/.Algebra anda quadratiic equations:: Since the engineering e instructor iss a structurall engineer, hebegan thee visits by deescribing wh hat he did in his professiional practicce. The enginneeringillustratio on was desig gn of a reinfo orced concreete beam. Thhe formula tto determinee the requireddarea of thhe reinforcem ment steel is: wu l 2 1 As f y 0.9 As f y d 8 2 0.8 f b c where wu is the load = 200 lb/in; ݈ is the leng gth
technical elective, would go far inenabling students to handle engineering-type data more proficiently.iv) Reshuffling design topics in prerequisites - In the process of designing various structuralmembers for buildings, the teaching staff have noted two discrepancies in design prerequisites: a)the subjects need to be realigned i.e., to have the topics properly sequenced; and, b) the need tointroduce the students to local/regional design practices, making use of local codes. A strongargument has emerged with regard to the timing of the capstone experience. Many have arguedthat capstone courses occur much too late in an engineering student education (?).v) The infusion of design concepts in a first-year introductory course - A first year
. Page 23.459.153. Pomberger, G., “Software Engineering Education — Adjusting our Sails,” Education and Computing, vol. 8, no. 4, 1993, pp. 287-294.4. Thorpe, J. F., “Design of Mechanical Systems: A Capstone Course in Mechanical Engineering Design,” ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 1984), pp. 803-807.5. Todd, R. H., S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan and D. K Anthony, “A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, no. 2, 1995, pp. 165-174.6. Banios, E. W., “Teaching Engineering Practices,” Proceedings, 1992 Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 1992, pp. 161-168.7. Todd, R. H., C. D. Sorensen, and S. P. Magleby, “Designing a Senior capstone Course to Satisfy
. 2005, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Volume 37, Number 4, pp. 399-409.13. Future Directions of the Conferencing and Collaboration Field. Keary, Alfie and Redfern, Sam. 2012, International Journal of e-Collaboration, VOlume 8, Issue 2, pp. 1-24.14. Creative expression in virtual worlds: Imitation, imagination, and individualized collaboration. . Ward, Thomas B. and Sonneborn, Marcene S. 2011, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Volume 1(S), pp. 32-47.15. Digital Mastery: The Skills Needed for Effective Virtual Leadership. Roy, Shelly R. 2012, International Journal of e-Collaboration, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 56-66.16. Sense of Virtual Community: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation . Koh, Joon and Kim
final two weeks of the program includedcompletion of work in a U.S. research lab and preparation for an academic- year activity in whichresults were disseminated in a K-12 environment.The assessment question for the program that we were interested in is “How does theInternational Research Experience for Students in Mexico Program influence the overall studentlearning experience in preparing future engineers who are culturally prepared to confrontglobal science and engineering challenges?” In order to answer this question, six sub-questions(Assessment sub-question #A, Assessment sub-question #B, Assessment sub-question #C,Assessment sub-question #D, Assessment sub-question #E , and Assessment sub-question #F)were developed and will guide the
: Reality and Promise”, Society for Marketing Professional ServicesFoundation, 2009.[13] Ashcraft, H.W., “Negotiating an Integrated Project Delivery Agreement”, The Construction Lawyer, Vol. 31(3):pp. 17,34,49-50, 2011.[14] Weigle, G.W. and Garber, S.,” Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Project Target Cost Estimate (PTCE)Relative to Traditional Project Delivery and Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)”, Facility Care, 2010.[15] Abdulaziz A, B., “Incentive/disincentive contracts and its effects on industrial projects”, International Journalof Project Management, Vol. 21(1), pp. 63-70, 2003.[16] Lam, S. and Tang, C. “Responsibilities of Engineering Surveyors under ISO 9000 Certification in Hong KongConstruction Industry”.Journal of Geospatial
transformative sustainable education, presented at AASHE 2010 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12)4 Rhodes, F.H.T., Sustainability: the Ultimate Liberal Art. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53 (9): B24, 2006.5 Minsker, B. A Framework for Integrating Sustainability Education, Research, Engagement, and Operations through Experiential Learning, presented at AASHE 2011 (Pittsburgh PA) (accessed 5/22/12).6 Hauser, J.R., D. Clausing (1988) The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 63-73.7 Hacker, M., Barden B., Living with Technology, 2nd edition. Delmar Publishers, Albany NY, 1993.8 Crismond, D.P., R.S. Adams (2012). The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101(4): 738-797
Paper ID #7610The T-shaped Engineer: Connecting the STEM to the TOPProf. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Joe Tranquillo was the second faculty member in the new Biomedical Engineering Program at Bucknell University and helped build an accredited department with seven faculty and 60 undergraduate students. His teaching interests are in biomedical signals and systems, neural and cardiac electrophysiology, and medical device design. Nationally Tranquillo has published or presented over 50 peer reviewed or invited works in the field of engineering education. In 2012 he was a founding faculty member of the KEEN Winter
4) and any recommendations and action items that require attention from the safety perspective.Initial feedback was varied, with some students performing a very thorough review, othersproviding very little information. Process and instrumentation diagrams were included inseparate sections of the student reports. Appendices A and B include two of the best reportsprovided by the students. Not all students followed the tabulated formats to collect theinformation. In some cases this led to lack of clarity; in others, the chosen format was clear andconcise, nonetheless. We expect greater consistency in the PHA responses in the fall 2013course, and will evaluate and compare results as the first full cycle comes to a close.Concluding
