Proposed assignment You are tasked to define the location for a Your boss tasks you to define the location for new manufacturing facility for your company. a new manufacturing facility for your You are offered three alternative locations: A, company. You are offered three alternative B, and C, with economic conditions X, Y, and locations: A, B, and C, with economic Z, respectively. Using conditions X, Y, and Z, respectively. Please, Break-even analysis, please choose the note that child labor is legal in location A; preferred location. employees in location B are forced to work 18 hours/day
of the ergonomic design learning module focuses on anthropometry for hand toolsdesign and discusses the importance of measurements of different hand dimensions for userssuch as hand length, finger length, hand breadth, grip/pinch force, etc. In this session, studentspractice anthropometric measurements technique using relevant measuring tools which includethe bone caliper, segmometer, anthropometric goniometer, pinch gauge, hand dynamometer, etc.Figure 3 shows the relevant anthropometric measuring tools relevant to hand tool design. (a) Bone caliper (b) Segmometer (c) Goniometer (d) Pinch gauge (e) Hand dynamometer (f) Sample hand dimensions Figure 3
ModelDepicting the ABET Engineering Criteria in this way allows us to recognize the parallelsbetween the individual Engineering Criteria criterion and the elements of ISO 9001:2015 [8].This in turn allows us to apply the tools and concepts of quality to each Criterion.Engineering Program as a Process ISO 9001:2015 “promotes the adoption of a process approach when developing,implementing and improving the effectiveness of a quality management system. The processapproach involves the systematic definition and management of processes and their interactionsso as to achieve the intended results.”[8] Such an approach enables: a. understanding and consistency in meeting requirements; b. consideration of processes in terms of added value; c
and make improvements, if needed, and (8) present project results to anaudience using written and oral formats. Figure 1. Project activities and deliverables as an integrated processThe project proposal was evaluated using a rubric (Appendix A) and detailed comments onproject scope and objectives were provided to students as a midterm feedback process. At theend of the semester, each team delivered a written report and presented a poster whichhighlighted their methods, findings and recommendations. The written reports were evaluatedby the course instructor using a project rubric (Appendix B) specifically designed for thecourse. The oral poster presentations were evaluated by a panel of judges using an oralpresentation rubric
first attempt questions while also testing the same concepts. Figure 2 shows an example oftwo questions from the first and second trial of the second quiz. The quizzes also involvequalitative questions. The student will not receive grade points for these quizzes until he/shesuccessfully solves the quiz questions or finish the trials. Successfully solving a quiz is definedas achieving at least a B grade in any trial. After the initial attempt, students are awarded areduced credit for successive retakes as shown in Table 2. Table 1. Breakdown of Topics in the Engineering Economy Course Topics Teaching
the IE EE class A. The instructor knowing student names in the Class B. Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions C. Knowing all upcoming events from ANGEL Calendar D. Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and Quizzes E. Knowing Your Grades at all times on ANGEL F. Having a 1 class Quiz or Case Study Grade Return Policy and 1 Week Exam Grade Return PolicyThe average results for the three semesters of the IE EE class are shown in Figure 1 below: Importance for your Course Satisfaction (IE EE) The instructor knowing your Name Starting Every Class with Announcements/Questions Knowing all upcoming events from Angel Calendar Knowing the Topics to Study for all Exams and
capability analysis, measurement systemanalysis, specification and tolerances, and acceptance sampling plans. Students typically take thiscourse in the second year of their masters program. The course learning outcomes are (a) Defineconcepts in quality and quality management; (b) Apply statistical tools in analysis andapplication of Statistical Process Control; (c) Produce and employ control charts; (d) Explainsampling process; and (e) Design acceptance sampling procedures for quality control.The course work and activities typically include a term paper, a term project, homework, in classexercises and discussions, quizzes and two exams (midterm and final). During the study periodthe author added the library training and a factory visit to the class
). Nurturing affinity spaces and game-based learning. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age (pp. 123-153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Grohs, J. R., Maczka, D. K., Soledad, M., & Bagalkotkar, K. K. (2016). Exploring the Feasibility of an Educational Computer Game as a Novel Means of Assessing Problem Solving Competencies. Paper presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Now Orleans, LA.Hazelrigg, G. A. (1998). A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653-658. doi: 10.1115/1.2829328Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011). Situated Engineering
Economy: The Crossroads of Business,Engineering, and Entrepreneurship,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society forEngineering Education, New Orleans, Louisiana.McFarland, B. (February 18, 2016), “A Continuing Shift in Retirement Offerings in the Fortune 500,” Willis TowersWatson, www.towerswatson.com/en-US/Insights/Newsletters/ Americas/insider/2016/02/a-continuing-shift-in-retirement-offerings-in-the-Fortune-500, accessed 1/30/2017.Mutter, B.V. (June 2011), “Using Pen-Based Tablet PC Technology to Improve Instruction in EngineeringEconomics,” 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education,Vancouver, British Columbia.Newnan, D.G. (1976), Engineering Economic Analysis, Engineering
