Conference Session

ME Division 3: Modern Tools and Methods in Structural Analysis and CAD

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qiuyan Li, Grove City College; George Richards, Grove City College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

ultrasonic transducer." ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congressand Exposition. Vol. 50633. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016..Appendix: An example of student reportMECE 251 Mechanical Systems Laboratory MECE 251 Mechanical Systems Lab I Tensile Testing LaboratoryInvestigators: Students A, B, CObjectives: 1. To learn how to perform material characterization using a Non-Destructive Ultrasound Testing system (NDT). a. To measure the longitudinal wave velocity (𝑉𝐿 ) and transverse wave velocity (𝑉𝑇 ) travelling in metal test specimens

Conference Session

DSAI Technical Session 7: Natural Language Processing and LLM Applications

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suman Saha, Pennsylvania State University; Fatemeh Rahbari, The Pennsylvania State University; Farhan Sadique, Kansas State University; Sri Krishna Chaitanya Velamakanni, Pennsylvania State University; Mahfuza Farooque, Pennsylvania State University; William J. Rothwell, Penn State University

Tagged Divisions

Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (DSAI) Constituent Committee

. Emphasize critical thinking and application of concepts where appropriate. Question: If you have int *p1, *p2; and p1 = p2;, what does this mean? A) p1 and p2 now point to the same memory address. B) p2 is copied into p1. C) p1 is the parent pointer of p2. D) p1 and p2 are no longer usable.Table 3: A Generated Quiz Prompt: List the lecture objectives in the given refined transcript and slides, design scenario- based activities for each identified objective that encourage students to apply the concepts and skills covered in the material. Create realistic, context-driven scenarios relevant to the subject matter, requiring students to analyze, problem-solve, or make decisions based on the knowledge gained from the lecture. Ensure the scenarios are

Conference Session

Civil Engineering in the Age of AI

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Campbell, Oklahoma State University; John J Phillips P.E., Oklahoma State University; Alan Kirkpatrick

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

maximum deflection equation at the free end of a beam that is cantilevered with the fixed support on the left end of the beam and a point load Accurate Accurate Mixed Accuracy Accurate Mixed Accuracy located a distance "b" from the support?L1.9 What is the modulus of elasticity of steel? Mixed Accuracy Accurate Accurate Mixed Accuracy Mixed AccuracyL1.10 How do you calculate the centroid of an object using integration? Provide an example. Accurate Mixed Accuracy Accurate Accurate Mixed AccuracyLEVEL 1

Conference Session

ERM WIP I: Methodological Applications in the Disciplines

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brendan Lobo, University of Toronto; Sinisa Colic, University of Toronto; Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

,” Stud Sci Educ, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03057260701828101.[2] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. B. Krathwohl, TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES; The Classification of Educational Goals. 1956.[3] M. Scardamalia and C. Bereiter, “Text-Based and Knowledge Based Questioning by Children,” Cogn Instr, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 177–199, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI0903_1.[4] S. R. Goldberg, C. Venters, and A. Masnick, “Refining a Taxonomy for Categorizing the Quality of Engineering Student Questions,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.18260/1-2--37649.[5] “Hugging Face – The AI community building the future

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Accessibility and Empathy in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aya Mouallem, Stanford University; Trini Rogando, Stanford University; Sean Patrick Dougherty M.S., LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired; Mirelys Mendez Pons, Stanford University; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

complete activityworkbook for RAD 2.0, including activities on circuit design, a real-life engineering scenario,and co-design reflection activities. Appendix B includes RAD organizing resources.RAD 1.0 (Dec 2023)Eight BLV participants joined the first RAD program, RAD 1.0, in person on the Stanfordcampus. This program used the preliminary tool prototype, described in Stage 2, as a scrappyfoundation upon which the co-design efforts would build. The BLV community members firstcompleted a set of electrical engineering activities using the tool. These activities includeddesigning circuits in certain configurations and debugging an erroneous circuit design. Theparticipants also completed design thinking exercises. Later, during the co-design

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin; Carl O. Hilgarth, Shawnee State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

settingdivision priorities encourages the breadth of dialogue and debate needed for self-correction orwhether we are more focused on the bureaucracy (literally ‘governance of drawers’) of thepublications needed for promotion and advancement; i.e. creating order. In this model thechallenge is to figure out how divisions can better cooperate in sharing information to create amore self-correcting organization. The alternative is an organization locked into a top-downmodel where volunteers dutifully fulfill quotas without ever reconsidering the broader raisond’être. Figure 1: Three models of information from Harari [16]: (a) ‘naive’ view of information that sees more information as beneficial, (b) ‘populist’ view of information that focuses on

