June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
26.1449.1 - 26.1449.19
Global, Sustainable, Interdisciplinary and Concerned for Others? Trends in Environmental Engineering StudentsThe Environmental Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK) discusses the skills and attributesrequired for environmental engineers to be successful and productive professional engineers whoare best equipped to benefit society. Globalization and sustainability are specified as outcomes,and interdisciplinary interactions are also discussed. The BOK focuses on the cognitive domain.However, affect is important in determining how cognitive knowledge and skills are applied.The ASCE’s Civil Engineering BOK (2008) discusses the affective domain and has an attitudesoutcome that includes consideration of others. In this study the four affective attributes of globalinterest, sustainability value, interdisciplinary value, and concern for others were exploredamong engineering students. The research questions were: (1) to what extent do incomingenvironmental engineering students possess an interest in global work, value interdisciplinaryskills, are motivated by sustainable engineering, and recognize the importance of considerationfor others in the context of engineering; (2) to what extent are environmental engineeringstudents similar to or different from civil and architectural engineering students in theseattitudes; and (3) are there correlations between these attitudes.To answer these research questions, a survey was given to incoming first year students at theUniversity of Colorado Boulder in fall 2014. The survey was comprised of 41 questions on a 7-point Likert scale. Single items were used to measure global interests and interdisciplinary value,while sustainable engineering motivation was evaluated using 25 items (from a previouslyvalidated instrument) and consideration for others was evaluated using 14 items (from among the50 items on the previously developed Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment,EPRA).Among the 70 environmental engineering students, interest in working on projects outside theU.S. averaged 6.1, not significantly different than 50 first year civil engineering and 37 first yeararchitectural engineering students. Interdisciplinary value averaged 5.4, higher than architecturalengineering students (average 4.8). There was a weak positive correlation between global interestand interdisciplinary value, with correlation coefficients of 0.16 and 0.20 among environmentaland civil engineering students, respectively. Four dimensions of sustainable engineeringmotivation were evaluated (self-efficacy, value, negative attitudes (reverse coded), and affect),with environmental engineering students having an overall sustainable engineering motivationscore of 5.7. With the exception of self-efficacy, environmental engineering students had higherscores than civil and architectural engineering majors on the other three sustainable engineeringattitudes. Concern for others was measured by questions from the analyze and professionalconnectedness dimensions of the EPRA instrument; environmental engineering students hadaverage scores for these dimensions of 6.0 and 5.7, respectively, which were more positive thanarchitectural engineering students and similar to civil engineering students. Correlations betweenthe concern for others as engineers and sustainable engineering value were moderately positive(0.60 correlation coefficient). These results will be discussed in the broader context ofcomparisons to previous data from first year environmental engineering students on sustainableengineering motivation in fall 2010 and international work interest and social responsibility infall 2011. The data will also be discussed in terms of attracting a broader diversity of individualsto engineering, and retaining these individuals into the engineering workforce.
Bielefeldt, A. R. (2015, June), Sustainable, Global, Interdisciplinary, and Concerned for Others? Trends in Environmental Engineering Students Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24786
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015