ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying results 1471 - 1500 of 2458 in total

← Previous
1
2
…
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
…
81
82
Next →

BOARD # 227: Building Engineering Leaders: Pairing Leadership Coursework with Service Learning - NSF DUE #2012339

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Marianna Savoca, Stony Brook University; Monica Bugallo, Stony Brook University; Diana Voss, Stony Brook University; Urszula Zalewski, Stony Brook University
Tagged Topics: Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

employers are looking for on graduates’ resumes," NationalAssociation of Colleges and Employers (NACE), Jan. 16, 2024. [Online].[3] J. L. Graves Jr., M. Kearney, G. Barabino, and S. Malcom, "Inequality in science and the casefor a new agenda," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119, no. 10, articlee2117831119, 2022.[4] V. Tiberius, "In defense of reflection," Philosophical Issues, vol. 23, pp. 223-243, 2013.[5] B. Jacoby, Service-Learning Essentials: Questions, Answers, and Lessons Learned. SanFrancisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.[6] B. Brown, Dare to Lead: Brave Work, Tough Conversations, Whole Hearts. New York:Random House, 2018.[7] R. Jarvis, K. Dempsey, G. Gutierrez, D. Lewis, K. Rouleau, and B. J. Stone, Peer

Relevance Score: 0.029974716

Identifying the Learning Needs of Construction Professionals for Artificial Intelligence

Conference Session: Construction Engineering Division: AI & Automation
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Sooin Kim, Wayne State University; Aaroh Swarup, Construction Industry Development Council (CIDC), India
Tagged Divisions: Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

. Lee, "Empirical Case Study on Applying Artificial Intelligence and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for the Efficient Visual Inspection of Residential Buildings," Buildings, 2023-10-31 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13112754.[3] H. Alavi, P. Gordo-Gregorio, N. Forcada, A. Bayramova, and D. Edwards, "AI-Driven BIM Integration for Optimizing Healthcare Facility Design," Buildings, 2024-07-30 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14082354.[4] O. R. Aziza, N. S. Uzougbo, and M. C. Ugwu, "AI and the future of contract management in the oil and gas sector," World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023-09-30 2023, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.19.3.1424.[5] M. Regona, T. Yigitcanlar, B. Xia, and R. Li, "Artificial

Relevance Score: 0.029961135

Beyond Swipe and Tap: Cultivating Mobile Accessibility Awareness and Knowledge in Computing Disciplines

Conference Session: Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.E
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, University of Texas at San Antonio; Chunyu Liu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Yunqi Li, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Devorah Kletenik, Brooklyn College, City University of New York; Rachel F. Adler, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Computers in Education Division (COED)

dexterityimpairment in rounds 2 and 4, rather than using a shaking mouse, which is not used on a mobiledevice, we implemented shaking balls to simulate the difficulty that someone with a physicalimpairment may have when trying to click in the area. For the Blindness Game, in addition toverbally announcing color instructions, people had the option to swipe and tap on the screen: they (a) Round 1. (b) Round 2. Figure 1: Round 1 and round 2 of the Blindness Game.could swipe up or down to select a ball and use a two-finger tap to pop the ball. In addition, theBlindness Game had a different look, with a vertical instead of a random layout for the balls. Thisrepresented how a screen

Relevance Score: 0.029953115

Engaging Engineering Students in Experiential Learning through Robot Droids and K-12 Outreach

Conference Session: Advancing Robotics Education: Frameworks, Platforms, and Teacher Preparation for K-12 Engagement
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joshua Montgomery, THE Ohio State University & Southern State Community College; Amy Perkins-McClellan, Southern State Community College; Ayanna Howard, The Ohio State University
Tagged Divisions: Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

of educationalpartnerships that can inspire future efforts to enhance STEM learning and build well-educated,creative, and resilient communities. These programs create a stronger community of futureinnovators!AcknowledgmentThis educational program is based upon work partially supported by funding from the Ohio CodeScholars and gift funding to THE Ohio State University from the Two Sigma Faculty ResearchAward.References[1] B. Fralick, J. Kearn and S. Thompson, “How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18, 60- 73, 2009.[2] M. Liu, F.K. Chiang, “Middle school students’ perceptions of engineers: a case study of Beijing students,” Int J Technol Des Educ 30, 479–506, 2020.[3] J. Rodrigues

