of a Middle School Engineering-Education Program,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://asu.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/learning-through- engineering-design-and-practice-implementation-a-2 [4] M. K. Daugherty and V. Carter, “The Nature of Interdisciplinary STEM Education,” in Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2017, pp. 1–13. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_12-1. [5] S. Foroudastan and B. Prater Thompson, “Experimental Vehicles Program Research and Innovation Prepares Students for Challenges of
participants exhibited gains in their skills along with enthusiasm and motivation toundertake further global engagement. To a practitioner in the field of global engineeringeducation, this is exciting. However, gateway course students are a subset of a significantlylarger population of global experience alumni (at the Pennsylvania State University’s College ofEngineering and across peer engineering colleges). Thus, a question remains: How can theenthusiasm of global experience participants be harnessed into scalable, sustained momentum toforge global leaders?References[1] M. E. Mendenhall, B. S. Reiche, A. Bird, and J. S. Osland, “Defining the 'Global' in GlobalLeadership,” Journal of World Business, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 493-503, 2012.[2] N. A
Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment, University Park, Pa., 1992.[20] Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek ’11, page 9–15, New York, NY, USA, 2011. Association for Computing Machinery.[21] Beth Hurst, Randall Wallace, and Sarah B. Nixon. The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4):375–398, 2013. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5 (Accessed August 2018).[22] Kamaruzaman
(MoMoTech). Heidelberg: Springer.[15] van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016), Study choice and career development inSTEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technologyand Design Education, 26(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1[16] Krüger, H. (1992), Vorberufliche Sozialisation. German Journal of Research in HumanResource Management, 318-341.[17] Ivemark, B., & Ambrose, A. (2021), Habitus Adaptation and First-Generation UniversityStudents’ Adjustment to Higher Education: A Life Course Perspective. Sociology of Education.https://doi.org/10.1177/00380407211017060[18] Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Kalogiannakis, M., & Stamovlasis, D. (2021).Attitudes towards
. DOI:10.1177/03064190231169129.[22] V. Souitaris, S. Zerbinati and A. Al-Laham, "Do entrepreneurship programmes raiseentrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspirationand resources," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 22, pp. 566–591, 2007.[23] J. Mattioli and B. Braunschweig, "AITA: AI trustworthiness assessment," AI Magazine, vol.44, (2), pp. 202, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/aaai.12096.[24] G. Verhulsdonck et al, "Incorporating Human Judgment in AI-Assisted ContentDevelopment: The HEAT Heuristic," Tech. Comm., vol. 71, (3), pp. 60, 2024. . DOI:10.55177/tc286621.[25] M. Flaherty. (Sep. 12). Q. What does OneSearch search?. Available:https://libanswers.quinnipiac.edu/abl/faq/411035.[26] Y. Engeström
Paper ID #49524Implementing an Interdisciplinary Senior Design Approach Within a TraditionalDepartmental FrameworkDr. Michelle H. Rosen, The Cooper Union Dr. Michelle H. Rosen is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The Cooper Union, where she joined the faculty in 2021. Her research focuses on the mechanical design of bio-inspired robotics as well as hands-on engineering education. Dr. Rosen earned her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Harvard University in 2018. After her Ph.D., she served as a Lecturer at Harvard where she taught both introductory and senior design courses. Dr. Rosen is dedicated to
Education, 111(4), 770–791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20474 Murzi, H. G., Chowdhury, T. M., Karlovšek, J., & Ulloa, B. C. R. (2020). Working in Large Teams: Measuring the Impact of a Teamwork Model to Facilitate Teamwork Development in Engineering Students Working in a Real Project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 1(B), 274–295. https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol36-1B/02_ijee3872.pdf Rodríguez-Simmonds, H. E., Godwin, A., Langus, T., Pearson, N., & Kirn, A. (2023). Building Inclusion in Engineering Teaming Practices. Studies in Engineering Education, 3(2), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.84 Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021
