- vancement, Tucson, Ariz.; ”Faculty Research Award,” Southeast Missouri State University, COSM, 2010; ”Tony B. Award,” Association of laboratory Automation, 2010, 2011; Center of Nanoscale Science and Technology-University of Maryland, College Park (CNST-UMD) Scholarship, 2009-2011; and Marquis ”Who’s Who in America,” 2009. He has involved both undergraduates (22 to date) and graduates (five) in his research projects. He has established a laboratory for Nano-biotechnology and micro- and nanoflu- idics at Southeast and created and developed interest at the pre-college level by incorporation of science in K-12 classroom.Dr. Ken Surendran, Southeast Missouri State University Ken Surendran is a professor in the Department of
dependence of the width of the peak in theemission spectra with temperature.References 1. L. D. Winkler, J. F. Arceo, W. C. Hughes, B. A. DeGraff and B. H. Augustine, “Quantum Dots: An Experiment for Physical or Materials Chemistry,” J. Chem. Educ., 82 (11), p. 1700 (2005). 2. B. M. Hutchins, T. T. Morgan, M. G. Ucak-Astarlioglu and M. E. Williams, “Optical Properties of Fluorescent Mixtures: Comparing Quantum Dots to Organic Dyes,” J. Chem. Educ., 85 (6), p. 842 (2008). 3. T. A. Laubach, L. A. Elizondo, P. J. McCann and S. Gilani, “Quantum Dotting the “i” of Inquiry: A Guided Inquiry Approach to Teaching Nanotechnology,” The Physics Teacher, 48 (3), p. 186 (2010). 4. C. V. Rice and G. A. Giffin, “Quantum
online quiz after each laboratory to assess their conceptual understanding ofthe topic covered in lab that week. The instructor will use the Weekly Reports to tailor thefollowing lecture(s) to address any remaining conceptual difficulties, and to guide revisions ofthe laboratories. Responses to exam questions will then be used to assess students’ understandingonce more.2. Globally: (a) A comprehensive qualitative final exam with multiple choice and short-answer questionswill be given focused on testing students on the learning goals established for the course:knowledge of the concepts of energy levels and probability densities, and how they apply tophysical devices. We will model exam questions after the ones shown in reference 6. (b) Pre
AC 2012-3301: A PHYSICS LABORATORY ACTIVITY TO SIMULATETHE OPERATION OF THE TOUCHSCREEN ON A SMARTPHONEProf. Gary P. Hillebrand, University of Detroit Mercy College of Engineering and ScienceMs. Meghann Norah Murray, University of Detroit Mercy Meghann Murray has a position and conducts research in the Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry at University of Detroit Mercy. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemistry from UDM and is certified to teach high school chemistry and physics. She has taught in programs such as the Detroit Area Pre-college and Engineering program. She has been a judge and mentor with the Science and Engineering Fair of Metropolitan Detroit, FIRST Lego League, and FRC Robotics. She
AC 2012-3896: A TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE: UN-DERWATER ROBOTICS RESEARCHProf. Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma Baha Jassemnejad is Chair and professor of engineering and physics.Mr. Wei Siang Pee, University of Central OklahomaMr. Kevin Rada, University of Central Oklahoma Engineering & Physics Department, Edmond Okla.Mr. Devon Kelley Keith, University of Central Oklahoma Mechanical and Electrical SystemsMr. Dylan Bradley MillerDr. Evan C. Lemley, University of Central OklahomaAdam Dorety, University of Central Oklahoma Adam Dorety is currently a freshman at the University of Central Oklahoma (UCO). He is involved in UCO Robotics, and the UCO chapter of the American Society of Mechanical
Page 25.1474.3motivated” students. Secondly, the average course grade for the survey participants was a “B”, aletter grade higher than the class average of “BC”. Among survey participants, 86 scored acourse grade of “B” or above. The remaining 46 participants scored “BC” or lower. Thirdly,among the 132 participants, 68 students were asked to indicate their readiness for college physicscourses; of these 37 indicated they were “ready to take college physics” while the remaining 31indicated they were “somewhat ready”. The average course grade for these two groups differs:the “ready” group (nR=37) had a “B” average, and the “somewhat ready” group (nSR=31) had a“BC” average. Finally, most survey participants completed their college education at