Relevance Score: 0.029906716

BOARD # 203: Engineering Community Inclusion of Individuals with Autism (ECIIA): Leveraging Virtual Reality (VR) Technology and Community Collaborators to Broaden Participation in Engineering (Work in Progress)

Conference Session: WIP Poster Session: Emerging Research and Practices in Pre-College Engineering Education
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jennifer Kouo, The Johns Hopkins University; Jeanette Chipps, The Johns Hopkins University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

b Background Conor, high school Engineering teacher at a private high school, and holds a mechanical teacher from Southwest engineering degree. Gabe, high school teacher Teacher of project-based engineering classes that incorporates both from mid-Atlantic STEM/STEAM and global competency and serves as a coordinator for multiple student groups. Greg, high school teacher Emerging young STEM teacher who has a strong interest in broadening from mid-Atlantic participation in STEM education curriculum. Tabitha, high school Participated in the engineering program during high school and

Relevance Score: 0.02989983

Exploring the Intersection between Lifelong Learning and Workforce Development in Engineering

Conference Session: Continuing Education
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Arsalan Ashraf, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Bailey Kathryn McOwen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Emad Ali, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Dayoung Kim, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions: Continuing, Professional, and Online Education Division (CPOED)

, "AI and the Future of Work: Preparing the Workforce for Technological Shifts and Skill Evolution," in 2024 International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS), 2024, vol. 1: IEEE, pp. 1-6.[2] World Economic Forum, "Future of Jobs Report," p. 296, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf.[3] A. Naimpally, H. Ramachandran, and C. Smith, "Lifelong learning for engineers and scientists in the information age," 2011.[4] O. K. Sabri, "Lifelong Learning for Engineers: A Literature Review," International Society for Technology, Education, and Science, 2023.[5] S. Chakrabarti, P. Caratozzolo, B. Norgaard, and E. Sjoer, Preparing

Relevance Score: 0.029860143

Evaluating the Future Self Continuity Questionnaire for use in Engineering Education Research

Conference Session: ERM Technical Session: Quantitative Instrument Development
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

, “Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies,” in Design Education Today, D. Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 115–148. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_6.[8] D. M. Gilbuena, B. U. Sherrett, E. S. Gummer, A. B. Champagne, and M. D. Koretsky, “Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 7–34, 2015, doi: 10.1002/jee.20061.[9] R. Korte, S. Brunhaver, and S. Sheppard, “(Mis)Interpretations of Organizational Socialization: The Expectations and Experiences of Newcomers and Managers,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Q., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 185–208, 2015, doi

Relevance Score: 0.029853934

From Good Pedagogy to Racial Equity: Experimenting with what works in Engineering Classrooms

Conference Session: Faculty Development: Broad Impact
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Atota Halkiyo, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, Florida,USACorrespondenceAtota B. Halkiyo, 10555 W Flagler St, Miami, FL 33174 | Florida International University,U.S.AEmail: ahalkiyo@fiu.edu 1AbstractThe issue of race-based disparities in higher education, particularly in engineering, is a pressingconcern in the United States. Many faculty developers are actively seeking ways to bridge thisgap and foster racial equity, including workshops for culturally responsive pedagogy. Facultydevelopment workshops and seminars are inherently constrained by limited time, limitedconnection to and responsiveness to each faculty’s context, and limited ability to exploreeffective interventions. This paper presents

Relevance Score: 0.0298538

Engineering Inclusion: Understanding Faculty and Student Views

Conference Session: Faculty Development: Student Engagement
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Shenghua Wu, University of South Alabama; Drew Gossen, University of South Alabama
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Faculty Development Division (FDD)

% 8% 5% Disagree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Strongly DisagreeFigure 1. Chart showing the sense of belonging among both students and faculty members.In terms of understanding the importance of diversity in engineering (Figure B1, Appendix B),Most engineering students (72%) affirm their understanding of diversity and its importance toengineering. When asked about the role of diversity in engineering, 45% strongly agree thatdiversity can provide benefits to the field, and an additional 22% agree. In contrast, 21% ofstudents strongly disagree, and 12% hold a neutral perspective

