Paper ID #8918Using a ”Flipped Classroom” Model in Undergraduate Newtonian DynamicsProf. Susan B Swithenbank, US Coast Guard Academy Dr. Swithenbank is an Assistant Professor at the US Coast Guard Academy in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. Prior to working at the USCGA, she was a researcher at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim Norway. She has a PhD from MIT in Ocean Engineering.Prof. Thomas William DeNucci, U.S. Coast Guard Academy Thomas DeNucci is an Assistant Professor of Ship Design at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New
, University of Maine John Thompson is an Associate Professor of Physics and Cooperating Associate Professor of STEM Education, and a member of the Maine Center for Research in STEM Education at the University of Maine. He is co-director of the UMaine Physics Education Research Laboratory, a research group of over a dozen faculty, postdoctoral research associates, graduate students, and undergraduates. His research focuses on the learning and teaching of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics at the upper division, and student understanding at the physics-mathematics interface. He is very interested in cross-disciplinary studies of specific topics.Donald B. Mountcastle, University of Maine Donald Mountcastle is an
. (i) A recognition of the need knowledge of mathematics, engage in life-long learning (b) An ability to design and (d) An ability to function on
given application 6) Use modern engineering tools (MATLAB) to compute simulation of transient fluids problemsOther course objectives include: 7) Communicate effectively to produce professionally-quality technical reports a. Free from spelling & grammar errors and typos b. Professionally formatted with clear and consise communication c. Figures & Tables are used to convey information effectively 8) Design and Conduct Experiments, and Analyze and Interpret Data a. Attend all labs b. Complete all necessary measurements c. Complete all analysis of data (as shown in Lab Reports) 9) Be a valuable member of a team that successfully completes a group project. This
. Evans, G. L. Gray, S. Krause, J. Martin, K. C. Midkiff, B. M. Notaros, M. Pavelich, D. Rancour, T.Reed-Rhoads, P. Steif, R. Streveler and K. Wage. Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. in 33rdASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2003. Boulder, CO.8. B. M. Olds, R. A. Streveler, R. L. Miller and M. A. Nelson. Preliminary results from the development of aconcept inventory in thermal and transport science. in American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah.9. R. L. Miller, R. A. Streveler, D. Yang and A. I. S. Roman, Identifying and repairing studentmisconceptions in thermal and transport science: Concept inventories and schema training studies
. R. A. Streveler, B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller and M. A. Nelson. Using a delphi study to identify the mostdifficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. in American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition. 2003. Nashville, TN.2. B. M. Olds, R. A. Streveler, R. L. Miller and M. A. Nelson. Preliminary results from the development of aconcept inventory in thermal and transport science. in American Society of Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition. 2004. Salt Lake City, Utah.3. M. J. Cochran and P. R. L. Heron, Development and assessment of research-based tutorials on heat
were significantly lower than the meanresponse for all mechanical engineering courses.This evaluation also included space for free-form responses related to (a) strengths of the course,(b) weaknesses, and (c) suggestions for improvement. Of the twelve responses in part (a), sevenindicated a perceived increase in problem solving ability by the student. Two of the commentsalso mentioned the relationship between the assignments and knowledge gained in previouscourses. Of the nine responses in part b, three indicated that the workload was too heavy, threesuggested that the lectures should be more closely aligned with the analysis problems, and onesuggested more guidance on problem validation. Of the seven responses in part c, three werepositive or
results for dispersion for the source near the duct centerlineby comparison with the exact solution. Discuss the importance of gravity andBrownian forces for different size particles. Also evaluate the deposition rate ofpanicles for point sources, which are very near the wall (about a=1 mm). (UseFLUENT as well as your own program and compare the results.)b) Uniform Inlet Concentration: For a uniform inlet concentration of particles insize range of 0.01 to 10 micron, evaluated the deposition rate for laminar flowsbetween two parallel plates. Plot the results in term of Schmidt number. (UseFLUENT as well as your own program and compare the results with thoseobtained from the diffusion analysis.)c) Electromagnetic Forces: For the cases studied in
Paper ID #10506An Attempt to Gamify a first course in ThermodynamicsDr. Andrew Trivett P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Trivett completed a Doctor of Science in the Department of Ocean Engineering (Now part of the department of Mechanical Engineering) at MIT. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineer- ing at the Technical University of Nova Scotia (now Dalhousie University Faculty of Engineering), and attended a high school formerly in Chester, Nova Scotia. While he does not believe that he was ever the cause of academic institutions closing after he graduated, it did seem to be a trend. Since 2003, how
most widely used is the Bruel & Kjaer (B&K) impedance tube Type 4206 [12].This tube has become almost the industry standard in acoustic applications. It is well-built withquality materials and has proven to produce consistent results for industrial and otherapplications. The objective of this work was to develop a low-cost alternative to this tube foreducational use especially in developing countries where cost is a primary issue for promotinghands-on educational activities. We wanted to use a PVC tube, an inexpensive speaker, studiomicrophones and off-the-shelf materials for the construction of the tube. A low-end laptop withintegrated sound card was used for data acquisition and custom developed MATLAB softwarewith a Graphical User
