about work and family. Review of Higher Education, 34(3), 447-476.9. Mason, A.M., Wolfinger, N.H., Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter?: Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.10. Manchester, Leslie, & Kramier. (2013). Is the clock still clicking? An evaluation of the consequences of stopping the tenure clock. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 66(1), 3-31.11. National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Advance at a glance. Retrieved from the National Science Foundation website: http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/index.jsp12. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Washington, DC
effectively J) Knowledge of contemporary issuesFeedback and Assessment:Several assignments were used throughout the semester to assess students’ attainment of thenewly developed course learning goals. 1) Final group project, which included a written report and group presentation. Note: The final group project was the only part unchanged in the course both before and after the redesign. This assignment was used to assess Course Goals I and II. a. For the final project, students selected topics on global health issues or other problems in bioengineering. The students were asked to brainstorm and design solutions to these bioengineering issues. b. The project was scaffolded, where parts were
. Lan, Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 2008. 9(2): p. 1-11.9. Britton, B.K. and A. Tesser, Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991. 83(3): p. 405-410. Page 26.1585.1410. Eilam, B. and I. Aharon, Students’ planning in the process of self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2003. 28(3): p. 304-334.11. Forbus, P., J.J. Newbold, and S.S. Mehta. A study of non-traditional
GlobalPreparedness Index8 and the Global Perspectives Inventory19. The dependent variables weremeasured in two ways: (a) the students’ subscale and overall scale scores on the GPI, and (b) thestudents’ subscale and overall scale scores on the EGPI. Brief descriptions of the instruments arepresented below.The Engineering Global Preparedness Index. Designed and extensively tested by one of thestudy’s Investigators, the EGPI instrument is aligned to both ABET’s outcomes (Criterion 3) andthe NAE’s Engineer of 2020.8 The EGPI directly measures how prepared students are to enterglobally focused engineering workforces. The EGPI uses a 6-point Likert-type scale and has foursubscales, each of which have been extensively validated and tested for reliability using
as type of engineeringcourse will determine if the amount and type of engineering exposure then and/or the exposurewith Architectural (Humanities Habitat) and Sustainable Living (now Year B) has had thedesired effect. The architects offer a Kid in Architecture day that is only open up to ALERTstudents and occurs on a Saturday. Here is an example of verbiage that supports high school leadSTEM activities: “The DISCOVERY Program at Spring Valley High School is a four-year Honors/AP program designed for students with motivation, interest, aptitude and commitment to academic excellence. Student participants investigate both theory and application over a broad range of academics and engage in, under the guidance
characteristics of engineering literacy from existing literature, we constructed theEngineering Literacy survey (see Survey Design section and Appendix A) to provide aninstrument to determine student perceptions of their knowledge, skills, and valuing ofengineering. The survey was designed to address several questions: (a) What are students’ levelsof engineering literacy, in general? (b) Do students from science backgrounds differ from Page 26.1304.3students with liberal arts backgrounds with respect to engineering literacy? (c) Do male andfemale students differ on their engineering literacy perceptions? (d) Do more advanced students(e.g., juniors and
. degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology in 2007. She received her Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering in 2012 from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, studying mechanochemical reactions of a spiropy- ran mechanophore in polymeric materials under shear loading. She is currently an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology where her research interests include novel manufacturing and characterization techniques of polymer and com- posite structures and the incorporation of multifunctionality by inducing desired responses to mechanical loading.Dr. Marius D Ellingsen, South Dakota School
larger field of projectmanagement is more broad and diverse, as shown in Table 1. CAPM® (Certified Associate in Project Management) PRINCE2 Foundation PMP (Project Management Professional) PRINCE2 Practitioner PgMP® (Program Management Professional) IPMA Level A (Certified Projects Director) PfMPSM (Portfolio Management Professional) IPMA Level B® (Certified Senior Project PMI-RMP® (PMI Risk Management Professional) Manager) PMI-SP® (PMI Scheduling Professional) IPMA Level C® (Certified Project Manager) PMI-ACP® (PMI Agile Certified Practitioner) IPMA Level D® (Certified Project Management PMI-PBASM (PMI Professional in Business Analysis
Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education, 2009. 5. Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., et al. "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning." Educational psychologist 26.3-4 (1991): 369-398. 6. Bybee, Rodger W., et al. "The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness." Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS (2006). 7. Bransford, John D., et al. "Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help." Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (1990): 115-141. 8. Freeman, R. A., Crown, S. W., Fuentes, A. A., Jones, R. B., Gonzalez, M., & BenGhalia, M. "The Synergistic Impact of the
their own timeline. The faculty mentor spoke toeach fracking team member individually. For those students who werecompleting their tasks, suggestions as to how to develop a "Plan B" for non-responsive teammates, time management strategies, etc. were discussed. Teammembers that were not fulfilling their responsibilities were informed what gradehe/she earned and how his/her inactions impacted the rest of the team.Design modifications and summer activitiesThe first task of the summer session for the engineering students was theevaluation of the tasks completed during the previous spring, the proposedsummer timeline, and the 'condition' of the hand off plan. It is interesting to note,that although the engineering students wished that their