Engineering Programs, 2011 - 2012. (2011).at 4. Tull, K. & Jones, S. A sophomore-level Engineering and Public Policy course required for B.A. Engineering majors at Lafayette College. 13 (2006).at 5. Myers, T. D. Learning outcomes for an Engineering and Technology Public Policy curriculum. (2008).at 6. Grose, T. K. Public Policy for the Tech-Minded. ASEE Prism 18, 47 – 48 (2009).7. Myers, T. & Stuart, B. Teaching engineering and technology public policy while fulfilling multiple ABET and university requirements. 13 (2010).at 8. Harter, K. & Libros, R. Aset 101: Science, Technology And Public Policy: Increasing Technological Literacy Among Community College Students. (2010).at 9. Sicker
Paper ID #7729Implications of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Elementary Schools Uponthe K-12 Engineering Education PipelineDr. Daniel Tillman, The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) Page 23.709.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Implications of Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Elementary Schools Upon the K-12 Engineering Education PipelineAbstractThis paper examines the effectiveness of a second grade math focused problem based learning(PBL) unit in fostering student interest and collaboration
. Learning outcomes in each area reflect the overall goals of theproject and include: (1) at the component level, students will demonstrate their ability to (a)select appropriate sensors to monitor physical phenomena and (b) design analog and digitalsignal conditioning circuits to connect them to microcontroller/computers; (2) at the systemlevel, students will be able to identify and use current technology practiced in monitoring andcontrol systems; (3) at the network level, students will be able to (a) understand fundamentalconcepts of WSN, and (b) design and develop such a system; and (4) at the capstone/projectlevel, students will be able to demonstrate their capability to design, develop, implement, and testa networked data acquisition system to
insteadstudents who have no prior experience with the topic, that the questions were too easy or basicthis semester is not necessarily indicative of how later classes will fare. An example of one such Page 23.869.3question that showed high pre-existing knowledge (95% correct on the pre-quiz and 100%correct on the post-quiz) is: 3. What is the addenda? A.) The document issued to bidders before the bid to notify them of any changes. B.) The document showing an outline of the entire estimate. C.) The document letting the bidders know if they won the bid. D.) Both B
b) Bottom View Figure 1 A Remote Controlled RC Car Prototype.There are over fifty components in the RC car prototype. This provided a realistic scenario toinform the students that product design requires the design and selection of many componentsin a systematic way in order for the product to function properly and to meet certain designspecifications. The sizes and dimensions of most of the components such as the wheels, the DCmotors for driving the RC car and a servo to drive the steering system were given to thestudents in the form of individual 3D CAD files so students don’t have to create them. Studentswere only required design three subsystems mentioned earlier: 1) the chassis, 2) the differential
American Manufacturing Research Institution (NAMRI) and chair of the Manufacturing Engineering Division of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (MED/ASME). Dr. Liang is a member of CIRP (The International Academy for Production Engineering) and the recipient of many awards including the Robert B. Douglas Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award of SME, Ralph R. Teetor Education Award of the Society of Automotive Engineers, and Blackall Machine Tool and Gage Award of ASME. Dr. Liang is fellow of both ASME and SME. Page 23.1296.1 c American Society for Engineering
and Environmental Design as a Healing Art. Burlington, MA: Architectural Press.[3] U.S, EPA. (2009, April 22). Buildings and Their Impact on the Environment: A Statistical Summary. Retrieved from Green Building: www.epa.gov/greenbuilding[4] Baker, E.D., Hope L., Karandjeff, K. (2009). Contextualized Teaching & Learning: A Faculty Primer. Funded by The Chancellor’s Office Of The California Community Colleges.[5] Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning. Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.[6] Palmer B., Terenzini P., Harper B., Merson D. (2011). Design In Context: Where Do The Engineers Of 2020 Learn This Skill.Conference Proceedings from American Society for Engineering Education.[7] Sanders
23.747.10 Communities Heller School for Social Policy and Management. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University.11. Walcerz, D. (2007). Report on the Third Year of Implementation of the True Outcomes Assessment System for Project Lead The Way. PLTW document, October 1, 2007.Willis, G.B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.12. Bricker, L. A. & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498.13. Barron, B., Martin, C., Takeuchi, L. & Fithain, R. (2009). Parents as Learning Partners and the Development of
engineering (FE) students develop the knowledge and skills required tofunction in the different fields of FE, distinguish the main factors responsible for food spoilageand deterioration and combine theory and practice for the preservation of representative foodproducts in the first-semester course entitled Introduction to Food Engineering, which learningoutcomes include that students will be able to: a) identify the major components of food and thefactors responsible for deterioration during storage, b) identify the main technologies availablefor food processing, c) identify the nutritional needs of humans, d) explain how processingoperations affect the stability of foods, e) distinguish the role of microorganisms in the stabilityand safety of food
: The National Academies Press (accessed 07/12). (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165)13 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Science, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (accessed 01/10) http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/14 IPCC Data Distribution Centre (accessed 07/10) http://www.ipcc-data.org/maps/15 DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.16 Benson, J., Clark, F. (1982). A guide for instrument development and validation. The American J. Occupational Therapy, 36(12), 789-800.17 Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching (Eighth ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.18 Qaqish, B