Paper ID #19548Using Programming and Simulation as a Research Tool in a Graduate Capi-tal Budgeting CourseDr. James D Burns, Purdue Univeristy Jim Burns, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation Jim joined the faculty at Purdue Polytechnic in 2015 after completing a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Western Michigan University, and has more than 10 years industry experience in the manufacturing sector in a variety of roles including process engineering, operations management, and technical sales. His area of expertise centers on applying OR/MS and Simulation techniques to Supply
Paper ID #19204Does Knowing a Study’s Outcome Further Impact It’s Conclusion: A Class-room StudyDr. Kate D. Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Kate Abel serves as the as the Director of the Bachelor of Engineering in Engineering Management Program in the School of Systems and Enterprises at Stevens Institute of Technology. She holds a Ph.D. in Technology Management and Applied Psychology. She has held several professional service positions, including the President of the Engineering Management Division of the American Society for Engineering Education and the President of Epsilon Mu Eta
. (2008). Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(2), 227-233. [4] Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). The genetics concept assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 422-430. [5] Midkiff, K. C., Litzinger, T. A., & Evans, D. L. (2001). Development of engineering thermodynamics concept inventory instruments. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual (Vol. 2, pp. F2A- F23). IEEE. [6] Martin, J., Mitchell, J., & Newell, T. (2003, November). Development of a concept inventory
., Zeytinci, A, Behera, P., “Engineering Economics Applied to Public Policy Issues,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2009. 9. Fragoso-Diaz, G. M., Gray, B., Jones, E., “Enhancing Students’ Learning Experience Using Case Studies,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2015. 10. Tong, J., Nachtman, H., “Economic Analysis of disruptions on the Mississippi River: An Engineering Economy Educational Case Study“ ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2016. 11. Ivry, Bob, “Woman Who Couldn’t Be Intimidated by Citigroup Wins $31 Million”, Bloomberg, May 31, 2012, www.yahoo.com/news/woman-who-couldn%E2%80%99t- be-intimidated-by-citigroup-wins--31-million.html . 12. Nessman, Ravi, Professor on quest for India’s hidden
funding small teams oftechnicians to accomplish a well-defined, finite task.4) Learning to work in small teams (3-4 students) to capture data and to perform analyses.Taking the project on in four steps worked well. It provided the time to grade the submissions,to return them to the students, to discuss the solutions in class, and to increase the concept ofanalyzing a project in terms of its economic payback over the life of the project. This last pointis crucial for the future analyses the students will be required to do in supporting their analysesof life-cycle cost analysis (particularly in the area of “green” buildings) during the next threeyears of their education. The performance of the class was heartening with class averages of B,A-, B and
-17/the-new-stem-index-2016. [Accessed: 11–01-2016].[3] “Free and Reduced School Lunch Data.” [Online]. Available: http://www.arkansased.gov/divisions/fiscal- and-administrative-services/e-rate/free-and-reduced-school-lunch-data. [Accessed: 11–01-2016].[4] “The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016,” 2016.[5] D. St. John and E. Specking, “From College to K-12: Adapting Industrial Engineering Classroom Exercises for Outreach Purposes,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[6] E. Specking, P. E. Kirkwood, and L. Yang, “Perceptions and Misconceptions of Industrial Engineering from First-Year Engineering Students,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[7] B. M. Capobianco, H. A. Diefes-dux, I
*Indicates not significant (α=.05) Table1: Paired t-test for differences between pre and post EECI scoresThe reason that the difference was not significant for question 19 is more difficult to explain andcould demonstrate a problematic question that requires further revision. This question reads:Question 19Fill in the blanks for this statement:If the net present value of all of the cash flows associated with an investment opportunity is apositive value at a company's "required" rate of return, then the internal rate of return for thatinvestment is ______ than the company's required rate and the investment is a ______investment for this company. a. Lower, Good b. Lower, Bad c. Higher, Good d. Higher, BadAs will be
of Engineering Education.3. Fragoso-Diaz, G. M., Gray, B., & Jones, E. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Learning Experience Using Case Studies. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seattle: American Society for Engineering Education.4. Gibson, J. D. (1998). The Use of Industrial Design Projects as a Means for Integrating Senior Engineering Design and Engineering Economics. 1998 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education.5. Hackney, R. A., McMaster, T., & Harris, A. (2003). Using cases as a teaching tool in IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 14(3), 229-234.6. Hartman, J. C. (1999). Readers' Forum: Suggestions for Teaching Engineering
Paper ID #18126Case Studies Under Your Nose: Using Campus Projects as Case Studies forEngineering EconomyAimee T Ulstad P.E., Ohio State University Aimee Ulstad, P.E is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Integrated Systems Engineering Department at The Ohio State University. Prior to joining the faculty at Ohio State, Aimee was an industry professional in various field in engineering for over 30 years. Aimee received her degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Masters in Business Administration from Ohio State. She began her career as a packaging equipment engineer at Procter and Gamble, then moved to Anheuser-Busch