broadobjectives and specific goals previously outlined. Once the funding was secured, the secondaryfacilitator identified and hired the primary facilitator, coordinated advertising efforts andlogistics, and participated in the discussion sessions.Assessment Process and InstrumentsThe facilitators obtained approval for research with human subjects from the MSU’s InstitutionalReview Board. Appendix B includes copies of the pre- and post-experience surveys as well asthe open-ended feedback forms distributed at the end of each discussion session. The facilitatorsalso used observation as a tool to capture qualitative data; this included notes taken during eachsession, notes captured by both watching and participating in the online community forum
Paper ID #11352Elementary Teachers’ Reported Responses to Student Design FailuresDr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Associate Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering, worked briefly as a process engineer, and taught high school physics and pre-engineering. She has taught engineering and science to children in multiple informal settings. As a pre-service teacher educator, she includes engineering in her elementary and early childhood science methods
. Leu and C. K. Kinzer, Eds. Chicago: National ReadingConference, 1995, pp. 197-204.[6] J. Piaget, The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1985.[7] R. J. Spiro, "Constructive processes in prose recall," in Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension:Perspectives in Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruceand W. F. Brewer, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1980, pp. 245-278.[8] V. Picciarelli, M. di Gennaro, R. Stella and E. Conte, "A Study of University Students' Understanding of SimpleElectric Circuits Part 2: Batteries, Ohm's Law, Power Dissipated, Resistors in Parallel," European Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 16
Students,” Journal of Vocational. Behavior, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–33, 1979.2 J. Eccles, T. F. Adler, R. Futterman, S. B. Goff, C. M. Kaczala, J. Meece, and C. Midgley, Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman, 1983.3 C. M. Lewis, K. Yasuhara, & R. E. Anderson, “Deciding to major in computer science: a grounded theory of students' self-assessment of ability,” Seventh international workshop on Computing education research ACM, pp. 3-10, Aug. 2011.4 Martin, J. P., Simmons, D. R., & Yu, S. L. “The role of social capital in the experiences of Hispanic women engineering majors,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.102, no. 2, pp. 227–243, 20135 N. Al‐Holou, N. M. Bilgutay, C
relates to wearables and engineering. Based on participant feedback, a modifiedcurriculum is being written in hopes of more successfully meeting these goals in future versionsof the camp.Bibliography 1. Buechley, Leah, Kylie A. Peppler, Michael Eisenberg, and Yasmin B. Kafai. Textile Messages: Dispatches From the World of E-Textiles and Education. New York: Peter Lang, 2013. Print. 2. Buechley, Leah, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. “The LilyPad Arduino: Using Computational Textiles to Investigate Engagement, Aesthetics, and Diversity in Computer Science Education.” In SIGCHI: Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–368.2. Johri, A. and Olds, B. M. (2011), Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education, 100: 151–185. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2011.tb00007.x3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press Washington, DC.4. Engle, R (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and continuing developments. Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012.5. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding
outside of their coursework. During their final year, engineering standardsare presented as standalone lecture in their senior capstone design course. Students prior orduring the same semester are presented with database and library resources for completingliterature reviews in a parallel course.The presentation of engineering standards is given just prior to project assignment. The timingof the instruction prior to the project assignments is because the first step after projectassignment is to complete a codes and standards worksheet (Appendix A) and realisticconstraints worksheet (Appendix B). After completing the worksheets the industry sponsors signoff on the scope of the project and standards utilized.Library instruction introduces students
Paper ID #13848Work-in-Progress: Leveraging Cloud Computing and Web Standards to Sup-port Learning Objectives in Multiple ClassroomsMs. Amber Shanice Solomon, Clemson UniversityDr. Sekou L Remy, Clemson University Sekou L. Remy is a researcher focused on removing barriers to effective use of Robotics and Cloud Computing in our homes, schools, and training centers. Dr. Remy is currently an Assistant Professor in Human-Centered Computing, and comes to Clemson from the University of Notre Dame where he was a Moreau Postdoctoral Fellow. He also had the pleasure of serving as a part-time instructor in Computer Science at Spelman
bache- lor degree in Physics Engineering from Tecnologico de Monterrey and a doctoral degree in Mathematics Education from Syracuse University, New York. Professor Dominguez is a member of the Researchers’ National System in Mexico (SNI) and currently she is the President of Red de Investigaci´on e Innovaci´on en Educaci´on del Noreste de M´exico (REDIIEN). Angeles has been a visiting researcher at Syracuse Uni- versity, at the University of Texas at Austin. She teaches undergraduate courses in Mathematics and grad- uate courses in Education. Professor Dominguez is a thesis advisor on the master and doctoral programs on education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are: a) models and modeling, b
and software engineering development managementprocess, which is a vast area, and does that in a fast-paced manner, leaving not much room forstudent experimentation with the techniques presented in class. Secondly, the topics covered aregeneric, as they apply for multiple engineering disciplines and the instructor needs to talk about“Activity A” and “Activity B” when presenting the modeling techniques rather than the “design Page 26.639.6the propulsion system” and “design the software control system.” Having said that, the instructordeveloped the course learning outcomes in such a manner to provide the students with thefoundations of the
