all of its advantages canbe applied in academics since students normally practice to fabricate similar components indifferent semesters. This new approach is proposed to replace the traditional manufacturinglaboratory practice. Group cells with different machines are utilized rather than havingduplicated of same machines. The objectives of this paper are to: a) Compare the Traditional and Group Cell approaches for university students, b) Presents an example of machining laboratory exercise.Literature ReviewHands-on laboratory practice is the key to effective learning. "I hear and I forget. I see and Iremember. I do and I understand" was preached by the famous teacher and philosopherConfucius (551–479 BCE) during Spring-Autumn period of
Paper ID #9939Understanding Team Ethical Climate Through Interview DataMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is
(required bi-weekly synchronous chats) Message activity (messages are similar to email within the LMS system and can be forwarded to outside email as an option) Course Letter grade earned (A, B, C, D, F) Course Grade percentage earnedThe main PI collected and then coded the data for the research team to work with under IRBapproval. Only the main PI had access to the original data with student identifiers. Theinformation gathered is not identifiable and does not reflect which section the student was Page 24.1112.4enrolled into or completed. A random number was assigned to each student as an identifier. Thedata was stored
, China. His first PhD dissertation on improving the practical effectiveness of engineering ethics that draws on theories in hermeneutics, practical philosophy, and discourse ethics has recently been awarded the ”Outstanding Dissertation Award” in Liaoning Province, China.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment
-onexperiences. The figure 2 shows the components of the environmental sensor platform in thismodule activity. (a) (b) (c)Fig. 2 Components of the environmental sensor platform show in module 6 activity. (a) Android phone. (b) Bluetooth external module to MCU. (c) Environmental dust sensorIII. Preliminary evaluationThe prototype of the labware (first 5 modules) has been demonstrated to be used on students whoparticipated the NSF Peach State Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation summerresearch sessions at SPSU for preliminary evaluation. Several students in this program workedon the project leaded by authors on mobile embedded system designs and
mathematics, (a) science and engineering science and engineering An ability to design and conduct experiments, An ability to design and conduct experiments, as (b) as well as to analyze and interpret data well as to analyze and interpret data An ability to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic
Report of the Women’s Experiences in College (WECE) Project. April 2002. http://www.grginc.com/WECE_FINAL_REPORT.pdf6. Prince, M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93(3), 2004.7. Stevens, R., O’Connor, K., Garrison, L, Jocuns, A., and Amos, D. Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, July 2008.8. Ohland, M., Sheppard, S., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., Chachra, D., and Layton, R. Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs, Journal of Engineering Education, volume 97(3), 2008.9. French, B., Immekus, J., Oakes, W. An Examination of Indicators of Engineering Students
Paper ID #8949Best Practices in K-12 and University Partnerships Panel WinnersMiss Mindy Hart, EPICSDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Laura Bottomley directs The Engineering Place for K-20 Outreach at North Carolina State University. She is also a teaching professor in the Colleges of Engineering and Education at NC State University and the Director of Women in Engineering. She teaches classes in engineering for freshmen and sophomores and for juniors in elementary education. In her role as director of The Engineering Place at NC State, Dr. Bottomley and her colleagues reach more than 5,000 students
essentialto the success of this program. These include the Center for Pre-college Outreach, CorporateRelations, and the Admissions Office.7. References1 Zweben, S., Bizot, B., 2013, 2012 Taulbee Survey Strong Increases in Undergraduate CS Enrollment and Degree Production; Record Degree Production at Doctoral Level, Computing Research News, pp. 11-60.2 Hartmann, T., Klimmt, C., 2006, Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes, in Journal of Computer ‐Mediated Communication 11, 910-931.3 Colley, A., 2003, Gender differences in adolescents' perceptions of the best and worst aspects of computing at school, in Computers in Human Behavior 19, 673-682.4 Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Eccles, J. S., 2002, Pool
starting, where you’re ending, and basically how to get from A to B.” Those learners who have a problem getting from point A to point B may seek additionalhelp. Authors categorized this as information seeking and found that students sought additionalhelp through TAs and group members. “If it came right down to it if I did have questions I couldjust ask (the TA), then the other member of the group and say, ‘do you know what’s going on?’I think having the people there was helpful.” Instructors should encourage student collaborationand may need to provide some guidance to PBL learners. Another emerging student concept was effort. Student 6 discussed the payoff for theeffort required to solve equations by hand. “It helps me understand
