courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e- portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the engineering education discipline, assessment methods, and evaluating communication in engineering. Page 24.651.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Graduate Student and Faculty Member: An Exploration of Career and Personal DecisionsIntroduction Practice in the profession can be a foundational
]. Family obligations, travelfor work, and problems with poor health for either the student or a family member are othersignificant external factors[15]. Students may find their expectations of what the course wouldentail differ from the reality[16]. Problems with a heavy courseload, unsatisfactory teaching, ordisenchantment with the course material are also cited as factors in course withdrawal decisions[17, 18] . Gender and transfer student status have shown value as predictors of course withdrawalwith females and transfer students having a higher risk of course withdrawal[19]. Studentsconsidering course withdrawal have been found to frequently seek advice from personal contactsrather than academic advisors[20].The time to graduation with
) conference. (He was also a participant in the 2003 US FOE, and the 2006 German-American FOE, conferences.) He currently serves on the Executive Council of the HFES as its Secretary-Treasurer Page 24.584.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Exploring the Development of Undergraduate Research ExperienceAbstractThis paper describes a multi-year experiential reflection process examining the development ofresearch awareness and integration for an undergraduate industrial engineering student. As asophomore, I approached the faculty
Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient
Natascha Trellinger is a first year PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her BS in aerospace engineering from Syracuse University. At Purdue, Natascha is a part of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is interested in global teaching and learning at both the undergraduate and graduate levels.Prof. M. D. Wilson, Purdue University MICHAEL WILSON is an Adjunct faculty member in the College of Technology and Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University in the College of Engineering. He earned a Bachelors of Science from the University of Massachusetts and a Masters from the University of Chicago; his broad research interests include Engineering Education
engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Dr. Suely M. Black, Norfolk State University Page 24.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Snapshot of an Interdisciplinary Graduate Engineering
retention rates and recruitment success of Hispanic students in STEMprograms at TAMIU as of Fall 2013.In order to succeed, many University-wide initiatives (not specifically for STEM disciplines) areset up. Engaging Sophomores, for example, encompasses Graduation Roadmap, a programdesigned to increase the academic success of TAMIU’s Hispanic, low-income student populationby: 1) strengthening sophomore academic, career, and personal counseling support services; 2)assessing the sophomore academic experience; 3) increasing professional opportunities forfaculty development that build pedagogical and academic connectedness for sophomore students;4) institutionalizing financial resources for faculty development; and 5) creating an endowmentfor student
College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF Faculty Early Career (CAREER) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient.Mr. Paul Carrick Brunson, Paul Carrick Brunson AgencyMs. Nikitha Sambamurthy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nikitha Sambamurthy is pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests include: blended
design and entrepreneurship courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her work is often cross-disciplinary, collaborating with colleagues from engineering, education, psychology, and industrial design.Dr. Diane L Peters, Kettering University Diane Peters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University in Flint, MI. Her engineering education research focuses on the interaction between industry and academia.Prof. Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan Professor Steven J. Skerlos is Arthur F. Thurnau Professor at the University of Michigan. He is a tenured faculty member in Mechanical Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering. He also serves as a UM Distinguished Faculty
Session at the ASEE 2014 Annual Conference, anddescribes a recently funded project (October 2013) under the Research Initiation Grant inEngineering Education (RIGEE) program. It is hypothesized that there is disconnect betweenthe principles outlined in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the actual classroomenvironment, thus creating a barrier to intrinsic motivation needed for student learning. Theproposed work is an empirical investigation to explore this disconnect in the context ofundergraduate engineering education. The primary tasks will be to (i) assess the Facultyknowledge of SDT; (ii) develop a measurement framework to assess the classroom environmentas it relates to SDT; and (iii) determine the association among Faculty knowledge of SDT
continue on tograduate school7 compared with non-participants. Male and female REU students show the samelevel of interest in continuing on to graduate school.5,8,9 Undergraduate research participantsreport their faculty mentor as being highly influential in their decision to continue on to graduateschool or in their career choice compared with non-participants.10 The primary motivation forfaculty who mentor undergraduate researchers is to have a positive impact on the careers oftalented students11.REUs provide student interns a pathway to explore their sense of “becoming a scientist” and toestablish a career identity which is often inextricably bound up with personal identity.12 Themost frequent student-reported gains of participating in a REU
needs improvement. Employment inSTEM fields grew by 23% between 1994 and 2003, compared to only 17% for non-STEM fields;nonetheless, the US is now struggling to meet the rapidly increasing demand for STEMworkers.2 The continued need to remain globally competitive and the fact that 39% of people inthe US under 18 are persons of color (U.S. Census 2000) underlie the urgent need for collegesand universities to improve their efforts to graduate minority students in STEM disciplines.3Along with an increased interest in undergraduate degree attainment, there is significant interest Page 24.492.2in increasing the number of graduate degrees awarded in