climate. Following the initial coding, the threeresearchers met to define preliminary hypotheses based on the results. Considering both researchquestions, the researchers drafted 10 initial hypotheses that were used as a starting point for theremainder of the data analysis.The next phase in analytic induction is to examine a new case25, for this study that aligned with anew interview, final report, or qualitative survey response. The aim of this examination is todetermine whether the hypotheses adequately describe the new case. If a hypothesis does nothold, the hypothesis is either (a) modified to capture the new case and all previous cases moreaccurately or (b) given bounds such that this new case is excluded from the hypothesis25. The
Design (CAD) of Recursive/Non-Recursive FiltersA b s t r a c t. Computer Tools are integral part of many engineering design courses, they shouldbe used in the right place, right time. Courses in the Digital Signal Processing/Filter areas(including speech, image and video processing) have been traditionally viewed by students to befairly mathematical subjects including many abstractions (e.g., spectrum, analysis/designmethods in time/frequency domains, SNR, bandwidth, white/pink noise, various transforms, etc.)The pedagogical value of this work is that, with the help of modern engineering tools,engineering educators can better help students visualize these apparently difficult (but important)concepts. We focus on the subject of designing digital
must demonstrate the ability to accomplish theintegration of systems using appropriate analytical, computational, and application practices andprocedures… must demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge of probability, statistics,engineering economic analysis and cost control, and other technical sciences and specialtiesnecessary in the field of industrial engineering technology3”. According to ABET,manufacturing deals with value-added transformations in shape, form or properties of materials4.The specific ABET ETAC student outcomes for Engineering Technology are4: a. An ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities b. An ability
Paper ID #12572Engineering, Society and the Environment in the Teaching Goals and Prac-tices of Engineering InstructorsMs. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Senior Lecturer, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engi- neering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and imple- mentation of various teaching and learning initiatives. Lisa is cross-appointed with the Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning at OISE/UT, and
, Edvardsson B. New service development: learning from and with customers. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 2004;15(5):479–498. doi:10.1108/09564230410564948.16. Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22(1):1 – 16. doi:10.1080/0144929021000055530.17. Oehlberg L, Leighton IAN, Agogino A. Teaching Human-Centered Design Innovation across Engineering , Humanities and Social Sciences. Int J Eng Educ. 2012;28(2):484–491.18. Klatsky GJ. User centered design of human factors class projects. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 1998;42(7):611–615. doi:10.1177/154193129804200703.19. Sugar WA. What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on
intendedobjective is to increase the support of, and participation in, the “BRIDGE” program at GeorgiaSouthern University. Another measure taken will be to encourage faculty to participate in communityactivities involving underrepresented groups. Additionally, the department plans to provide a nurturingenvironment for incoming freshmen through retention initiatives like the ‘Living LearningCommunity’. Progress will be measured by tracking enrollment, retention and diversity statistics, andidentifying the most prevalent recruitment avenues through the administration of a freshman survey. Page 26.268.4GOAL B: Prepare female students to function as high
the systems approach,the educators are exposing their students to the various perspectives related to the utilization ofnatural resources for bio-energy, ways to mitigate the global climate change, and understand thecomplexities that are involved in modern scientific and technological challenges. The studentsare also exposed to career choices in the cutting-edge STEAM disciplines; b)To develop andprovide curricular materials and set of teaching tools for educators for enhancing instruction inthe areas of sustainable bio-energy and sustainability in their classrooms--In addition to trainingthe STEAM educators on a systems perspective of renewable energy, the program includesdeveloping and providing curricular materials and laboratory tool kits
and CCMSalignment project.References1. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.2. Akins, L. & Burghardt, D. (2006) Work in Progress: Improving K-12 Mathematics Understanding with Engineering Design Projects. 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, M3C-14, October 28-31, 2006, San Diego, CA. Accessed 1/16/2015. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=41168693. Bottoms, G. & Anthony, K. (2005) Project Lead the Way: A Pre-Engineering Curriculum That Works: A New Design for High School Career
portions: Part A investigating scientificliteracy and Part B investigating student value of the inquiry-guided pedagogy. Both parts wereassessed for validity using factor analysis and reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Data wereanalyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests for non-parametric statistics.The SLIGS had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8). All statements factoredas anticipated with three exceptions. These exceptions will be revised and re-piloted. Thescientific literacy portion showed high levels of confidence both pre- and post-intervention (76%and 91% respectively, npre = 155 and npost=165). Further, there was a statistically significantincrease in confidence in all ten categories including explanation of scientific
., and Johnson, R.T., “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 94, Issue 1, pages 87-101, 20056. Tsang, E. Van Haneghan, J., Johnson, B., Newman, E.J., and Van Eck, S., “A Report on Service-Learning and Engineering Design: Service Learning’s Effect on Students Learning Engineering Design in ‘Introduction to Mechanical Engineering,’” International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(1), pages 30-39, 2001.7. Lamancusa, J.S., Jorgensen, J.E., Zayas-Castro, J.L., “The Learning Factory—A New Approach to Integrating Page 26.138.16 Design and Manufacturing into