courses, we determined that we would not be able to simply adapt theapproaches used to develop these survey instruments into a new survey for cybersecurity. Instead,we would need to first identify how students relate to a course in cybersecurity. Therefore, wechose to first perform a qualitative study of students enrolled in an introductory cybersecuritycourse and then use those results to inform our development of the quantitative tool. 14Initial Qualitative StudyOver the course of a semester, we performed 3 rounds of semi-structured interviews with studentsenrolled in an introductory cybersecurity course designed for upper division undergraduate andfirst year graduate students. 7,27 Our goal was to discover those topics and experiences that
the Graduate Teaching Fellowship from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Departmental Doctoral and Masters Awards in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, and the R.C. Edwards Graduate Recruiting Fellowship from Clemson Univer- sity. Dr. Caldwell is a member of ASME and Pi Tau Sigma.Dr. Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Julie S. Linsey is an Assistant Professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technological. Dr. Linsey received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas. Her research area is design cognition including systematic methods and tools
Paper ID #12803Comparing Disparate Outcome Measures for Better Understanding of Engi-neering GraduatesMs. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. She completed her graduate work in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Her research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and prac- ticing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering
Paper ID #11532Qualitative Study of First-Generation Latinas: Understanding Motivationfor Choosing and Persisting in EngineeringDina Verdin, Purdue University Graduated with my B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from San Jose State University. Currently, I am a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her re- search focuses on increasing female enrollment in engineering, how students’ attitudes and beliefs affect their choices and their learning
State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The
discussion leaders; and 4) assessed learning outcomes associated with self-authorship for students enrolled in the course as compared to students outside the course.In the following sections, we describe the results of a pilot study to assess learning outcomesassociated with integrative learning, self-authorship and confidence in choosing a major.2.0 Course TransformationThe overall goal of this course transformation is to increase students’ level of self-authorshipthrough exposure to a safe and welcoming learning environment in which to discuss topics suchas their identities, values and goals, and the broad educational opportunities available at our theUniversity of Michigan. Prior to this transformation, the course was delivered as a 2-day per
. Amelink is the Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering Virginia Page 26.506.1 Tech and affiliate faculty in the Department of Engineering Education and the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing the Postsecondary Student Engagement Survey (PosSES) to Measure Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Out-of-Class Involvement Abstract A large body of literature focuses on the importance of student involvement in all aspects ofcollege for achieving
Initiative Pilot Program structure and curriculum. The pilot program focuses onthe development of qualitative and quantitative methods of assessment. In addition, it aims to provide some limited evidence that theproposed methods are effective at improving students’ desire to be retained in the college of engineering until the completion of theirundergraduate level degrees. The pilot consists of two phases: the recruitment and training of potential mentors which was completedin the Fall of 2014 and the execution of a Robotics Summer Academy during the Summer of 2015. This paper outlines the programstructure for Bulls-EYE Mentoring and the logistics of the program’s curriculum. Potential mentors are selected and trained through partnerships
, CU Boulder piloted a new, flexible design-based undergraduate engineeringdegree program described in this study.The General Engineering Plus (GE+) program facilitates significant curricular choice andcustomizability for students, allowing for a deep dive into both an engineering discipline andconcurrent study in a complementary subject. Comprehensive degree requirements include adesign-based engineering core with the choice of a “traditional” engineering emphasis —including mechanical, aerospace, civil, environmental, architectural or electrical engineering —coupled with a customizable concentration, such as secondary STEM teacher licensure,economics, environmental policy or a world language. Additionally, this degree integrates hands-on
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