role in fosteringentrepreneurship in undergraduate students through the creation of and exposure to differententrepreneurial activities and environments. The Stanford Innovation Survey is a systematicsurvey of Stanford alumni, faculty and selected staff that assesses the university’s economicimpact based on involvement in entrepreneurship. The study outlines some of the differentlearning experiences that alumni encountered as undergraduates, which may have influencedtheir perception of entrepreneurship. Approximately one-third of the alumni respondentsreported being entrepreneurs who founded an organization, and described themselves asinvestors, early employees or board members in a startup at some point in their careers. Eesleyand Miller9
PWIs who are involved in ethnic student organizations areoften more involved, feel more positively towards their institution, and successfully graduate11.These organizations have the potential to connect students of similar cultural heritage whocelebrate their personal academic achievements and educational aspirations. These findingsconverge to support SCCT’s notion that environment impacts career aspirations7. While wefound no studies directly examining this phenomenon among Hispanic students, the currentliterature suggests involvement in student organizations is instrumental to Hispanic STEMmajors’ graduate degree aspirations. Therefore, guided by SCCT7 we intend to explore whatenvironmental factors support Hispanic STEM student aspirations
undergraduate level, and is interested in educational partnerships with industry and international issues in design. As associate dean of undergraduate studies he has promoted and supported the structuring and expansion of leadership development and international programs. He is an active member of ASME and ASEE.Prof. Gregory M. Roach, Brigham Young University, Idaho Page 24.536.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Establishing an Immersive Cross-Cultural Experiential Learning and Design Collaboration for Engineering Students and FacultyAbstractEngineering graduates
trips) that give students hands-on experiences or enable them to see and/or experience science and engineering in action, and in ways that relate directly to their personal lives; 2) Bringing STEM professionals to class or providing other means by which students can talk directly to professionals with STEM careers; 3) Sharing science and engineering anecdotes and personal experiences in class and when meeting with students in one-on-one and small group interactions; and 4) Alerting students to STEM-oriented programs within and outside of school in which they (students) can participate. After exploring how teachers influence students towards STEM, we asked them tospeculate why they believe that the mechanisms of
project are to: 1) Provide an innovative network of support and communications among University-based outreach project directors and educational evaluation experts, creating a learning community to promote sharing of best practices and innovation that will deepen the impact of NCSU’s pre-college STEM programs on students’ future academic and career choices. 2) Develop and demonstrate a system of data-driven planning and analysis guided by best practices to facilitate longitudinal assessment of participant outcomes through development of a common STEM Outreach Evaluation Protocol as well as a database integrating records of NCSU K-12 outreach participants with NC Department of Public Instruction
career stages.14-16 St. Rose and her co-authors Catherine Hill, AmericanAssociation of University Women’s director of research, and Christianne Corbette, a researchassociate examined hundreds of studies and identified “eight factors that helped depress thenumbers of girls and women in STEM: beliefs about intelligence, stereotypes, self-assessment,spatial skills, the college student experience, university and college faculty, implicit bias, andworkplace bias.”17These factors manifest themselves in the fact that women are less likely to indicate an intentionto major in a STEM field. Despite the fact that girls and boys take math and science courses inroughly equal numbers during pre-university schooling, by the time they graduate college,women are
Paper ID #9063Developing engineers who lead: Are student, faculty and administrator per-spectives aligned?Lt. Col. Brian J Novoselich P.E., Virginia Tech Brian Novoselich is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army and currently a Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His is a former assistant professor at the United States Military Academy. His dissertation research interest is undergraduate student leadership development in capstone design teams.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education David Knight is an Assistant Professor in the
Paper ID #9370Middle School Curricular Materials on Grand Challenges for Engineering:Impact on Efficacy and Expectancy BeliefsDr. Kimberly A.S. Howard, Boston University Dr. Kimberly Howard is an Associate Professor in Counseling Psychology in the Boston University School of Education.Mr. Jacob William Diestelmann, University of Wisconsin - MadisonTsu-Lun HuangLauren E AneskavichMr. Kevin ChengBenjamin Bryan Crary, University of Wisconsin - MadisonJean DeMerit, UW–MadisonTam Mayeshiba, University of Wisconsin-Madison Tam Mayeshiba is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow/graduate student in the Ma- terials
positive impact the program has made on their careers and personal lives. Pictures of actual MSPM students and graduates are incorporated into our advertisements and brochures. This practice has made the programs more relevant to interested employers and potential students. For example, when talking about the program, the faculty can identify the people in the pictures by name and note their position and accomplishments. The Advisory Tool, shown in Figure 1, is used extensively. The program core and elective course options, along with the graduate certificate programs, are placed on a single page. This enables each person is able to quickly grasp the path to graduation and completion of