projectlearning, (b) early prototyping that accelerates and improves the quality of final designs, (c)formal communication (oral and written) that allows clients to easily integrate design projectresults, and (d) cadre of graduate student mentors with exceptional technical leadership skills.Program operation outcomes include: (a) annual planning, oversight, and assessment thatproduces yearly improvements, (b) project results that delight all stakeholders, leading to follow-on projects in subsequent years, and (c) minimal cost to produce results, leading to increasedfinancial resources for infrastructure.Infrastructure development outcomes include: (a) locally produced, web-based design tools,rubrics, and quick references for just-in-time professional
0% 75% 25% 100% 60% h 0% 0% 0% 0% Exemplary i 0% 67% 33% 100% 50% Acceptable j 0% 0% 0% 0% Unsatisfactory k 7% 63% 33% 102% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% a b c d e
thePMFC and its constituent components, an alternate and perhaps more instructive way ofassessing the efficacy of instruction is to examine the distribution of grades earned by students ineach of the mechanics classes involved in this transformation. Figures 5 and 6 present thepercentage of students earning A, B, C, D, and F grades, or a W marking (resulting from awithdrawal from the course before completion) in the Basic Mechanics I and II courses since theFall 2008 (Spring 2009 in the case of Basic Mechanics II) Semester, which is prior to the Page 24.1241.10complete implementation of the PMFC. Data is presented for fall semesters (spring
laboratory courses includingmeasurements and dynamic systems and controls.References1. J. E. Corter, J. V. Nickerson, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, J. Ma (2007), "Constructing Reality: A study of remote, hands-on and simulated laboratories", ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction 2 (14)2. Nickerson, J.V., Corter, J.E., Esche, S.K., and C. Chassapis (2007), "A Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Remote Engineering Laboratories and Simulations in Education", Computers and Education. 3 (49)3. P. Bhargava, J. Antonakakis, C. Cunningham and A. T. Zehnder (2006), “Web-based virtual torsion laboratory,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 14, pp 1-8.4. S. Grober, M. Vetter, B. Eckert and H-J. Jodl (2007), “Experimenting
313A.4. B. Munson, D. Young, T. Okiishi, Huebsch, W. (2009). Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, Sixth Edition. Danavers, MA, Wiley.5. A.W. Henderson, E.C. Lemley, A. Muvadgah, and O Yasar. (2012). “Flow Experiments in Microjunction Networks.” Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting (FEDSM201272327)6. E.C. Lemley, et al. (2010). "Milliscale Junctions Flow Experiments." Proceedings of ASME 2010 3rd Joint Page 24.365.11 UsEuropean Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting and 8th international. (FEDSM ICNMM2010 30123)7. A.W. Henderson, E.C. Lemley, M. Sanchez, and V.D. Papavassiliou
Paper ID #8628Machining Experience in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past thirteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez in the
: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering. Available: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12187[3] S. M. Lord, "Work in Progress - Engineering students' disciplinary choices: Do race and gender matter?," in Proceedings of the IEEE/ASEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009, pp. W1D-1 - W1D-2.[4] ASME Intl. (2013, March 30, 2013). About American Society of Mechanical Engineers - ASME. Available: https://www.asme.org/about-asme[5] B. L. Yoder. (2011, June 21, 2013). Engineering by the Numbers. Available: http://www.asee.org/papers- and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2011-profile-engineering-statistics.pdf[6] S. M. Lord, R. A. Layton, and M. W. Ohland
Paper ID #9027Development and evolution of a new mechanical design laboratory courseDr. Steven P Marra P.E., Johns Hopkins University Steven P. Marra received his B.S. degree from the University of Pittsburgh in 1993, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, all in mechanical engineering. He is currently a Senior Lecturer in mechanical engineering at The Johns Hopkins University. His research interests include soft and hard tissue biomechanics, nonlinear mechanics of solids, mechanics of tissue damage, and undergraduate engineering education
. Caldwell’s primary research ex- periences included the development of design methods for lightweight systems (BMW Manufacturing Co.) and modeling the functionality and interactions of mechanical systems to support conceptual de- sign (National Science Foundation). Prior to his graduate work, Dr. Caldwell gained design experience working at Electrolux Major Appliances on a team designing and developing consumer bottom-mount refrigerators. Among other awards, Dr. Caldwell received the Graduate Teaching Fellowship from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Departmental Doctoral and Masters Awards in Me- chanical Engineering from Clemson University, and the R.C. Edwards Graduate Recruiting Fellowship from
Paper ID #9735Building a Foundation: Tools for Accentuating the First Law in an Introduc-tory Thermodynamics CourseDr. Natasha Smith P.E., University of Southern Indiana Dr. Natasha Smith is Assistant Professor of Engineering at the University of Southern Indiana.Dr. Brandon S Field, University of Southern Indiana Page 24.238.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Building a Foundation: Tools for Accentuating the First Law in an Introductory
