Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sumito Nagasawa, Shibaura Institute of Technology; Hatsuko Yoshikubo Ph.D., SHIBAURA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

(0.36 [degree]) signals (A, B) $50 45mm, 180g position detection Widely used Incremental / 3 1000 CPR Approx. φ40 x forE6B2-CWZ6C Omron signals (A, B, (0.36 [degree]) $150 39mm, 100g educational Z) robots

Conference Session

Transformative and Just Futures in Engineering (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 11)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Pleasants, University of Oklahoma; Moses Olayemi, The University of Oklahoma; Brandon Scot Abbott, University of Oklahoma; Jacqueline M. Vadjunec PhD, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

. 9References[1] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, "Criteria for accrediting engineeringprograms, 2024-2025," ABET, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024-2025/[2] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, "A multi-level review of engineering ethicseducation: Towards a socio-technical orientation of engineering education for ethics," Sci. Eng.Ethics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 60, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6[3] National Academy of Engineering, "Grand challenges for engineering," Washington, DC:National Academies Press, 2008.[4] M. Berge, E. Silfver, and A. Danielsson, "In search of the new engineer: Gender, age, andsocial class in

Conference Session

ME Division 3: Modern Tools and Methods in Structural Analysis and CAD

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Szwalek, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Christopher Carducci, The University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

expectations of the design review (i.e., what makes it useful vsunhelpful) that was derived from Scott Hamilton’s study [2]. Each design review is a small,graded assignment (10 points), so that students put in effort. Not all learning activities need tobe graded, but students are motivated to engage in it if it is incorporated into their final grade [5].A second page was added to the design review form to incorporate reflection practices asdescribed in Part I (Page 2, Appendix B) [8]. This has been adapted from a peer reviewworkshop evaluation form used for team-based project reporting that has been shown to work inan industrial and systems engineering course [3]. The second page ensures students have readtheir feedback and internalized it, thereby

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelsey Scalaro, Cornell University ; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Justin L Hess, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

scales [13].Instrument Design MethodologyRGS is an approach to scale development for progressive constructs. RSG is guided by Raschmeasurement principles [23] and Guttman facet theory design [24], [25], [26], which togetherguide the generation of scenarios to measure progressive phenomena. Rasch measurementprinciples serve as an a priori foundation to identify constructs and guide scale development.Rasch principles dictate that scale items must (a) measure a single construct, (b) measure a rangeof levels of the construct, (c) spread uniformly across the construct continuum, (d) measure theincreasing progress of the construct, (e) have the same relationship to the construct, (f) that oneresponse to an item is not dependent on the response of

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Examining Identity

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katharine Sarah Getz, Pennsylvania State University; Allison Godwin, Cornell University; Matthew Bahnson, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Danielle V. Lewis, University at Buffalo; Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20239[2] Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), eaao6373. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373[3] Hughes, B. E. (2017). “Managing by Not Managing”: How Gay Engineering Students Manage Sexual Orientation Identity. Journal of College Student Development, 58(3), 385– 401. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0029[4] Haverkamp, A., Butler, A., Pelzl, N. S., Bothwell, M. K., Montfort, D., & Driskill, Q. (2019). Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergraduate Experiences through

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jose Manuel Padilla, Michigan Technological University; Michelle E Jarvie-Eggart P.E., Michigan Technological University; Briana C Bettin, Michigan Technological University; Kathryn Laura Hannum, Michigan Technological University; Adrienne Minerick, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2016. 20(2): p. 154-164.6.​ L.W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Completed. 2001, New York: Longman.7.​ R. A. Sperling, B. C. Howard, L. A. Miller, and C. Murphy. “Measures of Children’s Knowledge and Regulation of Cognition,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–79, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1006/ceps.2001.1091.8.​ J. R. Sablan. “Can You Really Measure That? Combining Critical Race Theory and Quantitative Methods,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 178–203, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218798325.9.​ E

Conference Session

Identity, Experiences, and Perceptions (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 2)

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lucy Arellano Jr., University of California, Santa Barbara; Margarita Rodriguez, University of California, Santa Barbara