and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Mrs. Dee K Mooney, Micron FoundationJanine Rush-Byers, Micron Technology Foundation, Inc. Janine Rush-Byers has been with the Micron Foundation since 2006 as the university relations manager. Janine works with domestic and international universities to build strategic, long term partnerships fo- cusing on engineering programs, students and faculty members. The Foundation funds $5 million in grants annually around the world, including $2 million to universities. Janine holds a bachelor’s degree in engineering from the University of Washington and
apply classroom knowledge in newsettings;1 explore or confirm major choices and career pathway;2,3 and prepare for graduatestudy.4–6 Participating in undergraduate research can also help retain and engage students,particularly those in populations that are historically underrepresented in STEM (Science,Technology, Engineering, Math).7–10 One important component of successful undergraduateresearch experiences is that students are able to develop a mentoring relationship with faculty,graduate students, and/or other researchers who can provide guidance during the researchprocess.1,11–15 Often, these mentoring relationships persist over time and become a source offeedback and support as students navigate academic, professional and personal
Technological University. Additionally, he has six years of industrial experience as a Senior Engineer and 17 years of academic experience as a professor, Associate Professor, and Assistant Professor. Foroudastan’s academic experience includes teaching at Tennessee Technological University and Middle Tennessee State University in the areas of civil engineering, me- chanical engineering, and engineering technology. He has actively advised undergraduate and graduate students, alumni, and minority students in academics and career guidance. Foroudastan has also served as Faculty Advisor for SAE, Mechanical Engineering Technology, Pre-engineering, ASME, Experimental Vehicles Program (EVP), and Tau Alpha Pi Honors Society. In
influential” in their decisions to attend the CEAS (Table 2).As the number of women who attended Girls Explore Engineering Day increased in 2013, so didthe program’s effectiveness. Of the women who attended in 2013, 93% found it to be somewhator very influential in their decisions to attend the CEAS, while in 2012, only 40% of attendeesreported this degree of influence, as shown in Figure 2. Why the improvements? The 2013program provided tours of labs in disciplines that women are typically more interested in, andmore staff and student volunteers were made available for one-on-one chats with both studentsand parents. And, with the addition of the parent track, this event became more personal andsocially engaging. Many staff members commented that
protection, interdisciplinary engineering education, and risk education.Mr. William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences William D. Schindel is president of ICTT System Sciences, a systems engineering company, and devel- oper of the Systematica Methodology for model and pattern-based systems engineering. His 40-year engineering career began in mil/aero systems with IBM Federal Systems, Owego, NY, included ser- vice as a faculty member of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and founding of three commercial systems-based enterprises. He has consulted on improvement of engineering processes within automotive, medical/health care, manufacturing, telecommunications, aerospace, and consumer products businesses. Schindel
visions for change, learn tools that can help them facilitate emergentchange from their work as change agents, and create plans for action on their home campuses.The MACH workshop develops strategies for emergent changes of institutional environmentsover three intensely focused, hands-on days. MACH is organized around three themes: “Know-ing Yourself,” “Cultivating an Allied Community of Colleagues,” and “Making Change Happenon Campus.” The “Knowing Yourself” segment helps participants focus on skills and changeaspects that an individual faculty member can control, including interactions with students andcolleagues. This segment considers personality assessment, communication, risk assessment andmitigation, and diversity. The “Community of
. Mason Jr., J. P. Tarris, Members, ASCE, and E. Zaki, 1995. Choosing a civil engineering career: Some market research findings. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 121 (3): 170-176.17. Jawitz, J. and J. Case. 1998. Exploring the reasons South African students give for studying engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education 14 (4): 235-240.18. Bloom, Benjamin S. 1976. Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.19. Lam, P., D. Doverspike, J. Zhao, J. Zhe, and C. Menzemer. 2008. An evaluation of a STEM program for middle school students on learning disability related IEPs. Journal of STEM Education 9 (1&2): 21-29.20. Budny, D. D., and C. A. Paul
programtargeting the improvement of undergraduate engineering education. Faculty proposed large-scalerenovations of a specific undergraduate course or closely-related group of courses, with the goalof improving student engagement, learning outcomes, and faculty teaching experiences.Alternatively, faculty could propose to develop teaching technologies that would facilitate theimplementation of evidence-based teaching practices. Priority in funding was given to projectsthat would impact large numbers of students or provide critical interventions early in students’learning careers.“Live deep, not fast,” is an admonition coined in the early 1900’s by literature professor, critic,and editor Henry Seidel Canby 1. Faculty participating in SIIP were invited to
Paper ID #9271Integrating Freshmen into Exploring the Multi-faceted World of Engineeringand Sustainability through Biofuels Synthesis from Waste Cooking OilMs. Laura-Ann Shaa Ling Chin, Villanova University A Malaysian native, Laura-Ann Chin attended the University of Arizona where she completed her B.Sc. in Chemical Engineering. Throughout her undergraduate career, Laura has worked with numerous cut- ting edge projects including studying endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewater, researching genetic stability of E.Coli in a novel COSBIOS reactor (RWTH, Aachen Germany) and designing an automated zebrafish tracking