/TSSJ.V17I1.2752.[9] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, “Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research,” Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, pp. 1–271, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.4324/9780203793206.Appendix 1WPI IRB Approval and ExemptionAppendix 2Copilot Prompts and ResponsesTeam 3 Team PerspectivesPrompt 1: Analyze the emerging themes for the 6 decolonization questions and present your analysis withclear summary of how themes emerged for each question I upload 3 set of these question and theiranswers.Thank you for sharing the questions and answers. I'll analyze the emerging themes for each question andprovide a clear summary.1. Who is driving this process?Emerging Themes: • Responsibility and
development of a systematic approach for the integration of generative AI tools in thecourse development process. This study focuses on the effect of generative AI tools on theefficiency of course development projects and their subsequent student learning outcomes.Specifically, the research aims to answer the following questions: 1. How does the use of generative AI affect the efficiency of the course development process and the quality of the content produced? a. What are the perceptions of the subject matter expert regarding the use of generative AI tools in course development? b. What are the perceptions of the instructional designer regarding the use of generative AI tools in course development
necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] G. Miller, H.M. Jerónimo, Q. Zhu, Editors’ Introduction to Thinking through Science andTechnology: Philosophy, Religion, and Politics in an Engineered World, edited by Miller,Jerónimo, and Zhu, 1–10. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2023.[2] C.E. Harris, S. Pritchard, J. Ray, E.E. Eanglehardt, M.J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics – Conceptsand Cases, Sixth Edition, Cengage, Boston, MA, USA, 2019.[3] S.J. Bird, A. Briggle, “Research Ethics.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: AGlobal Resource, edited by J. B. Holbrook, 2nd ed., vol. 3, Macmillan Reference USA, 2015, pp.584-592.[4] D.H. Guston, T. Kowall, “Research Integrity.” Ethics, Science, Technology, and
. Wireless Pers Commun 108, 363–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06407-w[4] L. C. B. C. Ferreira, O. C. Branquinho, P. R. Chaves, P. Cardieri, F. Fruett and M. D. Yacoub, "A PBL-Based Methodology for IoT Teaching," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 20-26, November 2019, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900242.[5] Gemini Developer API. [online]. Available at: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs. (Accessed: January 9, 2025).[6] C. Grabowski, M. Rush, K. Ragen, V. Fayard, and Karen Watkins-Lewis, “Today’s Non- Traditional Student: Challenges to Academic Success and Degree Completion,” Inquiries Journal, Vol. 8, No. 03, pp. 1-2, 2016. [7] K. Habib, E. Kai, M. Saad, A. Hussain, A. Ayob and A. Ahmad, “Internet
menagerie of media to solve problems and deliver creative, unexpected, solutions that are rich in play and story. Kent also celebrates teaching in the Design Department at the University of Kansas, as well as working with the Lawrence Arts Center, VanGo, Percolator and other fine organizations. Smitty loves super-heroes, ninjas, monkeys, UFOs, cryptids, robots, ray-guns, and romance. He is always up for creative adventures and hopes you will come visit Smittytown whenever you need a fantastic escape, ridiculous adventure, and fun solutions for your creative needs. Smittytown.com instagram.com/smittytownart/ facebook.com/KentSmithIllustration/Prof. Mark B Shiflett P.E., The University of Kansas Mark B. Shiflett is a
https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) assessment tool for engineering students. accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/Starting in 2003 Matthew Ohland led a team from multiple universities whodesigned CATME. A Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) of five factors fit the Beigpourian, B., Ferguson, D. M., Berry, F. C., Ohland, M. W., & Wei, S. (2019). Usingdata best. The five behaviors are
necessity of shifting from deficit toassets-based approaches to engaging communities of color and to push researchers, practitioners,and policymakers to expand beyond practices that broadly position Whiteness, maleness, andcapitalism as the norm. For example, (a) Critical Race Theory [14], which explores theintersections of race, power, and privilege in engineering education; (b) Culturally Sustainingand Revitalizing Pedagogies for integrating cultural identities and linguistic practices in fosteringinclusive educational environments [15]; Culturally responsive pedagogy [16,17]; or Reciprocity[18] which emphasizes mutual engagement and respect between institutions and communitiesthey engage with to name a few. However, as we went about this work
exercise to help students engage moresuccessfully and update the pre-recorded videos to better address common questions submittedby students. All module files are available to other instructors on our website:https://unites.engr.tamu.edu/.AcknowledgementThe National Science Foundation Grant EEC-2022275 supported the initiation of this project.References[1] T. W. Hissey, "Education and careers 2000. Enhanced skills for engineers," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1367-1370, 2000.[2] L. Small, K. Shacklock, and T. Marchant, "Employability: a contemporary review for higher education stakeholders," Journal of Vocational Education & Training, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 148-166, 2018.[3] R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R