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

code, term of first enrollment, cumulative credit hours, intention to transfer, andmajor.Data Analysis Guided by the research questions, this study utilized three primary regression models toexamine (1) sense of belonging, (2) STEM pathways, and (3) gender discrepancies. To predicteach outcome, a multiple regression model was optimized using all participants in the dataset,ensuring that the data met the necessary assumptions for regression analysis, including linearity,independence, and normality. A central focus was understanding how the experiences ofmarginalized students differed from the broader STEM student population at Blue Lake College.Accordingly, six additional subgroups were analyzed: (a) Latinx students, (b) students

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.D

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James E. Lewis, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville; Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

Paper ID #46639First-Year Student Interest in Hands-On Final Project with an AutonomousRobotDr. James E. Lewis, University of Louisville James E. Lewis, Ph.D. is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals in the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville. His primary research focus is Engineering Education and First-Year Programs. He also has interests in cryptography, and parallel and distributed computer systems.Dr. Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville Nick Hawkins is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department at the University of Louisville. He

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Constanza Miranda, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel; Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, The Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

) motivation to improve their performance, and (3) better decision-making when it comes tochoices on what to focus on and when to seek help. However, not all students may have the skillsto correctly interpret their data. Misinterpretation could lead to misguided actions. Studentsmight focus on the wrong areas of improvement or experience unnecessary stress. For ethical useof the collected data, students need to be provided with the resources to make sense of it in aconstructive way. Also, constant monitoring of feedback can psychologically impact students bycreating more anxiety and potentially unhealthy competition among students.References[1] Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts

Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jonathan William Ross, Drexel University; Karen Miu Miller, Drexel University; Christopher Wayne Peters, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

. [3] C. Ahnert, D. Cuervo, N. Garcia-Herranz, J. M. Aragones, O. Cabellos, E. Gallego, “E. Minguez, A. Lorente, D. Piedra, L. Rebollo, and J. Blanco, “Education and training of future nuclear engineers through the use of an interactive plant simulator,” in International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 722-732, 2011. [4] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Computer codes,” NRC.gov, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/regulatory/research/safetycodes.html. [5] P. K. Romano, N. E. Horelik, B. R. Herman, A. G. Nelson, B. Forget, and K. Smith, “OpenMC: a state-of-the-art Monte Carlo code for research and development,” in Annals of Nuclear Energy

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olugbenro Ogunrinde, Tarleton State University; Isabella-Kharissa Pena, Tarleton State University; Tyler Rider, Tarleton State University; Billy Gray, Tarleton State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

distribution ofone owner and engineering individual respectively, other role distributions are three (3) mid-level management, two (2) upper-level management, and one (1) owner. This implies that almost90% of the participants are in a management position or higher roles that are considered as thosewho make major strategic decisions and oversee directions in the organization. The surveyquestion that guided this response is “What is your current role within your organization”. In Fig.1.b., the survey question was “What is your company’s specialty”. As seen below the responserepresents that multiple specialties exist within a single organization, and the data result areMachinery & Equipment (3), Energy and Aerospace (2) respectively, and one (1) for

Conference Session

Smarter Strategies: Evolving Tools for Engineering Management Excellence

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Ivan Rodriguez-Devora, University of Georgia; Roger Hilten, University of Georgia; Wayne Johnson, University of Georgia; Gustavo Morán-Soto, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Durango

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management Division (EMD)

, Pew Research Center. https://Www.Pewresearch.Org/Social- Trends/2018/01/09/Diversity-in-the-Stem-Workforce-Varies-Widely-across-Jobs/.[3] Schuster, P., Cooper, L., Elghandour, E., Rossman, E., Harding, S., & Self, B. (2020, June). Senior capstone team formation based on project interest: Team selection by students compared with team selection by instructors. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35187[4] Aller, B. M., Lyth, D. M., & Mallak, L. A. (2008). Capstone project team formation: Mingling increases performance and motivation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540

Conference Session

ECCNE Technical Session 2 - Alternative Energy Sources

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lihong Heidi Jiao, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

) (b) (c) Figure 1The effect of series resistance and temperature on the performance of solar cell. (a) MATLAB Simulink setup (b) The I-V curve of the solar cell as series resistance changes from 0 to 0.08 (c) The I-V curve as temperature changes from 0oC to 75oCThrough this exercise, students gained a deeper understanding of the concepts covered inlectures. By analyzing Figure 1b, they reinforced key ideas, including: • Solar cells with the same Voc and Isc may not produce the same Pmp, highlighting the 𝑃 importance of the fill factor, F, where 𝐹 = 𝑉 𝑚𝑝 . 𝐼 𝑜𝑐 𝑠𝑐 • Parasitic