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monika Tomar, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Mario Ventresca, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy Division (EPP)

for each question, below which a student would earn a zero on thatquestion. Hence, in order to maximize the total grade on an assignment, a student mustcontribute equally on all assignment questions.In case of heterogeneous teams, imagine a team comprises of two types of students : TypeA (High intrinsic motivation or Low effort cost) and Type B (Low intrinsic motivation or Higheffort cost). In this case, the challenge for the instructor is to design a policy that deters Type Bstudents from strategically inflating their contribution (moral hazard) or free-riding on Type A’sefforts. Similarly, the policy should also de-incentive Type A students from single-handedlyelevating the team grade. In this case, the likely equilibrium behavior is Type B

Conference Session

Two-Year College Division (TYCD) Technical Session 4: Curriculum and Assessment

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel; Timothy Aaron Wood P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

: 10.1177/0091552120920358.[7] B. Kerr, “The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research,” in 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 2015, pp. 815–818. doi: 10.1109/ICL.2015.7318133.[8] M. C. Low, C. K. Lee, M. S. Sidhu, S. P. Lim, Z. Hasan, and S. C. Lim, “Blended Learning to Enhanced Engineering Education using Flipped Classroom Approach: An Overview,” electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2021, doi: 10.52650/ejcsit.v7i1.111.[9] S. Kushnarev, K. Kang, and S. Goyal, “Assessing the efficacy of personalized online homework in a first-year engineering multivariate calculus course,” Proceedings

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Track 6.C

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Monika Wiktor, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Mohsen M Dorodchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

challenge has been resolved. This task answers the question ‘What challenges do students discuss in reflections?’ This is a reflection taken from an undergraduate computer science course where students are taught the fundamentals Context of software engineering. Labels and Descriptions - a. Label Types - i. Category Label pcategory ii. Resolution Label presolution b. Challenge Category ⟨ycategory , dcategory ⟩ Labels Defined c. Resolution Labels Defined ⟨yresolution , dresolution ⟩ Output Instructions poutputTable 6: The structure for the text classification

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander James Carroll, Vanderbilt University; Joshua Daniel Borycz, Vanderbilt University; Sheldon Salo, Vanderbilt University; Amanda R. Lowery, Vanderbilt University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

reported in Supplementary Table 2.Figure 1: Proportion of correct responses for (A) all questions combined, (B) individual multiple-choice questions, and (C) topics covered by the questions (Resource: 1-7, Tool: 8-11, Reading:12) for each BME class. The error bars show the standard error for each point.Discussion: These results suggest that targeted information and data literacy instruction, offeredwithin laboratory courses, can contribute to science process skill gains for BME students.Students who completed this training sequence showed statistically significant improvement intheir ability to identify the best sources of evidence to use to answer technical questions, as wellas the ability to identify library licensed resources that could provide

Conference Session

ECE-Applications of AI and ChatGPT in Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farid Farahmand, Sonoma State University; Shivakumar Mathapathi, Northeastern University, Silicon Valley Campus

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

as ChatGPTcan facilitate brainstorming, prototype ideation, and technical documentation.4. CAPCHAT Development MethodologyIn this section we elaborate on key features and development methodology of our proposed AI-based tool, CAPCHAT, to assist students in defining their marketing and engineeringrequirements. A snapshot of CAPCHAT page is shown in Appendix B. This tool not onlyencourages students to articulate their project ideas, elaborate on their target customer base, andidentify project features and limitations but also prompts them to consider less familiar aspectssuch as potential failure cases, power consumption, and ethical implications. Additionally, thetool supports students in evaluating the product’s lifecycle and disposal

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology; Alexandra Werth, Cornell University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division (TELPhE)

Paper ID #46877Factorial measurement of epistemological theories of developmentDr. Todd M. Fernandez, Georgia Institute of Technology Todd is the Director of Learning Innovation and a Senior Lecturer in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His research interests are engineering faculty and students beliefs about knowledge and education with a special focus on how those beliefs interact with engineering education as a culture.Alexandra Werth, Cornell University Alexandra Werth is an assistant professor at the Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, specializing in