Relevance Score: 0.029847037

Visualizing TDOP+ Classroom Observation Data using Dashboards

Conference Session: ERM Technical Session: Improving Assessment in Engineering Education
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Allison Van Beek, University of Toronto; Susan McCahan, University of Toronto
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Analytics With Learning Design," Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 57, (10), pp. 1439– 1459, 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213479367 [4] D. H. Jonassen, "Revisiting activity theory as framework for designing student-centered learning environments," in Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, 1st ed., D. H. Jonassen and S. M. Land, Eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2000, pp. 89– 122. [5] V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi, "Affordances in HCI: Toward a mediated action perspective," in Chi 2012, Austin, TX, 2012. [6] A. Van Beek and S. McCahan, "Adaptation of a classroom observation protocol for active learning," in Canadian Engineering Education Association, June 2021. [7] M. T. Hora, "How the TDOP Illuminates the

Relevance Score: 0.029841175

BOARD # 376: Improving Electrical Engineering Education Structure by Bridging CTE, Community College, and University Programs through Hands-on Skills Integration

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Reza Kamali, California State University San Marcos; Hector Garcia VIlla, Palomar College; Khang Nguyen, MiraCosta College; Anthony P. Mauro
Tagged Topics: Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

) program under Award No. 2400983. The authors express their gratitude for thisessential funding, which has significantly contributed to the research and findings presented in thispaper. 6. References[1] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen and B. Bogue (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, January 2012.[2] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attritionfrom engineering majors. International Journal of Engineering Education 29(4): 914–25.Available at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1890&context=abe_eng_pubs[3] ASEE Retention Project https://www.asee.org/retention-project/keeping-students-in-engineering-a-research

Relevance Score: 0.029834945

BOARD # 379: IMPROVING TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD PHYSICS BY INTEGRATING MUSIC IN ONLINE AND IN-PERSON PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. AN ITEST STUDY.

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Victor Hugo Minces*, University of California, San Diego; Linlin Li, WestEd; Susan Yonezawa, University of California, San Diego; Eunice Chow; Alec Barron, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Topics: Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

contributes to the growing body of literatureadvocating for innovative and inclusive approaches to teacher training, fostering a deeperappreciation for science among educators and their students.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNo. (NSF 2048930)References[1] C. Dede, Online Professional Development for Teachers: Emerging Models and Methods. Harvard Education Press, 2006.[2] C. D. Lay, B. Allman, R. M. Cutri, and R. Kimmons, “Examining a Decade of Research in Online Teacher Professional Development,” Front. Educ., vol. 5, Sep. 2020[3] G. Lichtenstein and M. L. Phillips, “Comparing Online vs. In-Person Outcomes of a Hands-On, Lab-Based, Teac her Professional

Relevance Score: 0.029834945

Vertical lab Integration with myCobot Robotic Arms

Conference Session: Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 4.D
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Nebojsa I Jaksic P.E., Colorado State University Pueblo
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Computers in Education Division (COED)

aspects of the courses they teach. While we are using a Jetson Nano-based myCobot,an Arduino-based robot is sufficient for a short robotic demonstration for this course. In class,robot programming can be quickly demonstrated using myBlockly drag-and-drop graphicalprogramming language.The first robotic task consists of the following subtasks. 1. Verify that the robot is operational by remotely controlling the robot by using your phone. You will need to download the Mycobot-Controller app to your phone. 2. Using myBlockly, program the robot to perform the following actions twice. a. Turn the LED matrix of the Atom 5 red b. Hold for one second c. Turn the LED matrix green d. Hold for one second e

Relevance Score: 0.029818345

Hidden Trends in Data on Women in STEM

Conference Session: Systemic and Policy Issues affecting Women Engineers
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Leah Granger, North Carolina State University at Raleigh
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

2021.Figure 2: (a) COE enrollment by gender where male enrollment is plotted on the left y-axisand female enrollment is plotted on the right y-axis. Note that both y-axes have a range of800 students to allow a comparison of slopes. (b) COE enrollment by gender plotted on the left y-axis, and the percent of total enrollment attributed to female-identifying students plotted on the right y-axis. Figure 3: COE enrollment based on gender for (a) white, (b) African American, (c)Hispanic, and (d) Asian enrollments, where enrollments based on gender are plotted on the left y-axis, and the percent of enrollment attributed to female-identifying students within the given racial group is plotted on the right y-axis