Conference Session

Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rajan Kumar, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Materials Division (MATS)

before stepping foot in the laboratory.Four new RDC learning outcomes (LO-C to LO-F) were established to support this goal thatmapped directly to our department-level learning outcomes for the undergraduate curriculum.The revised course learning outcomes prepared students to: LO-A. Describe various techniques used to synthesize nanomaterials and justify their use LO-B. Explain how to characterize important properties of nanomaterials LO-C. Summarize the important objectives, methods, findings, and conclusions of a scientific report LO-D. Perform a literature search on a nanomaterials topic that interests you LO-E. Identify an important research question or gap in scientific knowledge LO-F. Design a logical set of experiments

Conference Session

DSAI Technical Session 8: Learning Analytics and Data-Driven Instruction

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Selena Johnson, Rowan University; Paromita Nath, Rowan University; Smitesh Bakrania, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee

theyencountered, and subsequently analyzing and interpreting the collected data to derive meaningfulinsights.Survey questionnaireThe survey questions were designed to investigate how specific aspects of online learning, such asengagement and feedback, influence learning outcomes. By incorporating a mix of rating-scaleand open-ended questions, the study gathered both quantitative data and in-depth qualitativeinsights, providing a holistic view of student experiences. The questions were organized into fourcategories: (a) Engagement with online courses assessed students’ overall perceptions of online learning and their prior experience with such courses (b) Factors influencing engagement focused on students’ interactions with course materials and

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

: 10.1561/2000000111.[10] E. Yong, A Popular Algorithm Is No Better at Predicting Crimes Than Random People, en, Section: Technology, Jan. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.theatlantic. com / technology / archive / 2018 / 01 / equivant - compas - algorithm / 550646/.[11] B. Templeton, An 8-Car Pileup Started By A Tesla In Autopilot Opens Up Many Com- plex Issues, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https : / / www . forbes . com / sites / bradtempleton/2023/01/11/an-8-car-pileup-started-by-a-tesla- in-autopilot-opens-up-many-complex-issues/?sh=2fae2f0212be.[12] O. Gencoglu, M. van Gils, E. Guldogan, et al., “HARK side of deep learning – From grad student descent to automated machine learning,” en, Apr. 2019. [Online

Conference Session

ERM WIP II: Equity & Accessibility in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tania Gosselin, Université du Québec à Montréal ; Lawrence R Chen, McGill University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

variance.The largest increment is associated with Supervision Experience (R2 = .219; F(1,148) =47.889, p < .01). Adding Research Group Experience makes a smaller, yet significantcontribution (R2 = .036; F(1,147) = 8.289, p < .01). In Model 3, both Supervision Experience(b = .418, t = 5.943, p < .01) and Research Group Experience (b = .210, t = 2.879, p < .01) aresignificantly associated with the perceptions of belonging to the professional community.Discussions and limitationsOur preliminary results show that it makes sense to consider simultaneously the supervision andresearch group experiences when evaluating graduate research training. As expected, the two arerelated, yet play a varying role depending on the outcomes being examined

Conference Session

WiP: Interdisciplinary Connections

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tamara Floyd Smith, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Gifty Osei-Prempeh, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Yogendra M. Panta P.E., West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Bernhard P Bettig, West Virginia University Institute of Technology; Kenan Hatipoglu, West Virginia University Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

. The instructor volunteered to teach the mechanical/civilengineering section to begin to explore offering a combined course with all three disciplines.TextbooksFigure 2 shows the covers of the textbooks used for the two disciplines. The content is verysimilar, but the organizations of the books are different. Table 1 compares the chapter titles forthe two textbooks. Most topics are covered in both books, but the difference is how the courseswere structured for the different disciplines. (a) (b) Figure 2: (a) Engineering Fluid Mechanics 12th Edition adopted for the mechanical and civil engineering course (b) Fluid Mechanics for Chemical Engineers adopted for