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - AI and Digital Futures in Design Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catalina Aranzazu-Suescun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott; Luis Felipe Zapata-Rivera, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

. Computer, 55(5):64–72, 2022. doi: 10.1109/MC.2021.3109841. [4] M. Khader, M. Karam, and H. Fares. Cybersecurity awareness framework for academia. Information, 12(10), 2021. doi: 10.3390/info12100417. [5] S. Ramezanian and V. Niemi. Cybersecurity education in universities: A comprehensive guide to curriculum development. IEEE Access, 12(2024), 2024. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3392970. [6] B. Bordel, T. Robles R. Alcarria, and D. Martin. Flipped classroom and educational videos to improve the cybersecurity competencies in future computer engineers. In 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2021. doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2021.0080. [7] I. A. Buckley, J. Zalewski, and P. J. Clarke. Introducing a

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pavel Navitski, Oral Roberts University; Elena Gregg Dr, Oral Roberts University; Wesley David Klehm, Oral Roberts University; Gabriel Pendell, Oral Roberts University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

research study, where we will recordoutdoor temperature and barometric pressure alongside other experimental parameters.References [1] Peter Dunne. “Demonstrating Cosmic Ray Induced Electromagnetic Cascades in the A- Level Laboratory.” 1999 Phys. Educ. 34 19 [2] Frederiksen Scientific. “The Interaction Between Cosmic Rays and Matter”. https://www.frederiksen-scientific.dk 2017-01-18 [3] American Society for Quality. https://asq.org Richard Boddy, “Statistical methods in practice: for scientists and technologists”, (2009), John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 978-0-470- 74664-6 [4] Bruno B. Rossi’s work is described in a Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruno_Rossi. [5] Navitski, P., Gregg, E. “Physics teaching at Oral

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mahima Agumbe Suresh, San Jose State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

, 2011. [8] Linda B Nilson. Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015. [9] Kate J McKnelly, William J Howitz, Taylor A Thane, and Ren´ee D Link. Specifications grading at scale: Improved letter grades and grading-related interactions in a course with over 1,000 students. 2022.[10] William J. Howitz, Kate J. McKnelly, and Ren´ee D. Link. Developing and implementing a specifications grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2):385–394, 2021. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450.[11] Dennis Earl. Two years of specifications grading in philosophy. Teaching Philosophy, 45(1):23–64, 2022.[12] Ella Tuson and Tim Hickey

Conference Session

Undergraduate Career Development

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Keilin Jahnke, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Yaning Cao, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Joe Bradley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Viktoria Loidl, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

, and faculty. Table 1 providesan overview of participants. To maintain anonymity, pseudonyms were used for all participants,departments have been given a letter pseudonym, and titles have been generalized to theparticipants’ overall area of expertise. Pseudonym Department/Unit Area of Expertise Amy A Advising Mia B Academic administration Billy C Academic administration Mary D Corporate engagement Tom E Faculty James E Faculty John F Corporate engagement Wendy

Conference Session

Preparing Future Chemical Engineers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniela Galatro, University of Toronto; Sourojeet Chakraborty, Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)

5.0,” J Ind Inf Integr, vol. 25, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311.[6] S. Chakraborty, Y. Gonzalez-Triana, J. Mendoza, and D. Galatro, “Insights on mapping Industry 4.0 and Education 4.0,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1150190.[7] S. Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, “Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution,” J Manuf Syst, vol. 64, pp. 424–428, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010.[8] D. Galatro, Y.-H. Chin, and B. Saville, “STRATEGIES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS DESIGN: A SUSTAINABILITY-BASED APPROACH,” in 2024 ASEE St. Lawrence Section Annual Conference Proceedings, ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/1-2

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Work-in-Progress 1: Curriculum Design and Innovative Pedagogy

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Shivani Kundalia, Georgia Institute of Technology; Pranathi C Amballa, Georgia Institute of Technology; Stacy Ross, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

mentoring. Figure A2: Cornerstone to Capstone student activity checklistAppendix 2: Assessment ToolsTo measure student progress, pre- and post-surveys were implemented, in addition to an end-of-semester reflection. Within the surveys, most questions use Likert scaling to quantify studentexperiences with a neutral option provided to allow students to accurately indicate an impartialview, without bias or pressure to select a side inconsistent with their feelings. The promptspresented to students in these assessment tools are outlined below.Pre-Survey Questions 1. I am from Team… a. ME 1670 b. ME 4182 / ME 4723 2. What is your project title? 3. How well do you understand the value of being a mentor to someone