Relevance Score: 0.029804487

Stifling Dissent: Engineering PhD Students’ Response when Considering Departing

Conference Session: ERM Technical Session: Methods in Graduate Education
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Luis Delgado Jr., Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, The Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 669– 700, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2005.11772304.[3] B. E. Lovitts, Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.[4] K. M. Wilson, Of Time and the Doctorate: Report of an Inquiry into the Duration of Doctoral Study. SREB Research Monograph No. 9. 1965. Accessed: Dec. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED149658[5] P. H. Henderson and A. Others, “Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Summary Report 1995,” Doctorate Records Project, National Research Council, OSEP- Room TJ 2006, 2101 Constitution Ave, 1996. Accessed: Dec

Relevance Score: 0.029792339

Transforming K-12 STEM Education with Personalized Learning through Large Language Models (Fundamental)

Conference Session: Harnessing AI and Collaborative Platforms to Personalize and Innovate K-12 STEM Curriculum
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Michael Thomas Vaccaro Jr, University of Connecticut; Mikayla Friday, University of Connecticut; Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut
Tagged Divisions: Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

optimization in educational research,” in 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2025.[18] OpenAI, “OpenAI Platform API Reference,” Create chat completion. Accessed: Jan. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create[19] B. Atil, A. Chittams, L. Fu, F. Ture, L. Xu, and B. Baldwin, “LLM Stability: A detailed analysis with some surprises,” ArXiv, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.04667.[20] M. Vaccaro, M. Friday, and A. Zaghi, “Evaluating the capability of large language models to personalize science texts for diverse middle-school-age learners,” arXiv [Preprint], 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05204.[21] A. V. Maltese, C. S. Melki, and H

Relevance Score: 0.02979232

Work-in-Progress: Evaluating the impact of changes in DEI programs, policies, and initiatives on graduate student experiences across three HSI universities

Conference Session: Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 4
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Adrian Rodriguez, The University of Texas at Austin; Andrea Lidia Castillo, Arizona State University; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

]. Students may also be forced to rely on grassroots efforts to build their own supportsystems and lead DEI efforts, understandably at a much smaller scale. Without intentional effortto serve graduate students at HSIs, these students are left with an ongoing lack of institutionalsupport. This paper presents a plan to recruit, interview, and compare the experiences of 9 first-generation graduate students in STEM majors from three, 4-year HSI universities to understandhow potential changes in resources and support systems are affecting their degree progression inlight of emerging anti-DEI policies. University A resides in a historically conservative statewhere anti-DEI legislation was passed, University B also resides in a historically

Relevance Score: 0.0297907

Exploring Student Use of an ACT-based Mobile Application and its Impact on Reducing Procrastination

Conference Session: Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 6.C
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yiqing Li, University of California, San Diego; Jiaen Yu, University of California, San Diego; U Lam Lou, University of California, San Diego; Dingyi Yu, University of California, San Diego; Michael Levin, Utah State University; Korena S Klimczak, Utah State University; Soohyun Nam Liao, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Divisions: Computers in Education Division (COED)

.-P. Liu, and Y.-F. Chen, “Acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive–behavioral therapy as treatments for academic procrastination: A randomized controlled group session,” Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2017. [4] M. E. Levin. (2023, Jun.) Act guide lite. [5] B. E. Holtz, A. M. McCarroll, and K. M. Mitchell, “Perceptions and attitudes toward a mobile phone app for mental health for college students: qualitative focus group study,” JMIR Formative Research, vol. 4, no. 8, p. e18347, 2020. [6] P. A. Arean, K. A. Hallgren, J. T. Jordan, A. Gazzaley, D. C. Atkins, P. J. Heagerty, and J. A. Anguera, “The use and effectiveness of mobile apps for depression: results from a fully remote