. Display of angle measurements and equationsAs shown in Figure 5, learners can interact with the diagram by dragging points B, C, and Daround the circle, while point A remains fixed. As the points move, the application calculates anddisplays the angles in real-time. Manipulating points on the circle allows students to instantly seehow angles change and relate to each other.Students were provided links to the Interactive Angle Addition Simulator in Geogebra (Figure 4)and the Angle Simulator (Figure 5). Students explored and engaged with the simulators tofamiliarize themselves with the configurations. They used the simulators to answer the oddnumbered questions from the class worksheet (Figure 6). Figure 4: Angle Addition
. Wegner, "Networking Ability and the Financial Performance of New Ventures: Moderating Effects of Venture Size, Institutional Environment, and Their Interaction," Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 266-283, 2015, doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12009.[4] B. Batjargal, "Network dynamics and new ventures in China: A longitudinal study," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139-153, 2010, doi: 10.1080/08985620802628864.[5] H. Hoang and B. Antoncic, "Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 165-187, 2003/03/01/ 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00081-2.[6] A. Yi and H. Hoang
Paper ID #47056Interactivity Unleashed: Integrating Embedded Questions in Videos to IncreaseStudent Interaction with Content in Asynchronous Engineering CoursesChristine Allain Roach, Texas A&M University Christine Roach is an instructional designer at the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Drawing from her background as an educator and her M.Ed. in Educational Technology, she collaborates with faculty to design and implement engaging online learning experiences that promote active student engagement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Interactivity
Paper ID #46085Systematic literature review on the common misconceptions in thermodynamics,fluid mechanics, and heat transferDr. Adrian Rodriguez, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Adrian Rodriguez is a Senior Engineering Content Developer for zyBooks, a Wiley brand and a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include engineering education, multibody dynamics, contact and impact with friction, electro-mechanical systems, and nonlinear dynamics. He earned his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical
potential for upperclassmen and graduatestudents to benefit in these ways from acting as peer mentors should be included in plans to enactmentoring programs potentially even as a part of a graduate student program.Acknowledgments The authors are thankful for support from Texas A&M University-Kingsville and theNational Science Foundation. The material presented is based upon work supported by theNational Science Foundation under Grant No. 1928611. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions,and recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Rodgers, K.A., “Retention of Underrepresented College Students in STEM,” In B. Bogue &E
Paper ID #45450”We’ve got the solutions!” A chemical engineering high school summer campDr. Leah Granger, North Carolina State University Leah Granger is a postdoctoral researcher for Engineering Education and a course instructor for the Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department at North Carolina State University.Dr. Lisa G. Bullard P.E., North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa Bullard is an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. ©American Society for
Employers Want,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 10, p. 641, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11100641.[2] S. J. Aguilar, C. Holman, and B. J. Fishman, “Game-Inspired Design: Empirical Evidence in Support of Gameful Learning Environments,” Games Cult., Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1555412015600305.[3] L. A. Sutch, “Challenge Accepted! Going Gameful to Develop Soft Skills,” Exp. Learn. Teach. High. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 39–42, May 2021, doi: 10.46787/elthe.v3i3.3422.[4] L. A. Sutch, “Professional Competency Development through Reflection (Work-in-Progress),” presented at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2024. doi: 10.18260/1-2--47877.[5] A. Gregg, J. Park, C. Fenton, D. Lang, and M. Handley, “Exploring the ‘Why’ of