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division (MVD) 1 - Access and Integration

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Pointer, Biologically Inspired Design for Resilience(BID4R) lab.; Julianna Gesun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Bryan Watson, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans Division (MVD)

. Rizzo, “What most facilitates thriving for undergraduate engineeringstudents? A rank order investigation of engineering experts,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition Proceedings, Aug. 2022. doi:10.18260/1-2--41107[3] J. Marcus, “Student-Veteran Graduation Rates Astonishingly Low - The Atlantic.”Accessed: Nov. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/04/why-is-the-student-veteran-graduation-rate-so-low/523779/[4] M. Rowlands, “The Mind-Body Problem,” Encyclopedia of Consciousness, pp. 43–55,2009, doi: 10.1016/B978-012373873-8.00053-0.[5] R. B. Lawson, J. E. Graham, and K. M. Baker, “A History of Psychology,” A History ofPsychology, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.4324/9781315665214.[6] “Biometrics | Homeland

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martell Cartiaire Bell, The University of Iowa; Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan; Rachel Vitali, The University of Iowa

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

directly support design.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No.2306052.References[1] B. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from," Interntational Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 914-925, 2013.[2] N. Honken and P. Ralston, "Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 29-37, 2013.[3] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[4] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, "Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[5] M. Hoit and M. Ohland, "The

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khadija Ishfaq Rana, University of Toronto; Emily Moore, University of Toronto

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

LITERATUREREVIEW,” INTED2021 Proceedings, pp. 9289–9298, 2021, doi: 10.21125/inted.2021.1943.[12] B. Hedeler, M. Lettner, T. Stern, P. Schwarzbauer, and F. Hesser, “Strategic decisions onknowledge development and diffusion at pilot and demonstration projects: An empiricalmapping of actors, projects and strategies in the case of circular forest bioeconomy,” ForestPolicy and Economics, vol. 110, p. 102027, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102027.[13] J. P. Monat and T. F. Gannon, “What is Systems Thinking? A Review of SelectedLiterature Plus Recommendations,” American Journal of Systems Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp.11–26, 2015, Accessed: Sep. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://article.sapub.org/[14] A. Azad, E. Moore, and A. Hounsell, “Advancing

Conference Session

Evaluating Pre-College STEM Programs: Longitudinal Impact, Integration, and Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Karen Flammer, University of California, San Diego; Cindy Mui Perez, University of California, San Diego; Mimi Phùng, University of California, San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

the rigor of the course material. From conversations with instructors involved in theDiscover program and consultations with K12 educators, the design team identified commonthemes to address with the course design: (a) Many high school students are unaware of thedifferences between high school and college level courses, such as expectations for lateassignments or workload; (b) students have limited attentional capacity and benefit from targetedcontent delivery; and (c) students need guidance to develop skills such as time management andother self-directed learning strategies. Despite challenges unique to young learners, high schoolstudents have the desire and the capacity to be successful with intentional guidance and support.Week 0

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Blanca Esthela Moscoso; David Francisco Coronado; MiguelAndres Andres Guerra P.E., Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Valeria Dayana Izurieta

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

-framework-for-engineering-courses[2] J. M. Bonilla, M. S. Valarezo, B. D. Villacrés, and M. A. Guerra, “Board 44A: Work in Progress: Unannounced Frequent Examinations to contribute student learning and building academic integrity,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023. Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-44a-work-in- progress-unannounced-frequent-examinations-to-contribute-student-learning-and- building-academic-integrity[3] J. M. Bonilla, M. S. Valarezo, and M. A. Guerra, “WIP: Unannounced Tests and Examinations to Improve Student Performance and Build Academic Integrity,” in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available

Conference Session

Programmatic Design and Resiliency Among Women Engineers

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Renee Casner, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Nancy L Lollar, Purdue University University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

them to be successful in the end. They need to know that they can come totheir mentor with all the raw emotions of not knowing their goals or what their next move is. Itis theirs to shape into how they want to mold their futures, but they should feel assured byfaculty and staff that they will be there from point A to point B or Z if need be. REFERENCES[1] GALLUP and F. Lummina, "State of Higher Education 2024 Report," Lumina, Washington, D.C., 2024.[2] S. R. Covey, The seven habits of highly effective people: restoring the character ethic, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989.[3] J. Pinchot, D. Cellante, S. Mishra and K. Paullet, "Student perceptions of challenges and the role of mentorship in