expectations (expected consequences of a particular behavior), self-efficacy(confidence about being successful at a task), and goal setting (identifying a desired outcome).The cognitive apprenticeship model is characterized by expert guidance provided by a mentor to Page 24.1226.3the novice in an authentic task or setting within a community of practice.16 This model differsfrom the traditional apprenticeship model by (a) allowing the objectives of the learningassignments to dictate the types of tasks given to students rather than the demands of theworkplace; and (b) decontextualizing knowledge so that it can be applied in diverse settingsrather than a
p inclluding compputer-aided ddesign (CAD D)models and a computerr-aided manufacturing (C CAM) code was compiled and standdardized withhproper diimensions to o pass along to the next team. t Page 24.1250.4 a. b. b c. Figure 2. Preliminaary Feasibiliity Prototypee (a.) CAD M Model (b.) C Components (c.) Assembbly.Prototype
- Page 24.1195.14systems: lecture 2 hours, lab 2 hours. ABET outcomes (and modified outcomes) covered by thiscourse: a, b, c, d, kERE 3024 Unified Robotics III:This is the third course in a four course sequence combining mechanical engineering, electrical& computer engineering and computer science to develop both the theory and practice ofrobotics engineering. The focus of this course is actuator design, embedded computing andcomplex response processes. The principles of operation and interface methods for variousactuators will be discussed. Various feedback control mechanisms including motion control andforce control will be implemented using software executing in an embedded system. Thenecessary concepts for real-time processor programming
given purpose (i.e.,evaluation)2. Within the context of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET),the lowest levels in any learning hierarchy model are incompatible with required ABET programoutcomes. According to ABET1, three of the required 11 ABET student outcomes include 1) theability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [a]), 2) the ability to design and conduct experiments (i.e., ABET student outcome [b]),and 3) the ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (i.e., ABET studentoutcome [e]). It is important that engineering faculty of all disciplines continuously push theenvelope and work to elevate student learning and comprehension so that
models were fostered prior to travel through a series of pre-trip meetingsbetween the students, the faculty advisor of the student chapter, and the Bridges to Prosperitystaff. Through these meetings, the students developed a shared set of goals to be accomplishedduring the trip, created a detailed construction schedule, designated task leaders for eachconstruction task, and discussed and planned for various scenarios that might be encountered inthe field. Interdependence was high due to the complex and high-stakes nature of the project. Forexample, quality control naturally required certain team members to check the work of others,which was described by one student as follows: [B]efore we could back fill you must be 100% sure of your
Course Grades 10 Frequency 8 6 4 2 0 A B C D E (>=90%) (80-89%) (70-79%) (60-69%) (<= 59%) Letter Grade Figure 5. Project and Final Grade DistributionDiscussionResults appear to indicate that using a combination of Automated and Manual quantity takeoffmethods yield optimal estimates and understanding of the construction tasks (as measured by theproject grade). The authors are not suggesting that it is the
Paper ID #9314Implementation and Assessment of a Failure Case Study in a Multi-DisciplineFreshman Introduction to Engineering CourseDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His research interests include paral- lel and distributed computer systems, cryptography, engineering education, undergraduate retention and technology (Tablet PCs) used in the classroom.Dr. Norb Delatte P.E., Cleveland State University Norb Delatte is Professor and Chair of the
the U.S. Navy (SPAWAR). She held a Fulbright fellowship at the Center for Wireless Communications (CWC) at the University of Oulu in Finland. She has received teaching excellence awards from her Division and the College of Engineering. She has received funding for her research from the NSF, the US Navy, NASA, and the business community. She is an ABET IEEE ETAC Commissioner and an active program evaluator.Mr. Thomas B. Stout, Tidewater Community College Thomas Stout is an associate professor of Electromechanical Controls Technology at Tidewater Commu- nity College in Chesapeake Virginia. He has worked in industrial maintenance, mechatronics and safety. He earned his BS degree from Old Dominion University in 2004
Paper ID #8981What’s in the Soup? Auto-ethnograhies from an Engineer, a Physicist, andan English Professor Regarding a Successful Multidisciplinary Grand Chal-lenge ProgramDr. Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Anneliese Watt is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches and re- searches technical and professional communication, rhetoric and composition, medicine in literature, and other humanities elective courses to engineering and science students. Her graduate work in rhetoric and literature was completed at Penn State, and her recent research often focuses on engineering and
material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1 American Association of Engineering Societies (AAES). 2005. Diversity. Available online at: http://www.aaes.org/diversity/index.asp.2 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). 2005. ASEE Statement: Diversity. Available online at: http://www.asee.org/about/statementDiversity.cfm.3 Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. 2011. Women in stem: A gender gap to innovation. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Available online at: http://www.esa.doc.gov/Reports/women-stem-gender-gap-innovation4 National Science Foundation, National