Relevance Score: 0.029775951

Impact of Ungrading on Student Confidence in Capstone Engineering Design

Conference Session: Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Innovative Assessment Strategies in Design
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Duncan Davis-Hall, Colorado School of Mines; Carter Moulton, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions: Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

align performance in class with institutional course grading policies, students wereasked which letter grade (A, B, C, D, or F) best represented their course effort so far, and wereasked to explain their reasoning for that grade. Actual final letter grades were proposed andjustified in a separate letter submitted by each student at the end of the semester.FindingsThe three types of feedback in this course – self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and instructor-provided narrative assessments – were regarded as accurate and helpful by students. Trendsindicated an overall increase in this perception as the semester progressed, although self-evaluated team membership saw a gradual decline in average Likert scale response. Notably,self-evaluated

Relevance Score: 0.029755719

The impact of technology on minoritized students’ agency and environmental responsibility

Conference Session: Culture, Agency, and Responsibility through Curriculum (Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division ECSJ Technical Session 5)
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mobina Beheshti; Julia Wilder; Annick M Manseau; Sofia Ella Migon; Isabella Stuopis, Brown University; Avneet Hira, Boston College
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

environmental education. Journal of Virtual Studies, 9(2), 25-36.[18]Dari, S. S. (2024). The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Environmental Education: A Pilot Study. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 14(1), 01-13.[19]McNally, B., & de Andrade, B. (2022). Altered spaces: new ways of seeing and envisioning nature with Minecraft. Visual Studies, 37(3), 175-182.[20]Harrison, M., & Gesthuizen, R. (2020). Shared regulatory planning in Minecraft. In Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (pp. 1484-1497). Cham: Springer International Publishing.[21]Minecraft Education. (n.d.). Get Minecraft for your classroom. https://education.minecraft.net/en-us[22]Doğan, A., & Kahraman, E. (2020

Relevance Score: 0.029754043

Title: Building Curiosity and Competency: Designing and Evaluating Activities for Microelectronics Education (Evaluation of Program/Curricula)

Conference Session: Harnessing AI and Collaborative Platforms to Personalize and Innovate K-12 STEM Curriculum
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Yash Ajay Garje, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Shauna Adams, Purdue University – West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Bruce Wellman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

perspectives.Insights on engagement from participant reflections: This section presents the set of five themes that we noticed from the participants’ captionsacross all activities. We noticed that memorable takeaways were related to experiences,emotional engagements, skill learning, knowledge or factual gain, and awareness about topicsrelated to the semiconductor industry. Table 5 presents a brief description of the theme andillustrates it with a sample reflection from the participants.Participant lighting up an Participant operating the BBC A team making a stakeholder LED from Activity 1 micro:bit from Activity 2 map from Activity 3 Photograph (a) Photograph (b) Photograph (c

Relevance Score: 0.029754043

Experiential Activities Demonstrating Mass Transfer in Porous Materials in an Introductory Bioengineering Course

Conference Session: First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 1: Tech-Forward Teaching - Digital Tools to Enhance Engagement
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Madison Christine Fanning, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Shreya Khosla Gustafson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Sarah Meece, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Divya Bendigeri, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Trisha Patnaik, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

discussed in this paper was offered in Fall 2024 with anenrollment of ~70 total students (Figure 1). Classroom time is structured to consist of mini-lectures from experts in the field of bioengineering coupled with in-class discussions. Studentsvisit research institutes on campus, participate in medical simulation activities, and converse withresearchers and graduates in the field. Course assignments allow students to work on identifyingreal-world biomedical problems, technology gaps, and innovation needs. (a) Class Makeup by Gender (b) Class Makeup by Year Freshman

Relevance Score: 0.02974343

Engaging Mechanics of Materials and Dynamics Students in Designing Curriculum for Statics

Conference Session: ME Division 10: Innovation in the Sophomore Year
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Matthew Stephen Barner, University of Portland; Sean Lyle Gestson, University of Portland
Tagged Divisions: Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

.52, no. 6, pp. 663-674, 2015.[6] E. Blair and K.V. Noel, “Improving higher education practice through student evaluationsystems: is the student voice being heard?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol.39, no. 7, pp. 879-894, 2014.[7] B. Uttl, C.A. White, and D.W. Gonzalez, “Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness:Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related,” Studies inEducational Evaluation, vol. 54, pp. 22-42, 2017.[8] A. Tuhkala, A. Ekonoja, and R. Hämäläinen, “Tensions of student voice in higher education:Involving students in degree programme curricula design,” Innovations in Education andTeaching International, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 451-461, 2021.[9] A. Fernandez, E. Delgado, Y