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session: Evolution of Engineering Education Research Methods

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Angela Minichiello, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Education, 2025The Narrative Turn in Engineering Education Research: Theory and MethodThis full-length, theory/methods paper contributes to theoretical, methodological, and methods-based conversations about narrative research currently occurring within the engineeringeducation research (EER) community. For almost 40 years, narrative approaches to qualitativeresearch have evolved and migrated from their origins in the humanities, establishing themselveswithin social science fields such as psychology, anthropology, and education [1, 2]. Recently,narrative research has garnered interest within EER as an approach for (a) understandingengineering student and faculty experience and (b) critiquing structures that constrain andobstruct these experiences

Conference Session

New Approaches and Leadership Development Frameworks

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University; Rhea Dutta

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

catering to individual requirements [14].4. Methods4.1 ParticipantsThe participants included 40 students enrolled in a senior-level technology class titled,Leadership Strategies for Quality and Productivity, at a large research-intensive university in theMidwest. The participant pool was diverse in terms of age and academic standing. Ages rangedfrom 19 to 25. Participants were randomly assigned to either Group A or Group B, eachconsisting of 20 students. This study has IRB approval as Exempt Category 1.4.2 InterventionThis study focused on comparing immersive Virtual Reality (VR) lessons with traditionalPowerPoint (PPT) lessons, offering students a unique learning experience across three keytopics. Each lesson included both an informative section

Conference Session

Games & Competitions for Civil Engineering Education

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eun Jeong Cha, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Abigail Louise Beck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Eric Shaffer, University of Illinois; Luc Paquette, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

/majors/engineering/civil- engineering/structural-engineering/[2] Zippia, “Civil/Structural Engineer Demographics and Statistics [2024]: Number Of Civil/Structural Engineers In The US.” Accessed: Feb. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.zippia.com/civil-structural-engineer-jobs/demographics/[3] J. L. Plass, B. D. Homer, and C. K. Kinzer, “Foundations of Game-Based Learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 258–283, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533.[4] P. Martín-Hernández, M. Gil-Lacruz, A. I. Gil-Lacruz, J. L. Azkue-Beteta, E. M. Lira, and L. Cantarero, “Fostering University Students’ Engagement in Teamwork and Innovation Behaviors through Game-Based Learning (GBL),” Sustainability, vol. 13

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

,” European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 42, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1287664.[4] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity,” in2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEEConferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[5] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, “Engineering identity development: a review of thehigher education literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science andTechnology, vol. 6, no. 3, Art. no. 3, May 2018.[6] B. Scheuringer, “Multiple Identities: A theoretical and an empirical approach,” EuropeanReview, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 397–404, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1017/S1062798716000120.[7] J

Conference Session

MATH - Student Mindsets in Mathematics

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hui Ma, University of Virginia; Diana D Morris, University of Virginia; Lindsay Wheeler

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics Division (MATH)

out.Grade Distribution ComparisonTo examine whether students from mastery graded and traditionally graded Calculus I sectionshad the same grade distribution in subsequent courses (Calculus II and III), we conducted a Chi-Square test, comparing the distribution of final exam grades (A, B, C, D, F) across two groups(Mastery vs. Traditional). • Calculus I (p-value=0.41): The Chi-Square test showed no significant difference in grade distributions between students in Mastery vs. Traditional grading sections. This suggests that the grading method in Calculus I did not impact final grade distribution. Grade Distribution Comparison: Calculus I 100% 80% 60

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Dimitrie C Popescu, Old Dominion University; Emanuel PUSCHITA

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

Defined Radio Laboratory Course for Undergraduate Wireless Engineering Curriculum Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2— 22880[9] Wu, Z., & Wang, B., & Cheng, C., & Cao, D., & Yaseen, A. (2014, June), Software Defined Radio Laboratory Platform for Enhancing Undergraduate Communication and Networking Curricula Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2—23023[10] A. M. Wyglinski, D. P. Orofino, M. N. Ettus and T. W. Rondeau, "Revolutionizing software defined radio: case studies in hardware, software, and education," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 68-75, January 2016