–243. doi: 10.1142/9789811232701_0022.[6] L. Seyyed-Kalantari, H. Zhang, M. B. A. McDermott, I. Y. Chen, and M. Ghassemi, “Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations,” Nat. Med., vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2176–2182, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01595-0.[7] A. J. Larrazabal, N. Nieto, V. Peterson, D. H. Milone, and E. Ferrante, “Gender imbalance in medical imaging datasets produces biased classifiers for computer-aided diagnosis,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 117, no. 23, pp. 12592–12594, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919012117.[8] A. Arora et al., “The value of standards for health datasets in artificial intelligence-based
mindset.References[1] K.-Y. Lin, Y.-T. Wu, Y.-T. Hsu, and P. J. Williams, “Effects of infusing the engineering design processinto STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering designthinking,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9.[2]S. A. Wind, M. Alemdar, J. A. Lingle, R. Moore, and A. Asilkalkan, “Exploring student understandingof the engineering design process using distractor analysis,” International Journal of STEM Education,vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0156-x.[3]L. K. Berland, “Designing for STEM integration,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering EducationResearch (J-PEER), vol. 3, no. 1, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1078.[4]B. L
Paper ID #48362BOARD # 327: Biomimicry as an authentic anchor: Giving teacher the toolsto adapt an interdisciplinary middle school curriculum (DRK12)Geling Xu, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Geling Xu is a Ph.D. student in STEM Education at Tufts University and a research assistant at Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. She is interested in K-12 STEM Education, AI Education, MakerSpace, LEGO Education, and curriculum design.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Education at Tufts University. Her research at the
Bs.Quantitatively, almost all students earning A grades completed 100% of the reading tasks by thedue date. Specifically, 11 of the 13 students earning A grades completed 99% of the readingclicks or more, which is not articulated in a box plot based on quartiles. This level of readingparticipation for students earning A grades in thermodynamics is consistent with students inmaterial and energy balance courses [13, 15].Next, the median reading participation for students earning B and C grades were 100 and 94%,respectively. The 1st quartile scores showed a larger difference with 97 and 86% for the B and Cgroups. While the reading participation did decrease with subsequent letter grades (more clearlyobserved for the zoomed in right panel of Figure 3), the
Engineering at The University of Louisville. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering form The State University of New York at Binghamton.Dr. Jay B. Brockman, University of Notre Dame Dr. Jay Brockman is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Experiential Learning and Community Engagement. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and previously worked for Intel Corporation. He is also a founder ofDr. Hazel Marie, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering Hazel Marie, Ph.D., P.E. received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas in Austin, her M.S. from Youngstown State University, and her Ph.D. from the University of Akron
Polytechnic Institute and State University Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds an honorary position at the University of Cape Town. Her research on the student experience of learning, focusing mainly on science and engineerinDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Chief of Strategy in the College of Engineering and Special Assistant to the Provost. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive
Paper ID #49285Integrating Robotics and Automation in STEM Education: Preparing theFuture Workforce for Advanced ManufacturingDr. Md B. Sarder, Bowling Green State University Dr. Sarder is a professor & director of the School of Engineering at Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Prior to joining BGSU, he worked at the U.S. Air Force Academy as a distinguished research fellow. He served as an associate professor, and graduate director of the logistics, trade, and transportation program at the University of Southern Mississippi (USM). Dr. Sarder has a record of excellence in research, teaching, and services as
engineering competition teams. Additionally, there are strict PPErequirements for entering the space, regardless of what is being used, including safety goggles,closed toe shoes, ankle covering pants, and no jewelry. School B is a student volunteer managedspace located inside the mechanical engineering building. As such, the space is used primarily bymechanical engineering students despite being open to all engineering students. Both personal andclass-based projects are allowed. PPE requirements vary depending on the area of space beingused, with the main area requiring none and the wood and metal workspaces needing closed toeshoes and safety goggles. Data was collected at both schools using end of semester surveys (see[10] for further details). The