Page 26.631.3 Accreditation is one of the most distinctive features of and influential processes inundergraduate engineering education. As the ABET website describes it, “accreditation is proofthat a collegiate program has met certain standards necessary to produce [emphasis added]graduates who are ready to enter their professions. Students who graduate from accreditedprograms have access to enhanced opportunities in employment; licensure, registration andcertification; graduate education and global mobility.”8 A sympathetic reading of this descriptiontakes accreditation to be a process of quality control achieved through the
educational opportunities into the curriculum through capstone design courses, realistic case studies facilitated by professional engineers, mentorship experiences, and interviews with engineering leaders across the career trajectory. Each of these activities can be used to help engineering students value and develop organizational skills before they secure their first job. 4) While the relatively recent introduction of accreditation bodies (ABET, CEAB) to engineering education may feel like a constraint to many professors, the graduate attributes generated by these bodies can be used creatively as a pedagogical framework. When used as a regulatory checklist, the
misconceptions of emergence for the semiconductor phenomenon driftAbstract Recent research in learning science has focused on students’ misconceptions about emergence. In emergentphenomena, the interactions of the agents in the phenomenon aggregate and form a self-organizing pattern that canbe seen at a higher level. One such emergent system, drift, is a fundamental mechanism for semiconductors. Thepurpose of this study was to demonstrate the presence and prevalence of misconceptions about emergence studentshave about drift, and to determine what relationships existed between the identified misconceptions. Forty-oneundergraduate engineering students participated in the written protocol study. Participants’ responses were
among early career graduates in engineering and taking appropriate steps tosupport continued persistence in the field. Identification of these patterns is also helpful fordesigning a quantitative study that can point to the significance of gender differences in a largerpopulation.IntroductionWhat motivates men compared to women can be studied from a variety of different perspectives.Looking at the autonomy with which both men and women make choices in early career isespecially useful because developing autonomy is a central goal of an undergraduate education1and autonomy plays an important role in predicting stability within a field or career. The higherthe degree of autonomy on which an individual bases important life and career choices
these attitudes similar to or different from the majority of engineeringstudents? These questions led to the development of a pilot study with first year students at theUniversity of Colorado Boulder. The next section provides information that grounds the study inpublished literature, which is followed by the research methods, results, and discussion.BackgroundThe Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK) discusses the skills and attributesrequired for environmental engineers to be successful and productive professional engineers whoare best equipped to benefit society.12 Sustainability and global issues are specified as outcomes,and interdisciplinary interactions are also discussed in the context of teamwork. These sameoutcomes are
at Virginia Tech, his research focused on understanding engineering career choice in the Appalachian region of the United States. Matthew is currently employed as an engineer at Bledsoe Telephone Cooperative, a rural telecommunications service provider in Pikeville Tennessee.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech
experiences, new types of pressures may impact both students and their families. Toidentify some of the pressures that should be anticipated when introducing a new program, thisexploratory case study focused on the hopes, concerns, and fears of the first cohort of studentsenrolled in the first semester of a pilot program at the Purdue Polytechnic Institute – a new multi-disciplinary, hands-on, competency-based program. Since students do not act in isolation,additional considerations are given to expectations and concerns of their parents, and facultyresponse to those concerns. Students and parents were surveyed, and in-depth interviews wereconducted with both students and faculty. Qualitative and quantitative analyses found that whilethe majority of
-engineering fields. Research on Engineering LLCshas focused primarily on student engagement. Two studies to examine performance and retentionfound that LLCs had little effect on first-semester grades but increased first-year retention inengineering by 2 to 12%. Unfortunately, one of these studies did not control for differences inincoming student characteristics, and another used a comparison group that differed little fromthe LLC group, possibly causing them to understate the LLC’s true effects. To improve ourunderstanding, this paper examines performance and retention in the inaugural EngineeringLLCs at a small, private non-profit, regional university in the northeastern United States.Results indicate that 82% of the Engineering LLC participants