Paper ID #9669A Multidisciplinary MOOC on Creativity, Innovation, and Change: Encour-aging Experimentation and Experiential Learning on a Grand ScaleDr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior
Paper ID #8617Forming a Coalition to Decrease Freshout Rampup Time in the EngineeringWorkplace: A Business Plan for an Academic, Industry, and GovernmentPartnershipDr. Steven W Villachica, Boise State University Steve Villachica is an Associate Professor of Instructional and Performance Technology (IPT) at Boise State University. His research interests focus on leveraging expertise in the workplace in ways that meet organizational missions and business goals. He is currently working on an NSF grant to increase engineer- ing faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices [NSF #1037808: Engineering Education
performance, it is found thatstudents who earned an “A” submitted almost all assigned homework during the semester. Onthe other hand, if the students submitted only 63% of their homework, chances of their success inthose courses were little. Another observation states that homework score is also correlated withthe final course grade. For example, when a student earned an “A” on the course, his/herhomework score was above 90 on average. Similar conclusion can be made for those studentswho scored “B,” “C,” “D,” and “F.” Many TAMIU students work very hard in their courses, yeta regular class time may not be sufficient to create and interactive environment to address all theproblems that students may have for the course. This situation is true for the
Paper ID #10447A MOOC with a Business PlanMr. Eugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Academic Director in the College of Engineering & Applied Science with academic and administrative oversight of distance learning programs, combined degree programs and high school dual enrollment. Experience as educator, practicing engineer and educational researcher.Jim Tappel, University of CincinnatiDr. BJ Zirger, University of Cincinnati Page 24.71.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014
Date DateFig. 5(a) Roof Inner Temperature (July 21-Aug Fig. 5(b) Roof
after the workshop, in comparisons to that of before the workshop, showed higher average ratings in their interest in STEM field and pursuing a college degree program, thereafter. b) MORE-Transfer and Retention Program (MORE-TRP) This 2-week summer workshop is intended to improve the recruitment and retention of highly motivated Hispanic and other minority students in the Systems Engineering program at TAMIU. Page 24.1021.8 A major goal is to facilitate the transfer of Laredo Community College (LCC) students into the Systems Engineering Program at TAMIU by allowing them to take the first two years of coreand
laptops, internet access, and work space with whiteboards.Students’ teamwork, including their conversations and notes on whiteboards, were video-recorded.Eleven teams volunteered to be videotaped as they responded to written feedback from TAs, andthe individual team members committed to being interviewed following the MEA. After thecollection and initial analysis of data, Team A and B were selected among the eleven teams.There were basically two rationales behind choosing these two particular teams: (1) they had Page 24.611.7nearly complete data sets (i.e., written documents, interviews, and video-recordings), and (2)both had similar TA feedback
most widely used is the Bruel & Kjaer (B&K) impedance tube Type 4206 [12].This tube has become almost the industry standard in acoustic applications. It is well-built withquality materials and has proven to produce consistent results for industrial and otherapplications. The objective of this work was to develop a low-cost alternative to this tube foreducational use especially in developing countries where cost is a primary issue for promotinghands-on educational activities. We wanted to use a PVC tube, an inexpensive speaker, studiomicrophones and off-the-shelf materials for the construction of the tube. A low-end laptop withintegrated sound card was used for data acquisition and custom developed MATLAB softwarewith a Graphical User
, etc.). Thequestionnaire used in the Fall 2013 semester is included as Appendix A with answers andexplanations and reflections of the authors. Continued improvement of the questionnaire wasconducted with the help of sustainability teaching colleagues across the U.S. leading to animproved questionnaire included as Appendix B, but not used in the assessment. The assessmentwas conducted by having students complete the questionnaire prior to AND after completing allthe module elements. The results from the Fall 2013 semester are reported next.ResultsOf the 24 students invited to complete the literacy questionnaire in the Fall 2013 semester, 17submitted full responses for both the pre- and post-module instances. The average score on thepre-module
is an Academy Professor with the Department of Physics and Nuclear Engineering. He graduated from USMA in 1993 with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering. He is an aviation officer who served in B Co., 3-23 Av Hunter Army Airfield, GA as a UH-60 helicopter flight platoon leader and an assistant battalion operations officer. LTC Allen served as a Company Commander for A Co. 78th Aviation Bn, Camp Zama, Japan. He earned a Master of Science degree in Nuclear Engineering from The University of Florida in 2003. He was an assistant professor in the West Point Department of Physics from 2003 – 2006 teaching core physics and nuclear engineering. After leaving the department, he served two years as a reactor