Paper ID #10002Challenges and Evolution of Combined and Separate Thermodynamics Coursesin a Mechanical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology Pro-gramProf. Martin William Weiser, Eastern Washington University Martin Weiser is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Design Department at Eastern Washington University. He earned his BS in Ceramic Engineering from the Ohio State University and his MS and PhD in Materials Science and Mineral Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. He then joined the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of New Mexico where he taught Materials
Appendix A (Pre- and Post-Learning Module Quiz) Pre/Post Quiz: Thermal Analysis Finite Element Learning Module ActivitiesAnimal ID: ____________________ 1. Which of the following is true for a semi-infinite medium: a) Heat conduction does not change with time b) Heat conduction is one-dimensional c) Heat conduction is multi-dimensional d) There will always be heat generation 2. Which of the following is true for a semi-infinite medium: a) Heat conduction results from the thermal condition at one boundary b) Heat conduction results from the thermal conditions at two boundaries
Director of the ME Senior Capstone Design Program. In 1996 he began envisioning a technology company which he ultimately founded as Endres Machining Innovations, LLC (EMI) in 2004 to develop and commercialize innovative processes and tooling technologies. EMI’s industry-leading R&D efforts aim to provide substantial efficiency improvements. EMI’s focus is the machining of difficult-to-machine materials, such as titanium, nickel alloys, stainless steels, compacted-graphite iron (CGI), hardened steel, and abrasive composites, and applications like energy efficient chipping/chopping of cellulosic biomass. In 2013 a manufacturing company was formed for production of their first product line leaving EMI to focus on
identical, but some were the same forboth sections. The percentages of correct answers by students are also provided in the table. a) Identify each of the following parameters as: (A)-Extensive property, (B)-Intensive property, or (C)-Not a property. Parameter n % Correct Answers Volume, V 50 73 Heat transfer, Q 50 73 Temperature, T 50 68 Work, W 50 75 Density, 50 73 Internal Energy, U 50
to differences in student population (anecdotally,at-a-distance students have family commitments and a full-time job). Additionally, when there isnot a specific class time, students must have exceptional time management skills or they quicklyfall behind. This conclusion is supported by historical completion rates of approximately 65%. Table 2: The grade distribution of ME 101. The first column reflects the percentage of students that do not have to retake the course, students that obtained an A, B, or C. The second column contains the percentage of students that took the final exam, but must retake the course. The final column indicated the percentage of students that withdrew or stopped participating in the course prior to
lead to a group discussion of the data and possible decision options. The hands-on labtakes about 50-60 minutes of class time and involves four students working as a team. The thirdstep is a structured team discussion, reviewing the data collected and talking about differentmodels of interpretation (see Figure 3). The final step in the process is a homework assignmentthat requires students to synthesize their learning and make a choice for how they would proceedas a character in the story. Figure'3'*!Integrative!Learning!in"action!(starting!upper!left):!Trek!B"cycle!lab,!Madison! Longboard!Deck!lab,!full!class!(94!students)!participating!in!a!lab!experience!and!discussion'The scenarios incorporate
cuberepresents a different process in aCarnot cycle. The top and bottom ofthe cube represent the hot and cold Figure 4: Student art example: Entropy comic by Alexreservoir for the cycle. The students Varvel.were inspired by the perfect squareshape representing the Carnot cycleon a Temperature-Entropy phase dia-gram. Page 24.1260.6 (a) (b) Figure 5: Student art example: Carnot’s Cube by Jonathan Harper and Alvaro Garay.Table of TablesA student group used copies of thethermodynamics steam tables to con-struct a small table. This sculpturewas titled Table of Tables and wasa clear favorite with the
, debugging, and software training. Acourse in programming can be challenging for many students choosing to major in mechanicalengineering. The major attracts students with diverse backgrounds and a wide variety ofacademic interests. It is uncommon for students to choose to study mechanical engineeringbecause of their interest in programming or modeling. This often leads to a disconnect betweenthe students and the instructor, which can create an intimidating classroom environment. Thework presented here is driven by these findings.A new programming course has been developed to address the problems existing in the originalcourse model, which include: (a) the course being offered outside of an engineering department,(b) the extreme variability in the
asking the audience questions present a complex example problem utilizing some of the concepts just discussed give students some time to work the problem quickly go over problem solutionSome examples of shorter problems presented by students during the review include thefollowing: Assume that there is a wind blowing at 8 m/s and a Hummer is traveling at 32 m/s. a) How much power is used to oppose the drag force when driving with the wind? b) How much power is used to oppose the drag force when driving against the wind? Your dog sticks his head out of your car window when you are driving 35 mph. What is the maximum pressure on his nose? (assume STP conditions)Some examples of longer problems
-Bass higher and adult education series. Wiley, 2010. 4. Louis Deslauriers, Ellen Schelew, and Carl Wieman. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332(6031):862–864, 2011. 5. David C. Haak, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Emile Pitre, and Scott Freeman. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034):1213–1216, 2011. 6. Karl A. Smith, Sheri D. Sheppard, David W. Johnson, and Roger T. Johnson. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-Based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, pages 1–15, January 2005. 7. Eann A. Patterson, Patricia B. Campbell, Ilene Busch-Vishniac, and Darrell W. Guillaume. The effect of