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mollie Johnson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Olivier Ladislas de Weck, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

used a Meta Quest 2before. Table 5: Outline of the general course structure for Aeroverse. Theme Module Nickname Description VR Group Aircraft Module A: Explore a Jet Plane Custom module Group 1 Week Module B: Fly a Jet Plane Microsoft Flight Simulator Group 1 Spacecraft Module C: Explore Mars with a Custom module Group 2 Week Remote-Controlled Vehicle Module D: Explore Mars with an Custom module Group 2 Autonomous Vehicle Astronaut Module E: Human-Machine Mission: ISS scavenger hunt

Conference Session

Hands-on Learning and Industry-Relevant in ECE Curriculum Development

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom J. Zajdel, Carnegie Mellon University; Allison E. Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

: 10.18260/p.26947.[12] S. Zekavat, “A Preliminary Study On The Shortcomings Of The Interdisciplinary Course Electrical Engineering For Nonmajors,” presented at the 2004 Annual Conference, Jun. 2004, p. 9.86.1- 9.86.17.[13] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women Engineering Students and Self- Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self-Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27–38, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01003.x.[14] G. Trujillo and K. D. Tanner, “Considering the Role of Affect in Learning: Monitoring Students’ Self-Efficacy, Sense of Belonging, and Science Identity,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–15, Mar. 2014

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.D

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leslie Bondaryk, The Concord Consortium; Aaron Kyle, Duke University; Ido Davidesco, University of Connecticut; Chad Dorsey; Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

used to power thesensors and communicate signals through the system. The middle school units containmicro:bits and sensors for humidity and temperature in conjunction with heat lamps, fans, andhumidifiers contained within an integrated terrarium environment. All of these components arerouted through Dataflow, a custom data pipeline programming language that allows students toeasily connect with hardware components and introduce filtering and control logic as shown inFigure 1.Figure 1. A screen capture of CLUE software showing (a) the inline curriculum (left) with aphotograph of the hardware kit, and (b) WYSIWIS collaborative student view (right) wheregroups can compare and reuse solutions as they evolve. Note digital twins in the upper

Conference Session

ME Division 10: Innovation in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

JuEun Lee, Cal Poly Humboldt

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

of Chicago Press, 2012.[3] M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, "Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2001.[4] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[5] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, "Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278, 2008.[6] R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education," Eng. Educ., vol. 78

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 1: Integrating AI, VR, and MR in Engineering Lab Experiences

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathanael Kloeppel, Purdue Polytechnic Graduate Programs; Denis Uebiyev, Purdue University; Lisa Bosman, Purdue University; Joshua J Ellis, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Learning Curriculum of the Aircraft Maintenance Training Organization 147 for Avionic Study Program as a Basis in Meeting the Need of the Aviation Industry," Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol. 34, 2020.[6] T. W. Jiang, C.-t. Lu, H. Fu, N. Palmer, and J. Peng, "An Inductive Approach to Identify Aviation Maintenance Human Errors and Risk Controls," The Collegiate Aviation Review International, vol. 40, no. 1, 2022.[7] H. Padil, M. Said, and A. Azizan, "The contributions of human factors on human error in Malaysia aviation maintenance industries," in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, vol. 370, no. 1: IOP Publishing, p. 012035.[8] B. Denizhan and A

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seyedehsareh Hashemikamangar, The University of Memphis; Stephanie S Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig O. Stewart, University of Memphis; Karen D Alfrey, Purdue University; Tom Altman; Michael S. Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Tony Chase, Indiana University (IUPUI); Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; William Taylor Schupbach, University of Colorado Denver

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, Z. Andrijasevic, and B. Pejovic, “STEM Education and Growth in Europe,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2348–2371, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00817-7.[2] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, “Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the president.,” Exec. Off. Pres., 2012.[3] M. White, E. Legg, B. Foroughi, and J. Rose, “Constructing past, present, and future communities: Exploring the experiences of community among last‐dollar scholarship students,” J. Community Psychol., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 805–818, 2019.[4] “Building a Sense of Community.” https://serc.carleton.edu/lsamp/community.html (accessed Dec

Conference Session

Tech Session 2: Course-Level Innovations in Environmental Engineering: Projects, Case Studies, and Social Impact

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hadley Willman, Engineering for One Planet; Victoria Matthew, Engineering for One Planet; Andrew K. Schulz, Georgia Institute of Technology; Emma Telepo, Michigan State University; Reese Emily Simancek

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering & Sustainability Division (ENVIRON)