AC 2012-3501: CRITERION 2: A DISCUSSION OF ABET PROGRAM ED-UCATIONAL OBJECTIVESDr. Michael De Antonio, New Mexico State University Michael DeAntonio is a College Associate Professor at New Mexico State University. He is Past Chair of the Physics Division of ASEE, and he is currently a member of the Engineering Physics ABET committee at NMSU. Page 25.365.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Criterion 2: A Discussion of ABET Program Educational ObjectivesIntroductionABET has made a change in its definition of Criteria 2: Program Educational Objectives for the2011-2012
AC 2012-3390: HOW MUCH PHYSICS THE FIRST-YEAR ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS REALLY NEED: A STUDY AND SURVEYDr. Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University Bala Maheswaran, College of Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115. Page 25.701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 1 How much Physics the First Year Engineering Students really need: A Study and Survey AbstractFreshmen engineering courses are the eye opener for engineering students in
G 1 ρ G G μ J V ( R) = ∫ 4πε R ' dV ' A( R) = 4π ∫ R ' dV ' G G 1 ρ G G G μ J × Rˆ ' E ( R) = ∫ Rˆ ' 2 dV ' 4π ∫ R '2 4πε R' B( R) = dV
byElectrical Engineering and Physics majors.We first introduced “Equations in Words” in our courses as part of homework or in-classproblem packets. We showed students an example of an equation in words to clarify theexpectation that they were not to do a literal translation symbol by symbol but that they had tothink about the physical meaning of the equation. A typical “Equations in Words” problem fromthe Waves unit in Classical Physics II is shown below: Consider the following equation: ∆L = 𝑛 + 1 2 𝜆 n = 0, 1, 2, 3, … a) This equation applies to: b) The variables and their units are: ΔL n λ c) Explain the equation in your own words: d) Draw
new way of controlling the spray can bedeveloped. Synthesis of microfibers with magnetic properties that can be assembled asmagnetically controlled filters can be another interesting idea. Finally, engineering crystalsynthesis by means of electrospray (Fig. 3) is largely an open field in which we have already hadsome interesting results. Page 25.729.5 Fig. 3 a) Student working in the lab on crystal synthesis by means of electrospray; b) the high voltage module.Moreover, with the recent purchase of a research-grade SEM (not available at the time of theproject) the opportunities in this direction are
AC 2012-4139: PHOTON MASSDr. Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes Bert Pariser is a faculty member in the Electronic Engineering Technology and the Computer Science Technology departments at Technical Career Institutes. His primary responsibility is developing curricu- lum and teaching methodology for physics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic field theory, computers, and databases. Pariser has prepared grant proposals to the National Science Foundation, which produced the funding for a Fiber Optics Laboratory. He served as Faculty Advisor to the IEEE and Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society. Pariser was instrumental in merging Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society into the ASEE. In addition, Pariser co-founded
AC 2012-4332: ONLINE AUTOMATED INTERACTIVE UNDERGRADU-ATE PHYSICS COURSE AND LABMr. Hatem M. Wasfy, Advanced Science and Automation Corp. Hatem Wasfy is the President of Advanced Science and Automation Corp. (ASA), a company that special- izes in the development of online virtual learning environments, and advanced engineering simulations. He has helped design several interactive learning environments that include a CNC machining course, a centrifugal pump maintenance course, an undergraduate physics course, and a welding course. He re- ceived a B.S. (1994) and an M.S. (1996) in mechanical engineering from the American University in Cairo. Wasfy’s research interests include advanced learning systems, cavitation
AC 2012-5386: TEACHING COLLEGE PHYSICSDr. Bert Pariser, Technical Career Institutes Bert Pariser is a faculty member in the Electronic Engineering Technology and the Computer Science Technology departments at Technical Career Institutes. His primary responsibility is developing curricu- lum and teaching methodology for physics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic field theory, computers, and databases. Pariser has prepared grant proposals to the National Science Foundation, which produced the funding for a Fiber Optics Laboratory. He served as Faculty Advisor to the IEEE and Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society. Pariser was instrumental in merging Tau Alpha Pi National Honor Society into the ASEE. In addition