Relevance Score: 0.029732358

On meaningfulness and performativity in engineering education methods practices: The “honest” methods section

Conference Session: ERM Technical Session: Evolution of Engineering Education Research Methods
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Stephen Secules, Florida International University
Tagged Divisions: Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

through acceptance of diverse ways of knowing,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 247–257, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1080/03043791003703177.[11] A. L. Pawley, “‘Learning from small numbers’ of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2013.[12] B. K. Jesiek, M. Borrego, and K. Beddoes, “Advancing global capacity for engineering education research: relating research to practice, policy and industry,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 117–134, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/03043791003596928.[13] C. Hampton, D. Reeping, and D

Relevance Score: 0.029731805

Harnessing Generative AI for Educators: Case Study of Accurate Wildfire Location Mapping

Conference Session: Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 1
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute; SATHVIKA KATIKANENI, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute; Ashish Gunda, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions: Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

the map. For the rest of the paper, the produced mapsare shown without the California boundary. Figure 2: Burnt area of California state in the year of 2010ResultsAs discussed in the previous section, a total of 24 maps were produced to check the wildfireseverity. To conserve space, not all of them are displayed in the paper. A total of 12 maps areshown. The first set of maps are selected from 2000-2014 when the wildfire severity isn’t thathigh (Figure 3) whereas the next set of maps are selected from 2015-2023 (Figure 4) when thered dot areas kept increasing across the state. (a) (b) (c

Relevance Score: 0.029728094

Pilot Study of Gen Z Candidates For Successful Employment on the U.S. Job Market

Conference Session: Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 3
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Edwige F. Songong, Pittsburg State University; Tatiana V. Goris, Pittsburg State University
Tagged Topics: Diversity
Tagged Divisions: Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

seeks to provide insights into what motivates these individuals to remain employed at asingle workplace for over three years or to leave within the first year. The research utilizedsurvey responses from two cohorts of international graduate students, collected in Fall 2023(referred to as Cohort 1) and Spring 2024 (referred to as Cohort 2). A total of 50 participants (25from each cohort) completed questionnaires addressing two key topics: (a) factors that wouldencourage them to stay with the same organization for more than three years, and (b) factors thatwould lead them to leave within one year of employment. The collected data was categorizedinto different tables by counting the occurrences of each factor. This data was then plotted

Relevance Score: 0.029726451

BOARD # 54: Pedagogical Proposal for the Use of Technologies for Collaborative Work of Construction Management Students.

Conference Session: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mishel Odalis Camargo, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; MiguelAndres Andres Guerra P.E., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Ignacio Guerra P.
Tagged Divisions: Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

designing the spaces, facades and circulation corridors. Chat GPT to verifycompliance with standards in design.2. Assignment of roles: Students will be divided into groups of 3 students and will beassigned the respective roles for each stage of the project.Tesfit: Student A will be in charge of designing the green spaces while student Bmakes the geometry of the building and student C the access roads.Hypar: Student A will be in charge of locating the terrain and the design of the space,while student B will be in charge of the façade design and student C will design thecirculation corridors and the placement of the elevator.At the same time, all participants will be in charge of verifying that the designcomplies with construction standards using

Relevance Score: 0.029681744

BOARD # 438: Research Initiation: Facilitating Knowledge Transfer within Engineering Curricula

Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alexander John De Rosa, University of Delaware; Teri Kristine Reed, The University of Oklahoma Polytechnic Institute; Samuel Van Horne, University of Delaware
Tagged Topics: NSF Grantees Poster Session

team who debriefed as a group before integrating and interpreting the resultingdata. (a) Mathematical formulation for the centroid. (b) Applied formulation from course notes. Figure 2: Formulations for calculating the centroid presented to study participants.In addition to the observed student difficulties with centroids, observations from priorimplementations of this work [10-12] also noted the potential importance of reflective thinkingin transferring knowledge and solving the statics problem (Fig.1). Anecdotally, expert problemsolvers (faculty participants) were observed to be significantly more metacognitive and reflectivethan novice problem solvers (students) and the only student who correctly solved the problemunaided was very