. 549, no. 7671, pp. 257–260, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1038/nature23878.[2]​ A. Schulz, C. Greiner, B. Seleb, C. Shriver, D. L. Hu, and R. Moore, “Towards the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Conservation Technology for Design Teaching & Learning,” in American Society of Engineering Education, Mar. 2022.[3]​ E. W. Davis, J. M. Lakin, V. A. Davis, and P. K. Raju, “Nanotechnology Solutions to Engineering Grand Challenges,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/nanotechnology-solutions-to-engineering-grand-challenges[4]​ S. Strachan and A. Greig, “PEDAGOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE GREEN SKILLS GAP

Conference Session

ME Division 10: Innovation in the Sophomore Year

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oziel Rios, University of Texas at Dallas; Dani Fadda, University of Texas at Dallas; P.l.stephan Thamban

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

(b) Hollow Cylinder Fig. 1, Tolerance Zones Produced by Circularity and Cylindricity2. Measurement Fixture for Circularity and CylindricityCircularity or roundness is a cross-sectional check resulting in a planar (2D) tolerance zone [2]. Thetolerance zone is the space between two concentric circles (the annulus shown in Fig. 1a) and if thesurface of the feature’s cross-section is contained within this space, the feature will pass inspection.If the surface exceeds the space, the feature will be rejected. (a) Parts and tools needed to check circularity (b) 3D printed part showing the rotation and and cylindricity cross-section guides. (c

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haniye Mehraban, Oklahoma State University; Jennifer Dawn Cribbs, Oklahoma State University; Erin Dyke, Oklahoma State University; James Stine, Oklahoma State University; John Hu, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

program’s consistent effectiveness in enhancing teacherknowledge of semiconductor concepts. Together, the data from both years underscores theprogram’s impact in equipping teachers with the skills necessary to integrate semiconductoreducation into their classrooms. (a) (b) Figure 1: Mean percent change from pre to post assessment. (a): Year One, (b): Year TwoChallenges and RecommendationsBased on data collected throughout the implementation of the RET program, key areas forimprovement have been identified to enhance the Chip-RET program’s impact. Adding morestructure, such as clear goals, regular mentor meetings, and scaffolding for challenging content,could better support

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Centers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Merrimack College; Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Heather Dillon, University of Washington; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; Glenn R Gaudette, Boston College; Douglas E. Melton, The Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Family Foundation

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, the assignment was segmented and explicitly required completion before the semester’send to allow faculty to consult with campus colleagues. See Appendix B for details of the pre-workshop assignment deployed for the third offering. These changes led to improvedengagement during the in-person workshop and a stronger focus on entrepreneurial-mindedefforts.Lastly, the coaching model evolved substantially. In the first offering, a clear separation existedbetween facilitators and coaches, with only one of the three coaches attending the in-personsessions. For the second offering, coaches were more integrated into the in-person workshop,attending reporting sessions either in person or via Zoom. By the third offering, the teamexpanded to include

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Examining Undergraduate Recruitment & Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyler Milburn, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Camp, “Freshman Engineering Student Perceptions of Engineering Disciplines,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Southeast Section Annual Conference, 2010, pp. 1–11.[3] S. Zahorian, M. Elmore, and K. J. Temkin, “Factors that Influence Engineering Freshman to Choose Their Engineering Major,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp. 1–13.[4] M. A. Jacobs and Z. Shahbazi, “Best practices in Encouraging STEM Majors Among 6- 12 Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[5] M. B. Sarder, “Designing STEM Curriculum for K12 Students,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[6] G. Hein, K. Torrey, J. Hertel, D

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 4: Fostering Belonging - Identity, Self-Efficacy, and Retention

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Patrick O'Connell, Northeastern University; Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University; Richard Whalen, Northeastern University; Constantine Mukasa, Northeastern University; Susan F Freeman, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

experiences workingon a design team. Each participant provided reflective statements regarding their experiences withteamwork, leadership, and project management. Reflections were structured to include insights onchallenges faced, leadership styles, group dynamics, and personal contributions. Though not specificallyasked for, this data was analyzed for the level of engagement pertinent to team dynamic concepts. Theanalysis utilized a systematic qualitative approach, incorporating iterative validation, refinement, andcategorization strategies informed by best practices in qualitative research and emerging AI-basedtechniques[20], [21], [22], [23].Data Handling and AnalysisThis report compares Cohorts A, B, C, and F Datasets, summarized in Table 1. The