capstone design project, but will help build their identity as engineers and better preparethem for professional practice 41, 42. Research points to several contributing factors which play arole in improving student learning during engineering design experiences, including the impactof active, project-based, and hands-on learning methodologies, and the development of a sense ofcommunity and a peer support network23, 43-45. Cooperative learning approaches that are hands-on and interactive are particularly appealing to underrepresented students 46-49. First-yearengineering design was highlighted as one of six key areas in engineering education innovationat the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference 50. Pioneered in the 1990’s and implemented in severalNSF
gathering and informed decision-makingduring the first year. Our hybrid model is targeted at students who meet all the standardadmission requirements for engineering, but do not know which degree program they want topursue. In the remainder of this paper, we describe two primary challenges for transitioning tothe hybrid model (Sections 3 and 4), the resultant introduction to engineering course that wasdeveloped and piloted in Fall 2014 (Section 5 and 6), our future trajectory for our hybrid model(Section 7).2. Institutional ContextMississippi State University is a rural, research-focused, public, land-grant institution with anenrollment of 16,500 undergraduate students and 3,700 graduate students. The college ofengineering (CoE) is the third
and engineering projects. She also co-directs the Welcome Project (welcomeproject.valpo.edu), a first-person story collection about identity and inclusion.Dr. Jeffrey Dale Will, Valparaiso University Will completed his B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and has been a full-time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering De- partment at Valparaiso University since August of 2001. He teaches courses in senior design, computer architecture, digital signal processing, freshman topics, and circuits laboratories and is heavily involved in working with students in undergraduate research. Will is also a 2013 recipient of the Illinois-Indiana ASEE
topics and specific ideas for surveyitems.13 For example, Crede and Borrego3 utilized ethnographic observations and interviews todevelop a survey about retention amongst graduate-level engineering students. Themes identifiedfrom this ethnographic study and previous research literature were used to develop surveyconstructs. The researchers then used participant excerpts to design specific survey itemsrepresentative of the survey constructs, often using the direct language of the target population.The survey was revised through two rounds of pilot testing. The first of these rounds includedreview by members of the original ethnography sample and a panel of experts. The second ofthese rounds included pilot testing of the revised survey with a
Education, 2015 The Business Case for Engineering Skills-based Volunteerism in K-12 EducationAbstractSkills-based volunteerism programs can provide technical employees effective and meaningfulopportunities to utilize, develop, and transfer their skills while contributing to their companies’community engagement objectives in K-12 education. While many companies encourage theiremployees to engage in education-related volunteerism, these efforts are often one-off eventsrelated to student outreach or recruiting, rather than opportunities for employees to utilize theirskills to not only give back to community, but also develop professionally and personally. Thisstudy focuses on assessing the impact of a pilot
Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Potsdam NY: Clarkson University.14 Obermiller, C., A. Atwood, 2014. Measuring Sustainability Literacy: Scale Development. Journal of Jesuit Business Education, 5(1): 105-128.15 Horvath, N., M. Stewart, M. Shea, 2013. Toward instruments of assessing sustainability knowledge; Assessment development, process, and results from a pilot survey at the University of Maryland. Journal of Sustainability Education, 5: 27.16 Azapagic, A., S. Perdan, D. Shallcross, 2005. How much do engineering students know about sustainable development ? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum. European Journal of Engineering
education options. The first of these options, reserved for the most academically talentedstudents, is the Gymnasium (grades 5-12). Successful completion of the Gymnasium results in adiploma and prepares students for university study or for a dual academic and vocationalcredential. Another option is the Realschule (grades 5 – 10), the completion of which leads to“part-time vocation schools and higher education vocational schools.”14 Students with highacademic achievement at the Realschule, upon graduation, can switch to a Gymnasium andcomplete the necessary studies for a diploma. A third option is the Hauptschule (grades 5 – 9)which “teaches similar subject matter as the Realschule and Gymnasium, but at a slower paceand with some vocational
Paper ID #11839Using Phenomenography: Reflections on Key Considerations for Making Method-ological DecisionsEmily Dringenberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette Emily Dringenberg is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering (Kansas State ’08) and a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering (Purdue ’14). Her current dissertation research focuses on using qualitative methods to ex- plore the experiences of students engaging with engineering design problems. Additionally, her research interests include transfer of learning, personal epistemology